Advertisement

GPS Solutions

, 22:37 | Cite as

A new evil waveforms evaluating method for new BDS navigation signals

  • Chengyan He
  • Ji Guo
  • Xiaochun Lu
  • Xue Wang
  • Yongnan Rao
  • Li Kang
  • Zhigang Hu
Original Article

Abstract

With the advent of new global navigation satellite systems (GNSSs) and new signals, GNSS users will rely more on them to obtain higher-accuracy positioning. Evil waveform monitoring and assessment are of great importance for GNSS to achieve its positioning, velocity, and timing service with high accuracy. However, the advent of new navigation signals introduces the necessity to extend the traditional analyzing techniques already accepted for binary phase-shift keying modulation to new techniques. First, the well-known second-order step thread model adopted by the International Civil Aviation Organization is introduced. Then the extended new general thread models are developed for the new binary offset carrier modulated signals. However, no research has been done on navigation signal waveform symmetry yet. Simulation results showed that, waveform asymmetry may also cause tracking errors, range biases, and position errors in GNSS receivers. It is thus imperative that the asymmetry be quantified to enable the design of appropriate error budgets and mitigation strategies for various application fields. A novel evil waveform analysis method, called waveform rising and falling edge symmetry (WRaFES) method, is proposed. Based on this WRaFES method, the correlation metrics are provided to detect asymmetric correlation peaks distorted by received signal asymmetry. Then the statistical properties of the proposed methods are analyzed, and a proper deformation detection threshold is calculated. Finally, both simulation results and experimentally measured results of Beidou navigation satellite system (BDS) M1-S B1Cd signal are given, which show the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed thread models.

Keywords

GNSS Satellite navigation signal Evil waveform Evaluating Threat model 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Test data for this work were provided by Haoping Radio Observatory (HRO), China. The authors would like to thank the staff in HRO and in Navigation and Communication Laboratory from National Time Service Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), for their support and data. The authors would like to acknowledge that this effort was sponsored by National Nature Science Foundation of China (Nos. 61501430 and 41604029) and Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN). In particular, the authors would like to thank the editors and reviewers for their constructive comments.

References

  1. Chengyan H (2013) Research on evaluation methods of GNSS signal quality and the influence of GNSS signal on ranging performance. Dissertation, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, pp 1–239Google Scholar
  2. Chengyan H, Ji G, Xiaochun L, Jun L (2015) Generation mechanisms of GNSS navigation signal distortions and the influence on ranging performance. Syst Eng Electron 37(7):112–121Google Scholar
  3. Edgar C, Czopek F, Barker B (1999) A cooperative anomaly resolution on PRN-19. In: Proceedings of the ION GPS 1999. Institute of Navigation, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, September 14–17, pp 2281–2284Google Scholar
  4. Enge P, Phelts RE, Mitelman A (1999) Detecting anomalous signals from GPS satellites. In: Proceedings of the GNSS/P, ICAO, Toulouse, France, pp 341–349Google Scholar
  5. Fontanella D, Paonni M, Eissfeller B (2010) A novel evil waveforms threat model for new generation GNSS signals—theoretical analysis and performance. In: 2010 5th ESA workshop on satellite navigation technologies and European workshop on GNSS signals processing (NAVITEC), Noordwijk, Holand, December 8–10, 2010, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  6. Gamba MT, Motella B, Pini M (2013) Statistical test applied to detect distortions of GNSS signals. In: Proceedings of the international conference on localization and GNSS, Turin, Italy, June 25–27, pp 1–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICL-GNSS.2013.6577267
  7. Jahromi AJ, Broumandan A, Daneshmand S, Lachapelle G, Rigas TI (2016) Galileo signal authenticity verification using signal quality monitoring methods. Localization and GNSS (ICL-GNSS), Barcelona, Spain, 28–30 June 2016, pp 1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICL-GNSS.2016.7533684
  8. Jakab A (1999) An approach to GPS satellite failure detection. In: Proceedings of the ION GPS 1999. Institute of Navigation, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, September 14–17, pp 751–759Google Scholar
  9. Leick A, Rapoport L, Tatarnikov D (2015) GPS satellite surveying, 4th edn. Wiley, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  10. Macabiau C, Chatre E (2000) Impact of evil waveforms on GBAS performance. IEEE Position Locat Navig Symp 2002:22–29Google Scholar
  11. Misra P, Enge P (2012) Global positioning system: signals, measurements, and performance. Ganga Jamuna Press, LincolnGoogle Scholar
  12. Phelts RE (2001) Multicorrelator techniques for Robust mitigation of threats to GPS signal quality. Dissertation, Stanford University, pp 1–345Google Scholar
  13. Phelts RE (2004) Nominal signal deformations: limits on GPS range accuracy. In: The 2004 international symposium on GNSS/GPS. Sydney, Australia, 6–8 December 2004, pp 1–14Google Scholar
  14. Phelts RE, Akos DM, Enge P (2000) Robust signal quality monitoring and detection of evil waveforms. In: Proceedings of the ION GPS 2000. Institute of Navigation, Salt Lake City, USA, September 19–22, pp 1180–1190Google Scholar
  15. Rebeyrol E, Macabiau C, Lestarquit L, Ries L, Issler JL, Boucheret ML, Bousquet M (2005) BOC power spectrum densities. In: Proceedings of the ION ITM 2005. Institute of Navigation, San Diego, CA, USA, January 24–26, pp 769–778Google Scholar
  16. Rodriguez JA (2008) On generalized signal waveforms for satellite navigation. Dissertation, University FAF Munich, Neubiberg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  17. Rodriguez JA, Hein GW, Wallner S, Issler JL, Ries L, Lestarquit L, Latour A, Godet J, Bastide F, Pratt T, Owen J (2008) The MBOC modulation: the final touch to the Galileo frequency and signal plan. Navigation 55(1):1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wesson KD, Evans BL, Humphreys TE (2013) A combined symmetric difference and power monitoring GNSS anti-spoofing technique. In: IEEE global conference on signal and information processing.  https://doi.org/10.1109/globalsip.2013.67736854
  19. Wong G, Phelts RE, Walter T, Enge P (2010) Characterization of signal deformations for GPS and WAAS satellites. In: Proceedings of the ION GNSS 2010. Institute of Navigation, Portland, USA, September 14–17, pp 3143–3151Google Scholar
  20. Xiaochun L, Yanhong K, Zheng Y, Chengyan H, Qing L (2016) Research advances in GNSS satellite navigation signals. J Satell Navig 2(2):24–28Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory for Precise Navigation, Positioning and TimingChinese Academy of SciencesXi’anChina
  2. 2.National Time Service CenterChinese Academy of SciencesXi’anChina
  3. 3.Graduate University, Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  4. 4.GNSS Research CenterWuhan UniversityWuhanChina
  5. 5.School of Astronomy and Space ScienceUniversity of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations