Advertisement

Industrial solid waste management through the application of multi-criteria decision-making analysis: a case study of Shamsabad industrial complexes

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

Industrial towns, as major bases of small and medium production centers, have played a major role in the industrial development of several countries. These towns have paved a way for the prosperity of economic plans and have been able to meet up with the production perspectives of investors, thereby providing the necessary fundamental services. In this regard, paying attention to proper management of waste production is quite important both in the preservation of the environment from industrial pollution and reduction of probable risks threatening the employees of industrial units located in the towns. Therefore, the present research determined the stream of the industrial waste production in Shamsabad Industrial Town, by designing four appropriate disposal scenarios according to the quality of the produced wastes, and assesses them technically, economically and environmentally using two methods of analysis: analytic hierarchical process and analytic network process. The fourth scenario, which consisted of landfilling, incineration and recycling, was ultimately selected as the best disposal scenario. Indeed, the main objective of current paper is to develop a model which could be implemented in other industrial towns, to proper management of generated wastes.

Keywords

Industrial towns Industrial pollution Waste management Disposal scenarios 

References

  1. 1.
    Woodard F (2001) Industrial waste treatment handbook. Butterworth–Heinemann, pp 397–437Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Khan S, Faisal M (2008) An analytical network process model for municipal solid waste disposal options. Waste Manag 28(3):1500–1508MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vego G, Kucar-Dragicevic S, Koporivanic N (2008) Application of multi-criteria decision-making on strategic municipal solid waste management in Dalmatia. Waste Manag 28(11):2192–2201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bhushan N, Rai K (2004) Strategic decision making applying the analytic hierarchy process. Springer, London, pp 3–25Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    An D, Yang Y, Chai X, Xi B, Dong L, Ren J (2015) Mitigating pollution of hazardous materials from WEEE of China: portfolio selection for a sustainable future based on multi-criteria decision-making. Resour Conserv Recycl 105:198–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Soltani A, Hewage K, Reza B, Sadiq R (2015) Multiple stakeholders in multi-criteria decision-making in the context of municipal solid waste management: a review. Waste Manag 35:318–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Qdais HA, Alshraideh H (2016) Selection of management option for solid waste from olive oil industry using the analytical hierarchy process. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 18(1):177–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yang YPO, Shieh HM, Tzeng GH (2013) A VIKOR technique based on DEMATEL and ANP for information security risk control assessment. Inf Sci 232:482–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bhattacharya A, Mohapatra P, Kumar V, Dey PK, Brady M, Tiwari MK, Nudurupati SS (2014) Green supply chain performance measurement using fuzzy ANP-based balanced scorecard: a collaborative decision-making approach. Prod Plan Control 25(8):698–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ren J, Tan S, Goodsite ME, Sovacool BK, Dong L (2015) Sustainability, shale gas, and energy transition in China: assessing barriers and prioritizing strategic measures. Energy 84:551–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Saaty TL (2008) Decision-making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int J Serv Sci 1(1):83–98MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rao PV, Baral SS (2011) Attribute based specification, comparison and selection of feed stock for anaerobic digestion using MADM approach. J Hazard Mater 186:2009–2016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Manzardo A, Ren J, Mazzi A, Scipioni A (2012) A grey-based group decision-making methodology for the selection of hydrogen technologies in life cycle sustainability perspective. Int J Hydrogen Energy 37(23):17663–17670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liao MS, Liang GS, Chen CY (2013) Fuzzy grey relation method for multiple criteria decision-making problems. Qual Quant 47(6):3065–3077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sánchez-Lozano JM, Antunes CH, García-Cascales MS, Dias LC (2014) GIS-based photovoltaic solar farms site selection using ELECTRE-TRI: evaluating the case for Torre Pacheco, Murcia, Southeast of Spain. Renew Energy 66:478–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ren J, Tan S, Dong L, Mazzi A, Scipioni A, Sovacool BK (2014) Determining the life cycle energy efficiency of six biofuel systems in China: a data envelopment analysis. Bioresour Technol 162:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Du J, Yang Y, Xu L, Zhang S, Yang F (2012) Research on the alternatives in a strategic environmental assessment based on the extension theory. Environ Monit Assess 184(9):5807–5819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ren J, Fedele A, Mason M, Manzardo A, Scipioni A (2013) Fuzzy multi-actor multi-criteria decision-making for sustainability assessment of biomass-based technologies for hydrogen production. Int J Hydrog Energy 38(22):9111–9120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shi S, Cao J, Feng L, Liang W, Zhang L (2014) Construction of a technique plan repository and evaluation system based on AHP group decision-making for emergency treatment and disposal in chemical pollution accidents. J Hazard Mater 276:200–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Aragonés-Beltrán P, Mendoza-Roca JA, Bes-Piá A, García-Melón M, Parra-Ruiz E (2009) Application of multicriteria decision analysis to jar-test results for chemicals selection in the physical–chemical treatment of textile waste water. J Hazard Mater 164(1):288–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Saaty TL, Vargas LG (2006) Decision making with the analytic network process. Springer Science, Business Media, LLC, pp 1–27Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hokkanen J, Salminen P (1997) Choosing a solid waste management system using multi criteria decision analysis. Eur J Oper Res 98(1):19–36CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wilson E, McDougall F, Willmore J (2001) Euro-trash searching Europe for a more sustainable approach to waste management. Resour Conserv Recycl 31:327–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Morrissey AJ, Browne J (2004) Waste management models and their application to sustainable waste management. Waste Manag 24(3):297–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Achillas C, Moussiopoulos N, Karagiannidis A, Banias G, Perkoulidis G (2013) The use of multi-criteria decision analysis to tackle waste management problems: a literature review. Waste Manag Res 31(2):115–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Karagiannidis A, Moussiopoulos N (1998) A model generating framework for regional waste management taking local peculiarities explicitly into account. Waste Manag 6:281–305Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hung ML, Ma HW, Yang WF (2007) A novel sustainable decision-making model for municipal solid waste management. Waste Manag (New York, N.Y.) 27:209–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Samah MAA, Manaf LA, Aris AZ, Sulaiman WNA (2011) Solid waste management: analytical hierarchy process (AHP) application of selecting treatment technology in Sepang Municipal Council, Malaysia. Curr World Environ 6:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pires A, Martino G, Chang NB (2008) Solid waste management in European countries: a review of system analysis techniques. J Environ Manag 92(4):1–18Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Duve JR, Deshmukh NK, Deshmukh NK (2015) Decision support system for solid waste sites allocation using GIS. Int J Comput Appl 5(5):1797–1805Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ohri A, Singh PK (2010) Development of decision support system for municipal solid waste management in India: a review. Int J Environ Sci 1(4):440–453Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Abduli MA (1997) Generation, on-site storage, handling and processing of industrial waste of Tehran. Int J Environ Stud 18:47–60 (in Persian) Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nouri J, Nabizadeh R, Naddafi K, Omidi Sh, Koulivand A, Binavapor M (2009) Qualitative and quantitative characteristics of industrial estates solid wastes (case study: Bu-Ali Industrial Estate). J Environ Sci Technol 11(4):215–223 (in Persian) Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Madadian E, Amiri L, Abdoli MA (2013) Application of analytic hierarchy process and multicriteria decision analysis on waste management: a case study in Iran. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 32:810–817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pak A, Tajrishi M, Taherisharaeini H (1996) Classification of industrial solid wastes and its importance in recycling and determination of landfill type. Sharif J Sci Technol 33:55–65 (in Persian) Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Amirian P, Talebbeydokhty N, Jafarzadeh N, Nabizadeh R (2007) Investigation of industrial hazardous waste: a case study of Fars Province. J Environ Sci Technol 33:47–54 (in Persian) Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Contreras F, Hanaki K, Aramaki T (2008) Application of analytical hierarchy process to analyze stakeholders preferences for municipal solid waste management plans, Boston, USA. Resour Conserv Recycl 52:979–991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tseng ML (2009) Application of ANP and DEMATEL to evaluate the decision-making of municipal solid waste management in Metro Manila. Environ Monit Assess 156:181–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mahdi IM, Alreshaid K (2005) Decision support system for selecting the proper project delivery method using analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Int J Proj Manag 23:564–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Basri H, Ezlin N, Basri A (2008) An intelligent system for integrated solid waste management. J Sustain Dev 1(2):39–46Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wu CR, Lin CT, Chen HC (2009) Integrated environmental assessment of the location selection with fuzzy analytical network process. Qual Quant 43(3):375–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Sener S, Sener E, Karagüzel R (2011) Solid waste disposal site selection with GIS and AHP methodology: a case study in Senirkent-Uluborlu (Isparta) Basin, Turkey. Environ Monitor Assess 173(1–4):533–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Abu-Qdais HA (2010) Selection of landfill leachate management strategy using decision support system. J Solid Waste Technol Manag 36(4):246–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Dewi O, Koerner I, Harjoko T (2010) A review on decision support models for regional sustainable waste management. The International Solid Waste Association World ConferenceGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Karmperis AC, Aravossis K, Tatsiopoulos IP, Sotirchos A (2013) Decision support models for solid waste management: review and game-theoretic approaches. Waste Manag (New York, N.Y.) 33:1290–1301CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dariush Nouri
    • 1
  • M. R. Sabour
    • 1
  • M. GhanbarzadehLak
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringK.N.Toosi University of TechnologyTehranIran
  2. 2.Civil Engineering Department, School of EngineeringUrmia UniversityUrmiaIran

Personalised recommendations