Abstract
The vicuña is a high Andean wild camelid that lives year-long in groups. We analyzed the social organization of 98 marked vicuñas after capture and live shearing, focusing on group composition, spatial patterns, territoriality and habitat use. The social units analyzed were families, bachelor groups and solo animals. Location fixes of 54 males and 36 females were registered over a 2-year period, and home range was estimated. All females belonged to family groups, and 8–12 month yearlings changed their home ranges prior to first reproduction at 2 years. Female yearlings dispersed to a new family group, while male yearlings dispersed to a bachelor group. Solitary males appeared during the interval between leaving bachelor or family groups, and vice versa. Our study showed that vicuña polygyny was based on female grazing area requirements. Females that stayed with the same males were defined as loyal, and had a mean 18.9 ha home range. Females that changed both to a different family and male; and grazed over the same home range size, were considered disloyal. Family groups selected the habitat that had a low stratum and the highest coverage of palatable plants, while bachelors used their habitat randomly.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Control 9:716–723
Arzamendia Y, Vilá B (2006) Estudios de comportamiento y organización social de vicuñas, en la Reserva de la Biósfera Laguna de Pozuelos, Jujuy, Argentina, como línea de base para el manejo sostenible de la especie. In: Vilá BL (ed) Investigación, conservación y manejo de vicuñas. Proyecto MACS- Argentina, pp 69–83. Available from: http://www.vicam.org.ar
Arzamendia Y, Vilá B (2012) Effects of capture, shearing, and release on the ecology and behavior of wild vicuñas. J Wildl Manag 76:57–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.242
Arzamendia Y, Vilá BL (2015) Vicugna habitat use and interactions with domestic ungulates in Jujuy, Northwest Argentina. Mammalia 79:267–278. https://doi.org/10.1515/mammalia-2013-0135
Arzamendia Y, Cassini MH, Vilá BL (2006) Habitat use by vicuña Vicugna vicugna in Laguna Pozuelos Reserve, Jujuy, Argentina. Oryx 40:198–203. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605306000639
Arzamendia Y, Maidana R, Vilá B, Bonacic C (2008) Wild vicuñas management in Cieneguillas, Jujuy. In: Frank E, Antonini M, Toro O (eds) South American Camelids Research, vol 2. Wageningen Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp 139–146
Arzamendia Y, Bonacic C, Vilá B (2010) Behavioural and physiological consequences of capture for shearing of vicuñas in Argentina. Appl Anim Behav Sci 125:163–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2010.04.013
Borgnia M, Vilá B, Cassini MH (2006) Estimación poblacional local y estructura social de vicuñas en la reserva laguna blanca (Catamarca, Argentina). In: Olivera D, Miragaya M, Puig S (eds) Memorias IV Congreso Mundial sobre Camélidos. Catamarca, Argentina, pp 11–15
Borgnia M, Vilá BL, Cassini MH (2008) Interaction between wild camelids and livestock in an Andean semi-desert. J Arid Environ 72:2150–2158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2008.07.012
Borgnia M, Vilá BL, Cassini MH (2010) Foraging ecology of Vicuña, Vicugna vicugna, in dry Puna of Argentina. Small Rumin Res 88:44–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2009.11.009
Bosch PC, Svendsen GE (1987) Behavior of male and female vicuna (Vicugna vicugna Molina 1782) as it relates to reproductive effort. J Mammal 68:425–429. https://doi.org/10.2307/1381491
Cabrera AL (1957) La vegetación de la Puna Argentina. Rev Inv Agr 4:317–412
Cajal JL, Bonaventura SM (1998) Densidad poblacional y dinámica de los grupos familiares de guanacos y vicuñas en la reserva de biosfera de San Guillermo. In: Cajal JL, García Fernández J, Tecchi R (eds) Bases para la conservación y manejo de la puna y cordillera frontal. FUCEMA-UNESCO, Uruguay, pp 167–173
Cassini M, Borgnia M, Arzamendia Y, Benítez V, Vilá B (2009) Sociality, foraging and habitat use by vicuña. In: Gordon IJ (ed) The vicuña: the theory and practice of community based wildlife management. Springer, Boston, MA, pp 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09476-2_4
Crawley MJ (2007) The R book. Wiley, England
Davis CE, Hyde JE, Bangdiwala SI, Nelson JJ (1986) An example of dependencies among variables in a conditional logistic regression. In: Moolgavkar SH, Prentice RL (eds) Modern statistical methods in chronic disease epidemiology. Wiley, New York, pp 140–147
Dechmann DKN, Kalko EKV, Kerth G (2007) All-offspring dispersal in a tropical mammal with resource defense polygyny. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:1219–1228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-007-0352-z
Franklin WL (1974) The social behavior of the vicuña. In: Geist V, Walther F (eds) The behavior of ungulates and its relation to management. IUCN, Morges, pp 447–487
Franklin WL (1982) Biology, ecology, and relationship of man to the South American camelids. In: Mares MA, Genoways HH (eds) Mammalian biology in South America. Pymatuning Laboratory of Ecology, Univ. of Pittsburg, Spec. Publ. Series Vol. 6, Pittsburg, PA pp. 457-487
Franklin WL (1983) Contrasting socioecologies of South America’s wild camelids: the vicuña and the guanaco. Am Soc Mammal Spec Publ 7:573–628
Franklin WL (2011) Family Camelide (Camels). In: Wilson DE, Mittermeier RA (eds) Handbook of the mammals of the world, vol 2. Hoofed mammals. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, pp 206–246
Gannon WL, Sikes RS (2007) Animal care and use. Committee of The American Society of Mammalogists. Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research. J Mammalogy 88:809–823. https://doi.org/10.1644/06-MAMM-F-185R1.1809-823
Glade CA, Cattan PE (1987) Aspectos conductuales y reproductivos de la vicuña. In: Torres H (ed) Técnicas para el manejo de la vicuña. UICN/CSE, PNUMA, pp 89–108
Greenwood PJ (1980) Mating systems, philopatry and dispersal in birds and mammals. Anim Behav 28:1140–1162. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(80)80103-5
Hooge PN (1998) Animal movement analysis ArcView extensions. USGS-BRD, Alaska Biological Science Center, Glacier Bay Field Station, Alaska
Hooge PN, Eichenlaub B (1997). Animal movement extension to ArcView, version 1.1. Alaska Biological Science Center, United States Geological Survey, Anchorage
Koford CB (1957) The vicuña and the puna. Ecol Monogr 27:153–219
Lucherini M (1996) Group size, spatial segregation and activity of wild sympatric vicuñas Vicugna vicugna and guanacos Lama guanicoe. Small Rumin Res 20:193–198
Manly BF, McDonald L, Thomas D, McDonald TL, Erickson WP (2002) Resource selection by animals. Springer, Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48151-0
Mosca Torres ME, Puig S, Novillo A, Ovejero R (2015) Vigilance behaviour of the year-round territorial vicuña (Vicugna vicugna) outside the breeding season: influence of group size, social factors and distance to a water source. Behav Process 113:163–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2015.02.006
R Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing [software]. Available from: http://www.R-project.org/
Rojo V, Arzamendia Y, Vilá B (2012) Uso del hábitat por vicuñas (Vicugna vicugna) en un sistema agropastoril en Suripujio, Jujuy. Mastozoología Neotrop 19:127–138
Seaman DE, Powell RA (1996) An evaluation of the accuracy of kernel density estimators for home range analysis. Ecology 77:2075–2085. https://doi.org/10.2307/2265701
Sutherland WJ (1996) From individual behaviour to population ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Vilá BL (1992) Mother-offspring relationship in the vicuña, Vicugna vicugna (Mammalia: Camelidae). Ethology 92:293–300
Vilá BL (1994) Use of dung piles by neighboring vicuñas. J Mamm Biol 59:126–128
Vilá BL (1995) Spacing patterns within groups in vicuñas in relation to sex and behaviour. Stud Neotrop Fauna Environ 30:45–51
Vilá BL (2000) Comportamiento y organización social de la vicuña. In: González B, Bas F, Tala C, Iriarte A (eds) Actas Seminario Manejo sustentable de la vicuña y el guanaco. SAyG, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, pp 175–192
Vilá BL, Cassini MH (1994) Time allocation during the reproductive season in vicuñas. Ethology 97:226–235
Vila BL, Roig VG (1992) Diurnal movements, family groups and alertness of vicuna (Vicugna vicugna) during the late dry season in the Laguna Blanca Reserve (Catamarca, Argentina). Small Rumin Res 7:289–297
Villalba ML (2000) Uso de hábitat e interacciones entre la vicuña y la alpaca en la Reserva Nacional de Fauna Ulla Ulla, La Paz, Bolivia. In: González B, Bas F, Tala C, Iriarte A (eds) Actas Seminario Manejo sustentable de la vicuña y el guanaco. SAyG, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, FIA, Santiago, pp 67–81
Wilson EO (1980) Sociobiología. La nueva síntesis, Omega
Wronski T (2005) Home-range overlap and spatial organization as indicators for territoriality among male bushbuck (Tragelaphus scriptus). J Zool Lond 266:227–235. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952836905006825
Wronski T, Apio A (2006) Home-range overlap, social vicinity and agonistic interactions denoting matrilineal organisation in bushbuck, Tragelaphus scriptus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59:819–828. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-005-0128-2
Yaccobaccio HD (2006) Variables morfométricas de vicuñas (Vicugna vicugna vicugna), en Cieneguillas, Jujuy. In: Vilá BL (ed) Investigación, conservación y manejo de vicuñas. Proyecto MACS, Argentina, pp 101–112
Zuur AF, Leno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New York
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the VICAM team: J. Baldo, V. Rojo, H. Yacobaccio, J. Atan, for field logistics and assistance, as well as D. Baldo, R. Miatello, H. Lamas and F. Cassini and the community of Cieneguillas, Province of Jujuy, for their field assistance and hospitality. We also thank Kevin Lane and Cecilia Baillo who helped us improve the English version of the manuscript.
Funding
This study was funded by the National Agency for Research PICT 0479-2013: “Vicuñas en Jujuy: Un abordaje interdisciplinario”. Drs. Y. Arzamendia, A. Carbajo and B. Vila are full-time researchers of the National Research Council (CONICET) of Argentina.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research involving humans
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
Research involving Animals
All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. All procedures performed in this study involving animals, such as the capture and handling of vicuñas, were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution or practice at which the studies were conducted, and were approved by the Provincial Directorate of Environment and Natural Resources of Jujuy, Argentina (DPMAyRN permits Nº 038-03, 130-04, and 203-05). Our procedures also complied with the guidelines set by the American Society of Mammalogists (Gannon and Sikes 2007), the animal welfare protocols of GECS (South American Camelid Specialist Group), and the Species Survival Commission (SSC) of the IUCN, the International Union for Conservation of Nature.
Informed consent
For this type of study formal consent is not required.
About this article
Cite this article
Arzamendia, Y., Carbajo, A.E. & Vilá, B. Social group dynamics and composition of managed wild vicuñas (Vicugna vicugna vicugna) in Jujuy, Argentina. J Ethol 36, 125–134 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-018-0542-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-018-0542-3