Abstract
Synchronization between system times of Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSSs), or GNSS time interoperability, is one of the prerequisites of GNSS interoperability. We explored the fractal behavior of time offsets between Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) and GNSS time scales (GNSST). A fractal-based prediction method for forecasting UTC-GNSST time offsets is developed. Through data analysis, the self-similarity behavior in UTC-GNSST time offsets is revealed, which is proven by calculating the Hurst exponent. The values of the fractal dimension and correlation metric indicated that the time series of UTC-GNSST time offsets have long memory, of which the memory span is 1247 days and could be obtained from V-statistics. Subsequently, the fractal interpolation-based mathematic model was built, and the prediction accuracy was tested through numerical experiments. Compared with the polynomial and gray prediction models, the fractal interpolation forecast model was found to have higher prediction accuracy. The prediction accuracies of UTC-GPST and UTC-GLOT using fractal interpolation forecast model in short term are less than 1.3 and 5.5 ns, and in long term are less than 2.3 and 8.3 ns, with an improvement by at least 50 and 30% compared to polynomial and gray model.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
BIPM (2017) Relations of UTC and TAI with predictions of UTC(k) disseminated by GNSS and with the GNSS times. https://www.bipm.org/en/bipm-services/timescales/time-ftp/other-products.html. Accessed 14 Dec 2017
Fu WJ, Zhang Q, Huang GW (2015) Analysis of combined real-time predicting model of BDS/GPS system time offset. J Geod Geodyn 35(4):653–657. https://doi.org/10.14075/j.jgg.2015.04.024
Han T (2016) Research on Interoperability Algorithm of Global Navigation Satellite System. Dissertation, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Han CH, Yang YX, Cai ZW (2011a) BeiDou navigation satellite system and its time scales. Metrologia 48(4):213–218. https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/48/4/S13
Han T, Lu XC, Wang X, Rao YN, Zou DC, Yang JF, Wu YY (2011b) Differential equation dynamical system based assessment model in GNSS interoperability. Sci China Ser G Phys Mech Astron 54(6):996–1003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-011-4337-6
Huang GW, Zhang Q, Xu GC (2014) Real-time clock offset prediction with an improved model. GPS Solut 18(1):95–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-013-0313-0
Hurst HE (1951) Long term storage capacities of reservoirs. Trans Am Soc Civ Eng 116(12):776–808. https://doi.org/10.1234/12345678
ICG-WGA (2008) Report of working group A: compatibility and Interoperability. http://www.unoosa.org/documents/pdf/icg/activities/2008/icg3/ICG\_WGA\_DEC2008.pdf. Accessed 13 Dec 2017
Jiabing J, Jigen P (2013) Analytical properties of bivariate fractal interpolation function with vertical scaling factor functions. Int J Comput Math 90(3):539–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207160.2012.722624
Jörg HH, Edward DP (2005) Implementation of the GPS to Galileo time offset (GGTO). In: IEEE international frequency control symposium and exposition, vol 5, pp 33–37
Lewandowski W, Arias EF (2011) GNSS times and UTC. Metrologia 48(4):219–224. https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/48/4/S14
Mandelbrot BB, Wallis JR (1968) Noah, Joseph, and operational hydrology. Water Resour Res 4(5):909–918. https://doi.org/10.1029/wr004i005p00909
Peters EE (1994) Fractal market analysis: applying chaos theory to investment and economics. Wiley, New York
Píriz R, Mozo G, Tobías G, Fernández V, Tavella P, Sesia I, Cerretto G, Hahn J (2008) GNSS interoperability: offset between reference time scales and timing biases. Metrologia 45(6):87–102. https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/45/6/S14
Qian B, Rasheed K (2004) Hurst exponent and financial market predictability. In: Proceedings of the 2nd IASTED international conference on financial engineering and applications, 8–11 Nov, Massachusetts, USA
Williams S (2003) Offsets in global positioning system time series. J Geophys Res 108(B6):2310. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JB002156
Yang YX (2010) Progress, contribution and challenges of Compass/Beidou satellite navigation system. Acta Geod Cartogr Sin 39(1):1–6
Yang YX, Li JL, Xu JY, Tang J, Guo HR, He HB (2011) Contribution of the compass satellite navigation system to global PNT users. Chin Sci Bull 56(26):2813–2819. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-011-4627-4
Yang YX, Lu MQ, Han CH (2016) Some notes on interoperability of GNSS. Acta Geod Cartogr Sin 45(3):253–259. https://doi.org/10.11947/j.AGCS.2016.20150653
Yuan HB, Wang ZM, Dong SW (2008) Dynamic grey-autoregressive model of an atomic clock. Metrologia 45(6):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/45/6/S01
Zhang HJ, Li XH, Xu LX (2010) Monitoring and prediction of GNSS system time difference. In: Proceedings of the 1st China satellite navigation conference, 19–21 May, Beijing, China, pp 587–592
Zhang HJ, Li XH, Zhu L, Zhang X (2014a) Research on GNSS system time offset monitoring and prediction. Lect Notes Electr Eng 303(1):427–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54737-9_3
Zhang JH, Yuan HB, Dong SW, Yin LL (2014b) Prediction of GNSS time difference based on combination of Grey model and quadratic polynomial model. J Time Freq 37(4):199–205. https://doi.org/10.13875/j.issn.1674-0637.2014-04-0199-07
Acknowledgements
This study is supported by the Shaanxi Postdoctoral Research Fund (no. 2017BSHEDZZ22), the Natural Science and Technology Fund of the Shaanxi Provincial Education Department (no. 17JK1077), the National Natural Science Fund of China (nos. 41774025, 41374019), the National Key R&D Program (Grant nos. 2016YFB0501700, 2016YFB0501701), and the Xi’an Siyuan University Natural Science Fund (no. XASY-B1618).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Han, T., Yang, Y., Huang, G. et al. Fractal behavior of GNSS time offsets and fractal interpolation forecasting method for multi-GNSS time synchronization. GPS Solut 22, 97 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-018-0762-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-018-0762-6