Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A fuzzy logic approach to poverty analysis based on the Gini and Bonferroni inequality indices

  • Published:
Statistical Methods & Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the poverty analysis framework, a great deal of attention has been paid to the poverty measurement in terms of monetary variables, such as income or consumption. In this context, a relevant open problem is connected with the distinction between poor and non-poor. In fact, the concept of poverty is rather vague and cannot be defined in a clear way. In this respect, following a fuzzy logic approach, some new poverty measures are proposed. In particular, the fuzzy extension of two existing poverty measures based on the Gini and Bonferroni inequality indices is provided. Some synthetic and real applications are given in order to show how the proposed poverty measures work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaberge R (2001) Axiomatic characterization of the Gini coefficient and Lorenz curve orderings. J Econ Theory 101: 115–132

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson AB (1987) On the measurement of poverty. Econometrica 55: 749–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson AB (1992) Measuring poverty and differences in family composition. Economica 59: 1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betti G, Verma V (2008) Fuzzy measures of the incidence of relative poverty and deprivation: a multi-dimensional perspective. Stat Methods Appl 12: 225–250

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bonferroni CE (1930) Elementi di statistica generale. Seeber, Firenze

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourguignon F, Fields GS (1997) Discontinuous losses from poverty, generalized measures, and optimal transfers to the poor. J Public Econ 63: 155–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourguignon F, Chakravarty SR (1999) A family of multidimensional poverty measures. In: Slottje DJ (ed) Advances in Econometrics, Income Distribution and Scientific Methodology: Essay in Honor of C. Dagum. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg pp 331–344

  • Bourguignon F, Chakravarty SR (2003) The measurement of multidimensional poverty. J Econ Inequal 1: 25–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bresson F (2010) A general class of inequality elasticities of poverty. J Econ Inequal 8: 71–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carbonaro G (1985) Nota sulla scala di equivalenza. Presidenza del Consiglio di Ministri, Commissione di indagine sulla povertà, “La povertà in Italia—Studi di base”, Roma

  • Cerioli A, Zani S (1990) A Fuzzy approach to the measurement of poverty. In: Dagum C, Zenga M (eds) Income and wealth distribution, inequality and poverty. Springer, Berlin, pp 272–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty SR (1983) Measures of poverty based on the representative income gap. Sankhya B 45: 69–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty SR (1997) On Shorrocks reinvestigation of the Sen poverty index. Econometrica 65: 1241–1242

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty SR (2006) An axiomatic approach to multidimensional poverty measurement via fuzzy sets. In: Lemmi A, Betti G (eds) Fuzzy set approach to multidimensional poverty measurement. Springer, New York, pp 49–72

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty SR (2007) A deprivation-based axiomatic characterization of the absolute Bonferroni index of inequality. J Econ Inequal 3: 339–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty SR, Muliere P (2004) Welfare indicators: a review and new perspectives. II. Measurement of poverty. Metron 62: 247–281

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cheli B, Lemmi A (1995) A totally fuzzy and relative approach to the multidimensional analysis of poverty. Econ Notes 24: 115–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiappero Martinetti E (1994) A new approach to evaluation of well being and poverty by fuzzy set theory. Giornale Degli Econ Ann Econ 53: 367–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiappero Martinetti E (2000) A multidimensional assessment of well-being based on Sen’s functioning approach. Rivista Int Sci Soc 108: 207–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Dagum C, Costa M (2004) Analysis and measurement of poverty. Univariate and multivariate approaches and their policy implications. In: Dagum C, Ferrari G (eds) Household behaviour, equivalence scales, welfare and poverty. Physica, Heidelberg, pp 221–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Dagum C, Gambassi R, Lemmi A (1992) New approaches to measurement of poverty. In: Poverty measurement for economies in transition in Eastern European Countries. Polish Statistical Association and Central Statistical Office, Warsaw

  • Deutsch J, Silber J (2005) Measuring multidimensional poverty, an empirical comparison of various approaches. Rev Income Wealth 51: 145–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D, Prade H (1980) Fuzzy sets and systems: theory and applications. Academic Press, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D, Prade H (1988) Possibility theory. Plenum Press, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Foster JE (1984) On economic poverty: a survey of aggregate measures. In: Basmann R, Rhodes G (eds) Advances in econometrics, vol 3. JAI Press, Connecticut, pp 215–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster JE, Shorrocks AF (1988) Poverty orderings. Econometrica 56: 173–177

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gini C (1914) Sulla misura della concentrazione e della variabilità dei caratteri. Atti del Reale Istituto Veneto di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti 73: 1203–1240 [English translation in Metron (2005) 63:3–38]

    Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi GM (1998) Concentration index, Bonferroni. In: Encyclopedia of statistical sciences. Wiley, New York, pp. 141–146

  • Giorgi GM, Crescenzi M (2001) A proposal of poverty measures based on the Bonferroni inequality index. Metron 59: 3–16

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Haagenars AJM (1987) A class of poverty measures. Int Econ Rev 28: 583–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Istat (2001) Indagine sui Consumi delle Famiglie—Manuale d’uso

  • Istat (2002) Note rapide, 7 (2)

  • Jenkins SP, Lambert P (1997) Three “I”s of poverty curves, with an analysis of UK poverty trends. Oxford Econ Pap 49: 317–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakwani NC (1980) On a class of poverty measures. Econometrica 48: 437–446

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lemmi, A, Betti, G (eds) (2006) Fuzzy sets approach to multidimensional poverty measurement. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Qizilbash M (2006) Philosophical accounts of vagueness, fuzzy poverty measures and multidimensionality. In: Lemmi A, Betti G (eds) Fuzzy set approach to multidimensional poverty measurement. Springer, New York, pp 9–28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sen A (1976) Poverty: an ordinal approach to measurement. Econometrica 44: 219–231

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Shorrocks AF (1995) Revisiting the Sen poverty index. Econometrica 63: 1225–1230

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xu K, Osberg L (2002) The social welfare implications, decomposability, and geometry of the Sen family of poverty indices. Can J Econ 35: 138–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaari ME (1988) A controversial proposal concerning inequality measurement. J Econ Theory 44: 381–397

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8: 338–353

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann HJ (2001) Fuzzy set theory and its applications. Kluwer, Boston

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paolo Giordani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Giordani, P., Giorgi, G.M. A fuzzy logic approach to poverty analysis based on the Gini and Bonferroni inequality indices. Stat Methods Appl 19, 587–607 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-010-0146-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-010-0146-8

Keywords

Navigation