Skip to main content
Log in

Odds ratio for a single 2 × 2 table with correlated binomials for two margins

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Statistical Methods and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While analyzing 2 × 2 contingency tables, the log odds ratio for measuring the strength of association is often approximated by a normal distribution with some variance. We show that the expression of that variance needs to be modified in the presence of correlation between two binomial distributions of the contingency table. In the present paper, we derive a correlation-adjusted variance of the limiting normal distribution of log odds ratio. We also propose a correlation adjusted test based on the standard odds ratio for analyzing matched-pair studies and any other study settings that induce correlated binary outcomes. We demonstrate that our proposed test outperforms the classical McNemar’s test. Simulation studies show the gains in power are especially manifest when sample size is small and strong correlation is present. Two examples of real data sets are used to demonstrate that the proposed method may lead to conclusions significantly different from those reached using McNemar’s test.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anscombe FJ (1956). On estimating bivariate response relations. Biometrika 43: 461–464

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Biswas A and Hwang J-S (2002). A new bivariate binomial distribution. Stat Prob Lett 60: 231–240

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Biswas A, Hwang J-S, Bhattacharya S (2006) Distribution of odds ratio in 2 × 2 contingency tables: adjustment for correlation. Unpublished manuscript

  • Breslow NE (1981). Odds ratio estimators when the data are sparse. Biometrika 68: 73–84

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kupperman KI, Blatt MHG, Wiesbader H and Filler W (1953). Comparative clinical evaluation of estrogenic preparations by the menopausal and amenorrheal indices. J Clin Endocrinol 13: 688–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai JN, Hwang JS, Chen HJ and Wang JD (2005). Finished herbal product as an alternative treatment for menopausal symptoms in climacteric women. J Altern Complement Med 11: 1075–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang K-Y (1985). Odds ratio inference with dependent data. Biometrika 72: 678–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNemar Q (1947). Note on the sampling of the difference between corrected proportions or percentages. Psychometrika 12: 153–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosner B (2000). Fundamentals of biostatistics, 5th edn. Duxbury, US

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jing-Shiang Hwang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hwang, JS., Biswas, A. Odds ratio for a single 2 × 2 table with correlated binomials for two margins. Stat Meth Appl 17, 483–497 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-007-0073-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-007-0073-5

Keywords

Navigation