Advertisement

Journal of Plant Research

, Volume 131, Issue 3, pp 367–393 | Cite as

Understanding the role of floral development in the evolution of angiosperm flowers: clarifications from a historical and physico-dynamic perspective

  • Louis Ronse De Craene
JPR Symposium Floral development –Re-evaluation of its importance–

Abstract

Flower morphology results from the interaction of an established genetic program, the influence of external forces induced by pollination systems, and physical forces acting before, during and after initiation. Floral ontogeny, as the process of development from a meristem to a fully developed flower, can be approached either from a historical perspective, as a “recapitulation of the phylogeny” mainly explained as a process of genetic mutations through time, or from a physico-dynamic perspective, where time, spatial pressures, and growth processes are determining factors in creating the floral morphospace. The first (historical) perspective clarifies how flower morphology is the result of development over time, where evolutionary changes are only possible using building blocks that are available at a certain stage in the developmental history. Flowers are regulated by genetically determined constraints and development clarifies specific transitions between different floral morphs. These constraints are the result of inherent mutations or are induced by the interaction of flowers with pollinators. The second (physico-dynamic) perspective explains how changes in the physical environment of apical meristems create shifts in ontogeny and this is reflected in the morphospace of flowers. Changes in morphology are mainly induced by shifts in space, caused by the time of initiation (heterochrony), pressure of organs, and alterations of the size of the floral meristem, and these operate independently or in parallel with genetic factors. A number of examples demonstrate this interaction and its importance in the establishment of different floral forms. Both perspectives are complementary and should be considered in the understanding of factors regulating floral development. It is suggested that floral evolution is the result of alternating bursts of physical constraints and genetic stabilization processes following each other in succession. Future research needs to combine these different perspectives in understanding the evolution of floral systems and their diversification.

Keywords

Floral meristem Genetics Heterochrony Morphospace Organ pressure Size change 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to Dr. Akitoshi Iwamoto for inviting me to participate in the symposium entitled “Floral development, re-evaluation of its importance” organized at the 80th Annual Meeting of the Botanical Society of Japan in Okinawa. I thank the Japanese Society for Promotion of Science for funding my travel to Japan. I also thank the editors of JPR for suggesting this special volume for Flo-Re-S. I am grateful to various colleagues including Dr. Akitoshi Iwamoto, Dr. Kester Bull-Hereñu, Prof. R. Classen-Bockhoff, and Dr. Wei Lai for helpful conversations on morphological topics. The Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh (RBGE) is supported by the Scottish Government’s Rural and Environmental Science and Analytical Services Division.

References

  1. Ajani Y, Bull-Hereñu K, Classen-Bockhoff R (2016) Patterns of flower development in Apiaceae–Apioideae. Flora 221:38–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvarez-Buylla ER, Azpeitia E, Barrio R, Benítez M, Padilla-Longoria P (2010) From ABC genes to regulatory networks, epigenetic landscapes and flower morphogenesis: making biological sense of theoretical approaches. Seminars Cell Dev Biol 21:108–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (2016) An update of the Angiosperm phylogeny group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV. Bot J Linn Soc 181:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arthur W (2000) The origin of animal body plans: a study in evolutionary developmental biology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. Basso-Alves JP, Goldenberg R, Teixeira SP (2017) The ontogenetic bases for variation in ovary position in Melastomatacae. Am J Bot 104:1142–1156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bateman RM, DiMichele WA (2002) Generating and filtering major phenotypic novelties: neoGoldschmidtian saltation revisited. In: Cronk QCB, Bateman RM, Hawkins JA (eds) Developmental genetics and plant evolution. Systematics Association Special Volume Series 65. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 109–159Google Scholar
  7. Beer SS, Beer AS, Sokoloff DD (2010) Flower and inflorecence development in Salicornia (Chenopodiaceae). Feddes Repert 121:229–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bello MA, Hawkins JA, Rudall PJ (2010) Floral ontogeny in Polygalaceae and its bearing on the homologies of keeled flowers in Fabales. Int J Plant Sci 171:482–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bowman JL, Smyth DR (1998) Patterns of petal and stamen reduction in Australian species of Lepidium L. (Brassicaceae). Int J Plant Sci 159:65–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bowman JL, Smyth DR, Meyerowitz EM (1989) Genes directing flower development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 1:37–52PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Box MS, Glover BJ (2010) A plant developmentalist’s guide to paedomorphosis: reintroducing a classic concept to a new generation. Trends Plant Sci 15:241–246PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brady MS, Stein W, Crane PR (1997) Exploring patterns in floral morphology: mathematical modeling of floral development using an inhibitory morphogen and meristematic growth parameters. Am J Bot Suppl 84:6–37Google Scholar
  13. Brockington SF, Roolse A, Ramdial J, Moore MJ, Crawley S, Dhingra A, Hilu K, Soltis DE, Soltis PS (2009) Phylogeny of the Caryophyllales sensu lato: revisiting hypotheses on pollination biology and perianth differentiation in the core Caryophyllales. Int J Plant Sci 170:627–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brockington SF, Dos Santos P, Glover B, Ronse De Craene LP (2013) Evolution of the androecium in Caryophyllales: insights from a paraphyletic Molluginaceae. Am J Bot 100:1757–1778PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Buckhari G, Zhang J, Stevens PF, Zhang W (2017) Evolution of the process underlying floral zygomorphy development in pentapetalous angiosperms. Am J Bot 104:1846–1856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bull-Hereñu K, Ronse De Craene LP, Pérez F (2018) Floral meristem size and organ number correlation in Eucryphia (Cunoniaceae). J Plant Res.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-018-1030-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Buzgo M, Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Ma H (2004) Towards a comprehensive integration of morphological and genetic studies of floral development. Trends Plant Sci 9:163–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cao L, Liu J, Lin Q, Ronse De Craene LP (2018) The floral organogenesis of Koelreuteria bipinnata and its variety integrifoliola (Sapindaceae): evidence of floral constraints on the evolution of monosymmetry. Plant Syst Evol (in press)Google Scholar
