Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Weak identification in probit models with endogenous covariates

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Weak identification is a well-known issue in the context of linear structural models. However, for probit models with endogenous explanatory variables, this problem has been little explored. In this paper, we study by simulating the behavior of the usual z-test and the LR test in the presence of weak identification. We find that the usual asymptotic z-test exhibits large level distortions (over-rejections under the null hypothesis). The magnitude of the level distortions depends heavily on the parameter value tested. In contrast, asymptotic LR tests do not over-reject and appear to be robust to weak identification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A further exception is Magnusson (2007), who considered in an early version of his paper the probit model with endogenous covariates as an example and found medium level distortions. However, in later versions of the working paper and in the published version (Magnusson 2010) the probit example was deleted.

  2. All simulations were done using R; see Core Team (2016). The GMM estimation was done using the package GMM, version 1.6-1. The case of iid observations can be implemented by the option vcov="iid"; see Chaussé (2010), p. 13. All R codes are available on request.

  3. For the ML estimation, the exogenous variable \(x_i\) was drawn from an N(0, 16) distribution.

  4. This result is similar to that of Magnusson (2007).

  5. We also tried the option "CUE" for the continuous updating estimator. However, we always got the error message "node stack overflow".

References

  • Abramitzky, R., Lavy, V.: How responsive is investment in schooling to changes in redistributive policies and in returns? Econometrica 82(4), 1241–1272 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D.W., Cheng, X.: Maximum likelihood estimation and uniform inference with sporadic identification failure. J. Econom. 173(1), 36–56 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D.W., Cheng, X.: GMM estimation and uniform subvector inference with possible identification failure. Econom. Theory 30(2), 287–333 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, T., Lin, C., Ma, Y.: Why do firms evade taxes? The role of information sharing and financial sector outreach. J. Finance 69(2), 763–817 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bijsterbosch, M., Dahlhaus, T.: Key features and determinants of credit-less recoveries. Empir. Econ. 49(4), 1245–1269 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blundell, R.W., Smith, R.J.: Simultaneous microeconometric models with censored or qualitative dependent variables. In: Maddala, G.S., Rao, C.R., Vinod, H.D. (eds.) Handbook of Statistics. Econometrics, vol. 11, pp. 117–143. North Holland, Amsterdam (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouoiyour, J., Miftah, A., Mouhoud, E.M.: Education, male gender preference and migrants’ remittances: interactions in rural Morocco. Econ. Model. 57, 324–331 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaussé, P.: Computing generalized method of moments and generalized empirical likelihood with R. J. Stat. Softw. 34(11), 1–35 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornelli, F., Kominek, Z., Ljungqvist, A.: Monitoring managers: Does it matter? J. Finance 68(2), 431–481 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croushore, D., Marsten, K.: Reassessing the relative power of the yield spread in forecasting recessions. J. Appl. Econom. 31(6), 1183–1191 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dufour, J.M.: Some impossibility theorems in econometrics with applications to structural and dynamic models. Econometrica 65(6), 1365–1387 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dufour, J.M.: Identification, weak instruments, and statistical inference in econometrics. Can. J. Econ./Revue canadienne d’économique 36(4), 767–808 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dufour, J.M.: Monte Carlo tests with nuisance parameters: a general approach to finite-sample inference and nonstandard asymptotics. J. Econom. 133(2), 443–477 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Engelhardt, G.V., Eriksen, M.D., Gale, W.G., Mills, G.B.: What are the social benefits of homeownership? Experimental evidence for low-income households. J. Urban Econ. 67(3), 249–258 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esaka, T.: De facto exchange rate regimes and currency crises: Are pegged regimes with capital account liberalization really more prone to speculative attacks? J. Bank. Finance 34(6), 1109–1128 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzenberger, B., Kohn, K., Wang, Q.: The erosion of union membership in Germany: determinants, densities, decompositions. J. Popul. Econ. 24(1), 141–165 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W.H.: Econometric Analysis, 6th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Haider, A., Jahangir, A.: La familia—how trust towards family decreases female labor force participation. J. Labor Res. 38(1), 122–144 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hao, L., Ng, E.C.: Predicting Canadian recessions using dynamic probit modelling approaches. Can. J. Econ./Revue canadienne d’économique 44(4), 1297–1330 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, D., Mátyás, L.: Introduction to the generalized method of moments estimation. In: Mátyás, L. (ed.) Generalized Method of Moments Estimation, pp. 3–30. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hlaing, K.P., Pourjalali, H.: Economic reasons for reporting property, plant, and equipment at fair market value by foreign cross-listed firms in the United States. J. Account. Audit. Finance 27(4), 557–576 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horvath, R., Katuscakova, D.: Transparency and trust: the case of the European central bank. Appl. Econ. 48(57), 5625–5638 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, V., Kim, E.H., Lu, Y.: CEO connectedness and corporate fraud. J. Finance 70(3), 1203–1252 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleibergen, F.: Testing parameters in GMM without assuming that they are identified. Econometrica 73(4), 1103–1123 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Litchfield, J., Reilly, B., Veneziani, M.: An analysis of life satisfaction in Albania: an heteroscedastic ordered probit model approach. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 81(3), 731–741 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, L.M.: Weak instruments robust tests for limited dependent variable models. Technical report, working paper, Brown University (RI) (2007)

  • Magnusson, L.M.: Inference in limited dependent variable models robust to weak identification. Econom. J. 13(3), S56–S79 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Massa, M., Zhang, L.: Monetary policy and regional availability of debt financing. J. Monetary Econ. 60(4), 439–458 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team: R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna https://www.R-project.org/ (2016)

  • Stock, J.H., Wright, J.H., Yogo, M.: A survey of weak instruments and weak identification in generalized method of moments. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 20(4), 518–529 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wen, J.F., Gordon, D.V.: An empirical model of tax convexity and self-employment. Rev. Econ. Stat. 96(3), 471–482 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilde, J.: A note on GMM estimation of probit models with endogenous regressors. Stat. Pap. 49(3), 471–484 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, Centre interuniversitaire de recherche en analyse des organisations (CIRANO), and Centre interuniversitaire de recherche en économie quantitative (CIREQ), McGill University, Leacock Building, Room 414, 855 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, QC, H3A 2T7, Canada

    Jean-Marie Dufour

  2. Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Rolandstr. 8, 49069, Osnabrueck, Germany

    Joachim Wilde

Authors
  1. Jean-Marie Dufour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joachim Wilde
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joachim Wilde.

Additional information

The authors thank Leandro Magnusson and two anonymous referees for several useful comments, and Dietrich Trenkler and Sebastian Veldhuis for valuable assistance. This work was supported by the William Dow Chair in Political Economy (McGill University), the Bank of Canada (Research Fellowship), the Toulouse School of Economics (Pierre-de-Fermat Chair of excellence), the Universitad Carlos III de Madrid (Banco Santander de Madrid Chair of excellence), a Guggenheim Fellowship, a Konrad-Adenauer Fellowship (Alexander-von-Humboldt Foundation, Germany), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, and the Fonds de recherche sur la société et la culture (Québec).

Appendix: Simulation results for model (5) with \(\beta _{11}=\pi _{21}= 0\)

Appendix: Simulation results for model (5) with \(\beta _{11}=\pi _{21}= 0\)

See Tables 7 and 8.

Table 7 Rejection frequencies of the z-test, H\(_0: \gamma _1 = 0\)
Full size table
Table 8 Rejection frequencies of the z-test, H\(_0: \gamma _1 = 2\)
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dufour, JM., Wilde, J. Weak identification in probit models with endogenous covariates. AStA Adv Stat Anal 102, 611–631 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10182-018-0325-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10182-018-0325-8

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation