Abstract
In this discussion, we consider two examples. The first example concerns the Old Faithful data, which the authors (Cerioli, Riani, Atkinson, Corbellini in Stat Methods Appl, to appear) discuss in detail in their paper. The second example, which is taken from www.kaggle.com, is based on the prices and other attributes of 53,900 diamonds. The point of our discussion is to demonstrate that the process of producing valid models and then looking at diagnostics, that compare least squares and robust fits, can also effectively identify outliers and/or important structure missing from the model. Using this approach, we identify a dramatic change point in the diamonds data. We are very curious about what information the sophisticated monitoring methods produce about this change point and its effects on the outcome variable.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abebe A, McKean JW, Kloke JD, Bilgic YK (2016) Iterated reweighted rank-based estimates for GEE models. In: Liu R, McKean JW (eds) Robust rank-based and nonparametric methods. Springer, Berlin, pp 61–79
Cerioli A, Riani M, Atkinson AC, Corbellini A The power of monitoring: How to make the most of a contaminated multivariate sample. Stat Methods Appl (to appear)
Kloke JD, McKean JW (2014) Nonparametric statistical methods using R. Chapman-Hall, Boca Raton
McKean JW, Hettmansperger T (2016) Rank-based analysis of linear models and beyond: a review. In: Liu R, McKean JW (eds) Robust rank-based and nonparametric methods. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–24
McKean JW, Naranjo JD, Sheather SJ (1996) Diagnostics to detect differences in robust fits of linear models. Comput Stat 11:223–243
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank an anonymous referee for his suggestions on clarification of several passages of the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sheather, S.J., McKean, J.W. Discussion of “The power of monitoring: how to make the most of a contaminated multivariate sample”. Stat Methods Appl 27, 625–629 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-018-0422-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-018-0422-6