  19. Caris P (2013) Bloemontogenetische patronen in the Ericales sensu lato. Dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  20. Caris P, Smets EF (2004) A floral ontogenetic study on the sister group relationship between the genus Samolus (Primulaceae) and the Theophrastaceae. Am J Bot 91:627–643PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Causier B, Schwarz-Sommer Z, Davies B (2010) Floral organ identity: 20 years of ABCs. Seminars Cell Devel Biol 21:73–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chandler JW (2014) Patterns and polarity in floral meristem and floral organ initiation. Crit Rev Plant Sci 33:457–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Charlton WA (1999) Studies in the Alismataceae XI. Development of the inflorescence and flowers of Wiesneria triandra (Dalzell) Micheli. Can J Bot 77:1569–1579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Charlton WA (2004) Studies in the Alistmataceae. XII. Floral organogenesis in Damasonium alisma and Baldellia ranunculoides, and comparisons with Butomus umbellatus. Can J Bot 82:528–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Chartier M, Jabbour F, Gerber S, Mitteroecker P, Sauquet H, von Balthazar M, Staedler Y, Crane PR, Schoenenberger J (2014) The floral morphospace—a modern comparative approach to study angiosperm evolution. New Phytol.  https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12969 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Chinga J, Pérez F (2016) Ontogenetic integration in two species of Schizanthus (Solanaceae): a comparison with static integration patterns. Flora 221:75–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Choob VV, Penin AA (2004) Structure of flower in Arabidopsis thaliana: spatial pattern formation. Russ J Devel Biol 35:224–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Citerne H, Jabbour F, Nadot S, Damerval C (2010) The evolution of floral symmetry. In: Kader JC, Delseny M (eds) Advances in botanical research. Elsevier, London, pp 85–137Google Scholar
  29. Classen-Bockhoff R (1991) Anthodien, Pseudanthien und Infloreszenzblumen. Beitr Biol Pflanz 66:221–240Google Scholar
  30. Classen-Bockhoff R (2001) Plant morphology: the historic concepts of Wilhelm Troll, Walter Zimmermann and Agnes Arber. Ann Bot 88:1153–1172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Classen-Bockhoff R (2016) The shoot concept of the flower: still up to date? Flora 221:46–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Classen-Bockhoff R, Bull-Hereñu K (2013) Towards an ontogenetic understanding of inflorescence diversity. Ann Bot 112:1523–1542PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Classen-Bockhoff R, Meyer C (2016) Space matters: meristem expansion triggers corona formation in Passiflora. Ann Bot 117:277–290PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Coen ES, Meyerowitz EM (1991) The war of the whorls: genetic interactions controlling flower development. Nature 353:31–37PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. De Barros TC, Pedersoli GD, Paulino JV, Teixeira SP (2017) In the interface of caesalpinioids and mimosoids: comparative floral development elucidates shared characters in Dimorphandra mollis and Pentaclethra macroloba (Leguminosae). Am J Bot 104:218–232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Donoghue MJ, Ree RH, Baum DA (1998) Phylogeny and the evolution of flower symmetry in the Asteridae. Trends Plant Sci 3:311–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Dos Santos P, Ronse De Craene LP (2016) Floral development of Lewisia (Montiaceae): investigating patterns of perianth and stamen diversity. Flora 221:4–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Dos Santos P, Brockington S, Glover B, Ronse De Craene LP (2012) Micromorphological evidence for androecium origin of Claytonia (Montiaceae) petaloids. Modern Phytomorph 1:23–25Google Scholar
  39. Douady S, Couder Y (1996) Phyllotaxis as a dynamical self organizing process Part III: The simulation of the transient regimes of ontogeny. J Theor Biol 178:295–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Doust AN (2001) The developmental basis of floral variation in Drimys winteri (Winteraceae). Int J Plant Sci 162:697–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Doust AN (2002) Comparative floral ontogeny in Winteraceae. Ann Missouri Bot Gard 87:366–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Doust AN, Drinnan AN (2004) Floral development and molecular phylogeny support the generic status of Tasmannia (Winteraceae). Am J Bot 91:321–331PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Doyle JA, Endress PK (2011) Tracing the early evolutionary diversification of the angiosperm flower. In: Wanntorp L, Ronse De Craene LP (eds) Flowers on the tree of life. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 88–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Dumais J (2007) Can mechanics control pattern formation in plants? Curr opinion Plant Biol 10:58–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Dumais J, Steele CR (2000) New evidence for the role of mechanical forces in the shoot apical meristem. J Plant Growth Regul 19:7–18PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Eichler AW (1875–78). Blütendiagramme 1 and 2. Wilhelm Engelmann, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  47. Einset JW (1987) Botany: the state of art. How development’s clock guides Evolution. Arnoldia 47:20–25Google Scholar
  48. Endress PK (1986) Floral structure, systematics, and phylogeny in trochodendrales. Ann Missouri Botl Gard 73:297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Endress PK (1987) Floral phyllotaxis and floral evolution. Bot Jahrb Syst 108:417–438Google Scholar
  50. Endress PK (1990) Patterns of floral construction in ontogeny and phylogeny. Biol J Linn Soc 39:153–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Endress PK (1992) Evolution and floral diversity: the phylogenetic surroundings of Arabidopsis and Antirrhinum. Int J Plant Sci 153:S106–S122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Endress PK (1994) Diversity and evolutionary biology of tropical flowers. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  53. Endress PK (1997) Evolutionary biology of flowers: prospects for the next century. In: Iwatsuki K, Raven PH (eds) Evolution and diversification of land plants. Springer, Tokyo, pp 99–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Endress PK (1998) Antirrhinum and Asteridae—evolutionary changes of floral symmetry. Soc Exp Biol Symp Ser 51:133–140Google Scholar
  55. Endress PK (1999) Symmetry in flowers. Diversity and evolution. Int J Plant Sci 160(6 Suppl):S3–S23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Endress PK (2003) What should a “complete” morphological phylogenetic anaylsis entail? In: Stuessy TF, Mayer V, Hörandl E (eds) Deep morphology: towards a renaissance of morphology in plant systematics. ARG Gantner, Liechtenstein, pp 131–164Google Scholar
  57. Endress PK (2005) The role of morphology in angiosperm evolutionary studies. Nova Acta Leopoldina NF 92:342:221–238Google Scholar
  58. Endress PK (2006) Angiosperm floral evolution: morphological developmental framework. Adv Bot Res 44:1–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Endress PK (2008) The whole and the parts: relationships between floral architecture and floral organ shape, and their repercussions on the interpretation of fragmentary floral fossils. Ann Missouri Bot Gard 95:101–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Endress PK (2010a) Flower structure and trends in evolution in eudicots and their major subclades. Ann Missouri Bot Gard 97:541–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Endress PK (2010b) Synorganisation without organ fusion in the flowers of Geranium robertianum (Geraniaceae) and its not so trivial obdiplostemony. Ann Bot 106:687–695PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Endress PK (2011) Evolutionary diversification of the flowers in angiosperms. Am J Bot 98:370–396PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Endress PK (2014) Multicarpellate gynoecia in angiosperms: occurrence, development, organization and architectural constraints. Bot J Linn Soc 174:1–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Endress PK (2016) Development and evolution of extreme synorganization in angiosperm flowers and diversity: a comparison of Apocynaceae and Orchidaceae. Ann Bot 117:749–767PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Endress PK, Armstrong JE (2011) Floral development and floral phyllotaxis in Anaxagorea (Annonaceae). Ann Bot 108:835–845PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Endress PK, Doyle JA (2007) Floral phyllotaxis in basal angiosperms: development and evolution. Curr Opinion Plant Biol 10:52–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Endress PK, Matthews ML (2006) Elaborate petals and staminodes in eudicots: diversity, function, and evolution. Org Div Evol 6:257–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Endress PK, Matthews ML (2012) Progress and problems in the assessment of flower morphology in higher-level systematics. Plant Syst Evol 298:257–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Erbar C (1994) Contributions to the affinities of Adoxa from the viewpoint of floral development. Bot Jahrb Syst 116:259–282Google Scholar
  70. Erbar C (2007) Current opinions in flower development and the evo-devo approach in plant phylogeny. Plant Syst Evol 269:107–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Erbar C, Leins P (1983) Zur sequenz von Blütenorganen bei einigen Magnoliiden. Bot Jahrb Syst 103:433–449Google Scholar
  72. Erbar C, Leins P (1994) Flowers in Magnoliidae and the origin of flowers in other subclasses of the angiosperms. I. The relationships between flowers of Magnoliidae and Alismatidae. Plant Syst Evol suppl 8:193–208Google Scholar
  73. Erbar C, Leins P (1997) Different patterns of floral development in whorled flowers, exemplified by Apiaceae and Brassicaceae. Int J Plant Sci 158(suppl. 6):S49–S64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Farrar J, Ronse De Craene LP (2013) To be or not to be a staminode: the floral development of Sauvagesia (ochnaceae) reveals different origins of presumed staminodes. In: Berntsen T, Alsvik K (eds) Flowers, morphology, evolutionary diversification and implications for the environment. Nova Science, New York, pp 89–103Google Scholar
  75. Friedman J (2011) Gone with the wind: understanding evolutionary transitions between wind and animal pollination in the angiosperms. New Phytol 191:911–913PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Friedman J, Barrett SCH (2008) A phylogenetic analysis of the evolution of wind pollination in the angiosperms. Int J Plant Sci 169:49–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Ge L-P, Lu A-M, Gong C-R (2007) Ontogeny of the fertile flower in Platycrater arguta (Hydrangeaceae). Int J Plant Sci 168:835–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Glover BJ, Airoldi CA, Brockington SF, Fernandez-Mazuecos M, Martinez-Perez C, Mellers G, Moyroud E, Taylor L (2015) How have advances in comparative floral development influenced our understanding of floral evolution? Int J Plant Sci 176:307–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Gordon SP, Chickarmane VS, Ohno C, Meyerowitz EM (2009) Multiple feed- back loops through cytokinin signaling control stem cell number within the Arabidopsis shoot meristem. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:16529–16534PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Green PB (1992) Pattern formation in shoots: a likely role for minimal energy configurations of the tunica. Int J Plant Sci 153:59–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Green PB (1999) Expression of pattern in plants: combining molecular and calculus-based biophysical paradigms. Am J Bot 86:1059–1076PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Green PB, Steele CS, Rennich SC (1996) Phyllotactic patterns: a biophysical mechanism for their origin. Ann Bot 77:515–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Guimarães E, di Stasi LC, Maimoni-Rodella RCS (2008) Pollination biology of Jacaranda oxyphylla with an emphasis on staminode function. Ann Bot 102:699–711PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Gustafsson MHG (2000) Floral morphology and relationships of Clusia gundlachii with a discussion of floral organ identity and diversity in the genus Clusia. Int J Plant Sci 161:43–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Hamant O, Heisler MG, Jönson H et al (2008) Developmental patterning by mechanical signals in Arabidopsis. Science 322:1650–1655PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Hamant O, Traas J, Boudaoud A (2010) Regulation of shape and patterning in plant development. Curr Opin Gen Dev 20:454–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Hardy CR, Stevenson DW (2000) Floral organogenesis in some species of Tradescantia and Callisia (Commelinaceae). Int J Plant Sci 161:551–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Harrison CJ, Moeller M, Cronk QCB (1999) Evolution and development of floral diversity in Streptocarpus and Saintpaulia. Ann Bot 84:49–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Haston E, Ronse De Craene LP (2007) Inflorescence and floral development in Streptocarpus and Saintpaulia (Gesneriaceae) with particular reference to theimpact of bracteole suppression. Plant Syst Evol 265:13–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Hayes V, Schneider EL, Carlquist S (2000) Floral development of Nelumbo nucifera Nelumbonaceae). Int J Plant Sci 161(6 Suppl.):S183–S191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Hernández LF, Green PB (1993) Transductions for the expression of structural pattern: analysis in sunflower. Plant Cell 5:1725–1738PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Hileman LC, Irish VF (2009) More is better: the uses of developmental genetic data to reconstruct perianth evolution. Am J Bot 6:83–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Hintz M, Bartholmes C, Nutt P, Ziermann J, Hameister S, Neuffer B, Theissen G (2006) Catching a ‘hopeful monster’: sherpherd’s purse (Capsella bursa-pastoris) as a model system to study the evolution of flower development. J Exp Bot 57:3531–3542PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Hochwallner H, Weber A (2006) Flower development and anatomy of Clusia valerioi, a Central American species of Clusiaceae offering floral resin. Flora 201:407–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Hodges SA, Arnold ML (1995) Spurring plant diversification: are floral nectar spurs a key innovation? Proc Roy Soc London B262:343–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Howarth DG, Martins T, Chimney E, Donoghue MJ (2011) Diversification of CYCLOIDEA expression in the evolution of bilateral flower symmetry in Caprifoliaceae and Lonicera (Dipsacales). Ann Bot 107:1521–1532PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Hufford LD (1990) Androecial development and the problem of monophyly of Loasaceae. Can J Bot 68:402–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Hufford LD (1995) Patterns of ontogenetic evolution in perianth diversification of Besseya (Scrophulariaceae). Am J Bot 82:655–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Hufford LD (1997) The roles of ontogenetic evolution in the origins of floral homoplasies. Int J Plant Sci 158(6 Suppl):S65–S80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Hufford LD (1998) Early development of androecia in polystemonous Hydrangeaceae. Am J Bot 85:1057–1067PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Hufford LD (2001a) Ontogenetic sequences: homology, evolution, and the patterning of clade diversity. In: Zelditch ML (ed) Beyond heterochrony: the evolution of development. Wiley-Liss, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  102. Hufford LD (2001b) Ontogeny and morphology of the fertile flowers of Hydrangea and allied genera of tribe Hydrangeeae (Hydrangeaceae). Bot J Linn Soc 137:139–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Hufford LD (2003) Homology and developmental transformation: models for the origins of the staminodes of Loasaceae subfamily Loasoideae. Int J Plant Sci 164(5 Suppl):S409–S439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Irish VF (2009) Evolution of petal identity. J Exp Biol 60:2517–2527Google Scholar
  105. Irish VF, Litt A (2005) Flower development and evolution: gene duplication, diversification and redeployment. Curr Opinion Gen Dev 15:454–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Iwamoto A, Nakamura A, Kurihara S, Ronse De Craene LP (2018) Floral development of petaloid Alismatales as an insight into the origin of the trimerous Bauplan in the flower of the Monocots. J Plant Res.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-018-1022-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Jabbour F, Ronse De Craene LP, Nadot S, Damerval C (2009) Establishment of zygomorphy on an ontogenic spiral and evolution of perianth in the tribe Delphinieae (Ranunculaceae). Ann Bot 104:809–822PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Jaramillo MA, Kramer EM (2007) The role of developmental genetics in understanding homology and morphological evolution in plants. Int J Plant Sci 168:61–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Jaramillo MA, Manos PS, Zimmer EA (2004) Phylogenetic relationships of the perianthless Piperales: reconstructing the evolution of floral development. Int J Pl Sci 165:403–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Kania W (1973) Entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen an Rosaceenblüten. Bot Jahrb Syst 93:175–246Google Scholar
  111. Karrer AB (1991). Blütenentwicklung und systematische Stellung der Papaveraceae und Capparaceae. Dissertation, University of ZürichGoogle Scholar
  112. Kirchoff BK (1991) Homeosis in the flowers of the Zingiberales. Am J Bot 78:833–837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Kirchoff BK (1997) Inflorescence and flower development in the Hedychieae (Zingiberaceae): Hedychium. Can J Bot 75:581–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Kirchoff BK (2000) Hofmeister’s rule and primordium shape: influences on organ position in Hedychium coronarium (Zingiberaceae). In: Wilson KL, Morrison DA (eds) Monocots: systematics and evolution. CSIRO, Melbourne, pp 75–83Google Scholar
  115. Kitazawa MD, Fujimoto K (2014) A developmental basis for stochasticity in floral organ numbers. Frontiers Plant Sci 5:545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Kitazawa MD, Fujimoto K (2015) A dynamic phyllotaxis modelto determine floral organ number. PLOS Comput Biol.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004145 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Kitazawa MD, Fujimoto K (2016) Relationship between the species-representative phenotype and intraspecific ariation in Ranunculaceae floral organ and Asteraceae flower numbers. Ann Bot 117:925–935PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Kramer EM, Hall JC (2005) Evolutionary dynamics of genes controlling floral development. Curr Opinion Plant Biol 8:13–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Kress WJ (1990) Phylogeny and classification of Zingiberales. Ann Missouri Bot Gard 77:698–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Krüger H, Tiedt LR, Wessels DCJ (1999) Floral development in the legume tree Colophospermum mopane, Caesalpinioideae: Detarieae. Bot J Linn Soc 131:223–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Kubitzki K (1987) Origin and significance of trimerous flowers. Taxon 36:21–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Kwiatkowska D (2008) Flowering and apical meristem growth dynamics. J Exp Bot 59:187–201PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Lehmann NL, Sattler R (1993) Homeosis in floral development of Sanguinaria canadensis and S. canadensis ‘Multiplex’ (Papaveraceae). Am J Bot 80:1323–1335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Leins P (1964) Die frühe Blütenentwicklung von Hypericum hookerianum Wight et Arn. und H. aegypticum L. Ber Deutsch Bot Ges 77:112–123Google Scholar
  125. Leins P, Erbar C (1985) Ein Beitrag zur Blütenentwicklung der Aristolochiaceen, einer Vermittlergruppe zu den Monokotylen. Bot Jahrb Syst 107:343–368Google Scholar
  126. Leins P, Erbar C (1987) Studien zur Blütenentwicklung an Compositen. Bot Jahrb Syst 108:381–401Google Scholar
  127. Leins P, Erbar C (1996) Early floral developmental studies in Annonaceae. Biosystematics and Ecology Series 10. In: Morawetz W, Winkler H (eds) Reproductive morphology in Annonaceae. Österr. Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien, pp 1–27Google Scholar
  128. Leins P, Erbar C (2010) Flower and fruit. Schweizerbart’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  129. Leins P, Stadler P (1973) Entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen am Androecium der Alismatales. Österr Bot Zeit 122:145–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Li P, Johnston MO (2000) Heterochrony in plant evolutionary studies through the twentieth century. Bot Rev 66:57–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Linder HP (1998) Morphology and the evolution of wind pollination. In: Owens SJ, Rudall PJ (eds) Reproductive biology in systematics, conservation and economic botany. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, pp 123–135Google Scholar
  132. Litt A, Kramer EM (2010) The ABC model and the diversification of floral organ identity. Seminars Cell Dev Biol 21:129–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. López J, Rodríguez-Riaňo T, Valtueňa FJ, Pérez JL, González M, Ortega-Olivencia A (2016) Does the Scrophularia staminode influence female and male functions during pollination? Int J Plant Sci 177:671–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. McMahon M, Hufford L (2005) Evolution and development in the Amorphoid clade (Amorpheae: Papilionoideae: Leguminosae): petal loss and dedifferentiation. Int J Plant Sci 166:383–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Meicenheimer RD (1998) Decussate to spiral transitions in phyllotaxis. In: Jean RV, Barabé D (eds) Symmetry in plants. World Scientific, Singapore, pp 125–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Meinhardt H, Gierer A (2000) Pattern formation by local self-activation and lateral inhibition. BioEssays 22:753–760PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Meyer-Abich A (1954) The principle of complementarity in biology. Acta Biotheor 11:57–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Mirabet V, Das P, Boudaoud A, Hamant O (2011) The role of mechanical forces in plant morphogenesis. Annu Rev Plant Biol 62:365–385PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Mitteroecker P, Huttegger SM (2009) The concept of morphospaces in evolutionary and developmental biology: mathematics and metaphors. Biol Theor 4:54–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Murbeck S (1912) Untersuchungen über den Blütenbau der Papaveraceen. Kungl Sv Vet Akad Handl 50:1–168Google Scholar
  141. Naghiloo S, Classen-Bockhoff R (2016) Developmental analysis of merosity and sexual morphs in Rubiaceae: a case study in Rubia and Cruciata. Flora 222:52–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Naghiloo S, Classen-Bockhoff R (2017) Developmental changes in time and space promote evolutionary diversification of flowers: a case study in Dipsacoideae. Front Plant Sci 8:1665PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Naghiloo S, Dadpour MR, Movafeghi A (2012) Floral ontogeny in Astragalus compactus (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae: Galegeae): variable occurrence of bracteoles and variable patterns of sepal initiation. Planta 235:793–805PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Nakayama N, Smith RS, Mandel T, Robinson S, Kimura S, Boudaoud A, Kuhlemeier C (2012) Mechanical regulation of auxin-mediated growth. Curr Biol 22:1468–1476PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Newell AC, Shipman PD, Sun Z (2008) Phyllotaxis: cooperation and competition between mechanical and biochemical processes. J Theor Biol 251:421–439PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Nishino E (1988) Early floral organogenesis in Tripetaleia (Ericaceae). In: Leins P, Tucker SC, Endress PK (eds) Aspects of floral development. J. Cramer, Berlin, pp 181–190Google Scholar
  147. Olson ME (2003) Ontogenetic origins of floral bilateral symmetry in Moringaceae (Brassicales). Am J Bot 90:49–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Patchell MJ, Bolton MC, Mankowski P, Hall JC (2011) Comparative floral development in Cleomaceae reveals two distinct pathways leading to monosymmetry. Int J Plant Sci 172:352–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Paulino JV, Prenner G, Mansano VF, Teixeira SP (2014) Comparative development of rare cases of a polycarpellate gynoecium in an otherwise monocarpellate family, Leguminosae. Am J Bot 101:572–586PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Plantefol L (1949) l’Ontogénie de la fleur, fondements d’une théorie florale nouvelle. Masson et Cie, ParisGoogle Scholar
  151. Prenner G (2004a) new aspects in floral development of Papilionoideae: initiated but suppressed bracteoles and variable initiation of sepals. Ann Bot 93:537–545PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Prenner G (2004b) Floral development in Polygala myrtifolia (Polygalaceae) and its similarities with Leguminosae. Plant Syst Evol 249:67–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. Prenner G, Klitgaard BB (2008) Towards unlocking the deep nodes of Leguminosae: floral development and morphology of the enigmatic Duparquetia orchidacea (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae). Am J Bot 95:1349–1365PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Prenner G, Rudall P (2007) Comparative ontogeny of the cyathium in Euphorbia (Euphorbiaceae) and its allies: exploring the organ-flower-inflorescence boundary. Am J Bot 94:1612–1629PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Prusinkiewicz P, Barbier de Reuille P (2010) Constraints of space in plant development. J Exp Bot 61:2117–2129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. Ramirez-Domenech JL, Tucker SC (1990) Comparative ontogeny of the perianth in Mimosoid legumes. Am J Bot 77:624–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. Reinhardt D, Kuhlemeier C (2002) Phyllotaxis in higher plants. In: McManus MT, Veit BE (eds) Meristematic tissues in plant growth and development. Academic, Sheffield, pp 172–212Google Scholar
  158. Reinhardt D, Pesce ER, Stiger PM, Mandel T, Baltensperger K, Bennett M et al (2003) Regulation of phyllotaxis by polar auxin transport. Nature 426:255–260PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Remane A (1956) Die Grundlagen des natűrlichen Systems, der vergleichenden Anatomie und der Phylogenetik, ed. 2. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  160. Remizowa MV, Sokoloff DD, Rudall PJ (2010) Evolutionary history of the monocot flower. Ann Missouri Bot Gard 97:617–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. Ren Y, Li H-F, Zhao L, Endress PK (Eupteleaceae R (2007) Floral morphogenesis in Euptelea. Ann Bot 100:185–193PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. Richards JH, Bruhl JJ, Wilson KL (2006) Flower or spikelet? Understanding the morphology and development of reproductive structures in Exocarya (Cyperaceae, Mapanioideae, Chrysitricheae). Am J Bot 93:1241–1250PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  163. Riegner MF (2008) Parallel evolution of plumage coloration and pattern in birds: implications for defining avian morphospace. Condor 110:599–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. Robinson S, Burian A, Couturier E, Landrein B, Louveaux M, Neumann ED, Peaucelle A, Weber A, Nakayama N (2013) Mechanical control of morpholgenesis at the shoot apex. J Exp Bot 64:4729–4744PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. Ronse De Craene LP (2002) Floral development and anatomy of Pentadiplandra (Pentadiplandraceae): a key genus in the identification of floral morphological trends in the core Brassicales. Can J Bot 80:443–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  166. Ronse De Craene LP (2003) The evolutionary significance of homeosis in flowers: a morphological perspective. Int J Plant Sci 164(Suppl 5):S225–S235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  167. Ronse De Craene LP (2005) Floral developmental evidence for the systematic position of Batis (Bataceae). Am J Bot 92:752–760PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  168. Ronse De Craene LP (2007) Are petals sterile stamens or bracts? The origin and evolution of petals in the core eudicots. Ann Bot 100:621–630PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  169. Ronse De Craene LP (2008) Homology and evolution of petals in the core eudicots. Syst Bot 33:301–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  170. Ronse De Craene LP (2010) Floral diagrams. An aid to understanding floral morphology and evolution. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  171. Ronse De Craene LP (2011) Floral development of Napoleonaea (Lecythidaceae), a deceptively complex flower. In: Wanntorp L, Ronse De Craene LP (eds) Flowers on the tree of life. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 279–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  172. Ronse De Craene LP (2013) Reevaluation of the perianth and androecium in Caryophyllales: implications for flower evolution. Plant Syst Evol 99:1599–1636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  173. Ronse De Craene LP (2016) Meristic changes in flowering plants: how flowers play with numbers. Flora 221:22–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  174. Ronse De Craene LP (2017) Floral development of the endangered genus Medusagyne (Medusagynaceae-Malpighiales): spatial constraints of stamen and carpel increase. Int J Plant Sci 178:639–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  175. Ronse De Craene LP, Brockington S (2013) Origin and evolution of petals in the angiosperms. Plant Ecol Evol 146:5–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  176. Ronse De Craene LP, Bull-Hereñu K (2016) Obdiplostemony: the occurrence of a transitional stage linking robust flower configurations. Ann Bot 117:709–724PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  177. Ronse De Craene LP, Haston E (2006) The systematic relationships of glucosinolate-producing plants and related families: a cladistic investigation based on morphological and molecular characters. Bot J Linn Soc 151:453–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  178. Ronse De Craene LP, Smets E (1987) The distribution and the systematic relevance of the androecial characters Oligomery and Polymery in the Magnoliophytina. Nord J Bot 7:239–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  179. Ronse De Craene LP, Smets E (1990) The systematic relationship between Begoniaceae and Papaveraceae: a comparative study of their floral development. Bull Jard Bot Nat Belg 60:229–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  180. Ronse De Craene LP, Smets E (1991a) The floral ontogeny of some members of the Phytolaccaceae (subfamily Rivinoideae) with a discussion of the evolution of the androecium in the Rivinoideae. Biol Jb Dodonaea 59:77–99Google Scholar
  181. Ronse De Craene LP, Smets E (1991b) The impact of receptacular growth on polyandry in the Myrtales. Bot J Linn Soc 105:257–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  182. Ronse De Craene LP, Smets E (1992a) An updated interpretation of the androecium of the Fumariaceae. Can J Bot 70:1765–1776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  183. Ronse De Craene LP, Smets EF (1992b) Complex polyandry in the Magnoliatae: definition, distribution and systematic value. Nord J Bot 12:621–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  184. Ronse De Craene LP, Smets E (1993a) Dédoublement revisited: towards a renewed in terpretation of the androecium of the Magnoliophytina. Bot J Linn Soc 113:103–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  185. Ronse De Craene LP, Smets E (1993b) The distribution and systematic relevance of the androecial character polymery. Bot J Linn Soc 113:285–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  186. Ronse De Craene LP, Smets EF (1994) Merosity in flowers: definition, origin, and taxonomic significance. Plant Syst Evol 191:83–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  187. Ronse De Craene LP, Smets E (1995a) The androecium of monocotyledons. In: Rudall PJ, Cribb P, Cutler DF, Hymphries CJ (eds) Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, pp 243–254Google Scholar
  188. Ronse De Craene LP, Smets E (1995b) The distribution and systematic relevance of the androecial character oligomery. Bot J Linn Soc 118:193–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  189. Ronse De Craene LP, Smets E (1996) The morphological variation and systematic value of stamen pairs in the Magnoliatae. Feddes Rep 107:1–17Google Scholar
  190. Ronse De Craene LP, Smets E (1998a) Notes on the evolution of androecial organisation in the Magnoliophytina (Angiosperms). Bot Acta 111:77–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  191. Ronse De Craene LP, Smets EF (1998b) Meristic changes in gynoecium morphology, exemplified by floral ontogeny and anatomy. In: Owens SJ, Rudall PJ (eds) Reproductive biology in systematics, conservation and economic botany. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, pp 85–112Google Scholar
  192. Ronse De Craene LP, Smets EF (2001) Floral developmental evidence for the systematic relationships of Tropaeolum (Tropaeolaceae). Ann Bot 88:879–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  193. Ronse De Craene LP, Clinckemaillie D, Smets DE (1993) Stamen-petal complexes in magnoliatae. Bulletin du Jardin botanique national de Belgique/Bulletin van de National Plantentuin van België 62(1/4):97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  194. Ronse De Craene LP, De Laet J, Smets EF (1998a) Floral development and anatomy of Moringa oleifera (Moringaceae): what is the evidence for a capparalean or sapindalean affinity? Ann Bot 82:273–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  195. Ronse De Craene LP, Smets EF, Vanvinckenroye P (1998b) Pseudodiplostemony, and its implications for the evolution of the androecium in the Caryophyllaceae. J Plant Res 111:25–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  196. Ronse De Craene LP, Linder HP, Dlamini T, Smets EF (2001) Evolution and development of floral diversity of Melianthaceae, an enigmatic Southern African family. Int J Plant Sci 162:59–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  197. Ronse De Craene LP, Yang TY, Schols P, Smets EF (2002) Floral anatomy and systematics of Bretschneidera (Bretschneideraceae). Bot J Linn Soc 139:29–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  198. Ronse De Craene LP, Soltis PS, Soltis DE (2003) Evolution of floral structures in basal angiosperms. Int J Plant Sci 164(5 Suppl):S329–S363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  199. Routier-Kierzkowska A-L, Smith RS (2013) Measuring the mechanics of morphogenesis. Curr Opinion Plant Biol 16:25–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  200. Rudall PJ (2010) All in a spin: centrifugal organ formation and floral patterning. Curr Opin Plant Biol 13:108–114PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  201. Rudall PJ (2011) Centrifugal stamens in a modern phylogenetic context: was Corner right? In: Wanntorp L, Ronse De Craene LP (eds) Flowers on the tree of life. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 142–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  202. Rudall PJ, Bateman RM (2003) Evolutionary change in flowers and inflorescences: evidence from naturally occurring terata. Trends Plant Sci 8:76–82PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  203. Rudall PJ, Bateman RM (2004) Evolution of zygomorphy in monocot flowers: iterative patterns and developmental constraints. New Phytol 162:25–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  204. Running MP, Hake S (2001) The role of floral meristems in patterning. Curr opin Plant Biol 4:69–74PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  205. Rutishauser R (2016) Acacia (wattle) and Cananga (ylang-ylang): from spiral to whorled and irregular (chaotic) phyllotactic patterns—a pictorial report. Acta Soc Bot Pol 85:  https://doi.org/10.5586/asbp.3531
