Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 461–468 | Cite as

Classification and management of kitchen waste: disposals and proposals in Chaoyang district, Beijing, China

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 126 Downloads

Abstract

The KW from Chaoyang District was mainly treated by incineration at present. The main purpose of this study was to analysis whether the properties of kitchen waste (KW) in Chaoyang District, Beijing were appropriate for anaerobic digestion (AD). The KW was obtained from four typical closed cleaning stations by sampling once per quarter. The results showed the classification of four different typical closed cleaning station based on living standard was around 90% with good classification levels except Erdaogou and all featured with high vegetables and peels contents. Variable pH with different typical closed cleaning station and sampling season and was suitable for AD other than composting. The high moisture content (MC) was also not suitable for composting. The indices of C/N ratio (basically ranged in 15–20), EC, and NH4+–N content were measured and showed the KW could be treated by AD. The properties of KW vary with living standard and seasons. The properties of KW sampled in the same season, but closed cleaning station were different with each other and also sampled in the same closed cleaning station but different seasons varied widely. Finally, (Guoxue Li) considering the particular nature of KW, AD was better disposal than composting for treating KW in Chaoyang District.

Keywords

Kitchen waste Classification Properties Closed cleaning station Anaerobic digestion 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Science and Technology Support Program of China (Nos. 2012BAD14B01 and 2012BAD14B06). We would like to thank the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China (MOST) for financing the projects.

References

  1. 1.
    Li YY, Jin YY, Li JH (2016) Enhanced split-phase resource utilization of kitchen waste by thermal pre-treatment. Energy 98:155–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wang YY, Zang B, Li GX, Liu Y (2016) Evaluation the anaerobic hydrolysis acidification stage of kitchen waste by pH regulation. Waste Manage 53:62–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Intergovernmental panel on climate change et al(2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis; contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yang N, Zhang H, Shao LM et al (2013) Greenhouse gas emissions during MSW landfilling in China:influence of waste characteristics and LFG treatment measures. J Environ Manag 129:510–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liu X, Gao X, Wang W et al (2012) Pilot-scale anaerobic co-digestion of municipal biomass waste: focusing on biogas production and GHG reduction. Renew Energy 44:463–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Djavan De Clercq, Zongguo Wen n, Fei Fan et al (2016) Biomethane production potential from restaurant food waste in megacities and project level-bottlenecks: a case study in Beijing. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 59:1676–1685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Levis JW, Barlaz MA, Themelis NJ et al (2010) Assessment of the state of food waste treatment in the United States and Canada. Waste Manag 30(8–9):1486–1494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Khoo HH, Lim TZ, Tan RBH (2010) Food waste conversion options in Singapore: environmental impacts based on an LCA perspective. Sci Total Environ 408(6):1367–1373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Beijing waste classification website (2012) [EB/OL]. http://www.ljfl.org.cn/index2.html. Accessed Dec 2012
  10. 10.
    Ren LM, Schuchardt F, Shen YJ, Li GX, Li CP (2010) Impact of struvite crystallization on nitrogen losses during composting of pig manure and cornstalk. Waste Manage 30:885–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhang HY, Li GX, Gu J, Wang GQ, Li YY, Zhang DF (2016) Influence of aeration on volatile sulfur compounds (VSCs) and NH3 emissions during aerobic composting of kitchen waste. Waste Manag 58:369–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Thompson WH, Leege PB, Millner PD et al (2002) Test methods for the examination of composting and compost. Composting Council Research and Education Foundation, United StatesGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yang F, Li GX, Shi H et al (2015) Effects of phosphogypsum and superphosphate on compost maturity and gaseous emissions during kitchen waste composting. Waste Manag 36:70–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Iqbal KM, Shafiq T, Ahmed K (2010) Characterization of bulking agents and its effects on physical properties of compost. Bioresour Technol 101:1913–1919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jiang T, Schuchardt F, Li GX et al (2011) Effect of C/N ratio, aeration rate and moisture content on ammonia and greenhouse gas emission during the composting. J Environ Sci 23:1754–1760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Huet J, Druilhe C, Trémier A et al (2012) The impact of compaction, moisture content, particle size and type of bulking agent on initialphysical properties of sludge-bulking agent mixtures before composting. Bioresour Technol 114:428–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liang C, Das KC, Mc Clendon RW (2003) The influence of temperature and moisture contents regimes on the aerobic microbial activity of a biosolids composting blend. Bioresour Technol 86:131–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kumar M, Ou YL, Lin JG (2010) Co-composting of green waste and food waste at low C/N ratio. Waste Manage 30:602–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Guo R, Li GX, Jiang T et al (2012) Effect of aeration rate, C/N ratio and moisture content on the stability and maturity of compost. Bioresour Technol 112:171–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Adhikari BK, Barrington S, Martinez J, King S (2008) Characterization of food waste and bulking agent for composting. Waste Manage 28:795–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Li Y, Park SY, Zhu J (2011) Solid-state anaerobic digestion for methane production from organic waste. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15:821–826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Puyuelo B, Ponsá S, Gea T et al (2011) Determining C/N ratios for typical organic wastes using biodegradable fractions. Chemosphere 85:653–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhang CS, Sun HJ, Baeyens J, Tan TW (2014) Reviewing the anaerobic digestion of food waste for biogas production. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 38:383–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chang JI, Chen YJ (2010) Effect of bulking agents on food waste composting. Bioresour Technol 101:5917–5924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Himmel M, Ding S, Johnson D, Adney W, Nimlos M, Brady J, Foust T (2007) Biomass recalcitrance: engineering plants and enzymes for biofuels yield. Science 315:804–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ye J, Li D, Sun Y, Wang G, Yuan Z, Zhen F, Wang Y (2013) Improved biogas production from rice straw by co-digestion with kitchen waste and pig manure. Waste Manag 33:2653–2658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Li Y, Feng L, Zhang R, He Y, Liu X, Xiao X, Ma X, Chen C, Liu G (2013) Influence of inoculum source and pre-incubation on bio-methane potential of chicken manure and corn straw. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 171:117–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Li Y, Zhang R, Chen C, Liu X, He Y, Liu X (2013) Biogas yield from co-digestion of corn stover and chicken manure under anaerobic wet, hemi-solid, and solid state condition. Bioresour Technol 149:406–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yuan J, Yang QY, Zhang ZY, Li GX, Luo WH, Zhang DF (2015) Use of additive and pretreatment to control odors in municipal kitchen waste during aerobic composting. J Environ Sci 37:83–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Li ZT, Lu HW, He LR (2013) Experimental and modeling approaches for food waste composting: a review. Chemosphere 93:1247–1257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nakasaki K, Yaguchi H, Sasaki Y et al (1993) Effects of pH control on composting of garbage. Waste Manage Res 11:117–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Smårs S, Gustafsson L, Beck-Friis B et al (2002) Improvement of the composting time for household waste during an initial low pH phase by mesophilic temperature control. Bioresour Technol 84:237–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Appels L, Assche AV, Willems K et al (2011) Peracetic acid oxidation as an alternative pre-treatment for the anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge. Bioresour Technol 102:4124–4130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Xu Z, Zhao M, Huang Z, Gao S, Ruan W (2014) In situ volatile fatty acids infuence biogas generation from kitchen waste by anaerobic digestion. Bioresour Technol 163:186–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wang X, Yang G, Feng Y et al (2012) Optimizing feeding composition and carbon-nitrogen ratios for improved methane yield during anaerobic co-digestion of dairy, chicken manure and wheat straw. Bioresour Technol 120:78–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Yenigün O, Demirel B (2013) Ammonia inhibition in anaerobic digestion: a review. Process Biochem 48:901–911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Walker M, Iyer K, Heaven S et al (2011) Ammonia removal in anaerobic digestion by biogas stripping: an evaluation of process alternatives using a first order rate model based on experimental findings. Chem Eng J 178:138–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wang Q, Peng L, Su H (2013) The effect of a buffer function on the semi-continuous anaerobic digestion. Bioresour Technol 139:43–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zhang CS, Su HJ, Tan TW (2013) Batch and semi-continuous anaerobic digestion of food waste in a dual solid-liquid system. Bioresour Technol 145:10–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Huang GF, Wong, JWC, Wu QT et al (2004) Effect of C/N on composting of pig manure with sawdust. Waste Manag 24(8):805–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    García C, Hernández T, Costa F (1991) Study on water extract of sewage sludge composts. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 37(3):399–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Shahriari H, Warith M, Hamoda M et al (2013) Evaluation of single vs. staged mesophilic anaerobic digestion of kitchen waste with and without microwave pretreatment. J Environ Manage 125:74–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Guo R, Li GX, Jiang T, Schuchardt F, Chen TB, Zhao YQ, Shen YJ (2012) Effect of aeration rate, C/N ratio and moisture content on the stability and maturity of compost. Bioresour Technol 112:171–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Neyla S, Soulwene K, Fadhel M et al (2009) Microbiological parameters and maturity degree during composting of Posidonia oceanica residues mixed with vegetable wastes in semi-arid pedoclimatic condition. J Environ Sci 21:1452–1458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Amir S, Hafidi M, Lemee L et al (2006) Structural characterization of humic acids, extracted from sewage sludge during composting, by thermochemolysis-gas chromatography-mass sectrometry. Process Biochem 41(2):410–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Stevenson FJ 1994. Humus chemistry Genesis, composition, reactions. 2nd edn. Wliey, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Agronomy/Center of Biomass EngineeringChina Agricultural UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.College of Resource and Environmental ScienceChina Agricultural UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations