Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Influence of environmental temperature, heat-treatment and design on the cyclic fatigue resistance of three generations of a single-file nickel–titanium rotary instrument

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Odontology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of environmental temperature, heat-treatment*** and design on the cyclic fatigue resistance of OneShape (OS), OneShape new generation (OSNG) and One Curve (OC) NiTi rotary single-file instruments. Cyclic fatigue testing of NiTi instruments was performed in an artificial canal with a 5-mm radius of curvature and a 60° angle of curvature located 5 mm from the tip of the instrument. During the experiment 3 different temperatures were used in a thermostatic bath with electronic and infrared controls: 0°, 20° and 35 °C. Sixty OneShape, 60 OneShape new generation and 60 One Curve instruments were rotated in the artificial canal until fracture occurred and the number of cycles to fracture (NCF) and the length of the fractured fragment (FL) was recorded. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA test at the 5% significance level. Fatigue resistance was significantly higher as the environmental temperature decreased, with differences ranging from 61 to 791%. OC instruments were significantly more resistant to cyclic fatigue than OS and OSNG instruments at all the temperatures tested (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference with respect to the length of the fractured file fragments for all the instruments tested at all the temperatures tested (P > 0.05). Within the limitation of the present study, fatigue resistance of the files was significantly increased when the environmental temperature decreased. OC instruments were significantly more resistant to cyclic fatigue than OS and OSNG instruments at all the temperatures tested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McGuigan M, Louca C, Duncan H. Clinical decision-making after endodontic instrument fracture. Br Dent J. 2013;214:395–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shen Y, Cheung GSP, Bian Z, Peng B. Comparison of defects in ProFile and ProTaper systems after clinical use. J Endod. 2006;32:61–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Martin B, Zelada G, Varela P, et al. Factor influening the fracture of nickel-titanium rotary instruments. Int Endod J. 2003;26:262–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kitchens GG, Liewehr FR, Moon PC. The effect of operational speed on the fracture of nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod. 2007;33:52–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim H-C, Kim H-J, Lee C-J, Kim B-M, Park J-K, Versluis A. Mechanical response of nickel–titanium instruments with different cross-sectional designs during shaping of simulated curved canals. Int Endod J. 2009;42:593–602.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shen Y, Zhou H-m, Zheng Y-f, Peng B, Haapasalo M. Current challenges and concepts of the thermomechanical treatment of nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod. 2013;39:163–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Plotino G, Grande NM, Cotti E, Testarelli L, Gambarini G. Blue treatment enhances cyclic fatigue resistance of vortex nickel-titanium rotary files. J Endod. 2014;40:1451–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gündoğar M, Özyürek T. Cyclic fatigue resistance of OneShape, HyFlex EDM, WaveOne Gold, and Reciproc blue nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod. 2017;43:1192–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shen Y, Zhou H-m, Zheng Y-f, Campbell L, Peng B, Haapasalo M. Metallurgical characterization of controlled memory wire nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod. 2011;37:1566–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang X, Ackland GJ, Rabe KM. Crystal structures and shape-memory behaviour of NiTi. Nat Mater. 2003;2:307–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yoneyama T, Kobayashi C. Endodontic instruments for root canal treatment using Ti–Ni shape memory alloys. Shape memory alloys for biomedical applications. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2009. 297–305.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Plotino G, Grande NM, Bellido MM, Testarelli L, Gambarini G. Influence of temperature on cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper Gold and ProTaper Universal rotary files. J Endod. 2017;43:200–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Özyürek T. Cyclic fatigue resistance of Reciproc, WaveOne, and WaveOne Gold nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod. 2016;42:1536–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Özyürek T, Yılmaz K, Uslu G. Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of old and new generation one shape NiTi instruments. Int J Appl Dent Sci. 2016;2:4–7.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Plotino G, Grande NM, Cordaro M, Testarelli L, Gambarini G. A review of cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod. 2009;35:1469–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. de Hemptinne F, Slaus G, Vandendael M, Jacquet W, De Moor RJ, Bottenberg P. In vivo intracanal temperature evolution during endodontic treatment after the injection of room temperature or preheated sodium hypochlorite. J Endod. 2015;41:1112–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Grande NM, Plotino G, Silla E, et al. Environmental temperature drastically affects flexural fatigue resistance of nickel-titanium rotary files. J Endod. 2017;43:1157–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. de Vasconcelos RA, Murphy S, Carvalho CAT, Govindjee RG, Govindjee S, Peters OA. Evidence for reduced fatigue resistance of contemporary rotary instruments exposed to body temperature. J Endod. 2016;42:782–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jamleh A, Yahata Y, Ebihara A, Atmeh AR, Bakhsh T, Suda H. Performance of NiTi endodontic instrument under different temperatures. Odontology. 2016;104:324–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dosanjh A, Paurazas S, Askar M. The Effect of temperature on cyclic fatigue of nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments. J Endod. 2017;43:823–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Capar ID, Ertas H, Arslan H. Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of novel nickel-titanium rotary instruments. Aust Endod J. 2015;41:24–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Özyürek T, Gündoğar M, Uslu G, et al. Cyclic fatigue resistances of Hyflex EDM, WaveOne gold, Reciproc blue and 2shape NiTi rotary files in different artificial canals. Odontology. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-018-0340-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Serafin M, De Biasi M, Franco V, Angerame D. In vitro comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of two rotary single-file endodontic systems: OneCurve versus OneShape. Odontology. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-018-0390-1).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. de Melo MCC, de Azevedo Bahia MG, Buono VTL. Fatigue resistance of engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod. 2002;28:765–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cheung G, Darvell B. Low-cycle fatigue of NiTi rotary instruments of various cross-sectional shapes. Int Endod J. 2007;40:626–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Haikel Y, Serfaty R, Bateman G, Senger B, Allemann C. Dynamic and cyclic fatigue of engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod. 1999;25:434–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Grande N, Plotino G, Pecci R, Bedini R, Malagnino V, Somma F. Cyclic fatigue resistance and three-dimensional analysis of instruments from two nickel–titanium rotary systems. Int Endod J. 2006;39:755–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Higuera O, Plotino G, Tocci L, Carrillo G, Gambarini G, Jaramillo DE. Cyclic fatigue resistance of 3 different nickel-titanium reciprocating instruments in artificial canals. J Endod. 2015;41:913–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Pedullà E, Plotino G, Scibilia M, et al. Cyclic fatigue comparison among endodontic instruments with similar cross section and different surface coating. Minerva Stomatol. 2016;65:231–4.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Pedullà E, Lizio A, Scibilia M, et al. Cyclic fatigue resistance of two nickel–titanium rotary instruments in interrupted rotation. Int Endod J. 2017;50:194–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pedullà E, Benites A, La Rosa GM, et al. Cyclic fatigue resistance of heat-treated nickel-titanium instruments after immersion in sodium hypochlorite and/or sterilization. J Endod. 2018;44:648–653.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Uslu G, Özyürek T, Yılmaz K, Plotino G. Effect of dynamic immersion in sodium hypochlorite and EDTA solutions on cyclic fatigue resistance of WaveOne and WaveOne gold reciprocating nickel-titanium Files. J Endod. 2018;44:834–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors deny any conflicts of interest related to this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Taha Özyürek.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Staffoli, S., Grande, N.M., Plotino, G. et al. Influence of environmental temperature, heat-treatment and design on the cyclic fatigue resistance of three generations of a single-file nickel–titanium rotary instrument. Odontology 107, 301–307 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-018-0399-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-018-0399-5

Keywords

Navigation