  206. Rutishauser R, Moline P (2005) Evo-devo and the search for homology (“sameness”) in biological systems. Theor Biosci 124:213–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  207. Rutishauser R, Sattler R (1985) complementarity and heuristic value of contrasting models in structural botany I. General considerations. Bot Jahrb Syst 107:415–455Google Scholar
  208. Rutishauser R, Ronse De Craene LP, Smets E, Mendoza-Heuer I (1998) Theligonum cynocrambe: developmental morphology of a peculiar rubaceous herb. Plant Syst Evol 210:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  209. Sattler R (1962) Zur frühen Infloreszenz und Blütenentwicklung der Primulales sensu lato mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Stamen-Petalum-Entwicklung. Bot Jahrb Syst 81:385–396Google Scholar
  210. Sattler R (1978) “Fusion” and “Continuity” in floral morphology. Notes Roy Bot Gard Edinb 36:397–405Google Scholar
  211. Sattler R (1988) Homeosis in plants. Am J Bot 75:1606–1617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  212. Sattler R, Singh V (1978) Floral organogenesis of Echinodorus amazonicus Rataj and floral construction of the Alismatales. Bot J Linn Soc 77:141–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  213. Saunders ER (1936) The vascular ground-plan as a guide to the floral ground-plan: illustrated from Cistaceae. New Phytol 35:47–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  214. Saunders ER (1937) Floral morphology, a new outlook, with special reference to the interpretation of the gynoecium II. Heffer and Sons, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  215. Sauquet H, von Balthazar M, Magallón S, Doyle JA, Endress PK et al (2017) The ancestral flower of angiosperms and its early diversifcation. Nat Commun.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nscomms16047 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  216. Schneider EL, Tucker SC, Williamson PS (2003) Floral development in the Nymphaeales. Int J Plant Sci 164:S279–S292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  217. Schöffel K (1932) Untersuchungen über den Blütenbau der Ranunculaceen. Planta 17:315–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  218. Schönenberger J, Conti E (2003) Molecular phylogeny and floral evolution of Penaeaceae, Oliniaceae, Rhychocalycaceae, and Alzateaceae (Myrtales). Am J Bot 90:293–309PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  219. Schwander T, Leimar O (2011) Genes as leaders and followers in evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 26:143–151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  220. Scotland RW (2010) Deep homology: a view from systematics. Bioessays 32:438–449PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  221. Sharma B, Guo C, Kong H, Kramer EM (2011) Petal-specific subfunctionalization of an APETALA3 paralog in the Ranunculales and its implications for petal evolution. New Phytol 191:870–883PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  222. Smith RS, Kuhlemeier C, Prusinkiewicz P (2006) Inhibition fields for phyllotactic pattern formation; a simulation study. Can J Bot 84:1635–1649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  223. Smyth DR, Bowman JL, Meyrowitz EM (1990) Early flower development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2:755–767PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  224. Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Endress PK, Chase MW (2005) Phylogeny and evolution of angiosperms. Sinauer, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  225. Specht CD, Bartlett ME (2009) Flower evolution: the origin and subsequent diversification of the angiosperm flower. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:217–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  226. Specht CD, Howarth DG (2015) Adaptation in flower form: a comparative evodevo approach. New Phytol 206:74–90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  227. Specht CD, Yockteng R, Almeida AM, Kirchoff BK, Kress WJ (2012) Homoplasy, pollination, and emerging complexity during the evolution of floral development in the tropical gingers (Zingiberales). Bot Rev 78:440–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  228. Staedler YM, Endress PK (2009) Diversity and lability of floral phyllotaxis in the pluricarpellate families of core Laurales (Gomortegaceae, Atherospermataceae, Siparunaceae, Monimiaceae). Int J Plant Sci 170:522–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  229. Stuessy TF, Mayer V, Hörandl E (eds) (2003) Deep morphology: towards a renaissance of morphology in plant systematics. ARG Gantner, LiechtensteinGoogle Scholar
  230. Stuppy WH, Maisano JA, Colbert MW, Rudall PJ, Rowe TB (2003) Three-dimensional analysis of plant structure using high-resolution X-ray computed tomography. Trends Plant Sci 8:2–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  231. Takhtajan A (1972) Patterns of ontogenetic alterations in the evolution of higher plants. Phytomorphology 22:164–171Google Scholar
  232. Theissen G, Melzer R (2007) Molecular mechanisms underlying origin and diversification of the angiosperm flower. Ann Bot 100:603–619PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  233. Traas J (2013) Phyllotaxis. Development 140:249–253PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  234. Tsou C-H (1998) Early floral development of Camellioideae (Theaceae). Am J Bot 85:1531–1547PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  235. Tucker SC (1988) Loss versus suppression of floral organs. In: Leins P, Tucker SC, Endress PK (eds) Aspects of floral development. J. Cramer, Berlin, pp 69–82Google Scholar
  236. Tucker SC (1997) Floral evolution, development, and convergence: the hierarchical-significance hypothesis. Int J Plant Sci 158(6 Suppl):S143–S161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  237. Tucker SC (1998) Floral ontogeny in Legume genera Petalostylis, Labichea, and Dialium (Caesalpinioideae: Cassieae), a series in floral reduction. Am J Bot 85:184–208PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  238. Tucker SC (1999) Evolutionary lability of symmetry in early floral development. Int J Plant Sci 160(6 Suppl):S25–S39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  239. Tucker SC (2000a) Floral development and homeosis in Saraca (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae: Detarieae). Int J Plant Sci 161:537–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  240. Tucker SC (2000b) Evolutionary loss of sepals and/or petals in Detarioid legume taxa (Aphanocalyx, Brachystegia, and Monopetalanthus (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae). Am J Bot 87:608–624PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  241. Tucker SC (2000c) Floral development in tribe Detarieae (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae): Amherstia, Brownea, and Tamarindus. Am J Bot 87:1385–1407PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  242. Tucker SC (2001) The ontogenetic basis for missing petals in Crudia (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae: Detarieae). Int J Plant Sci 162:83–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  243. Tucker SC (2002) Comparative floral ontogeny in Detarieae (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae) 2. Zygomorphic taxa with petal and stamen suppression. Am J Bot 89:888–907PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  244. Tucker SC (2003) Comparative floral ontogeny in Detarieae (Leguminosae: Caesalpinoideae). III. Adaxially initiated whorls in Julbernardia and Sindora. Int J Plant Sci 164:275–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  245. Tucker SC, Hodges SC (2005) Ranunculaceae floral ontogeny of Aquilegia, Semiaquilegia and Enemion. Int J Plant Sci 166:557–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  246. Uhl NW, Moore HE (1977) Centrifugal stamen initiation in phytelephantoid palms. Am J Bot 64:1152–1161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  247. Uhl NW, Moore HE (1980) Androecial development in six polyandrous genera representing five major groups of palms. Ann Bot 45:57–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  248. van Heel WA (1966) Morphology of the androecium in Malvales. Blumea 13:177–394Google Scholar
  249. van Heel WA (1978) Morphology of the pistil in Malvaceae-Ureneae. Blumea 24:123–137Google Scholar
  250. van Heel WA (1987) Androecium development in Actinidia chinensis and A. melanandra (Actinidiaceae). Bot Jahrb Syst 109:17–23Google Scholar
  251. Van der Niet T, Johnson SD (2012) Phylogenetic evidence for pollinator-driven diversification of angiosperms. Trends Ecol Evol 27:353–361PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  252. van der Niet T, Zollikofer CPE, Ponce de León MS, Johnson SD, Linder HP (2010) Three-dimensional geometric morphometrics for studying floral shape variation. Trends Plant Sc 15:423–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  253. van der Niet T, Peakall R, Johnson SD (2014) Pollinator-driven ecological speciation in plants: new evidence and future perspectives. Ann Bot 113:199–211PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  254. Vanvinckenroye P, Smets E (1996) Floral ontogeny of five species of Talinum and of related taxa (Portulacaceae). J Plant Res 109:387–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  255. Vasconcelos TNC, Prenner G, Buenger MO, De-Carvalho PS, Wingler A, Lucas EJ (2015) Systematic and evolutionary implications of stamen position in Myrteae (Myrtaceae). Bot J Linn Soc 179:388–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  256. Vasconcelos TNC, Prenner G, Santos MF, Wingler A, Lucas EJ (2017) Links between parallel evolution an systematic complexity in angiosperms—a case study of floral development in Myrcia s.l. (Myrtaceae). Persp Plant Ecol Evol Syst 24:11–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  257. Vergara-Silva F (2003) Plants and the conceptual articulation of evolutionary developmental biology. Biol Phil 18:249–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  258. von Balthazar M, Schönenberger J, Alverson WS, Janka H, Bayer C, Baum DA (2006) Structure and evolution of the androecium in the Malvatheca clade (Malvaceae s.l.) and implications for Malvaceae and Malvales. Plant Syst Evol 260:171–197Google Scholar
  259. Vrijdaghs A, Caris P, Goetghebeur P, Smets E (2005) Floral ontogeny in Scirpus. Eriophorum and Dulichium (Cyperaceae), with special reference to the perianth. Ann Bot 95:1199–1209PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  260. Walker-Larsen J, Harder LD (2001) Vestigial organs as opportunities for functional innovation: the example of the Penstemon staminode. Evolution 55:477–487PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  261. Wang Y-Z, Liangh R-H, Wang B-H, Li J-M, Qiu Z-J, Li Z-Y, Weber A (2010) Origin and phylogenetic relationships of the Old World Gesneriaceae with actinomorphic flowers inferred from ITS and trnL-trnF sequences. Taxon 59:1044–1152Google Scholar
  262. Wanntorp L, Anderberg AA (2011) Evolution and diversification of brook weeds (Samolus, Samolaceae, Ericales). Int J Plant Sci 172:250–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  263. Wanntorp L, Ronse De Craene L, Peng C-I, Anderberg AA (2012) Floral ontogeny and morphology of Stimpsonia and Ardisiandra, two aberrant genera of the primuloid clade of Ericales. Int J Plant Sci 173:1023–1035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  264. Weber A (2003) What is morphology and why is it time for its renaissance in plant systematics? In: Stuessy TF, Mayer V, Hörandl E (eds) Deep morphology: towards a renaissance of morphology in plant systematics. ARG Gantner, Liechtenstein, pp 3–32Google Scholar
  265. Whittall JB, Hodges SA (2007) Pollinator shifts drive increasingly long nectar spurs in columbine flowers. Nature 447:706–710PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  266. Yoshida H (2012) Is the lodicule a petal: molecular evidence? Plant Sci 184:121–128PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  267. Zeng L, Zhang Q, Sun R, Kong H, Zhang N, Ma H (2014) Resolution of deep angiosperm phylogeny using conserved nuclear genes and estimates of early diverging times. Nat Commun 5:4956.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5956 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  268. Zhang R-J, Schönenberger J (2014) Early floral development of Pentaphylaceae (Ericales) and its systematic implications. Plant Syst Evol 300:1547–1560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  269. Zhang W, Steinmann VW, Nikolov L, Kramer EM, Davis CC (2013) Divergent genetic mechanisms underlie reversals to radial floral symmetry from diverse zygomorphic flowered ancestors. Front Plant Sci 4:302.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00302 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  270. Zhao L, Bachelier JB, Chang H-L, Tian X-h, Ren Y (2012) Inflorescence and floral development in Ranunculus and three allied genera in Ranunculeae (Ranunculoideae, Ranunculaceae). Plant Syst Evol 298:1057–1071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  271. Zimmerman E, Prenner G, Bruneau A (2013) Floral morphology of Apuleia leiocarpa (Dialiinae: Leguminosae), an unusual andromonoecious legume. Int J Plant Sci 174:154–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Botanical Society of Japan and Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Royal Botanic Garden EdinburghEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations