Exact confidence limits for proportion difference in clinical trials with bilateral outcome

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.


Bilateral data are frequently occur in medical research. Asymptotic approaches are traditionally used to construct confidence intervals for proportion difference. However, they are often have unsatisfactory performance with regards to coverage, with the actual coverage below the nominal level or being too conservative. For these reasons, we propose developing exact one-sided limits for proportion difference in a parallel study with bilateral data to guarantee the coverage probability when sample size is small to medium. A statistical quantity has to be used for sample space ordering in the exact limit calculation. Four asymptotic limits are utilized as statistical quantities: the Wald limits under the independence or dependence assumptions for variance estimates, the Wald limits with the difference estimate under the dependence assumption, and the bootstrap percentile limits. We compare the performance of these exact limits with regards to average length and the limits of all possible samples. A real example from a randomized clinical trial in otolaryngology is used to illustrate the application of the proposed exact limits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3


  1. Buehler RJ (1957) Confidence intervals for the product of two binomial parameters. J Am Stat Assoc 52(280):482–493

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lloyd CJ, Moldovan MV (2007) Exact one-sided confidence limits for the difference between two correlated proportions. Stat Med 26(18):3369–3384

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mandel EM, Bluestone CD, Rockette HE, Blatter MM, Reisinger KS, Wucher FP, Harper J (1982) Duration of effusion after antibiotic treatment for acute otitis media: comparison of cefaclor and amoxicillin. Pediatr Infect Dis 1(5):310–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rosner B (1982) Statistical methods in ophthalmology: an adjustment for the intraclass correlation between eyes. Biometrics 38(1):105–114

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shan G, Ma C (2014a) Efficient tests for one sample correlated binary data with applications. Stat Methods Appl 23(2):175–188

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shan G, Ma C (2014b) Exact methods for testing the equality of proportions for binary clustered data from otolaryngologic studies. Stat Biopharm Res 6(1):115–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shan G, Wang W (2013) ExactCIdiff: an R package for computing exact confidence intervals for the difference of two proportions. R J 5(2):62–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shan G, Banks S, Miller JB, Ritter A, Bernick C, Lombardo J, Cummings JL (2018) Statistical advances in clinical trials and clinical research. Alzheimer’s Dement Transl Res Clin Interv 4:366–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tang N-S, Tang M-L (2002) Exact unconditional inference for risk ratio in a correlated 2 \(\times \) 2 table with structural zero. Biometrics 58(4):972–80

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tang N-S, Tang M-L, Qiu S-F (2008) Testing the equality of proportions for correlated otolaryngologic data. Comput Stat Data Anal 52(7):3719–3729

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tang N-S, Qiu S-F, Tang M-L, Pei Y-B (2011) Asymptotic confidence interval construction for proportion difference in medical studies with bilateral data. Stat Methods Med Res 20(3):233–259

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ying G-S, Maguire MG, Glynn R, Rosner B (2018) Tutorial on biostatistics: statistical analysis for correlated binary eye data. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 25(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang H, Shan G (2019) Letter to the Editor: A novel confidence interval for a single proportion in the presence of clustered binary outcome data (SMMR, 2019). Stat Methods Med Res. https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280219840056

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We are very grateful to Editor, Associate Editor, and two reviewers for their insightful comments that help improve the manuscript.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guogen Shan.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shan, G. Exact confidence limits for proportion difference in clinical trials with bilateral outcome. Stat Methods Appl 29, 515–525 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-019-00491-9

Download citation


  • Bilateral data
  • Binary data
  • Confidence interval
  • Exact limits
  • Proportion difference