Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Industrial solid waste management through the application of multi-criteria decision-making analysis: a case study of Shamsabad industrial complexes

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Industrial towns, as major bases of small and medium production centers, have played a major role in the industrial development of several countries. These towns have paved a way for the prosperity of economic plans and have been able to meet up with the production perspectives of investors, thereby providing the necessary fundamental services. In this regard, paying attention to proper management of waste production is quite important both in the preservation of the environment from industrial pollution and reduction of probable risks threatening the employees of industrial units located in the towns. Therefore, the present research determined the stream of the industrial waste production in Shamsabad Industrial Town, by designing four appropriate disposal scenarios according to the quality of the produced wastes, and assesses them technically, economically and environmentally using two methods of analysis: analytic hierarchical process and analytic network process. The fourth scenario, which consisted of landfilling, incineration and recycling, was ultimately selected as the best disposal scenario. Indeed, the main objective of current paper is to develop a model which could be implemented in other industrial towns, to proper management of generated wastes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Woodard F (2001) Industrial waste treatment handbook. Butterworth–Heinemann, pp 397–437

  2. Khan S, Faisal M (2008) An analytical network process model for municipal solid waste disposal options. Waste Manag 28(3):1500–1508

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Vego G, Kucar-Dragicevic S, Koporivanic N (2008) Application of multi-criteria decision-making on strategic municipal solid waste management in Dalmatia. Waste Manag 28(11):2192–2201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhushan N, Rai K (2004) Strategic decision making applying the analytic hierarchy process. Springer, London, pp 3–25

  5. An D, Yang Y, Chai X, Xi B, Dong L, Ren J (2015) Mitigating pollution of hazardous materials from WEEE of China: portfolio selection for a sustainable future based on multi-criteria decision-making. Resour Conserv Recycl 105:198–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Soltani A, Hewage K, Reza B, Sadiq R (2015) Multiple stakeholders in multi-criteria decision-making in the context of municipal solid waste management: a review. Waste Manag 35:318–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Qdais HA, Alshraideh H (2016) Selection of management option for solid waste from olive oil industry using the analytical hierarchy process. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 18(1):177–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yang YPO, Shieh HM, Tzeng GH (2013) A VIKOR technique based on DEMATEL and ANP for information security risk control assessment. Inf Sci 232:482–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bhattacharya A, Mohapatra P, Kumar V, Dey PK, Brady M, Tiwari MK, Nudurupati SS (2014) Green supply chain performance measurement using fuzzy ANP-based balanced scorecard: a collaborative decision-making approach. Prod Plan Control 25(8):698–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ren J, Tan S, Goodsite ME, Sovacool BK, Dong L (2015) Sustainability, shale gas, and energy transition in China: assessing barriers and prioritizing strategic measures. Energy 84:551–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Saaty TL (2008) Decision-making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int J Serv Sci 1(1):83–98

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Rao PV, Baral SS (2011) Attribute based specification, comparison and selection of feed stock for anaerobic digestion using MADM approach. J Hazard Mater 186:2009–2016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Manzardo A, Ren J, Mazzi A, Scipioni A (2012) A grey-based group decision-making methodology for the selection of hydrogen technologies in life cycle sustainability perspective. Int J Hydrogen Energy 37(23):17663–17670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liao MS, Liang GS, Chen CY (2013) Fuzzy grey relation method for multiple criteria decision-making problems. Qual Quant 47(6):3065–3077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sánchez-Lozano JM, Antunes CH, García-Cascales MS, Dias LC (2014) GIS-based photovoltaic solar farms site selection using ELECTRE-TRI: evaluating the case for Torre Pacheco, Murcia, Southeast of Spain. Renew Energy 66:478–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ren J, Tan S, Dong L, Mazzi A, Scipioni A, Sovacool BK (2014) Determining the life cycle energy efficiency of six biofuel systems in China: a data envelopment analysis. Bioresour Technol 162:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Du J, Yang Y, Xu L, Zhang S, Yang F (2012) Research on the alternatives in a strategic environmental assessment based on the extension theory. Environ Monit Assess 184(9):5807–5819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ren J, Fedele A, Mason M, Manzardo A, Scipioni A (2013) Fuzzy multi-actor multi-criteria decision-making for sustainability assessment of biomass-based technologies for hydrogen production. Int J Hydrog Energy 38(22):9111–9120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shi S, Cao J, Feng L, Liang W, Zhang L (2014) Construction of a technique plan repository and evaluation system based on AHP group decision-making for emergency treatment and disposal in chemical pollution accidents. J Hazard Mater 276:200–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Aragonés-Beltrán P, Mendoza-Roca JA, Bes-Piá A, García-Melón M, Parra-Ruiz E (2009) Application of multicriteria decision analysis to jar-test results for chemicals selection in the physical–chemical treatment of textile waste water. J Hazard Mater 164(1):288–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Saaty TL, Vargas LG (2006) Decision making with the analytic network process. Springer Science, Business Media, LLC, pp 1–27

  22. Hokkanen J, Salminen P (1997) Choosing a solid waste management system using multi criteria decision analysis. Eur J Oper Res 98(1):19–36

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Wilson E, McDougall F, Willmore J (2001) Euro-trash searching Europe for a more sustainable approach to waste management. Resour Conserv Recycl 31:327–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Morrissey AJ, Browne J (2004) Waste management models and their application to sustainable waste management. Waste Manag 24(3):297–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Achillas C, Moussiopoulos N, Karagiannidis A, Banias G, Perkoulidis G (2013) The use of multi-criteria decision analysis to tackle waste management problems: a literature review. Waste Manag Res 31(2):115–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Karagiannidis A, Moussiopoulos N (1998) A model generating framework for regional waste management taking local peculiarities explicitly into account. Waste Manag 6:281–305

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hung ML, Ma HW, Yang WF (2007) A novel sustainable decision-making model for municipal solid waste management. Waste Manag (New York, N.Y.) 27:209–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Samah MAA, Manaf LA, Aris AZ, Sulaiman WNA (2011) Solid waste management: analytical hierarchy process (AHP) application of selecting treatment technology in Sepang Municipal Council, Malaysia. Curr World Environ 6:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pires A, Martino G, Chang NB (2008) Solid waste management in European countries: a review of system analysis techniques. J Environ Manag 92(4):1–18

    Google Scholar 

  30. Duve JR, Deshmukh NK, Deshmukh NK (2015) Decision support system for solid waste sites allocation using GIS. Int J Comput Appl 5(5):1797–1805

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ohri A, Singh PK (2010) Development of decision support system for municipal solid waste management in India: a review. Int J Environ Sci 1(4):440–453

    Google Scholar 

  32. Abduli MA (1997) Generation, on-site storage, handling and processing of industrial waste of Tehran. Int J Environ Stud 18:47–60 (in Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Nouri J, Nabizadeh R, Naddafi K, Omidi Sh, Koulivand A, Binavapor M (2009) Qualitative and quantitative characteristics of industrial estates solid wastes (case study: Bu-Ali Industrial Estate). J Environ Sci Technol 11(4):215–223 (in Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Madadian E, Amiri L, Abdoli MA (2013) Application of analytic hierarchy process and multicriteria decision analysis on waste management: a case study in Iran. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 32:810–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Pak A, Tajrishi M, Taherisharaeini H (1996) Classification of industrial solid wastes and its importance in recycling and determination of landfill type. Sharif J Sci Technol 33:55–65 (in Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Amirian P, Talebbeydokhty N, Jafarzadeh N, Nabizadeh R (2007) Investigation of industrial hazardous waste: a case study of Fars Province. J Environ Sci Technol 33:47–54 (in Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Contreras F, Hanaki K, Aramaki T (2008) Application of analytical hierarchy process to analyze stakeholders preferences for municipal solid waste management plans, Boston, USA. Resour Conserv Recycl 52:979–991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Tseng ML (2009) Application of ANP and DEMATEL to evaluate the decision-making of municipal solid waste management in Metro Manila. Environ Monit Assess 156:181–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Mahdi IM, Alreshaid K (2005) Decision support system for selecting the proper project delivery method using analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Int J Proj Manag 23:564–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Basri H, Ezlin N, Basri A (2008) An intelligent system for integrated solid waste management. J Sustain Dev 1(2):39–46

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wu CR, Lin CT, Chen HC (2009) Integrated environmental assessment of the location selection with fuzzy analytical network process. Qual Quant 43(3):375–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Sener S, Sener E, Karagüzel R (2011) Solid waste disposal site selection with GIS and AHP methodology: a case study in Senirkent-Uluborlu (Isparta) Basin, Turkey. Environ Monitor Assess 173(1–4):533–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Abu-Qdais HA (2010) Selection of landfill leachate management strategy using decision support system. J Solid Waste Technol Manag 36(4):246–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Dewi O, Koerner I, Harjoko T (2010) A review on decision support models for regional sustainable waste management. The International Solid Waste Association World Conference

  45. Karmperis AC, Aravossis K, Tatsiopoulos IP, Sotirchos A (2013) Decision support models for solid waste management: review and game-theoretic approaches. Waste Manag (New York, N.Y.) 33:1290–1301

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dariush Nouri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nouri, D., Sabour, M.R. & GhanbarzadehLak, M. Industrial solid waste management through the application of multi-criteria decision-making analysis: a case study of Shamsabad industrial complexes. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 20, 43–58 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-016-0544-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-016-0544-6

Keywords

Navigation