Advertisement

Journal of Plant Research

, Volume 129, Issue 4, pp 675–684 | Cite as

Nutrient allocation among plant organs across 13 tree species in three Bornean rain forests with contrasting nutrient availabilities

  • Ryota Aoyagi
  • Kanehiro Kitayama
Regular Paper

Abstract

Allocation of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) among plant organs is an important factor regulating growth rate, which is a key ecological process associated with plant life-history strategies. However, few studies have explored how N and P investment in photosynthetic (leaves) and non-photosynthetic (stems and roots) organs changes in relation to depletion of each element. We investigated nutrient concentrations of plant organs in relation to whole-plant nutrient concentration (total nutrient weight per total biomass) as an index of nutrient status of each individual using the saplings of the 13 species in three tropical rain forests with contrasting N and P availabilities (tropical evergreen forests and tropical heath forests). We found a steeper decrease in foliar N concentration than foliar P concentration with decreasing whole-plant nutrient concentration. Moreover, the steeper decrease in foliar N concentration was associated with relatively stable N concentration in stems, and vice versa for P. We suggest that the depletion of N is associated with a rapid dilution of foliar N because the cell walls in non-photosynthetic organs function as an N sink. On the other hand, these species can maintain foliar P concentration by decreasing stem P concentrations despites the depletion of P. Our results emphasize the significance of non-photosynthetic organs as an N sink for understanding the variation of foliar nutrient concentrations for the tree species in the three Bornean rain forests with different N and P availabilities.

Keywords

Cell walls Functional traits Mixed dipterocarp forests Nutrient productivity Photosynthetic and non-photosynthetic organs Tropical heath forests 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank L. Ajon, P. Lagan, Y. Onoda, A. Hidaka, N. Imai, T. Seino, and K. Miyamoto for assisting our fieldwork and providing valuable suggestions. Permission to conduct our research was granted by the Sabah Forestry Department and the Sabah Parks. This study was supported by the Grant-in-Aid from the Japanese MESSC (22255002) to K.K. and by the Global Environment Research Fund D-1006 and 1-1403 of the Ministry of the Environment, Japan, to K.K.

Supplementary material

10265_2016_826_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (72 kb)
Online Resource 1 (PDF 72 kb)
10265_2016_826_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (106 kb)
Online Resource 2 (PDF 106 kb)
10265_2016_826_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (86 kb)
Online Resource 3 (PDF 86 kb)
10265_2016_826_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (98 kb)
Online Resource 4 (PDF 97 kb)
10265_2016_826_MOESM5_ESM.pdf (80 kb)
Online Resource 5 (PDF 79 kb)

