Skip to main content
Log in

A note on transformed likelihood approach in linear dynamic panel models

  • Published:
Statistical Methods & Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The transformed likelihood approach to estimation of fixed effects dynamic panel data models is shown to present very good inferential properties but it is not directly implemented in the most diffused statistical software. The present paper aims at showing how a simple model reformulation can be adopted to describe the problem in terms of classical linear mixed models. The transformed likelihood approach is based on the first differences data transformation, the following results derive from a convenient reformulation in terms of deviations from the first observations. Given the invariance to data transformation, the likelihood functions defined in the two cases coincide. Resulting in a classical random effect linear model form, the proposed approach significantly improves the number of available estimation procedures and provides a straightforward interpretation for the parameters. Moreover, the proposed model specification allows to consider all the estimation improvements typical of the random effects model literature. Simulation studies are conducted in order to study the robustness of the estimation method to mean stationarity violation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvarez J, Arellano M (2003) The time series and cross-section asymptotics of dynamic panel data estimators. Econometrica 71: 1121–1159

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez J, Arellano M (2004) Robust likelihood estimation of dynamic panel data models. Mimeo. (CEMFI, working papers wp2004 0421, IN)

  • Arellano M, Bover O (1995) Another look at the instrumental-variable estimation of error-component models. J Econ 68: 29–52

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi BH (1995) Econometric analysis of panel data. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Blomquist S, Dahlberg M (1999) Small sample properties of LIML and jackknife IV estimators: experiments with weak instruments. J Appl Econ 14: 69–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blundell R, Bond S (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J Econ 87: 115–143

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Blundell R, Smith R (1991) Initial conditions and efficient estimation in dynamic panel data models. Ann Econ Stat 20/21: 109–123

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Doornik JA (2006a) An introduction to OxMetrics. Timberlake Consultants Ltd., London

    Google Scholar 

  • Doornik JA (2006b) Ox—an object-oriented matrix programming language. Timberlake Consultants Ltd., London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall A (1993) Some aspects of generalized method of moments estimation. In: Maddala GS, Rao CR, Vinod HD (eds) Handbook of statistics, vol. 11 econometrics. Elsevier/North-Holland, New York/Amsterdam, pp 393–417

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen LP (1982) Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica 50: 1029–1054

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Harris M, Mátyás L (2004) A comparative analysis of different IV and GMM estimators of dynamic panel data models. Int Stat Rev 72: 397–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao C (2003) Analysis of panel data. 2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao C, Pesaran MH, Tahmiscioglu AK (2002) Maximum likelihood estimation of fixed effects dynamic panel data models covering short time periods. J Econ 109: 107–150

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Koop G, Osiewalski J, Steel MF (2000) Modeling the sources of output growth in a panel of countries. J Bus Econ Stat 18: 284–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koopman S (2002) Comment on “What are the advantages of MCMC based inference in latent variable models”. Stat Neerl 56: 34–40

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster T (2002) Orthogonal parameters and panel data. Rev Econ Stud 67: 647–666

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mátyás L (1999) Generalized method of moments estimation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogaki M (1993) Generalized method of moments: econometric applications. In: Maddala GS, Rao CR, Vinod HD (eds) Handbook of statistics, vol .11: Econometrics. Elsevier/North-Holland, New York/Amsterdam, pp 455–488

    Google Scholar 

  • Paap R (2002) What are the advantages of MCMC based inference in latent variable models. Stat Neerl 56: 2–22

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro JC, Bates DM (2000) Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. Springer-Verlag Inc, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D (2008) The R Core team, nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1–89

  • R Development Core Team (2010) R: A language and evironment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org

  • Ruppert D, Wand M, Carroll R (2003) Semiparametric regression. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Severini TA (2000) Likelihood methods in statistics. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Snijders TA, Bosker R (1999) Multilevel analysis: an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Sage Publication Inc., London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Staiger D, Stock JH (1997) Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments. Econometrica 65: 557–586

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Stock JH (2001) Instrumental variables in statistics and econometrics. In: Smelser NJ, Baltes PB (eds) International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences. Elsevier/North-Holland, New York/Amsterdam, pp 7577–7582

    Google Scholar 

  • Venables W, Ripley B (2002) Modern applied statistics with S. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luca Grassetti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grassetti, L. A note on transformed likelihood approach in linear dynamic panel models. Stat Methods Appl 20, 221–240 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-010-0158-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-010-0158-4

Keywords

Navigation