Review of World Economics

, Volume 154, Issue 2, pp 307–325 | Cite as

An elementary model of export tax war

Original Paper

Abstract

In this paper, the author uses a generalized version of Kennan and Riezman (Int Econ Rev 29(1):81–85, 1988) trade war model with Stone–Geary preferences, where countries can choose between a Nash tariff or an export tax. Three scenarios emerge from this setting, namely: the standard tariff war, the export tax war and a mixed scenario—“the tariff-export tax war”—where one country applies a Nash tariff, while the other imposes an export tax. In this setting, countries derive their market power not only from their relative endowment size, but also from their subsistence consumptions. As a consequence, a large country does not necessarily win a trade war if it has a substantially higher consumption requirement than the small country. This finding explains why large economies sign trade agreements with small counterparts that prohibit the use of tariffs and export taxes.

Keywords

Asymmetry Endowment Export tax Import tariff Free trade 

JELL Classification

F15 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to the editor, Gerald Willmann, and two anonymous reviewers for their useful comments on an earlier draft of this paper. Usual disclaimers apply.

References

  1. Bagwell, K., Mavroidis, P. C., & Staiger, R. W. (2007). Auctioning countermeasures in the WTO. Journal of International Economics, 73(2), 309–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bagwell, K., & Staiger, R. W. (1999). An economic theory of GATT. American Economic Review, 89, 215–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Breuss, F. (2004). WTO dispute settlement: An economic analysis of four EU-US mini trade wars—A survey. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 4(4), 275–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Broda, C., Limao, N., & Weinstein, D. E. (2008). Optimal tariffs and market power: The evidence. American Economic Review, 98(5), 2032–2065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chongbunwatana, K. (2004). Theories of tariffs: trade wars, trade agreements, and political economy. Ph.D. thesis, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
  6. Crucini, M. J. (2007). Tariffs and the great depression revisited. In T. Kehoe & E. Prescott (Eds.), Great depressions of the twentieth century (pp. 305–334). Minneapolis: Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  7. Crucini, M. J., & Khan, J. (1996). Tariffs and aggregate economic activity: Lessons from the great depression. Journal of Monetary Economics, 38(3), 427–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Epifani, P., & Vitaloni, J. (2006). GATT-think with asymmetric countries. Review of International Economics, 14(3), 427–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Espa, I. (2015). Export restrictions on critical minerals and metals: Testing the adequacy of WTO disciplines. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. European Commission (1996). Green Paper on relations between the European Union and the ACP countries on the eve of the 21st century. Challenges and options for a new partnership. (COM 96/570 final of 29 November 1996). Accessed at http://eur-lex.europa.eu.
  11. European Commission (2008). The raw materials initiative—Meeting our critical needs for growth and jobs in Europe. A Communication to the European Parliament and the Council.Google Scholar
  12. European Commission (2014). On the review of the list of critical raw materials for the EU and the implementation of the raw materials initiative. A communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions.Google Scholar
  13. European Commission (2015). Defining ’critical’ raw materials. Accessed 16 Mar 2015. http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/raw-materials/critical/index_en.htm.
  14. Felbermayr, G., Jung, B., & Larch, M. (2013). Optimal tariffs, retaliation, and the welfare loss from tariff wars in the Melitz model. Journal of International Economics, 89(1), 13–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fung, K., and J. Korinek (2013). Economics of export restrictions as applied to industrial raw material (OECD Trade Policy Papers, No. 155). Paris: OECD Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1787/5k46j0r5xvhd-en.
  16. Gros, D. (1987). A note on the optimal tariff, retaliation and the welfare loss from tariff wars in a framework with intra-industry trade. Journal of International Economics, 23(3–4), 357–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grossman, G.M. & Horn, H. (2012). Why the WTO? An introduction to the economics of trade agreements. In American Law Institute (Author) & H. Horn & P. Mavroidis (Eds.), Legal and Economic Principles of World Trade Law (The American Law Institute Reporters Studies on WTO Law). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139839105.004.
  18. Johnson, R., & Hanrahan, C. E. (2010). The US-EU beef hormone dispute. In CRS Report for Congress. Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
  19. Johnson, H. G. (1953). Optimum tariffs and retaliation. Review of Economic Studies, 21(2), 142–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kennan, J., & Riezman, R. (1988). Do big countries win tariff wars? International Economic Review, 29(1), 81–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Korinek, J., & Kim, J. (2011). Export restrictions on strategic raw materials and their impact on trade and global supply. Journal of World Trade, 45, 255.Google Scholar
  22. Krugman, P. (1980). Scale economies, product dierentiation, and the pattern of trade. American Economic Review, 70(5), 950–959.Google Scholar
  23. Latina, J., Piermartini, R., & Ruta, M. (2011). Natural resources and non-cooperative trade policy. International Economics and Economic Policy, 8(2), 177–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Madsen, J. B. (2001). Trade barriers and the collapse of world trade during the Great Depression. Southern Economic Journal, 67(4), 848–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mayer, W. (1981). Theoretical considerations on negotiated tariff agreements. Oxford Economic Papers, 33, 135–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Office for promotion of parliamentary democracy (OPPD 2012), Economic partnership agreements EU-ACP: facts and key issues, 76 pages, European Parliament.Google Scholar
  27. Opp, M. (2010). Tariff wars in the Ricardian model with a continuum of goods. Journal of International Economics, 80(2), 2012–2225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Piermartini, R. (2004). The role of Export Taxes in the Field of Primary Commodities (Discussion Paper). Geneva: WTO.Google Scholar
  29. Ramrod, I. (2011). Shopping for raw materials Should Africa be worried about EU raw materials initiative (ecdpm Discussion Paper No 105).Google Scholar
  30. Solleder, O. (2013). Three Essays on Export Taxes. Ph.D. thesis, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies.Google Scholar
  31. Syropoulos, C. (2002). Optimum tariffs and retaliation revisited: How country size matters. Review of Economic Studies, 69(3), 707–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. The Economist (2008). The battle of Smoot–Hawley. http://www.economist.com/node/12798595. Accessed 26 Apr 2017.
  33. WTO (2010). World Trade Report 2010: Trade in Natural Resources. Geneva: WTO.Google Scholar
  34. WTO (2013). World Trade Report 2013 Factors shaping the future of world trade. Geneva: WTO.Google Scholar
  35. WTO DISPUTE SETTLEMENT: DISPUTE DS431 China—Measures Related to the Exportation of Rare Earths, Tungsten and Molybdenum. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds431_e.htm. Accessed Apr 2017.
  36. Zhang, W. (2016). Export restrictions: Time for new disciplines. Ph.D. thesis, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kiel Institute 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University Pédagogique Nationale KinshasaDemocratic Republic of the Congo

Personalised recommendations