In this article we consider the sample size determination problem in the context of robust Bayesian parameter estimation of the Bernoulli model. Following a robust approach, we consider classes of conjugate Beta prior distributions for the unknown parameter. We assume that inference is robust if posterior quantities of interest (such as point estimates and limits of credible intervals) do not change too much as the prior varies in the selected classes of priors. For the sample size problem, we consider criteria based on predictive distributions of lower bound, upper bound and range of the posterior quantity of interest. The sample size is selected so that, before observing the data, one is confident to observe a small value for the posterior range and, depending on design goals, a large (small) value of the lower (upper) bound of the quantity of interest. We also discuss relationships with and comparison to non robust and non informative Bayesian methods.
Brutti P, De Santis F (2008) Avoiding the range of equivalence in clinical trials: Robust Bayesian sample size determination for credible intervals. J Stat Plan Inference 138:1577–1591zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brutti P, De Santis F, Gubbiotti S (2008) Robust Bayesian sample size determination in clinical trials. Stat Med 27(13):2290–2306MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brutti P, De Santis F, Gubbiotti S (2009) Mixtures of prior distributions for predictive Bayesian sample size calculations in clinical trials. Stat Med 28(17):2185–2201MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brutti P, Gubbiotti S, Sambucini V (2011) An extension of the single threshold design for monitoring efficacy and safety in phase II clinical trials. Stat Med 30(14):1648–1664MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang F, Gelfand AE (2002) A simulation-based approach to Bayesian sample size determination for performance under a given model and for separating models. Stat Sci 17(2):193–208MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar