Advertisement

Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management

, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp 1337–1347 | Cite as

Waste collection in rural communities: challenges under EU regulations. A case study of Neamt County, Romania

  • Florin Constantin Mihai
REGIONAL CASE STUDY

Abstract

The paper aims to examine the changes in the rural waste management sector at regional scale since the Romania adhesion to the EU in 2007. The traditional waste management based on the mixed waste collection and waste disposal often on improper sites prevailed in municipal waste management options of transitional economies across the globe. The lack of formal waste collection services in rural areas has encouraged the open dumping or backyard burning. The paper analyzes the improvements and challenges of local authorities to fulfill the new EU requirements in this sector supported by data analysis at local administrative unit levels and field observations. Geographical analysis is compulsory to reveal the local disparities. The paper performs an assessment of waste collection issues across 78 rural municipalities within Neamt County. This sector is emerging in rural areas of Eastern Europe, but is far from an efficient municipal waste management system based on the waste hierarchy concept.

Keywords

Waste collection Waste management Municipal waste Rural areas EU 

References

  1. 1.
    Lucendo-Monedero AL, Jordá-Borrell R, Ruiz-Rodríguez F (2015) Predictive model for areas with illegal landfills using logistic regression. J Environ Plan Manag 58(7):1309–1326. doi: 10.1080/09640568.2014.993751 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    De Feo G, Cerrato F, Siano P, Torretta V (2013) Definition of a multi-criteria, web-based approach to managing the illegal dumping of solid waste in Italian villages. Environ Technol 35:104–114. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2013.816328 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zeng C, Niu D, Zhao Y (2015) A comprehensive overview of rural solid waste management in China. Front Environ Sci Eng. doi: 10.1007/s11783-015-0816-8 Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Taboada-Gonzalez P, Aguilar-Virgen Q, Ojeda-Benitez S, Armijo C (2011) Waste characteristic and waste management perception in rural communities in Mexico: a case study. Environ Eng Manag J 10(11):1751–1759Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Taghipour H, Amjad Z, Aslani H, Armanfar F, Dehghanzadeh R (2016) Characterizing and quantifying solid waste of rural communities. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 18(4):790–797. doi: 10.1007/s10163-015-0365-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dubravská M (2014) Recycling of the MSW in the Slovak Republic. J Econ Dev Environ People 3(3):66–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gabršček AE, Išljamović S (2011) Communal waste management: case study for Slovenia. Manag časopis za teoriju i praksu menadžmenta 16(60):35–41Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stanic-Maruna I, Fellner J (2012) Solid waste management in Croatia in response to the European Landfill Directive. Waste Manag Res 30(8):825–838. doi: 10.1177/0734242X12444897 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Szántó R (2011) Waste Management Facility Siting and Social Conflicts—the Case of Hungary In: Kumar S (ed) Integrated waste management—vol I. InTech, pp 41–55. http://www.intechopen.com/books/integrated-waste-management-volume-i/waste-management-facilitysiting-and-social-conflicts-the-case-of-hungary. Accessed 15 July 2016
  10. 10.
    Lasaridi K (2009) Implementing the landfill directive in Greece: problems, perspectives and lessons to be learned. Geogr J 175(4):261–273. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4959.2009.00342.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cudecka-Purina N (2011) Evaluation of financial investment effectiveness in Latvian waste management regions. Sci J Riga Tech Univ Saf Technog Environ 1:14–20Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Scheinberg A, Mol APJ (2010) Multiple modernities: transitional Bulgaria and the ecological modernisation of solid waste management. Environ Plan C Gov Policy 28:18–36. doi: 10.1068/c0926 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Podgaiskyte V (2014) Waste management sector value changes in Lithuania along the last decade. Proc Soc Behav Sci 110:512–519 (Contemporary Issues in Business, Management and Education 2013) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Doležalova M, Benešova L, Zavodska A (2013) The changing character of household waste in the Czech Republic between 1999 and 2009 as a function of home heating methods. Waste Manag 33(9):1950–1957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Malinowski M, Kopytko AM (2014) Assessment of segregated waste accumulation efficiency in selected suburban communities. Polska Akademia Nauk Oddział w Krakowie s 6(3):1499–1512. doi: 10.14597/infraeco.2014.4.3.114 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Steinhoff-Wrześniewska A (2015) The pilot study of characteristics of household waste generated in suburban parts of rural areas. J Ecol Eng 16(2):92–100. doi: 10.12911/22998993/1862 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mihai FC (2015) Spatial distribution of rural dumpsites parameters in Romania. Bollettino dell’Associazione Italiana di Cartografia 154:93–101. doi: 10.13137/2282-472X/11830 Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nenković-Riznić M (2011) Socio-cultural models as an important element of the site selection process in rural waste management. SPATIUM Int Rev 26:1–6. doi: 10.2298/SPAT1126001N Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Poldnurk J (2015) Optimisation of the economic, environmental and administrative efficiency of the municipal waste management model in rural areas. Resour Conserv Recycl 97:55–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Government of Romania. Government Decision (G.D) nr.345/2005 regarding the landfill of waste [in Romanian]. Published in Official Monitor nr. 394 din 10 May 2005. Available at: http://www.mmediu.ro/beta/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/2012-05-17_hg_349_2005.pdf. Accessed 14 June 2016
  21. 21.
    UNECE (2012) Environmental performance reviews, second review, Romania. Available at: http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/env/epr/epr_studies/Romania_II.pdf. Accessed 14 June 2016
  22. 22.
    Mihai FC, Lămăşanu A (2013) Spatial analysis of dumpsites volumes from rural territory case study: Neamt County, Romania. Forum Geogr 12(1):59–60. doi: 10.5775/fg.2067-4635.2013.063.i CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    ANRSC (2015) Decree No. 82 of 9 March 2015 approving the framework-regulation regarding the sanitation services of localities (in Romanian). Available at: http://www.ecoteca.ro/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/Ordin-82-din-2015-privind-Regulamentul-cadru-SALUBRIZARE-ANRSC.pdf.  Accessed 14 June 2016
  24. 24.
    Mihai F-C, Ingrao C (2016) Assessment of biowaste losses through unsound waste management practices in ruralareas and the role of home composting. J Clean Prod. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.163 Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mihai FC, Oiste AM, Chelaru DA (2014) Rural waste generation: a geographical survey at local scale. In: 14th International multidisciplinary scientific geoconference on ecology, economics, education and legislation SGEM 2014, Conference Proceedings, vol 1, pp 585–593. doi:  10.5593/SGEM2014/B51/S20.080
  26. 26.
    Lasaridi KE, Rovolis A, Abeliotis K (2006) Waste management costs in Greece: spatial patterns and causal factors. Environ Econ Invest Assess 98:55–64 (WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment) Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mihai FC (2013) Tourism implications on local waste management. Case Study Neamţ County Present Environ Sustain Dev 7(1):214–221Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan KK 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Research, Faculty of Geography and Geology“Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University of IasiIasiRomania

Personalised recommendations