References

  1. Aoyagi R, Kitayama K (2015) Traits associated with nutrient impoverishment and shade-tolerance in tree juveniles of three Bornean rain forests with contrasting nutrient availability. J Trop Ecol 31:231–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aoyagi R, Imai N, Seino T, Kitayama K (2016) Soil nutrients and size-dependent tree dynamics of tropical lowland forests on volcanic and sedimentary substrates in Sabah, Malaysian Borneo. Tropics (accepted)Google Scholar
  3. Canham CD, Berkowitz AR, Kelly VR et al (1996) Biomass allocation and multiple resource limitation in tree seedlings. Can J For Res 26:1521–1530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chapin FS (1980) The mineral nutrition of wild plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 11:233–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chapin FS, Schulze E-D, Mooney HA (1990) The ecology and economics of storage in plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 21:423–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chua GLS, Koh BL, Lau S et al (1995) The nutrient status of the plateau heath forest on Gunung Keriong, Pahang, Peninsular Malaysia. J Trop For Sci 8:240–246Google Scholar
  7. Coomes DA (1997) Nutrient status of Amazonian caatinga forests in a seasonally dry area: nutrient fluxes in litter fall and analyses of soils. Can J For Res 27:831–839Google Scholar
  8. Cordell S, Goldstein G, Meinzer FC, Vitousek PM (2001) Regulation of leaf life-span and nutrient-use efficiency of Metrosideros polymorpha trees at two extremes of a long chronosequence in Hawaii. Oecologia 127:198–206CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Craine JM (2009) Resource strategies of wild plants. Princeton University Press, PrincetonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crews TE, Kitayama K, Fownes JH et al (1995) Changes in soil phosphorus fractions and ecosystem dynamics across a long chronosequence in Hawaii. Ecology 76:1407–1424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dent DH, Burslem DFRP (2009) Performance trade-offs driven by morphological plasticity contribute to habitat specialization of Bornean tree species. Biotropica 41:424–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elser JJ, Bracken MES, Cleland EE et al (2007) Global analysis of nitrogen and phosphorus limitation of primary producers in freshwater, marine and terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol Lett 10:1135–1142CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ericsson T, Ingestad T (1988) Nutrition and growth of birch seedlings at varied relative phosphorus addition rates. Physiol Plant 72:227–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Evans JR (1989) Photosynthesis and nitrogen relationships in leaves of C3 plants. Oecologia 78:9–19CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Field C, Mooney HA (1986) The photosynthesis–nitrogen relationship in wild plants. In: Givnish TJ (ed) On the economy of plant form and function. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 25–55Google Scholar
  16. Garnier E, Gobin O, Poorter H (1995) Nitrogen productivity depends on photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency and on nitrogen allocation within the plant. Ann Bot 76:667–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Geiger DR, Servaites JC (1994) Diurnal regulation of photosynthetic carbon metabolism in C3 plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 45:235–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grime JP (1979) Plant strategies and vegetation processes. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  19. Güsewell S (2004) N:P ratios in terrestrial plants: variation and functional significance. New Phytol 164:243–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Güsewell S (2005) Responses of wetland graminoids to the relative supply of nitrogen and phosphorus. Plant Ecol 176:35–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harrington RA, Fownes JH, Vitousek PM (2001) Production and resource use efficiencies in N- and P-limited tropical forests: a comparison of responses to long-term fertilization. Ecosystems 4:646–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hayes P, Turner BL, Lambers H, Laliberté E (2014) Foliar nutrient concentrations and resorption efficiency in plants of contrasting nutrient-acquisition strategies along a 2-million-year dune chronosequence. J Ecol 102:396–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hidaka A, Kitayama K (2009) Divergent patterns of photosynthetic phosphorus-use efficiency versus nitrogen-use efficiency of tree leaves along nutrient-availability gradients. J Ecol 97:984–991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hidaka A, Kitayama K (2011) Allocation of foliar phosphorus fractions and leaf traits of tropical tree species in response to decreased soil phosphorus availability on Mount Kinabalu, Borneo. J Ecol 99:849–857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hunt R (1978) Plant growth analysis. Edward Arnold, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Imai N, Kitayama K, Titin J (2010) Distribution of phosphorus in an above-to-below-ground profile in a Bornean tropical rain forest. J Trop Ecol 26:627–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ingestad T (1979) Nitrogen stress in birch seedlings II. N, K, P, Ca, and Mg nutrition. Physiol Plant 45:149–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ingestad T, Lund A-B (1979) Nitrogen stress in birch seedlings I. Growth technique and growth. Physiol Plant 45:137–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kerkhoff AJ, Fagan WF, Elser JJ, Enquist BJ (2006) Phylogenetic and growth form variation in the scaling of