Skip to main content
Log in

Single epoch estimation of the Galileo integrity chain sensor station clock offsets

  • Original Article
  • Published:
GPS Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Galileo integrity chain depends on a number of key factors, one of which is contamination of the signal-in-space errors with residual errors other than imperfect modelling of satellite orbits and clocks. A potential consequence of this is that the user protection limit is driven not by the errors associated with the imperfect orbit and clock modelling, but by the distortions induced by noise and bias in the integrity chain. These distortions increase the minimum bias the integrity chain can guarantee to detect, which is reflected in the user protection limit. A contributor to this distortion is the inaccuracy associated with the estimation of the offset between the Galileo sensor station (GSS) receiver clocks and the Galileo system time (GST). This offset is termed the receiver clock synchronization error (CSE). This paper describes the research carried out to determine both the CSE and its associated error using GPS data as captured with the Galileo System Test Bed Version 1 (GSTB-V1). In the study we simulate open access to a time datum using IGS data. Two methods are compared for determining CSE and the corresponding uncertainty (noise) across a global network of tracking stations. The single-epoch single-station method is an ‘averaging’ technique that uses a single epoch of data, and is carried out at individual sensor stations, without recourse to the data from other stations. The global network solution method is also single epoch based, but uses the inversion of a linearised model of the global system to solve for the CSE simultaneously at all GSS along with a number of other parameters that would otherwise be absorbed into the CSE estimate in the averaging technique. To test the effectiveness of various configurations in the two methods the estimated synchronisation errors across the GSS network (comprising 25 stations) are compared to the same values as estimated by the International GPS Service (IGS) using a global tracking network of around 150 stations, as well as precise orbit and satellite clock models determined by a combination of global analysis centres. The results show that the averaging technique is vulnerable to unmodelled errors in the satellite clock offsets from system time, leading to receiver CSE errors in the region of 12 ns (3.7 m), this value being largely driven by the satellite CSE errors. The global network approach is capable of delivering CSE errors at the level of 1.5 ns (46 cm) depending on the number of parameters in the linearised model. The International GNSS Service (IGS) receiver clock estimates were used as a truth model for comparative assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ARP:

Antenna reference point

BE:

Broadcast ephemeris

BRDC:

Concatenated BE parameter files

CSE:

Clock synchronisation error

DOY:

Day of year

ECI:

Earth centred inertial

ESA:

European space agency

GPST:

GPS time

GSS:

Galileo sensor station

GSTB:

Galileo system test bed

IERS:

International earth rotation service

ITRF:

International terrestrial reference frame

IGS:

International GPS service

NAV RINEX:

BE parameters in RINEX format

NGS:

US national geodetic survey

OSPF:

Orbitography and synchronisation processing facility

P1:

Pseudorange observable on the L1 carrier

P2:

Pseudorange observable on the L2 carrier

RINEX:

Receiver independent exchange format

SINEX:

Solution independent exchange format

SP3:

US national geodetic survey standard GPS orbit format

UTC:

Coordinated universal time

References

  • Askne J, Nordius H (1987) Estimation of troposphere delay for microwaves from surface weather data. Radio Sci 22(3):379–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevis M, Businger S, Herring T, Rocken C, Anthes R, Ware R (1992) GPS meteorology: remote sensing of atmospheric water vapor using the global positioning system. J Geophys Res 97:15787–15801

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevis M, Businger S, Chriswell S, Herring T, Rocken C, Anthes R, Ware R (1994) GPS meteorology: mapping zenith wet delays onto precipitable water. J Appl Meteorol 33:379–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dach R, Schildknecht T, Springer T, Dudle G, Prost L (2002) Continuous time transfer using GPS carrier phase. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 49(11):1480–1490

    Google Scholar 

  • Falcone M, Amarillo F, Van Der Wenden E (2004) Assessment of GALILEO performance based on the GALILEO system test bed experimentation results. In: Proceedings of the Institute of Navigation GNSS 2004 conference, Long Beach, pp 624–631

  • IGS website (2005) http://www.igscb.jpl.nasa.gov/components/prods.html. Accessed Nov 2005

  • Leick A (2004) GPS satellite surveying, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York

  • Ray J, Senior K (2005) Geodetic techniques for time and frequency comparisons using GPS phase and code measurements. Metrologia 42:215–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marek Ziebart.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ziebart, M., Cross, P., Sibthorpe, A. et al. Single epoch estimation of the Galileo integrity chain sensor station clock offsets. GPS Solut 11, 227–237 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-006-0053-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-006-0053-5

Keywords

Navigation