Skip to main content
Log in

Box–Cox t random intercept model for estimating usual nutrient intake distributions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Statistical Methods & Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The issue of estimating usual nutrient intake distributions and prevalence of inadequate nutrient intakes is of interest in nutrition studies. Box–Cox transformations coupled with the normal distribution are usually employed for modeling nutrient intake data. When the data present highly asymmetric distribution or include outliers, this approach may lead to implausible estimates. Additionally, it does not allow interpretation of the parameters in terms of characteristics of the original data and requires back transformation of the transformed data to the original scale. This paper proposes an alternative approach for estimating usual nutrient intake distributions and prevalence of inadequate nutrient intakes through a Box–Cox t model with random intercept. The proposed model is flexible enough for modeling highly asymmetric data even when outliers are present. Unlike the usual approach, the proposed model does not require a transformation of the data. A simulation study suggests that the Box–Cox t model with random intercept estimates the usual intake distribution satisfactorily, and that it should be preferable to the usual approach particularly in cases of highly asymmetric heavy-tailed data. In applications to data sets on intake of 19 micronutrients, the Box–Cox t models provided better fit than its competitors in most of the cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Block G (1982) A review of validations of dietary assessment methods. Am J Epidemiol 115:492–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borrelli R, Simonetti MS, Fidanza F (1992) Inter and intra individual variability in food intake of elderly people in Perugia (Italy). Br J Nutr 68:3–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Box GEP, Cox DR (1964) An analysis of transformations. J R Stat Soc Ser B 26:211–252

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Carriquiry AL (1998) Assessing the prevalence of nutrient inadequacy. Public Health Nutr 2:23–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole TJ, Green PJ (1992) Smoothing reference centile curves: the LMS method and penalized likelihood. Stat Med 10:1305–1319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodd KW, Guenther PM, Freedman LS, Subar AF, Kipnis V, Midthune D, Tooze JA, Smith SMK (2006) Statistical methods for estimating usual intake of nutrients and foods: a review of the theory. J Am Diet Assoc 106:1640–1650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari SLP, Fumes G (2017) Box–Cox symmetric distributions and applications to nutritional data. Adv. Stat Anal 101:321–344

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hubert M, Vandervieren E (2008) An adjusted boxplot for skewed distributions. Comput Stat Data Anal 52:5186–5201

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Medicine, Food and Nutrition Board (2003) Dietary reference intakes: applications in dietary planning. National Academies Press, Washington. [Acessed in 31 May, 2017], Subcommittee on interpretation and uses of dietary reference intakes and the standing committee on the scientific evaluation of dietary reference intakes. Available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK221369/pdf/Bookshelf_NBK221369.pdf

  • Nutrition Coordenating Center (2012) Nutrition data system for research. NDS-R. Features. http://www.ncc.umn.edu/products/. Accessed 31 May 2017

  • Pinheiro JC, Bates DM (1995) Approximations to the log-likelihood function in the nonlinear mixed-effects model. J Comput Graph Stat 4:12–35

    Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN: 3-900051-07-0

  • Rigby RA, Stasinopoulos DM (2006) Using the Box–Cox t distribution in GAMLSS to model skewness and kurtosis. Stat Model 6:209–229

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc. (2012) SAS/STAT 12.1 user’s guide. SAS Institute Inc., Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater B, Marchioni DL, Fisberg RM (2004) Estimating prevalence of inadequate nutrient intake. Rev. Saúde Pública 38:599–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souverein OW, Dekkers AL, Geelen A, Haubrock J, Vries JH, Ocke MC, Harttig U, Boeing H, Veer P (2011) Comparing four methods to estimate usual intake distribution. Eur J Clin Nut 65:S92–S101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stasinopoulos DM, Rigby RA (2007) Generalized additive models for location, scale and shape (GAMLSS) in R. J Stat Softw 23:1–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tooze JA, Kipnis V, Buckman DW, Carroll RJ, Freedman LS, Guenther PM, Krebs-Smith SM, Subar AF, Dodd KW (2010) A mixed-effects model approach for estimating the distribution of usual intake of nutrients: the NCI method. Stat Med 29:2857–2868

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Voudouris V, Gilchrist R, Rigby RA, Sedgwick J, Stasinopoulos DM (2012) Modelling skewness and kurtosis with BCPE density in GAMLSS. J Appl Stat 39:1279–1293

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions on an earlier version of the paper. We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Brazilian agencies FAPESP (grants 2008/10261-8 and 2012/21788-2) and CNPq (grant 304388/20149).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovana Fumes-Ghantous.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fumes-Ghantous, G., Ferrari, S.L.P. & Corrente, J.E. Box–Cox t random intercept model for estimating usual nutrient intake distributions. Stat Methods Appl 27, 715–734 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-018-00438-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-018-00438-6

Keywords

Navigation