Skip to main content
Log in

Mutual association measures

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Statistical Methods & Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Given two continuous variables X and Y with copula C,  many attempts were made in the literature to provide a suitable representation of the set of all concordance measures of the couple (XY), as defined by some axioms. Some papers concentrated on the need to let such measures vanish not only at independence but, more generally, at indifference, i.e. in lack of any dominance of concordance or discordance in (XY). The concept of indifference (or reflection-invariance in the language of copulas) led eventually to full characterizations of some well-defined subsets of measures. However, the built classes failed to contain some known measures, which cannot be regarded as averaged “distances” of C from given reference copulas (markedly, the Frechét–Hoeffding bounds). This paper, then, proposes a method to enlarge the representation of concordance measures, so as to include such elements, denoted here as mutual, which arise from averaged multiple comparisons of the copula C itself. Mutual measures, like Kendall’s tau and a recent proposal based on mutual variability, depend on the choice of a generator function, which needs some assumptions listed here. After defining some natural estimators for the elements of the enlarged class, the assumptions made on the generator are shown to guarantee that those statistics possess desirable sample properties, such as asymptotic normality under independence. Distributions under contiguous alternatives and relative efficiencies, in addition, are derived under mild assumptions on the copula. The paper provides several examples, giving further insight to some comparisons formerly conducted in the literature only via simulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Behboodian J, Dolati A, Úbeda-Flores M (2005) Measures of association based on average quadrant dependence. J Probab Stat Sci 3:161–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Billingsley P (1999) Convergence of probability measures, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Borroni CG (2013) A new rank correlation measure. Stat Pap 54:255–270

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Borroni CG, Cifarelli DM (2016) Some maximum-indifference estimators for the slope of a univariate linear model. J Nonparametric Stat 28:395–412

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cifarelli DM, Conti PL, Regazzini E (1996) On the asymptotic distribution of a general measure of monotone dependence. Ann Stat 24:1386–1399

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Conti PL, Nikitin YY (1999) Asymptotic efficiency of independence tests based on Gini’s rank association coefficient, Spearman’s footrule and their generalizations. Commun Stat A Theor 28:453–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durante F, Fuchs S (2019) Reflection invariant copulas. Fuzzy Sets Syst 354:63–73

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Durante F, Sempi C (2016) Principles of copula theory. Chapman & Hall, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards HH, Taylor MD (2009) Characterization of degree one bivariate measures of concordance. J Multivar Anal 100:1777–1791

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards HH, Mikusiński P, Taylor MD (2004) Measures of concordance determined by \(D_4\)-invariant copulas. Int J Math Math Sci 70:3867–3875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards HH, Mikusiński P, Taylor MD (2005) Measures of concordance determined by \(D_4\)-invariant measures on \((0,1)^2\). Proc Am Math Soc 133:1505–1513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs S, Schmid KD (2014) Bivariate copulas: transformations, asymmetry and measures of concordance. Kybernetika 50:109–125

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Genest C, Verret F (2005) Locally most powerful rank tests of independence for copula models. J Nonparametric Stat 17:521–539

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Genest C, Quessy JF, Rémillard B (2006) Local efficiency of a Cramér-von Mises test of independence. J Multivariate Anal 97:274–294

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hájek J, Šidák Z, Sen PK (1999) Theory of rank tests, 2nd edn. Academic Press, San Diego

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Klement EP, Mesiar R, Pap E (2002) Invariant copulas. Kybernetika 38:275–285

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liebscher E (2014) Copula-based dependence measures. Depend Model 2:49–64

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nelsen RB (1998) Concordance and Gini’s measure of association. J Nonparametric Stat 9:227–238

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Nelsen RB (2006) An introduction to copulas. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Scarsini M (1984) On measures of concordance. Stochastica 8:201–218

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Schweizer B, Wolff EF (1981) On nonparametric measures of dependence for random variables. Ann Stat 9:879–885

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Shirahata S, Wakimoto K (1984) Asymptotic normality of a class of nonlinear rank tests for independence. Ann Stat 12:1124–1129

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor MD (2016) Multivariate measures of concordance for copulas and their marginals. Depend Model 4:224–236

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tchen AH (1980) Inequalities for distributions with given marginals. Ann Probab 8:814–827

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Vaart A (1998) Asymptotic statistics. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Special thanks go to two anonymous referees for their suggestions to improve a first version of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudio G. Borroni.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Borroni, C.G. Mutual association measures. Stat Methods Appl 28, 571–591 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-018-00448-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-018-00448-4

Keywords

Navigation