Advertisement

Environmental Chemistry Letters

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 615–622 | Cite as

Red mud-modified biochar reduces soil arsenic availability and changes bacterial composition

  • Qi Zou
  • Wenhui An
  • Chuan Wu
  • Waichin Li
  • Anqin Fu
  • Ruiyang Xiao
  • Huikang Chen
  • Shengguo Xue
Original Paper

Abstract

Worldwide arsenic (As) contamination in soils induces pollution of surface and ground waters, reduces crop quality and yield, and threatens human health. Biochar-based material has been proposed as ameliorants for contaminated soils. Here soil incubations were conducted to investigate the effects of biochar, red mud and red mud-modified biochar on the pH, total organic carbon content, sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3)-extractable As concentration and microbial community composition of As-contaminated soils. Results show red mud-modified biochar reduces the concentration of NaHCO3-extractable As by 27%, whereas this concentration increases by 23% using biochar alone and 6% using red mud alone. Similar trends are observed for HCl-extractable As. The red mud and red mud-modified biochar treatments increased the relative abundance of Proteobacteria and its affiliated genera, such as Kaistobacter, Rhodanobacter and Rhodoplanes.

Keywords

Arsenic Biochar Iron Microbial community Red mud Soil 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Financial supports from National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41771512), the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (No. 28100014), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Central South University (No. 2017zzts598) and the open fund for valuable instruments and equipment of Central South University (No. CSUZC201712) are gratefully acknowledged. Chuan Wu acknowledged the Croucher Chinese Visitorships 2017/2018 of Hong Kong.

References

  1. Ahmad M, Lee SS, Lim JE, Lee SE, Cho JS, Moon DH et al (2014) Speciation and phytoavailability of lead and antimony in a small arms range soil amended with mussel shell, cow bone and biochar: EXAFS spectroscopy and chemical extractions. Chemosphere 95:433–441.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.09.077 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amstaetter K, Borch T, Kappler A (2012) Influence of humic acid imposed changes of ferrihydrite aggregation on microbial Fe(III) reduction. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 85:326–341.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2012.02.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beesley L, Marmiroli M (2011) The immobilisation and retention of soluble arsenic, cadmium and zinc by biochar. Environ Pollut 159:474–480.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2010.10.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beesley L, Marmiroli M, Pagano L, Pigoni V, Fellet G, Fresno T et al (2013) Biochar addition to an arsenic contaminated soil increases arsenic concentrations in the pore water but reduces uptake to tomato plants (Solanumlycopersicum L.). Sci Total Environ 454–455:598–603.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.02.047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bogdan K, Schenk MK (2008) Arsenic in rice (Oryza sativa L.) related to dynamics of arsenic and slicic acid in paddy soils. Environ Sci Technol 42:7885–7890.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es801194q CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B (2014) Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30(15):2114–2120.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cao MH, Ye YY, Chen J, Lu XH (2016) Remediation of arsenic contaminated soil by coupling oxalate washing with subsequent ZVI/Air treatment. Chemosphere 144:1313–1318.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.09.105 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen Z, Wang YP, Xia D, Jiang XL, Fu D, Shen L et al (2016) Enhanced bioreduction of iron and arsenic in sediment by biochar amendment influencing microbial community composition and dissolved organic matter content and composition. J Hazard Mater 311:20–29.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.02.069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gregory SJ, Anderson CWN, Camps Arbestain M, McManus MT (2014) Response of plant and soil microbes to biochar amendment of an arsenic-contaminated soil. Agr Ecosyst Environ 191:133–141.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.03.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Guo H, Ren Y, Liu Q, Zhao K, Li Y (2013) Enhancement of arsenic adsorption during mineral transformation from siderite to goethite: mechanism and application. Environ Sci Technol 47:1009–1016.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es303503m CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Inyang M, Gao B, Yao Y, Xue Y, Zimmerman A, Pullammanappallil P et al (2012) Removal of heavy metals from aqueous solution by biochars derived from anaerobically digested sugarcane bagasse. Bioresour Technol 110:50–56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.01.072 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Islam FS, Gault AG, Boothman C, Polya DA, Charnock JM, Chatterjee D et al (2004) Role of metal-reducing bacteria in arsenic release from Bengal delta sediments. Nature 430(6995):68–71.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02638 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Joseph SD, Camps-Arbestain M, Lin Y, Munroe P, Chia CH, Hook J et al (2010) An investigation into the reactions of biochar in soil. Soil Res 48:501–515.  https://doi.org/10.1071/SR10009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kappler A, Wuestner ML, Ruecker A, Harter J, Halama M, Behrens S (2014) Biochar as an electron shuttle between bacteria and Fe(III) minerals. Environ Sci Technol Let 1:339–344.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ez5002209 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kong XF, Tian T, Xue SG, Hartley W, Huang LB, Wu C et al (2017a) Development of alkaline electrochemical characteristics demonstrates soil formation in bauxite residue undergoing natural rehabilitation. Land Degrad Dev.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2836 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kong XF, Guo Y, Xue SG, Hartley W, Wu C, Ye YZ (2017b) Natural evolution of alkaline characteristics in bauxite residue. J Clean Prod 143:224–230.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.125 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lee S, Kim EY, Park H, Yun J, Kim J (2011) In situ stabilization of arsenic and metal-contaminated agricultural soil using industrial by-products. Geoderma 161:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.11.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lockwood CL, Mortimer RJG, Stewart DI, Mayes WM, Peacock CL, Polya DA et al (2014) Mobilisation of arsenic from bauxite residue (red mud) affected soils: effect of pH and redox conditions. Appl Geochem 51:268–277.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2014.10.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lopes G, Guilherme LRG, Costa ETS, Curi N, Penha HGV (2013) Increasing arsenic sorption on red mud by phosphogypsum addition. J Hazard Mater 262:1196–1203.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.06.051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lovley DR, Phillips EJ (1986) Availability of ferric iron for microbial reduction in bottom sediments of the freshwater tidal. Appl Environ Microbiol 52:751–757Google Scholar
  21. Ramos ME, Robles AB, Sánchez-Navarro A, González-Rebollar JL (2011) Soil responses to different management practices in rainfed orchards in semiarid environments. Soil Till Res 112(1):85–91.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2010.11.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Samsuri AW, Sadegh-Zadeh F, Seh-Bardan BJ (2013) Adsorption of As(III) and As(V) by Fe coated biochars and biochars produced from empty fruit bunch and rice husk. Jelectrical conductivityE 1:981–988.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2013.08.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tang JW, Liao YP, Yang ZH, Chai LY, Yang WC (2016) Characterization of arsenic serious-contaminated soils from Shimen realgar mine area, the Asian largest realgar deposit in China. J Soil Sediments 16:1519–1528.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-015-1345-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, Cole JR (2007) Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol 73(16):5261–5267.  https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00062-07 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wang S, Gao B, Zimmerman AR, Li Y, Ma L, Harris WG et al (2015) Removal of arsenic by magnetic biochar prepared from pinewood and natural hematite. Bioresource Technol 175:391–395.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.10.104 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang N, Xue XM, Juhasz AL, Chang ZZ, Li HB (2016) Biochar increases arsenic release from an anaerobic paddy soil due to enhanced microbial reduction of iron and arsenic. Environ Pollut 220:514–520.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.09.095 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. WHO (2011) Guidelines for drinking-water quality, vol 4. World Health Organisation, Geneva, pp 315–318Google Scholar
  28. Wu C, Zou Q, Xue SG, Pan WS, Yue X, Hartley W, Huang L, Mo JY (2016a) Effect of silicate on arsenic fractionation in soils and its accumulation in rice plants. Chemosphere 165:478–486.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.09.061 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wu C, Zou Q, Xue SG, Pan WS, Huang L, Hartley W et al (2016b) The effect of silicon on iron plaque formation and arsenic accumulation in rice genotypes with different radial oxygen loss (ROL). Environ Pollut 212:27–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.01.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wu C, Huang L, Xue SG, Shi LZ, Hartley W, Cui MQ, Wong MH (2017) Arsenic sorption by red mud-modified biochar produced from rice straw. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:18168–18178.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9466-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Xue Y, Gao B, Yao Y, Inyang M, Zhang M, Zimmerman AR et al (2012) Hydrogen peroxide modification enhances the ability of biochar (hydrochar) produced from hydrothermal carbonization of peanut hull to remove aqueous heavy metals: batch and column tests. Chem Eng J 200–202:673–680.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.06.116 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Xue SG, Zhu F, Kong XF, Wu C, Huang L, Huang N et al (2016) A review of the characterization and revegetation of bauxite residues (Red mud). Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(2):1120–1132.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4558-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yan XL, Zhang M, Liao XY, Tu SX (2012) Influence of amendments on soil arsenic fractionation and phytoavailability by Pterisvittata L. Chemosphere 88(2):240–244.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.03.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yan XL, Lin LY, Liao XY, Zhang WB, Wen Y (2013) Arsenic stabilization by zero-valent iron, bauxite residue, and zeolite at a contaminated site planting Panax notoginseng. Chemosphere 93:661–667.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.05.083 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yao Y, Gao B, Inyang M, Zimmerman AR, Cao XD, Pullammanappallil P et al (2011) Removal of phosphate from aqueous solution by biochar derived from anaerobically digested sugar beet tailings. J Hazard Mater 190:501–507.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.03.083 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yao Y, Gao B, Fang J, Zhang M, Chen H, Zhou Y et al (2014) Characterization and environmental applications of clay–biochar composites. Chemeng J 242:136–143.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.12.062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yoon IH, Moon DH, Kim KW, Lee KY, Lee JH, Kim MG (2010) Mechanism for the stabilization/solidification of arsenic-contaminated soils with Portland cement and cement kiln dust. J Environ Manage 91:2322–2328.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.06.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yu ZZ, Zhou L, Huang YF, Song ZG, Qiu WW (2015) Effects of a manganese oxide-modified biochar composite on adsorption of arsenic in red soil. J Environ Manag 163:155–162.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.08.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhang M, Gao B (2013) Removal of arsenic, methylene blue, and phosphate by biochar/AlOOH nanocomposite. Chemeng J 226:286–292.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.04.077 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zheng J, Xiao XH, Zhang Q, Mao LL, Yu M, Xu JP (2015) The Placental microbiome varies in association with low birth weight in full-term neonates. Nutrients 7:6924–6937.  https://doi.org/10.3390/nu7085315 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhu F, Liao JX, Xue SG, Hartley W, Zou Q, Wu H (2016a) Evaluation of aggregate microstructures following natural regeneration in bauxite residue as characterized by synchrotron-based X-ray micro-computed tomography. Sci Total Environ 573:155–163.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhu M, Tu C, Hu X, Zhang H, Zhang L, Wei J et al (2016b) Solid-solution partitioning and thionation of diphenylarsinic acid in a flooded soil under the impact of sulfate and iron reduction. Sci Total Environ 569–570:1579–1586.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhu F, Cheng QY, Xue SG, Li CX, Hartley W, Wu C et al (2017) Influence of natural regeneration on fractal features of residue microaggregates in bauxite residue disposal areas. Land Degrad Dev.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2848 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Metallurgy and EnvironmentCentral South UniversityChangshaPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Department of Science and Environmental StudiesThe Education University of Hong KongTai PoPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Spic Yuanda Environmental Protection Co., LtdChongqingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations