Skip to main content
Log in

Treatment of peritrochanteric fractures with the Endovis BA cephalomedullary nail: multicenter study of 1091 patients

  • Original
  • Published:
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology Submit manuscript

Abstract

Treatment of peritrochanteric fractures involves reduction and synthesis using reconstruction plates and screws, intramedullary or cephalomedullary nails, or external fixators. A new cephalomedullary nail, Endovis BA (Citieffe, Italy), made of titanium alloy implanted without reaming and is fixed with 2 cephalic screws was used to treat 1091 patients with lateral fractures of the femoral neck (AO class 31-A). The patients had a mean age of 75 years (range, 48–99 years), and 83% had one or more systemic comorbidities. Mean operative time was 35 min (range, 20–100 min), and 483 patients (44.3%) required transfusion of one or more units of blood. The nail was implanted without distal blockage in 886 patients (81.2%) and without reaming in 1081 patients (99.1%). Intra-operative complications were recorded in 28 patients (2.6%). At the 6-month follow-up, 128 patients (12%) had died from causes unrelated to the surgery. Of the remaining 963 patients, 632 (65.6%) could walk independently, 249 (25.9%) could walk with assistance, and 82 (8.5%) could not walk. Postoperative complications were recorded in 38 patients (3.5%); most common complications were cut-out (10 cases), loss of reduction (8 cases) and prominent screws (6 cases). In conclusion the Endovis BA nail seems to be a reliable choice for the treatment of lateral fractures of the femoral neck, especially considering the short operating time and low rate of complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zain Elabdien BS, Olerud S, Karlstrom G (1984) The influence of the age on the morphology of trochanteric fracture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 103:156–161

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cummings SR, Nevitt MC (1989) A hypothesis: the causes of hip fractures. J Gerontol 44:107–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Haidukewych GJ, Israel TA, Berry DJ (2001) Reverse obliquity fractures of the intertrochanteric region of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83:643–650

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Medoff RJ, Maes K (1991) A new device for the fixation of unstable pertrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:1192–1199

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Watson JT, Moed BR, Cramer KE, Karges DE (1998) Comparison of the compression hip screw with the Medoff sliding plate for intertrochanteric fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 348:79–86

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Parker MJ, Pryor GA (1996) Gamma versus DHS nailing for extracapsular femoral fractures. Meta-analysis of ten randomised trials. Int Orthop 20:163–168

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rantanen J, Aro HT (1998) Intramedullary fixation of high subtrochanteric femoral fractures: a study comparing two implant designs, the Gamma nail and the intramedullary hip screw. J Orthop Trauma 12:249–252

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Olsson O, Ceder L, Hauggaard A (2001) Femoral shortening in intertrochanteric fractures: a comparison between the Medoff sliding plate and the compression hip screw. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:572–578

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Owens WD, Felts JA, Spitznagel EL Jr (1978) ASA physical status classifications: a study of consistency of ratings. Anesthesiology 49:239–243

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Apolone G, Moscovi P, Ware JE Jr (1997) Questionario sullo stato di salute SF-36. Manuale d’uso e guida all’interpretazione dei risultati. Guerini, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  11. Müller ME, Nazarian S, Koch P (1990) The comprehensive classification of fractures of long bones. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Micaglio A, Turi G (2005) Il trattamento delle fratture laterali di collo femore. Aggiorn Club Ital Osteosint 11[Suppl 1]:249–250

    Google Scholar 

  13. Boriani S, De Iure F, Bettelli G et al (1994) The results of a multicenter Italian study on the use of the Gamma nail for the treatment of pertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures: a review of 1181 cases. Chir Organi Mov 79:193–203

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ingman AM (2000) Percutaneous intramedullary fixation of trochanteric fractures of the femur. Clinical trial of a new hip nail. Injury 31:483–487

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sailer R, Ulmer H, Hrubesch R et al (2000) Surgical stabilization of per-and subtrochanteric femoral fractures with the gamma nail. Chirurg 71:1380–1384

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rebuzzi E, Pannone A, Schiavetti S et al (2002) IMHS clinical experience in the treatment of peritrochanteric fractures. The results of a multicentric Italian study of 981 cases. Injury 33:407–412

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fogagnolo F, Kfuri M Jr, Paccola CA (2004) Intramedullary fixation of pertrochanteric hip fractures with the short AO-ASIF proximal femoral nail. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124:31–37

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hesse B, Gachter A (2004) Complications following the treatment of trochanteric fractures with the gamma nail. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124:692–698

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Alvarez DB, Aparicio JP, Fernandez EL et al (2004) Implant breakage, a rare complication with the Gamma nail. A review of 843 fractures of the proximal femur treated with a Gamma nail. Acta Orthop Belg 70:435–443

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Boriani S, De Iure S, Campanacci L et al (1996) A technical report reviewing the use of the 11-mm Gamma nail: interoperative femur fracture incidence. Orthopaedics 19:597–600

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Caiaffa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Caiaffa, V., De Vita, D., Laforgia, R. et al. Treatment of peritrochanteric fractures with the Endovis BA cephalomedullary nail: multicenter study of 1091 patients. J Orthopaed Traumatol 8, 111–116 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10195-007-0172-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10195-007-0172-y

Key words

Navigation