Advertisement

Porosity and surface chemistry development and thermal degradation of textile waste jute during recycling as activated carbon

  • Weifang ChenEmail author
  • Sijia Zhang
  • Feifei He
  • Weipeng Lu
  • Hui Xv
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 134 Downloads

Abstract

Textile waste jute was activated by H3PO4 and ZnCl2 for reuse as activated carbon. Thermal degradation behavior of jute, impregnated jute and activating agents via thermogravimetric analysis were conducted first. Yield and iodine adsorption number were employed to determine the optimal activation conditions. As a result, activation by H3PO4 was best conducted at 700 °C for 90 min with an impregnation ration of 1.0 while conditions for ZnCl2 were 500 °C, 60 min and impregnation ratio of 1.0. That is, the best activation conditions varied with activating agents. So were the properties of resultant jute-based activated carbons. H3PO4 activation produced an activated carbon that was mostly mesoporous while that by ZnCl2 was more even in micropore and mesopore volumes as proven by pore volume distribution analysis. In addition, both carbons were abundant in surface functional groups which could be beneficial for adsorption of pollutants. Overall, jute could be effectively recycled to produce activated carbon that boasted excellent surface chemistry and textual properties.

Keywords

Jute Porosity Surface chemistry H3PO4 ZnCl2 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Shanghai Natural Science Foundation (14ZR1428900) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (21707090).

References

  1. 1.
    Hu Y, Chen Y, Leu SY, Jing H, Li X, Lin CSK (2018) Valorisation of textile waste by fungal solid state fermentation: an example of circular waste-based biorefinery. Resour Conserv Recycl 129:27–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Haule LV, Carr CM, Rigout M (2016) Preparation and physical properties of regenerated cellulose fibres from cotton waste garments. J Clean Prod 112:4445–4451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Briga-Sá A, Nascimento D, Teixeira N, Pinto J, Caldeira F, Varum H, Paiva A (2013) Textile waste as an alternative thermal insulation building material solution. Constr Build Mater 38:155–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barbero-Barrera MDM, Pombo O, Navacerrada MA (2016) Textile fibre waste bindered with natural hydraulic lime. Compos Part B Eng 94:26–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shukla SR, Harad AM, Jawale LS (2008) Recycling of waste PET into useful textile auxiliaries. Waste Manag 28:51–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jeihanipour A, Aslanzadeh S, Rajendran K, Balasubramanian G, Taherzadeh MJ (2013) High-rate biogas production from waste textiles using a two-stage process. Renew Energy 52:128–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jeihanipour A, Taherzadeh MJ (2009) Ethanol production from cotton-based waste textiles. Bioresour Technol 100:1007–1010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gholamzad E, Karimi K, Masoomi M (2014) Effective conversion of waste polyester–cotton textile to ethanol and recovery of polyester by alkaline pretreatment. Chem Eng J 253:40–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hong F, Guo X, Zhang S, Han SF, Yang G, Jonsson LJ (2012) Bacterial cellulose production from cotton-based waste textiles: enzymatic saccharification enhanced by ionic liquid pretreatment. Bioresour Technol 104:503–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wu H, Fan SW, Yuan XW, Chen LF, Deng JL (2013) Fabrication of carbon fibers from jute fibers by pre-oxidation and carbonization. New Carbon Mater 28:448–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rahman MR, Huque MM, Islam MN, Hasan M (2008) Improvement of physico-mechanical properties of jute fiber reinforced polypropylene composites by post-treatment. Compos Part A Appl Sci 39:1739–1747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hong S, Cannon FS, Hou P, Byrne T, Nietodelgado C (2017) Adsorptive removal of sulfate from acid mine drainage by polypyrrole modified activated carbons: effects of polypyrrole deposition protocols and activated carbon source. Chemosphere 184:429–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yahya MA, Al-Qodah Z, Ngah CWZ (2015) Agricultural bio-waste materials as potential sustainable precursors used for activated carbon production: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 46:218–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hidayat A, Wijaya RK, Budiman A (2015) Esterification of free fatty acid on palm fatty acid distillate using activated carbon catalysts generated from coconut shell. Procedia Chem 16:365–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Correa CR, Otto T, Kruse A (2017) Influence of the biomass components on the pore formation of activated carbon. Biomass Bioenerg 97:53–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yakout SM, El-Deen GS (2011) Characterization of activated carbon prepared by phosphoric acid activation of olive stones. Arab J Chem 9:1155–1162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Roy S, Das P, Sengupta S (2017) Treatability study using novel activated carbon prepared from rice husk: column study, optimization using response surface methodology and mathematical modeling. Process Saf Environ Prot 105:184–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Duan X, Srinivasakannan C, Wang X, Wang F, Liu X (2016) Synthesis of activated carbon fibers from cotton by microwave induced H3PO4 activation. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 70:374–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nahil MA, Williams PT (2012) Surface chemistry and porosity of nitrogen-containing activated carbons produced from acrylic textile waste. Chem Eng J 184:228–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yan L, Chouw N, Jayaraman K (2014) Flax fibre and its composites—a review. Compos Part B-Eng 56:296–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang H, Xian G, Li H (2015) Grafting of nano-TiO2 onto flax fibers and the enhancement of the mechanical properties of the flax fiber and flax fiber/epoxy composite. Compos Part A Appl Sci 76:172–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Phan NH, Rio S, Faur C, Le Coq L, Le Cloirec P, Nguyen TH (2006) Production of fibrous activated carbons from natural cellulose (jute, coconut) fibers for water treatment applications. Carbon 44:2569–2577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Senthilkumaar S, Kalaamani P, Porkodi K, Varadarajan PR, Subburaam CV (2006) Adsorption of dissolved reactive red dye from aqueous phase onto activated carbon prepared from agricultural waste. Bioresour Technol 97:1618–1625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Iriarte-Velasco U, Ayastuy JL, Zudaire L, Sierra I (2014) An insight into the reactions occurring during the chemical activation of bone char. Chem Eng J 251:217–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wei XQ, Li QH, Li HC, Li HJ, Chen SX (2015) The use of ZnCl2 activation to prepare low-cost porous carbons coated on glass fibers using mixtures of Novolac, polyethylene glycol and furfural as carbon precursors. New Carbon Mater 104:579–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shamsuddin MS, Yusoff NRN, Sulaiman MA (2016) Synthesis and characterization of activated carbon produced from kenaf core fiber using H3PO4 activation. Procedia Chem 19:558–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yang K, Zhu L, Yang J, Lin D (2017) Adsorption and correlations of selected aromatic compounds on a KOH-activated carbon with large surface area. Sci Total Environ 618:1677–1684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Beltrame KK, Cazetta AL, de Souza PSC, Spessato L, Silva TL, Almeida VC (2018) Adsorption of caffeine on mesoporous activated carbon fibers prepared from pineapple plant leaves. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 147:64–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Stefanidis SD, Kalogiannis KG, Iliopoulou EF, Michailof CM, Pilavachi PA, Lappas AA (2014) A study of lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis via the pyrolysis of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 105:143–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hadoun H, Sadaoui Z, Souami N, Sahel D, Toumert I (2013) Characterization of mesoporous carbon prepared from date stems by H3PO4 chemical activation. Appl Surf Sci 280:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Castro-Muniz A, Suarez-Garcia F, Martinez-Alonso A, Tascon JM (2011) Activated carbon fibers with a high content of surface functional groups by phosphoric acid activation of PPTA. J Colloid Interface Sci 361:307–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mazzetti MJ, Derbyshire F (1998) Activated carbons from yellow poplar and white oak by H3PO4 activation. Carbon 36:1085–1097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rosas JM, Bedia J, Rodriguez-Mirasol J, Cordero T (2009) HEMP-derived activated carbon fibers by chemical activation with phosphoric acid. Fuel 88:19–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yorgun S, Yildiz D (2015) Preparation and characterization of activated carbons from Paulownia wood by chemical activation with H3PO4. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 53:122–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rombaldo CFS, Lisboa ACL, Mendez MOA, Coutinho AR (2014) Brazilian natural fiber (jute) as rawmaterial for activated carbon production. Ann Braz Acad Sci 86:2137–2144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hayashi JI, Kazehaya A, Muroyama K, Watkinson AP (2000) Preparation of activated carbon from lignin by chemical activation. Carbon 38:1873–1878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Qin C, Chen Y, Gao JM (2014) Manufacture and characterization of activated carbon from marigold straw (Tagetes erecta L) by H3PO4 chemical activation. Mater Lett 135:123–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Barpanda P, Fanchini G, Amatucci GG (2011) Structure, surface morphology and electrochemical properties of brominated activated carbons. Carbon 49:2538–2548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Xu J, Chen L, Qu H, Jiao Y, Xie J, Xing G (2014) Preparation and characterization of activated carbon from reedy grass leaves by chemical activation with H3PO4. Appl Surf Sci 320:674–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Nayak A, Bhushan B, Gupta V, Sharma P (2017) Chemically activated carbon from lignocellulosic wastes for heavy metal wastewater remediation: effect of activation conditions. J Colloid Interface Sci 493:228–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Gao Y, Yue Q, Gao B, Sun Y, Wang W, Li Q, Wang Y (2013) Preparation of high surface area-activated carbon from lignin of papermaking black liquor by KOH activation for Ni(II) adsorption. Chem Eng J 217:345–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Alriols MG, Tejado A, Blanco M, Mondragon I, Labidi J (2009) Agricultural palm oil tree residues as raw material for cellulose, lignin and hemicelluloses production by ethylene glycol pulping process. Chem Eng J 148:106–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ceyhan AA, Sahin O, Baytar O, Saka C (2013) Surface and porous characterization of activated carbon prepared from pyrolysis of biomass by two-stage procedure at low activation temperature and it’s the adsorption of iodine. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 104:378–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    de Celis J, Amadeo NE, Cukierman AL (2009) In situ modification of activated carbons developed from a native invasive wood on removal of trace toxic metals from wastewater. J Hazard Mater 161:217–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Lua AC, Yang T (2005) Characteristics of activated carbon prepared from pistachio-nut shell by zinc chloride activation under nitrogen and vacuum conditions. J Colloid Interface Sci 290:505–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Saleh TA, Gupta VK (2014) Processing methods, characteristics and adsorption behavior of tire derived carbons: a review. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 211:93–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Weifang Chen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sijia Zhang
    • 1
  • Feifei He
    • 1
  • Weipeng Lu
    • 1
  • Hui Xv
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Environment and ArchitectureUniversity of Shanghai for Science and TechnologyShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations