Advertisement

Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 481–488 | Cite as

Effect of ultrasonic pretreatment on secondary sludge and anaerobic biomass to enhance biogas production

  • Palanisamy Divyalakshmi
  • Devaraj Murugan
  • Meenatchisundaram Sivarajan
  • Arumugam Sivasamy
  • Palanivel Saravanan
  • Chockalingam Lajapathi Rai
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 138 Downloads

Abstract

Anaerobic digestion studies were carried out with tannery excess secondary sludge obtained from common effluent treatment plant. The excess sludge as a feed was disintegrated by ultrasonic homogenizer, to solubilize the intracellular compounds to overcome the rate-limiting hydrolysis step. The anaerobic biomass was subjected to diligent disintegration with the aim of increasing the maintenance energy requirements thereby enhancing its microbial activity. To achieve maximum gas production, the percentage treatment volume of feed and biomass were chosen as dynamic variables and the optimization of these variables was carried out by RSM technique. A 22 full factorial central composite design was used for experimental design and analysis. It was observed that the percentage treatment volume of biomass was found to be most significant variable that of feed and the interaction effects of these two variables found to be insignificant. Based on experimental results, quadratic model was arrived and the variables were optimized for maximum gas production. In addition, response surface for maximum gas production was obtained as a function of two dynamic variables for identification. In the present study, the influence of pretreatment was observed only in biogas production and COD removal, but the methane content remains unchanged.

Keywords

Anaerobic digestion Disintegration Secondary excess sludge Central composite design Response surface methodology Biomass Optimization 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank CSIR-ZERIS, WP-28 (CSC 0103) for funding this project. Thanks are also due to Dr. B. Chandrasekaran, Director, CSIR-CLRI for his encouragement and keen interest in this work.

Supplementary material

10163_2017_603_MOESM1_ESM.tif (47 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (TIF 46 KB)
10163_2017_603_MOESM2_ESM.docx (13 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 13 KB)
10163_2017_603_MOESM3_ESM.docx (13 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (DOCX 13 KB)
10163_2017_603_MOESM4_ESM.docx (15 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (DOCX 14 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Meyer T, Edwards EA (2014) Anaerobic digestion of pulp and paper mill wastewater and sludge. Water Res 65:321–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sri Bala Kameswari K, Chitra K, Thanasekaran K (2015) Optimization of organic load for co-digestion of tannery solid waste in semi-continuous mode of operation. Clean Techn Environ Policy 17:693–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    NEERI report (1997) Wastewater management in cluster of Tanneries in Tamil Nadu. CSIR-National Environmental Engineering Research Institute, Nagpur, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Guo WQ, Yang SS, Xiang WS, Wang XJ, Ren NQ (2013) Minimization of excess sludge production by in-situ activated sludge treatment processes—a comprehensive review. Biotechnol Adv 31:1386–1396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barton JR, Issaias I, Stentiford EI (2008) Carbon-making the right choice for waste management in developing countries. Waste Manage 28:690–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Adekunle KF, Okolie JA (2015) A review of biochemical process of anaerobic digestion. Adv Biosci Biotech 6:205–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Carrere H, Dumas C, Battimelli A, Batstone DJ, Delgenes JP, Steyer JP, Ferrer I (2010) Pretreatment methods to improve sludge anaerobic degradability: a review. J Hazard Mater 183:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ariunbaatar J, Panico A, Esposito G, Pirozzi F, Lens PNL (2014) Pretreatment methods to enhance anaerobic digestion of organic solid waste. Appl Energ 123:143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ferrer I, Ponsa S, Vazquez F, Font X (2008) Increasing biogas production by thermal (70 °C) sludge pre-treatment prior to thermophilic anaerobic digestion. Biochem Eng J 42:186–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wonglertarak W, Wichitsathian B (2014) Alkaline pretreatment of waste activated sludge in anaerobic digestion. J Clean Energ Technol 2:118–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cheng CJ, Andy Hong PK (2013) Anaerobic digestion of activated sludge after pressure-assisted ozonation. Bioresour Technol 142:69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yang Q, Luo K, Li XM, Wang DB, Zheng W, Zeng GM, Liu JJ (2010) Enhanced efficiency of biological excess sludge hydrolysis under anaerobic digestion by additional enzymes. Bioresour Technol 101:2924–2930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pilli S, Bhunia P, Yan S, LeBlanc RJ, Tyagi RD, Surampalli RY (2011) Ultrasonic pretreatment of sludge: a review. Ultrason Sonochem 18:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhang S, Zhang P, Zhang G, Fan J, Zhang Y (2012) Enhancement of anaerobic sludge digestion by high-pressure homogenization. Bioresour Technol 18:496–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kopp J, Muller J, Dichtl N, Schwedes J (1997) Anaerobic digestion and dewatering characteristics of mechanically disintegrated excess sludge. Water Sci Technol 36:129–136Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dohanyos M, Zabranska J, Jenicek P (1997) Enhancement of sludge anaerobic digestion by using of a special thickening centrifuge. Water Sci Technol 36:145–153Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vlyssides AG, Karlis PK (2004) Thermal-alkaline solubilization of waste activated sludge as a pre-treatment stage for anaerobic digestion. Bioresour Technol 91: 201–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Trzcinski AP, Tian X, Wang C, Lin LL, Ng WJ (2015) Combined ultrasonication and thermal pre-treatment of sewage sludge for increasing methane production. J Environ Sci Health Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng 50:213–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shehu MS, Manan ZA, Wan Alwi SR (2012) Optimization of thermo-alkaline disintegration of sewage sludge for enhanced biogas yield. Bioresour Technol 114:69–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Menon A, Ren F, Wang J, Giannis A (2016) Effect of pretreatment techniques on food waste solubilization and biogas production during thermophilic batch anaerobic digestion. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 18:222–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schlafer O, Onyeche T, Bormann H, Schroder C, Sievers M (2002) Ultrasound stimulation of micro-organisms for enhanced biodegradation. Ultrasonics 40:25–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Venkatesh Babu S, Ragupathy S, Rajasimman M (2016) Optimization of anaerobic conditions for the treatment of textile dye wastewater using mixed culture. Environ Sci Pollut R 2:50–53.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    APHA (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Priyadarshini R, Vaishnavi L, Murugan D, Sivarajan M, Sivasamy A, Saravanan P, Balasubramanian N, Lajapathi Rai C (2015) Kinetic studies on anaerobic co-digestion of ultrasonic disintegrated feed and biomass and its effect substantiated by microcalorimetry. Int J Environ Sci Technol 12(9):3029–3038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Itodo IN, Lucas EB, Kucha EI (1992) The effect of media material and its quality on biogas yield. Nigerian J Renew Energy 3:45–49Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Montgomery DC (1991) Design and analysis of experiments. Wiley, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Palanisamy Divyalakshmi
    • 1
  • Devaraj Murugan
    • 1
  • Meenatchisundaram Sivarajan
    • 1
  • Arumugam Sivasamy
    • 1
  • Palanivel Saravanan
    • 2
  • Chockalingam Lajapathi Rai
    • 1
  1. 1.Chemical Engineering DivisionCSIR-Central Leather Research InstituteChennaiIndia
  2. 2.Leather Processing DivisionCSIR-Central Leather Research InstituteChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations