Modelling and evaluation of anaerobic digestion process of tomato processing wastes for biogas generation
- 109 Downloads
Anaerobic digestion is the most attractive technique for biogas production from organic materials. This research studies and models such production from anaerobic digestion of tomato processing wastes in a single-stage laboratory digester and the variation of pH of the process. The single-stage digester was designed and built on a laboratory scale and the tomato processing wastes used as feed materials for digestion were collected from the Zoshk Khorasan Company (Mashhad-Iran). Some properties of digested materials were determined. The results revealed that the tomato processing wastes could be an appealing option for production of biogas by anaerobic digestion process. The digester was controlled under mesophilic conditions (35 °C) with continuous mixing. Also, the percentage of total solids content was adjusted 8%. The amount of production of biogas from the waste was approximately 142.00 L (130.00 L in STP conditions) which is equivalent to 0.14 m3 per kilogram of volatile solids (m3/kg vs). The methane content in the produced biogas was approximately 60.50% (about 86.00 L).
KeywordsTomato processing waste Anaerobic digestion Biogas Renewable energy
The authors would like to sincerely thank the senior management and staff of Laboratory of Recycling Organization of Mashhad Municipality. And the authors sincerely thank Dr. Abedini, Mr. Aryan Nejad and Mr. Hassan Nejad.
- 3.Richter F, Fricke T, Wachendorf M (2011) Influence of sward maturity and pre-conditioning temperature on the energy production from grass silage through the integrated generation of solid fuel and biogas from biomass (IFBB): 1. The fate of mineral compounds. Biores Technol 102:4855–4865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Arbabi M, Omrani QA (2011) Biogas technology. Fanavaran, TehranGoogle Scholar
- 7.Fazli F (1986) Biogas in China. Ministry of Planning and Budget, TehranGoogle Scholar
- 10.Ossai OS (2013) Comparative evaluation of qualitative and quantitative biogas production potential of oil palm fronds and co-digestion with cow dung. J Energy Technol Policy 3:25–33Google Scholar
- 11.Kurmanov A (2014) The biogas production effectiveness increase. Life Sci J 11(11s):24–29Google Scholar
- 18.Saev M, Koumanova B, Simeonov M (2009) Anaerobic co-digestion of wasted tomatoes and cattle dung for biogas production. J Univ Chem Technol Metall 44:55–60Google Scholar
- 19.Federation WE, Association A (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association (APHA), Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- 21.Zennaki-Bensouda Z, Zaid A, Lamini H, Aubineau M, Boulif M (1996) Methane fermentation of cattle manure: effects of hydraulic retention time, temperature and substrate concentration. Tropicultura 14:134–140Google Scholar
- 22.Dueblein D, Steinhauser A (2008) Biogas from waste and renewable resources. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH and Co 276, KGaAGoogle Scholar
- 24.Gerardi MH (2003) The microbiology of anaerobic digesters. In: Gerardi (ed) Wastewater microbiology series. Wiley, Hoboken, NJGoogle Scholar
- 25.Omrani G (1996) Basics biogas production from urban and rural waste. University of Tehran Publication, IranGoogle Scholar