Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 205–221 | Cite as

Margination and adhesion of micro- and nanoparticles in the coronary circulation: a step towards optimised drug carrier design

Original Paper
  • 149 Downloads

Abstract

Obstruction of left anterior descending artery (LAD) due to the thrombosis or atherosclerotic plaques is the leading cause of death worldwide. Targeted delivery of drugs through micro- and nanoparticles is a very promising approach for developing new strategies in clot-busting or treating restenosis. In this work, we modelled the blood flow characteristics in a patient-specific reconstructed LAD artery by the fluid–solid interaction method and based on physiological boundary conditions. Next, we provided a Lagrangian description of micro- and nanoparticles dynamics in the blood flow considering their Brownian motion and the particle–particle interactions. Our results state that the number of spherical particles migrating towards the region of lumen with potential of thrombus existence (PTE) rises by increasing the particle size. Also, an optimum scope of particle size in which the adhesive probability parameter reaches its maximum was determined. We acquired an optimum scope for a specific degree of particle sphericity in which the thrombus surfaces experience the maximum density of interaction with particles. We learned that the ligand–receptor mechanism-based drug carriers are better choices for treating LAD arterial diseases when the addressees are patients with low haematocrit-related diseases. While due to the amount of shear stress exerting on the diseased area, generally exploiting nanoshear-activated drug carriers would be the more effective option when it comes to the thrombolytic therapies of patients with high haematocrit-related diseases.

Keywords

Fluid–structure interaction Coronary heart disease Thrombolysis therapies Finite element method Drug delivery 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Doctor Amir Sajadieh the interventional cardiologist and attending physician of CT-Angio Department of Alzahra Hospital of Isfahan who provided insight and expertise that greatly assisted the research

References

  1. Abba AA, Wani BA, Rahmatullah RA, Khalil MZ, Kumo AM, Ghonaim MA (2003) Door to needle time in administering thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Saudi Med J 24(4):361–4Google Scholar
  2. Abeddoust M, Shamloo A (2015) A model for cell density effect on stress fiber alignment and collective directional migration. Phys Biol 12(6):066023Google Scholar
  3. Ali MR, Salim Hossain M, Islam MA, Saiful Islam Arman M, Sarwar Raju G, Dasgupta P, Noshin TF (2014) Aspect of thrombolytic therapy: a review. Sci World J 2014:586510Google Scholar
  4. Bächer C, Schrack L, Gekle S (2017) Clustering of microscopic particles in constricted blood flow. Phys Rev Fluids 2(1):013102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bagge U, Karlsson R (1980) Maintenance of white blood cell margination at the passage through small venular junctions. Microvasc Res 20(1):92–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boutsianis E, Dave H, Frauenfelder T, Poulikakos D, Wildermuth S, Turina M, Ventikos Y, Zund G (2004) Computational simulation of intracoronary flow based on real coronary geometry. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 26(2):248–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carboni E, Tschudi K, Nam J, Lu X, Ma AW (2014) Particle margination and its implications on intravenous anticancer drug delivery. AAPS PharmSciTech 15(3):762–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Colwell JA, Lopes-Virella M, Halushka PV (1981) Pathogenesis of atherosclerosis in diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 4(1):121–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dasgupta S, Auth T, Gompper G (2013) Wrapping of ellipsoidal nano-particles by fluid membranes. Soft Matter 9:5473–5482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Debakey ME, Lawrie GM, Glaeser DH (1985) Patterns of atherosclerosis and their surgical significance. Ann Surg 201(2):115–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Decuzzi P, Ferrari M (2006) The adhesive strength of non-spherical particles mediated by specific interactions. Biomaterials 27(30):5307–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Decuzzi P, Pasqualini R, Arap W, Ferrari M (2009) Intravascular delivery of particulate systems: does geometry really matter? Pharm Res 26(1):235–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eckstein EC, Tilles AW, Millero FJ 3rd (1988) Conditions for the occurrence of large near-wall excesses of small particles during blood flow. Microvasc Res 36(1):31–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. El-Sherbiny IM, Elkholi IE, Yacoub MH (2014) Tissue plasminogen activator-based clot busting: controlled delivery approaches. Glob Cardiol Sci Pract 2014(3):336–49Google Scholar
  15. Fedosov DA (2010) Multiscale modeling of blood flow and soft matter. Brown University, ProvidenceGoogle Scholar
  16. Fournier RL (2011) Basic transport phenomena in biomedical engineering, 3rd edn. Taylor & Francis, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  17. Gentile F, Chiappini C, Fine D, Bhavane RC, Peluccio MS, Cheng MM, Liu X, Ferrari M, Decuzzi P (2008) The effect of shape on the margination dynamics of non-neutrally buoyant particles in two-dimensional shear flows. J Biomech 41(10):2312–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Glagov S, Weisenberg E, Zarins CK, Stankunavicius R, Kolettis GJ (1987) Compensatory enlargement of human atherosclerotic coronary arteries. N Engl J Med 316(22):1371–1375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Godin B, Driessen WHP, Proneth B, Lee S-Y, Srinivasan S, Rumbaut R, Arap W, Pasqualini R, Ferrari M, Decuzzi P (2010) An integrated approach for the rational design of nanovectors for biomedical imaging and therapy. Adv Genet 69:31–64Google Scholar
  20. Goldman AJ, Cox RG, Brenner H (1967) Slow viscous motion of a sphere parallel to a plane wall–II Couette flow. Chem Eng Sci 22(4):653–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Goldsmith HL, Spain S (1984) Margination of leukocytes in blood flow through small tubes. Microvasc Res 27(2):204–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gradus-Pizlo I, Bigelow B, Mahomed Y, Sawada SG, Rieger K, Feigenbaum H (2003) Left anterior descending coronary artery wall thickness measured by high-frequency transthoracic and epicardial echocardiography includes adventitia. Am J Cardiol 91(1):27–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grief AD, Richardson G (2005) Mathematical modelling of magnetically targeted drug delivery. J Magn Magn Mater 293(1):455–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Haverkort JW, Kenjereš S, Kleijn CR (2009) Computational simulations of magnetic particle capture in arterial flows. Ann Biomed Eng 37(12):2436–2448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Johnston BM, Johnston PR, Corney S, Kilpatrick D (2004) Non-Newtonian blood flow in human right coronary arteries: steady state simulations. J Biomech 37(5):709–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Karimi A, Navidbakhsh M, Faghihi S, Shojaei A, Hassani K (2013) A finite element investigation on plaque vulnerability in realistic healthy and atherosclerotic human coronary arteries. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 227(2):148–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Karimi A, Navidbakhsh M, Shojaei A, Hassani K, Faghihi S (2014) Study of plaque vulnerability in coronary artery using Mooney–Rivlin model: a combination of finite element and experimental method. Biomed Eng Appl Basis Commun 26(01):1450013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kenjereš S, Righolt BW (2012) Simulations of magnetic capturing of drug carriers in the brain vascular system. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 35:68–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kim M (2004) Effect of electrostatic, hydrodynamic, and Brownian forces on particle trajectories and sieving in normal flow filtration. J Colloid Interface Sci 269(2):425–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kim HJ, Vignon-Clementel IE, Coogan JS, Figueroa CA, Jansen KE, Taylor CA (2010) Patient-specific modeling of blood flow and pressure in human coronary arteries. Ann Biomed Eng 38(10):3195–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kimmel SE, Berlin JA, Hennessy S, Strom BL, Krone RJ, Laskey WK (1997) Risk of major complications from coronary angioplasty performed immediately after diagnostic coronary angiography: results from the Registry of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol 30(1):193–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kirby BJ (2010) Micro- and nanoscale fluid mechanics: transport in microfluidic devices. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Korin N, Kanapathipillai M, Matthews BD, Crescente M, Brill A, Mammoto T, Ghosh K, Jurek S, Bencherif SA, Bhatta D, Coskun AU, Feldman CL, Wagner DD, Ingber DE (2012) Shear-activated nanotherapeutics for drug targeting to obstructed blood vessels. Science 337(6095):738–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kwon O, Krishnamoorthy M, Cho YI, Sankovic JM, Banerjee RK (2008) Effect of blood viscosity on oxygen transport in residual stenosed artery following angioplasty. J Biomech Eng 130(1):011003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lee J, Smith NP (2012) The multi-scale modelling of coronary blood flow. Ann Biomed Eng 40(11):2399–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lee SY, Ferrari M, Decuzzi P (2009) Design of bio-mimetic particles with enhanced vascular interaction. J Biomech 42(12):1885–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Letcher RL, Chien S, Pickering TG, Laragh JH (1983) Elevated blood viscosity in patients with borderline essential hypertension. Hypertension 5(5):757–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Li A, Ahmadi G (1992) Dispersion and deposition of spherical particles from point sources in a turbulent channel flow. Aerosol Sci Technol 16(4):209–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lowe GD (1986) Blood rheology in arterial disease. Clin Sci (Lond) 71(2):137–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mody NA, King MR (2007) Influence of Brownian motion on blood platelet flow behavior and adhesive dynamics near a planar wall. Langmuir 23(11):6321–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Muller K, Fedosov DA, Gompper G (2014) Margination of micro- and nano-particles in blood flow and its effect on drug delivery. Sci Rep 4:4871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Muller K, Fedosov DA, Gompper G (2016) Understanding particle margination in blood flow—a step toward optimized drug delivery systems. Med Eng Phys 38(1):2–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Multiphysics C (2015) Particle tracing module user’s guide, COMSOLGoogle Scholar
  44. Nacev A, Beni C, Bruno O, Shapiro B (2011) The behaviors of ferro-magnetic nano-particles in and around blood vessels under applied magnetic fields. J Magn Magn Mater 323(6):651–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Namdee K, Thompson AJ, Charoenphol P, Eniola-Adefeso O (2013) Margination propensity of vascular-targeted spheres from blood flow in a microfluidic model of human microvessels. Langmuir 29(8):2530–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Namdee K, Thompson AJ, Golinski A, Mocherla S, Bouis D, Eniola-Adefeso O (2014) In vivo evaluation of vascular-targeted spheroidal microparticles for imaging and drug delivery application in atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis 237(1):279–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pries AR, Neuhaus D, Gaehtgens P (1992) Blood viscosity in tube flow: dependence on diameter and hematocrit. Am J Physiol 263(6 Pt 2):H1770–8Google Scholar
  48. Sarnak MJ, Tighiouart H, Manjunath G, MacLeod B, Griffith J, Salem D, Levey AS (2002) Anemia as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease in The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 40(1):27–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schuhlen H, Kastrati A, Dirschinger J, Hausleiter J, Elezi S, Wehinger A, Pache J, Hadamitzky M, Schomig A (1998) Intracoronary stenting and risk for major adverse cardiac events during the first month. Circulation 98(2):104–11Google Scholar
  50. Serda RE (2012) Mass transport of nanocarriers. Pan Stanford, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  51. Shah S (2009) Numerical simulation of particle adhesion dynamics for applications in nanomedicine and biosensing, University of Texas at ArlingtonGoogle Scholar
  52. Shamloo A (2014) Cell-cell interactions mediate cytoskeleton organization and collective endothelial cell chemotaxis. Cytoskeleton 71(9):501–512Google Scholar
  53. Shamloo A, Nejad MA, Saeedi M (2017). Fluid-structure interaction simulation of a cerebral aneurysm: effects of endovascular coiling treatment and aneurysm wall thickening. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 74:72–83Google Scholar
  54. Slack JD, Kanke M, Simmons GH, DeLuca PP (1981) Acute hemodynamic effects and blood pool kinetics of polystyrene microspheres following intravenous administration. J Pharm Sci 70(6):660–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sohrabi S, Zheng J, Finol EA, Liu Y (2014) Numerical simulation of particle transport and deposition in the pulmonary vasculature. J Biomech Eng 136(12):121010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sohrabi S, Wang S, Tan J, Xu J, Yang J, Liu Y (2017) Nanoparticle transport and delivery in a heterogeneous pulmonary vasculature. J Biomech 50:240–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stadler AA, Zilow EP, Linderkamp O (1990) Blood viscosity and optimal hematocrit in narrow tubes. Biorheology 27(5):779–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tan J, Thomas A, Liu Y (2011) Influence of red blood cells on nanoparticle targeted delivery in microcirculation. Soft Matter 8:1934–1946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tan J, Wang S, Yang J, Liu Y (2013) Coupled particulate and continuum model for nanoparticle targeted delivery. Comput Struct 122:128–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tangelder GJ, Teirlinck HC, Slaaf DW, Reneman RS (1985) Distribution of blood platelets flowing in arterioles. Am J Physiol 248(3):318–323Google Scholar
  61. Thompson AJ, Mastria EM, Eniola-Adefeso O (2013) The margination propensity of ellipsoidal micro/nanoparticles to the endothelium in human blood flow. Biomaterials 34(23):5863–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tilles AW, Eckstein EC (1987) The near-wall excess of platelet-sized particles in blood flow: its dependence on hematocrit and wall shear rate. Microvasc Res 33(2):211–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tomey MI, Kini AS, Sharma SK (2014) Current status of rotational atherectomy. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 7(4):345–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Traberg MS, Jensen JA (2014) Ultrasound evaluation of an abdominal aortic fluid-structure interaction model, pp 2292–2295Google Scholar
  65. Umbarkar TS, Kleinstreuer C (2015) Computationally efficient fluid-particle dynamics simulations of arterial systems. Commun Comput Phys 17(02):401–423MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  66. van der Giessen AG, Groen HC, Doriot PA, de Feyter PJ, van der Steen AF, van de Vosse FN, Wentzel JJ, Gijsen FJ (2011) The influence of boundary conditions on wall shear stress distribution in patients specific coronary trees. J Biomech 44(6):1089–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Verheugt FW, Gersh BJ, Armstrong PW (2006) Aborted myocardial infarction: a new target for reperfusion therapy. Eur Heart J 27(8):901–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wen J, Ding G, Jiang W, Wang Q, Zheng T (2014) Numerical simulation of compliant artery bypass grafts using fluid-structure interaction framework. ASAIO J 60(5):533–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Woldhuis B, Tangelder GJ, Slaaf DW, Reneman RS (1992) Concentration profile of blood platelets differs in arterioles and venules. Am J Physiol 262(4 Pt 2):H1217–23Google Scholar
  70. Xie X, Wang Y, Zhu H, Zhou H, Zhou J (2013) Impact of coronary tortuosity on coronary blood supply: a patient-specific study. PLoS One 8(5):e64564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zhu SJ, Poon EK, Ooi AS, Moore S (2015) Enhanced targeted drug delivery through controlled release in a three-dimensional vascular tree. J Biomech Eng 137(3):031002CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Science and EngineeringSharif University of Technology-International CampusKishIran
  2. 2.School of Mechanical EngineeringSharif University of TechnologyTehranIran

Personalised recommendations