Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Estimating and using propensity score in presence of missing background data: an application to assess the impact of childbearing on wellbeing

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Statistical Methods and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Propensity score methods are an increasingly popular technique for causal inference. To estimate propensity scores, we must model the distribution of the treatment indicator given a vector of covariates. Much work has been done in the case where the covariates are fully observed. Unfortunately, many large scale and complex surveys, such as longitudinal surveys, suffer from missing covariate values. In this paper, we compare three different approaches and their underlying assumptions of handling missing background data in the estimation and use of propensity scores: a complete-case analysis, a pattern-mixture model based approach developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (J Am Stat Assoc79:516–524, 1984), and a multiple imputation approach. We apply these methods to assess the impact of childbearing events on individuals’ wellbeing in Indonesia, using a sample of women from the Indonesia Family Life Survey.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Becker S, Ichino A (2002) Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores. STATA J 2(4): 358–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Frangakis CE, Rubin DB (1999) Addressing complications of intention-to-treat analysis in the combined presence of all-or-none treatment-noncompliance and subsequent missing outcomes. Biometrika 86: 365–380

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gu XS, Rosenbaum PR (1993) Comparison of multivariable matching methods; structures, distances, and algorithms. J Comp Graph Stat 2: 405–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman JJ, Ichomura H, Todd PE (1998) Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator. Rev Econ Stud 65: 261–294

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hill J (2004) Reducing bias in treatment effect estimation in observational studies suffering from missing data. Working paper series, School of International and Public Affairs, Columbia University, New York

  • Klepinger D, Lundberg S, Plotnick R (1995) Instrumental selection: the case of teenage childbearing and women’s educational attainment. DP 1077-95, 1995 29 pp

  • Little RJA, Rubin DB (1987) Statistical analysis with missing data (2nd edition in 2002). Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Royston P (2004) Multiple imputation of missing values. Stata J 4: 227–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum PT, Rubin DB (1983) The central role of propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70(1): 41–55

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum PT, Rubin DB (1984) Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. J Am Stat Assoc 79: 516–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin DB (1976) Inference and missing data. Biometrika 63: 581–592

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin DB (1978) Multiple imputation in sample survey: a phenomenological Bayesian approach to nonresponse. In: The Proceedings of survey research methods section of the American Statistical Association, pp 20–34

  • Rubin DB (1987) Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin DB (1996) Multiple imputation after 18+ years (with discussion). J Am Stat Assoc 91: 473–489

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin DB, Thomas N (1992a) Affinely invariant matching methods with ellipsoidal distribution. Ann Stat 20: 1079–1093

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin DB, Thomas N (1992b) Characterizing the effect of matching using linear propensity score methods with normal distributions. Biomatrika 79: 797–809

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin DB, Thomas N (1996) Matching using estimated propensity score; relating theory to practice. Biomatrics 52: 249–264

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • van Buuren S, Boshuizen HC, Knook DL (1999) Multiple imputation of missing blood pressure covariates in survival analysis. Stat Med 18: 681–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dipartimento di Statistica “G. Parenti”, Università di Firenze, Viale Morgagni, 59-50134, Firenze, Italy

    Alessandra Mattei

Authors
  1. Alessandra Mattei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandra Mattei.

Additional information

I am grateful to all the participants at the project “Poverty Dynamics and Fertility in Developing Countries” for their support and encouragement. Special thanks are due to Fabrizia Mealli for her insightful suggestions and discussions. I also thank Jungho Kim, who is the main author of the STATA code to produce Indonesia consumption expenditure. Finally, I thank Arnstein Aassve, and Letizia Mencarini for help working with the data and their very useful discussions, and Alexia Fuernkranz-Prskawetz, and Henriette Engelhardt for detailed comments and suggestions which have improved the paper. Financial support from CNR-EFS and COFIN 2005 is gratefully acknowledged.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mattei, A. Estimating and using propensity score in presence of missing background data: an application to assess the impact of childbearing on wellbeing. Stat Methods Appl 18, 257–273 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-007-0086-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-007-0086-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation