Abstract
This paper analyzes the impact of some kinds of contaminant on model selection in graphical Gaussian models. We investigate four different kinds of contaminants, in order to consider the effect of gross errors, model deviations, and model misspecification. The aim of the work is to assess against which kinds of contaminant a model selection procedure for graphical Gaussian models has a more robust behavior. The analysis is based on simulated data. The simulation study shows that relatively few contaminated observations in even just one of the variables can have a significant impact on correct model selection, especially when the contaminated variable is a node in a separating set of the graph.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson TW (1984) An introduction to multivariate statistical analysis. Wiley, New York
Azzalini A, Capitanio A (1999) Statistical applications of the multivariate skew-normal distribution. J R Stat Soc Ser B 61(3):579–602
Azzalini A, Della Valle A (1996) The multivariate skew-normal distribution. Biometrika 83:715–726
Capitanio A, Azzalini A, Stanghellini E (2003) Graphical models for skew-normal variates. Scand J Stat 30(1):129–144
Cox DR, Wermuth N (1996) Multivariate dependencies Models, analysis and interpretation. Chapman and Hall, London
Dawid AP (1979) Conditional independence in statistical theory (with discussion). J R Stat Soc Ser B 41:1–31
Dempster AM (1972) Covariance selection. Biometrics 28:157–175
Drton M, Perlman MD (2004) A SINful approach to Gaussian graphical model selection, available in http://www.stat.washington.edu/drton/Papers/2005statsci.pdf
Edwards D (2000) Introduction to graphical modelling, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Edwards D (1995) Introduction to graphical modelling. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Grunert da Fonseca V, Fieller NRJ (2006) Distorion in statistical inference: the distinction between data contamination and model deviation. Metrika 63:169–190
Kuhnt S, Becker C (2003) Sensitivity of graphical modeling against contamination. In: Schader M, Gaul W, Vichi M (eds), Between data science and applied data analysis. Springer, Berlin Heildberg New York, pp. 279–287
Lauritzen SL (1996) Graphical models. Oxford Science, Oxford
Mardia KV, Kent JT, Bibby JM (1979) Multivariate Analysis. Academic London
Roverato A, Whittaker J (1996) Standard errors for the parameters of graphical Gaussian models. Stat Comput 6:297–302
Šidák Z (1967) Rectangular confidence regions for the means of multivariate normal distributions. J Am Stat Assoc 62:626–633
Whittaker JL (1990) Graphical models in applied multivariate statistics. New York, Wiley
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gottard, A., Pacillo, S. On the impact of contaminations in graphical Gaussian models. Stat. Meth. & Appl. 15, 343–354 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-006-0041-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-006-0041-5