Abstract
Significant quantities of building waste were generated from collapsed residential and dilapidated buildings as a result of the disastrous Gorkha earthquake in Nepal on April 25, 2015. In this study, in relation to the field damage investigation of the earthquake hit area and based on the building types, different types of building waste produced from each building are estimated and evaluated. An estimation procedure was established to assess the amount of debris resulting from earthquake. In Kathmandu Valley, different types of buildings generated different quantities of building waste per unit area, and the values for these building types ranged from 1.90 to 3.23 ton m− 2 in weight and 0.89 to 1.57 m3 m− 2 in volume respectively. Residential buildings in Nepal generated a larger amount of waste per unit area (ton m− 2) than buildings in Japan and China. Waste amounts (excluding that in the foundation) generated by public reinforced concrete buildings in Nepal were similar to the amounts generated by reinforced concrete buildings in Japan and China. Wooden buildings had the highest volume per unit area of building waste in Japan, as compared to those in Nepal and Sri Lanka. These results can be used to estimate the amount of building debris that must be cleared for emergency response after a disaster. This information is vital to pre-disaster planning to establish disaster management protocols for smooth recovery operations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Memon MA (2015) Disaster waste recovery and utilization in developing countries—Learning from earthquakes in Nepal. Japanese Geotech Soc Spec Publ 2(20):143–147. https://doi.org/10.3208/jgssp.ESD-KL-7
Hirayama N, Shimaoka T, Fujiwara T et al (2010) Establishment of disaster debris management based on quantitative estimation using natural hazard maps. Waste Manag Environ 140:167–178. https://doi.org/10.2495/WM100161
Brown C, Milke M, Seville E (2011) Disaster waste management: a review article. Waste Manag 31:1085–1098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011.01.027
Hayashi H, Katsumi T (1996) Generation and management of disaster waste. Jpn Soc Soil Mech Found Eng 36(1):349–358
Yang C-P (2009) Composition of demolition wastes from Chi-Chi earthquake-damaged structures and the properties of their inert materials. Can Geotech J 46:470–481. https://doi.org/10.1139/T08-131
Taylor A (2008) Sichuan’s earthquake, six months later. In: Boston Globe. http://archive.boston.com/bigpicture/2008/11/sichuans_earthquake_six_months.html. Accessed 24 May 2016
Booth W (2010) Haiti faces colossal and costly cleanup before it can rebuild. In: Washingt. Post, Cent. Am. Caribb. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/06/AR2010030602544.html. Accessed 24 May 2016
UNEP (2012) Managing post-disaster debris: the Japan experience.United Nations Environment Programme, June 2012
SWMTSC (2015) Disaster Waste: Addressing the Challenges in Nepal DESK STUDY Prepared for UNEP IETC. Solid Waste Management Technical Support Center, Nepal 2015
Xiao J, Xie H, Zhang C (2012) Investigation on building waste and reclaim in Wenchuan earthquake disaster area. Resour Conserv Recycl 61:109–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.01.012
Pathak DR (2015) “Waste Management before Reconstruction” Published in Nepali Language on 9th June, 2015. In: Kantipur Dly. Nepal. http://kantipur.ekantipur.com/news/2015-06-09/410537.html. Accessed 8 Jun 2016
Kapri U (2015) More than fifty thousand workers in problem after the shutdown of crusher industries. Published in Nepali Language on 30th November, 2015. In: Setopati News Online. http://kinmel.setopati.com/rojgaar/31284/. Accessed 1 Dec 2015
Gyawali S (2015) Kathmandu’s Uncoordinated Attempt to Manage Earthquake Debris. Article Published on 6th August 2015. In: Earth Isl. J. http://www.earthisland.org/journal/index.php/elist/eListRead/kathmandus_uncoordinated_attempt_to_manage_earthquake_debris/. Accessed 14 Oct 2015
Asari M, Sakai SI, Yoshioka T et al (2013) Strategy for separation and treatment of disaster waste: a manual for earthquake and tsunami disaster waste management in Japan. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 15:290–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-013-0154-5
FEMA (2010) Debris Estimating Field Guide. A guide developed by Federal Emergency Management Agency USA, September 2010
Yamazaki F, Yano Y, Matsuoka M (2005) Visual damage interpretation of buildings in Bam city using QuickBird images following the 2003 Bam, Iran, earthquake. Earthq Spectra 21:S329–S336. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2101807
DEBRI/UNEP (2008) Disaster Waste Management Mechanism; A Practical Guide for Const. and Dem. Wastes in Indonesia for Project Demonstrating Environmentally Sound Technologies (ESTs) for Building waste Reduction in Indonesia (DEBRI). United Nations Environment Programme, 2008
CBS (2012) National Population and Housing Census 2011 (National Report), Central Bureau of Statistics, Government of Nepal, 2012
Rodrigues H, Chaulagain H, Spacone E, Varum H (2015) Seismic response of current RC buildings in Kathmandu valley. Struct Eng Mech 53:791–818. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2015.53.4.791
JICA (2002) The Study on Eathquake Disaster Mitigation in the Kathmandu Valley, Kingdon of Nepal Final Report. Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) and Ministry of Home Affairs, His Majesty’s Government of Nepal, 2002
RF Cafe Density of Some Common Building Materials (2017) http://www.rfcafe.com/references/general/density-building-materials.htm. Accessed 4 May 2017
SI Metric (2016) Density of Materials. https://www.simetric.co.uk/si_materials.htm. Accessed 4 May 2017
Abdullah N, Sobri MS, Hamzah SH (2015) Shear Resistance Analysis of Rebar Connector in RC Stocky Wall Panel Using Lusas 3D Modelling. Springer Sci Media Singap 313–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-290-6
Graziotti F, Tomassetti U, Penna A, Magenes G (2016) Out-of-plane shaking table tests on URM single leaf and cavity walls. Eng Struct 125:455–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.07.011
Scribd (2016) unit weight of materials used at construction site. https://www.scribd.com/doc/125242342/Unit-Weight-of-Materials-Used-at-Construction-Site. Accessed 4 May 2017
Tarmac (2015) Technical Data Sheet Screed, Product Data Sheet No. 110/01. 5. http://www.tarmac.com/media/756549/screed-data-sheet-tarmac-nov-15.pdf. Accessed 4 May 2017
Wikipedia (2016) List of Indian Timber Trees. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Indian_timber_trees. Accessed 4 May 2017
Ciancio D, Beckett C (2013) Rammed earth: an overview of a sustainable construction material. Third international conference on sustainble construction materials and technology. 18–21 August 2013. Kyoto Research Park, Kyoto Japan. http://www.claisse.info/2013%20papers/data/list%20by%20second%20name.htm (Session M3-2; Country: Australia; No. 53). Accessed 24 May 2017
Greenheck (2004) Gauge and Weight Chart for Sheet Steel, Galvanized Steel, Stainless Steel and Aluminum. http://www.greenheck.com/library/articles/68. Accessed 4 May 2017
Porteous J, Kermani A (2007) Structural timber design to eurocode 5. Weight of building materials, appendix A. Blackwell Publ Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2
Wijeyewickremaa, ACShakyaa K, Panta DR, Maharjana M et al (2013) Lessons learned from performance of buildings during the September 18, 2011 earthquake in Nepal. Asian J Civ Eng 14:719–733
Sun BT, Zhang GX (2010) The Wenchuan earthquake creation of a rich database of building performance. Sci China Technol Sci 53:2668–2680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-010-4082-5
Tasaka A, Kusunoki K (2011) Current situation of low-rise wall type structures world federation of engineering organizations. Disaster Risk Management Committee, November 2011 Annex 4.
Nagaoka K, Tanikawa H, Yoshida N et al (2009) Study of accumulation-distribution tendency to the material stock of the construction sector in all prefectures and mega cities in Japan.pdf. Environ Sci 23:83–88. https://doi.org/10.11492/ceispapers.ceis23.0.83.0
Takatsuki H, Sakai S, Mizutani S (1995) Disaster and waste problem-per unit generation of disaster waste and change in the composition of municipal solid waste. Waste Manag Res (in Japanese) 6:351–1995. https://doi.org/10.3985/wmr.6.351
Hyogo Prefecture Office (1995) Per Unit generation of dismentled building waste in Kobe data of Hyogo Prefecture 1995 as cited in the book authored by Shimaoka T, Yamamoto K, “Saigai Haikibutsu, 2009” in Japanese. Chuo Hoki Shuppan
MoE Japan (Ministry of Environment Japan) (2013) Per unit generation of disaster waste value for fully damaged house, Ministry of Environment Japan, 2013. Page 9. http://www.env.go.jp/recycle/waste/disaster/guideline/pdf/parts/gi1-11-1-1.pdf. Accessed 26 May 2016
Housing and Land Survey Japan (2013) Average area of floor space for dwelling. Housing and Land Survey Japan 2013. Table 19. https://www.e-stat.go.jp/en/stat-search/files?page=1&layout=datalist&toukei=00200522&bunya_l=08&tstat=000001063455&cycle=0&tclass1=000001080435&result_page=1&second=1&second2=1. Accessed 26 Apr 2016
Karunasena G, Rameezdeen R, Amaratunga D (2012) Post-disaster C&D waste management: the case of COWAM Project, City of Galle, Sri Lanka. Australas J Constr Econ Build Conf Ser 1:60–71
Acknowledgements
We express a heartfelt condolence to the relatives and friends of Mr. Shree Krishna Bagale (Sub-Engineer) of Vyas Municipality, Tanahun, Nepal, at his sudden demise during the period of preparation of this paper. His support in providing detailed drawings and estimates for various buildings in this study was invaluable. This research was supported by the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund, Grant Number 3K163009, from the Ministry of Environment, Japan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Poudel, R., Hirai, Y., Asari, M. et al. Establishment of unit generation rates of building debris in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal, after the Gorkha earthquake. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 20, 1663–1675 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-018-0731-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-018-0731-8