Abstract
In this comment on the discussion paper “The power of monitoring: how to make the most of a contaminated multivariate sample” by A. Cerioli, M. Riani, A. Atkinson and A. Corbellini, we describe how the hard rejection property of the MCD method can be mimicked by an S-estimator with appropriate rho-function. We also point the reader to fast and deterministic algorithms for the MCD, S- and MM-estimators that are specifically suited for monitoring experiments. They were made available a few years ago and successfully used for monitoring in our papers. Finally, the question is raised how monitoring can be applied or extended for increasing numbers of cases, variables and tuning parameters.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hubert M, Rousseeuw P, Vakili K (2014) Shape bias of robust covariance estimators: an empirical study. Stat Pap 55:15–28
Hubert M, Rousseeuw P, Vanden Branden K (2005) ROBPCA: a new approach to robust principal component analysis. Technometrics 47:64–79
Hubert M, Rousseeuw P, Vanpaemel D, Verdonck T (2015) The DetS and DetMM estimators for multivariate location and scatter. Comput Stat Data Anal 81:64–75
Hubert M, Rousseeuw PJ, Verdonck T (2012) A deterministic algorithm for robust location and scatter. J Comput Graph Stat 21(3):618–637
Riani M, Perrotta D, Torti F (2012) FSDA: a MATLAB toolbox for robust analysis and interactive data exploration. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst 116:17–32
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Raymaekers, J., Rousseeuw, P.J. & Vranckx, I. Discussion of “The power of monitoring: how to make the most of a contaminated multivariate sample”. Stat Methods Appl 27, 589–594 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-018-0425-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-018-0425-3