nitrogen and phosphorus in the seed plants. Am Nat 168:E103–E122CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Laliberté E, Turner BL, Costes T et al (2012) Experimental assessment of nutrient limitation along a 2-million-year dune chronosequence in the south-western Australia biodiversity hotspot. J Ecol 100:631–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lambers H, Poorter H (1992) Inherent variation in growth rate between higher plants: a search for physiological causes and ecological consequences. Adv Ecol Res 22:187–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lamport DTA (1965) The protein component of primary cell walls. Adv Bot Res 2:151–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Moran JA, Barker MG, Moran AJ et al (2000) A comparison of the soil water, nutrient status, and litterfall characteristics of tropical heath and mixed-dipterocarp forest sites in Brunei. Biotropica 32:2–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Murphy J, Riley JP (1962) A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal Chim Acta 27:31–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Onoda Y, Hikosaka K, Hirose T (2004) Allocation of nitrogen to cell walls decreases photosynthetic nitrogen-use efficiency. Funct Ecol 18:419–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Palmiotto PA, Davies SJ, Vogt KA et al (2004) Soil-related habitat specialization in dipterocarp rain forest tree species in Borneo. J Ecol 92:609–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Poorter L (1999) Growth responses of 15 rain-forest tree species to a light gradient: the relative importance of morphological and physiological traits. Funct Ecol 13:396–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Poorter L, Kitajima K (2007) Carbohydrate storage and light requirements of tropical moist and dry forest tree species. Ecology 88:1000–1011CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Poorter H, Niklas KJ, Reich PB et al (2012) Biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots: meta-analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control. New Phytol 193:30–50CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. R Core Team (2014) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/
  41. Reed SC, Townsend AR, Davidson EA, Cleveland CC (2012) Stoichiometric patterns in foliar nutrient resorption across multiple scales. New Phytol 196:173–180CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Reich PB, Walters MB, Ellsworth DS, Uhl C (1994) Photosynthesis–nitrogen relations in Amazonian tree species. Oecologia 97:62–72CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Reich PB, Oleksyn J, Wright IJ (2009) Leaf phosphorus influences the photosynthesis–nitrogen relation: a cross-biome analysis of 314 species. Oecologia 160:207–212CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Richardson SJ, Peltzer DA, Allen RB et al (2004) Rapid development of phosphorus limitation in temperate rainforest along the Franz Josef soil chronosequence. Oecologia 139:267–276CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Richardson SJ, Allen RB, Doherty JE (2008) Shifts in leaf N:P ratio during resorption reflect soil P in temperate rainforest. Funct Ecol 22:738–745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ryser P, Verduyn B, Lambers H (1997) Phosphorus allocation and utilization in three grass species with contrasting response to N and P supply. New Phytol 137:293–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sardans J, Peñuelas J (2015) Trees increase their P:N ratio with size. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 24:147–156CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Seino T, Kitayama K, Lakim MB (2007) Floristic composition and stand structure of the mixed dipterocarp forest in Tawau Hills Park, Sabah, Malaysia. Sabah Park Nat J 8:63–82Google Scholar
  49. Sterner RW, Elser JJ (2002) Ecological stoichiometry: the biology of elements from molecules to the biosphere. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  50. Takashima T, Hikosaka K, Hirose T (2004) Photosynthesis or persistence: nitrogen allocation in leaves of evergreen and deciduous Quercus species. Plant Cell Environ 27:1047–1054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tiessen H, Moir JO (1993) Characterization of available P by sequential extraction. In: Carter MR (ed) Soil sampling and methods of analysis, Lewis Publishers, pp. 75–86Google Scholar
  52. Turner AIM, Lucas PW, Becker P et al (2000) Tree leaf form in Brunei: a heath forest and a mixed dipterocarp forest compared. Biotropica 32:53–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Veneklaas EJ, Lambers H, Bragg J et al (2012) Opportunities for improving phosphorus-use efficiency in crop plants. New Phytol 195:306–320CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Vicca S, Luyssaert S, Peñuelas J et al (2012) Fertile forests produce biomass more efficiently. Ecol Lett 15:520–526CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Vitousek PM, Turner DR, Kitayama K (1995) Foliar nutrients during long-term soil development in Hawaiian montane rain forest. Ecology 76:712–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wright IJ, Westoby M, Reich PB (2002) Convergence towards higher leaf mass per area in dry and nutrient-poor habitats has different consequences for leaf life span. J Ecol 90:534–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M et al (2004) The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428:821–827CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Botanical Society of Japan and Springer Japan 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of AgricultureKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations