The need for disruptive innovation in acute kidney injury

Abstract

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a threatening medical condition associated with poor outcomes at different settings. The development of standardized diagnostic criteria and new biomarkers addressed significant clinical impacts of AKI and the need for an early AKI detection, respectively. There have been some breakthroughs in understanding the pathogenesis of AKI through basic research; however, treatments against AKI aside from renal replacement therapy (RRT) have not shown adequate successful results. Biomarkers that could identify good responders to certain treatment are expected to facilitate translation of basic research findings. Most patients with severe AKI treated with RRT died due to multiple-organ failure, not renal dysfunction. Hence, it is essential to identify other organ dysfunctions induced by AKI as organ crosstalk. Also, a multidisciplinary approach of critical care nephrology is needed to evaluate a complex organ crosstalk in AKI. For disruptive innovation for AKI, we further explore these new aspects of AKI, which previously were considered outside the scope of nephrology.

Introduction

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is characterized by an acute decline in renal function. Since the concept of AKI was suggested by addressing the importance of early detection and early intervention around 2004–2005 [1, 2], many clinical studies have provided evidences that AKI is significantly associated with poor outcomes in various clinical situations [3]. This has increased awareness on AKI in the area of nephrology and other areas such as critical care medicine and cardiology. Basic research detected pathophysiological pathways that contributed to the development of AKI and subsequent progression of kidney injury using sophisticated techniques such as genetic engineering [4], intravital microscopy [5], and comprehensive analysis of transcriptomics [6] and metabolomics [7]. In AKI diagnosis, several new biomarkers have been clinically introduced and earlier detection of AKI has become possible in the last decades. However, no significant translation from the bench to the bedside has been attained in therapeutics against AKI. Thus, desired results of AKI research that would provide significant improvements on the outcomes of AKI patients are yet to be achieved.

Diagnosis

Serum creatinine and urine output

The Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria were published in 2012 and is currently the international gold standard of AKI diagnosis [8]. The KDIGO criteria were established by integrating two previous AKI diagnosis criteria: the Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss of kidney function, and End-stage kidney disease (RIFLE) [9] and the Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) [10] criteria. Recently, the Japanese clinical practice guideline for AKI was developed [11]. In this guideline, the KDIGO criteria were evaluated in comparison with the RIFLE and the AKIN criteria. In eleven observational studies, the KDIGO criteria were found to be more accurate than, or as accurate as, the RIFLE and AKIN criteria in predicting the in-hospital mortality of patients. Of note, these observations were mostly noted from the data of inpatients (hospital-acquired AKI). Community-acquired AKI was found to be more severe AKI than hospital-acquired AKI and showed better outcomes such as mortality despite having similar risk factors [12, 13].

The KDIGO criteria defined AKI as an increase in the serum creatinine and a reduction in the urine output. It is well known that an increase in serum creatinine delays glomerular filtration rate (GFR) reduction for 24–48 h [14]. To overcome this, the kinetic estimated GFR calculation was suggested [15]. Several studies evaluated its clinical significance in critically ill patients [16,17,18]. However, serum creatinine may not be elevated in a reduced GFR since creatinine production is suppressed under sepsis condition [19]. Sepsis is a leading cause of AKI in ICUs [20]. Hence, serum creatinine and serum creatinine-based methods are neither early nor sensitive markers of AKI especially in ICUs (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure1

Paradoxical increases of serum creatinine by sepsis treatment. Creatinine production in muscle is suppressed by sepsis and creatinine secretion into urine is reduced by septic AKI. If drug X improves sepsis and septic AKI, both creatinine production and secretion will be increased. These responses hamper the accurate evaluation of drug X against septic AKI. Cr, serum creatinine

The KDIGO criteria determines AKI severity by serum creatinine elevation and urine output. The Japanese AKI guideline [19] indicated that urine output along with serum creatinine significantly improved the survival outcome predictions in ICU patients. It suggested that the urine output should be included in AKI severity evaluation whenever possible. However, no study on outpatients or general ward patients has been conducted to evaluate the urine output criteria. Although urine output can be measured hourly in ICUs, it is not feasible to obtain urine output in other clinical settings such as the emergency department and general ward.

Two common clinical markers of serum creatinine and urine output, which are used by AKI diagnosis with the KDIGO criteria, have several serious disadvantages as described above. This promoted to develop better diagnostic tools for AKI and several new AKI biomarkers were investigated for the last decade.

Biomarker

Although AKI is a syndrome associated with a broad spectrum of diseases and a variety of underlying etiologies, two distinct phenotypes need to be assessed in clinical settings: transient (“pre-renal”) AKI and persistent (“renal”) AKI. Transient AKI can be categorized as a fluid-responsive AKI as correction of renal perfusion by fluid resuscitation will rapidly improve renal function in transient AKI patients. In several different clinical conditions, the prognosis of transient AKI was reportedly better than persistent AKI [21,22,23,24,25]. Persistent AKI is generally diagnosed with more severe AKI stage, i.e., higher serum creatinine and lower urine output (oliguria or anuria) compared with transient AKI. Distinguishing transient over persistent AKI is crucial for clinical management and for enrollment of AKI clinical trials because including transient AKI patients in the trials will interfere with detecting potential drug effects. However, determining transient over persistent AKI requires a fluid challenge or certain observation time. Fluid challenge may increase the risk of pulmonary edema and mechanical ventilation may be required when it is complicated with heart failure. A longer observation time will decrease the chance of response to new AKI treatment in clinical trials.

Especially in ICUs, the common underlying etiology of persistent AKI is acute tubular injury. Detecting tubular epithelial injury helps in distinguishing persistent from transient AKI. The fractional excretion of sodium (FeNa) and urea (FeUN) are widely used; however, their effectiveness is inadequate especially in sepsis [26, 27]. Furthermore, GFR reduction and subsequent serum creatinine elevation will be observed after tubular injury in AKI. For early detection and differentiation of persistent AKI, monitoring the tubular epithelial cell injury is expected to be a better strategy than monitoring the serum creatinine and urine output in AKI diagnosis based on the KDIGO criteria. Under these considerations, new AKI biomarkers have been developed (Table 1). Post-cardiac surgery AKI has been evaluated for the early detection of AKI using new biomarkers, because the incidence of renal insult is obvious (i.e., cardiopulmonary bypass) as well as a relatively high prevalence of AKI after the surgery (30–40%). Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) and L-type fatty acid-binding protein (L-FABP) were approved by the Japanese health insurance system. Both reportedly detected AKI earlier than serum creatinine elevation in adult and pediatric post-cardiac surgery AKI [28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35]. Animal experiments demonstrated that expressions of these biomarkers in the kidney were significantly increased in the persistent AKI model (ischemia reperfusion and cisplatin injection) than in the transient AKI model (dehydration) [36, 37]. Urinary NGAL can help in differentiating persistent AKI from transient AKI in a cohort from the emergency department [38]. In studies on inpatients, several biomarkers including NGAL and L-FABP showed statistically significant difference between pre-renal AKI and renal AKI, but some overlaps were observed between these two groups [36, 39, 40]. Similar overlaps were observed between non-AKI and AKI especially in adult ICU cohorts, possibly because of background heterogeneity and unclear onset of renal insult [41,42,43]. These findings suggest that measuring one biomarker cannot perfectly predict AKI development or other outcomes.

Table 1 Newly developed biomarkers

In cancer screening, five consecutive phases of biomarker development were proposed [44]. The final phase (Phase 5) describes whether biomarker measurement reduced the burden of disease on the population. Even if AKI was detected early through the biomarker, an overall benefit needs to be identified with the impact of measurement on improving the outcomes of AKI. Since no specific drug that can prevent or treat AKI is clinically available, including biomarker measurement in AKI clinical trials may be a possible solution (Fig. 2). After clinical risk factors are evaluated, patients are then screened for eligibility by measuring biomarkers. Prevalence of renal tubular injury (i.e., high biomarker value) will increase the proportion of target patients at enrollment and decrease the sample size and trial cost. If drug A will be demonstrated to be effective in patients with high biomarker B (responder), both drug A and biomarker B will simultaneously be considered. Several clinical trials on renal replacement therapy (RRT) and bundle approach against AKI have recently used biomarkers as basis for patient enrollment [45, 46]. The PrevAKI study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of implementing the KDIGO guideline bundle in preventing post-cardiac surgery AKI in high-risk patients characterized by the urinary insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7 (IGFBP7) and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2 (TIMP-2) [46]. A significant reduction in AKI occurrence was reported in the intervention group. It should be noted that 495 of 882 screened patients were excluded in this study due to low biomarker values.

Fig. 2
figure2

Use of biomarkers for enrollment in clinical trials. BM biomarker

Early detection of AKI seemed to be the main purpose for new AKI biomarker development; however, other purposes such as predicting fluid responsiveness (differential diagnosis of renal versus prerenal AKI) and identifying responders to certain treatments need to be emphasized for clinical applications.

Treatment

Barrier to translation

As abovementioned, no clinically available drug can prevent or treat AKI. A number of potential effective treatments in basic research with animal models failed to be translated for clinical application. It has been pointed out that the failure to translate results from basic research to clinical practice is due to complex and heterogeneous disease characteristics of AKI, inappropriate designs of clinical trials (e.g., delayed drug administration, canceled therapeutic benefit by adverse events, and inadequate sample size), and irrelevant animal models that insufficiently mimic human AKI [47].

The need for clinically relevant animal models in the preclinical study has been addressed [48, 49]. Sepsis and AKI are highly complicated syndromes, having several different pathological mechanisms; hence, the replication of septic AKI in animal models is difficult. Exogenous lipopolysaccharides (LPS) administration causes immune responses in animals that are similar to human sepsis and septic shock. An LPS injection induced a rapid and significant increase of the blood inflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL-1β, and treatments with neutralizing antibodies against these mediators significantly reduced mortality and organ injuries in LPS-injected mice. However, these treatments failed to show any protection from human sepsis [50, 51].

Cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) is another animal model showing a ligation distal to the ileocecal valve and a needle puncture of the ligated cecum that causes fecal material to leak into the peritoneum, resulting in poly-microbial bacteremia and sepsis [52]. Supportive treatment as with fluids and antibiotics is often given to mimic human sepsis. CLP-induced sepsis models show a cytokine profile similar to that of human sepsis [53], and an anti-TNF-α treatment fails to alleviate sepsis in CLP models similar to that in the case of human sepsis [54, 55]. However, CLP does not cause AKI in young C57/BL6 mice, prompting the use of either aged C57/BL6 or outbred CD-1 mice for the CLP-mediated induction of septic AKI [56, 57]. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a strong risk factor for AKI development in various clinical settings [58, 59]. To address the impact of preexisting renal dysfunction on sepsis and sepsis-induced AKI, a two-hit animal model of CKD-sepsis (acute-on-chronic renal failure) has been developed [60, 61]. In the CKD-sepsis model, some potential therapeutic targets of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) have been identified.

Animal models should mimic human AKI in as many aspects as possible, including the pace and severity of disease, renal hemodynamic changes, histological findings, and immunological responses. The use of bigger animals such as sheep and pigs may be applicable to mimic the human ICU environment, especially in the later phase of drug development. More fundamentally, to develop AKI models of higher clinical relevance, other factors that should be mimicked must be considered. Due to a very limited number of renal biopsies occurring in human AKI, actual mechanisms of disease and drug targets for human AKI could be overlooked. Of note, the Kidney Precision Medicine Project (KPMP), funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), is trying to obtain kidney biopsy samples from AKI patients to better characterize human AKI [62].

Basic research is undoubtedly necessary to develop clinically effective treatments against AKI. One-way translation of from bench-to-clinical approach seemed not to be effective so far. Bedside-to-bench-to-bedside approach will enable to improve animal models in basic research and promote drug development in the clinical.

Renal replacement therapy and blood purification

When potentially fatal changes in the body fluid, electrolyte, and acid–base balance occur, renal replacement therapy (RRT) is an effective treatment for severe AKI. Because of the remarkable progress in RRT, hemodynamically unstable patients in the ICU may be treated with continuous RRT (CRRT) or sustained low-efficiency dialysis (SLED) [63, 64]. Data obtained from the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database in 2011 showed that approximately 80% of adult dialysis-requiring AKI (AKI-D) patients in ICUs initially received CRRT [65]. Unfortunately, the mortality rate of AKI-D patients was unacceptably high (40–50%), although it gradually decreased in the last decades [66, 67]. Similar finding of gradual mortality reduction was reported in all the AKI population, whose mortality was approximately 20–30% [68]. Several clinical studies were conducted to determine the optimal RRT dose, modality, and timing for AKI-D; however, accumulated evidences did not provide a clear conclusion and recent AKI guidelines do not have a recommended standard RRT therapeutic strategy [8, 11].

Direct hemoperfusion using polymyxin B-immobilized fiber column (PMX-DHP) has been used for septic shock. Because AKI is a major complication of septic shock, PMX-DHP was expected to improve septic AKI. Several observational studies using the Japanese diagnosis procedure combination database showed controversial results [69, 70]. However, a recent meta-analysis that utilized low-risk-of-bias clinical trials showed that PMX-DHP had no effect on survival [71]. Other adsorption filters such as AN69ST and Cytosorb were evaluated in the clinical settings [72,73,74], even though their quality of evidence is not high. Further evaluations on these new filters are necessary.

Although RRT is considerably effective on severe AKI complicated with life-threating conditions, AKI-D patients still show unacceptably high mortality rate. Related blood purification therapy failed to demonstrate clinical utility for improvement of the outcomes. These suggest that breakthroughs are necessary for these treatments using extracorporeal circulation techniques.

Beyond the kidney

Critical care nephrology

In 1998, Ronco and Bellomo published a paper on their personal opinion on the need for “critical care nephrology,” which was suggested by these authors as a multidisciplinary approach to AKI [75]. They pointed out that effective clinical management for AKI requires a collaboration between intensivists and nephrologists. Moreover, for this multidisciplinary team development, they suggested a structure of training and patient care for critical care nephrology. An excellent training program on critical care nephrology is available at Alberta University, Edmonton, Canada [76]. The Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group, which suggested the RIFLE criteria [9], consisted of both intensivists and nephrologists [8]. Also, the KDIGO guideline for AKI was suggested by these two different specialists. However, the care for AKI patients in ICUs varied largely across institutions, and the role of nephrologists in critical care was recently determined by the American Society of Nephrology Acute Kidney Injury Advisory Group [77]. It should be noted that not only nephrologists and intensivists but also other specialists such as cardiologists, anesthesiologists, general surgeons, hospitalists, and emergency physicians need to be involved in critical care nephrology (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure3

Critical care nephrology involves different specialties and locations in the management of AKI patient. GP general practitioner, OPD outpatient department

In Japan, some nephrologists worked for acute dialysis in ICUs and some intensivists developed CRRT techniques for their clinical settings [78]. The 2016 Japanese AKI guideline was a result of collaboration of five different societies: the Japanese Society of Nephrology, the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine, the Japanese Society of Dialysis Therapy, the Japanese Society of Blood Purification in Critical Care, and the Japanese Society of Pediatric Nephrology [11]. However, there is a concern as regards the career development as a critical care nephrologist in Japan. In the current system developed by the Japanese Medical Specialty Board, it is necessary to complete two independent programs or internal medicine and emergency medicine/anesthesiology to be a double-board nephrologist and intensivist.

Critical care nephrology is a new specialty that promotes a multidisciplinary approach to AKI. There is no doubt that critical care nephrology is important and necessary to improve the outcomes of AKI patients. However, this specialty has not been widely accepted since Ronco and Bellomo suggested it in 1998. Further exploration will strengthen the role of critical care nephrology.

Organ crosstalk

In ICU patients, AKI does not occur alone but most often develops as a one-organ injury in multiple-organ failure. Although AKI in ICU patients is associated with a high mortality, other factors other than loss of kidney function seem to contribute to poor outcomes because non-AKI-D patients still had a remarkably higher mortality than the end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients [79]. As previously described, uremic conditions can be controlled through advanced technique of RRT even in unstable patients. In spite of the prevalence of technical advances, poor outcomes of AKI-D have been reported worldwide [66, 67, 80, 81]. These data indicate the following possibilities: (1) still insufficient replacement of renal function by current RRT, (2) considerably higher impact of other organ injuries on mortality than AKI, and (3) unrecognized mechanisms such as amplification of distant organ injury by AKI (organ crosstalk).

Organ crosstalk between the kidney and the heart is clinically recognized as a clinical entity called cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) [82]. CRS includes both renal failure secondary to cardiac dysfunction and heart failure secondary to renal dysfunction. Type 1 CRS includes AKI occurred in acute heart failure (low cardiac output syndrome). Type 3 CRS is characterized by an acute reduction of renal function that leads to acute cardiac injury and/or dysfunction. Retention of uremic solutes and/or volume overload may contribute to heart injury in type 3 CRS.

Organ crosstalk induced by AKI has been analyzed in the field of basic research. In the last decade, a number of experimental studies using animal models have identified possible pathways that connect the kidney with other organs such as the lung, heart, spleen, and gut (Table 2) [83]. For the kidney–lung interaction, inflammatory pathways such as IL-6 [84], neutrophil activation [85], TNFR1-mediated apoptosis [86], and toll-like receptor 4–high-mobility group protein B1 (HMGB1) [87] were identified. Metabolomic changes are intensively examined in the kidney of AKI patients [7]; however, similar changes were observed in the heart of AKI patients in the context of kidney–heart interaction [88, 89]. As no specific drug is clinically effective against AKI, targeting these organ-crosstalk pathways is expected to lead to novel therapeutics against AKI and decrease the high mortality of AKI-related multiple-organ failure. Before this translational step, the significance of each organ-crosstalk pathway in human study should be confirmed.

Table 2 Mechanisms of organ crosstalk in AKI

Perspective

New concepts of AKI and standardized diagnosis criteria helped us to determine a considerable impact of AKI on clinical outcomes and the need for early detection and early intervention. New biomarkers are a more useful tool in monitoring renal injury in AKI compared with serum creatinine and urine output. However, a better tool for therapeutics against AKI remains unknown. How can we make a breakthrough in this situation? The term of “disruptive innovation” was defined and first analyzed in 1995 by the American scholar Clayton M. Christensen [90]. A disruptive innovation is defined as an innovation that creates a new market and value network that will disrupt an already existing market and replace an existing product. How will a disruptive innovation occur in AKI? Highly advanced RRT technique is ultimately useful for life-threating conditions in severe AKI, and it seems that the “AKI therapeutic market” is satisfied with this high-end product. Unfortunately, RRT cannot effectively treat approximately 50% of AKI-D patients. In basic research, several studies investigated on the possible protective effects in kidney injury, but they did not pay much attention on other organ injuries in AKI. Exploring targets aside from the kidney may provide a disruptive innovation for AKI treatment.

Extracellular histones and neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) are one of the potential targets in other organ injuries in AKI. Extracellular histones induce cytotoxicity triggering the inflammatory cascade via toll-like receptors. They are released from neutrophils during the NETs formation. In a mouse intestinal ischemia–reperfusion model, we observed extracellular histone accumulation and NETs formation in the liver rather than intestine [91]. Extracellular histones derived from the intestinal tract were considered to transported to the liver via the portal system. In mouse renal ischemia–reperfusion injury model, elevated extracellular histones in blood and NETs formation in the lung was observed [92]. Human recombinant thrombomodulin (rTM) is clinically applied as a therapeutic agent for disseminated intravascular coagulation. Human rTM reportedly trap extracellular histones in vitro. Although no renal protection by rTM was observed in renal ischemia–reperfusion model, significant improvement of lung injury together with NTEs accumulation induced by AKI was observed in rTM-treated animals [93]. Taken together, extracellular histones and NETs formation seem to be responsible for AKI-induced lung injury and these pathways may be a good drug target for suppressing organ crosstalk in AKI.

In conclusion, AKI is one of the most serious diseases that show unacceptably high mortality and no specific drug can sufficiently prevent and treat AKI in the clinical. We need to be aware that AKI is not a self-limited kidney disease but a syndrome with wide disease spectrum mostly complicated with systemically ill patients. On the other hand, many basic researches especially focusing on organ crosstalk in AKI have found new mechanisms. Hopefully, a multidisciplinary approach of critical care nephrology and remote organ injury evaluation in AKI will lead to new directions for future AKI research.

References

  1. 1.

    Warnock DG. Towards a definition and classification of acute kidney injury. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16:3149–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Husain-Syed F, Ronco C. The odyssey of risk stratification in acute kidney injury. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2018;14:660–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Susantitaphong P, Cruz DN, Cerda J, Abulfaraj M, Alqahtani F, Koulouridis I, et al. World incidence of AKI: a meta-analysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;8:1482–93.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Kusaba T, Lalli M, Kramann R, Kobayashi A, Humphreys BD. Differentiated kidney epithelial cells repair injured proximal tubule. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:1527–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Nakano D, Doi K, Kitamura H, Kuwabara T, Mori K, Mukoyama M, et al. Reduction of tubular flow rate as a mechanism of oliguria in the early phase of endotoxemia revealed by intravital imaging. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;26:3035–44.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Liu J, Kumar S, Dolzhenko E, Alvarado GF, Guo J, Lu C et al. Molecular characterization of the transition from acute to chronic kidney injury following ischemia/reperfusion. JCI Insight. 2017;2:e94716.

  7. 7.

    Poyan Mehr A, Tran MT, Ralto KM, Leaf DE, Washco V, Messmer J, et al. De novo NAD(+) biosynthetic impairment in acute kidney injury in humans. Nat Med. 2018;24:1351–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Kdigo AKI. clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury. Kidney Int. 2012;2:1–138.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Bellomo R, Ronco C, Kellum JA, Mehta RL, Palevsky P. Acute renal failure—definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: the Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group. Crit Care. 2004;8:R204–R212212.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Mehta RL, Kellum JA, Shah SV, Molitoris BA, Ronco C, Warnock DG, et al. Acute kidney injury network: report of an initiative to improve outcomes in acute kidney injury. Crit Care. 2007;11:R31.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Doi K, Nishida O, Shigematsu T, Sadahiro T, Itami N, Iseki K, et al. The Japanese clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury 2016. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2018;22:985–1045.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Wonnacott A, Meran S, Amphlett B, Talabani B, Phillips A. Epidemiology and outcomes in community-acquired versus hospital-acquired AKI. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;9:1007–144.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Inokuchi R, Hara Y, Yasuda H, Itami N, Terada Y, Doi K. Differences in characteristics and outcomes between community- and hospital-acquired acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Nephrol. 2017;88:167–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Star RA. Treatment of acute renal failure. Kidney Int. 1998;54:1817–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Chen S. Retooling the creatinine clearance equation to estimate kinetic GFR when the plasma creatinine is changing acutely. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;24:877–88.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Seelhammer TG, Maile MD, Heung M, Haft JW, Jewell ES, Engoren M. Kinetic estimated glomerular filtration rate and acute kidney injury in cardiac surgery patients. J Crit Care. 2016;31:249–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    de Oliveira MF, Oliveira SA, de Lima ESPF, Nojoza WG, da Silva SM, Ferreira TM, et al. Kinetic estimated glomerular filtration rate in critically ill patients: beyond the acute kidney injury severity classification system. Crit Care. 2017;21:280.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Yoshida T, Matsuura R, Komaru Y, Miyamoto Y, Yoshimoto K, Hamasaki Y, et al. Kinetic estimated glomerular filtration rate as a predictor of successful continuous renal replacement therapy discontinuation. Nephrology (Carlton). 2019;24:287–93.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Doi K, Yuen PS, Eisner C, Hu X, Leelahavanichkul A, Schnermann J, et al. Reduced production of creatinine limits its use as marker of kidney injury in sepsis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20:1217–21.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Uchino S, Kellum JA, Bellomo R, Doig GS, Morimatsu H, Morgera S, et al. Acute renal failure in critically ill patients: a multinational, multicenter study. JAMA. 2005;294:813–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Brown JR, Kramer RS, Coca SG, Parikh CR. Duration of acute kidney injury impacts long-term survival after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90:1142–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Kim CS, Bae EH, Ma SK, Kweon SS, Kim SW. Impact of transient and persistent acute kidney injury on chronic kidney disease progression and mortality after gastric surgery for gastric cancer. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0168119.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Li Q, Zhao M, Wang X. The impact of transient and persistent acute kidney injury on short-term outcomes in very elderly patients. Clin Interv Aging. 2017;12:1013–20.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Federspiel CK, Itenov TS, Mehta K, Hsu RK, Bestle MH, Liu KD. Duration of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients. Ann Intensive Care. 2018;8:30.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Coelho S, Fonseca JN, Gameiro J, Jorge S, Velosa J, Lopes JA. Transient and persistent acute kidney injury in acute liver failure. J Nephrol. 2019;32:289–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Bagshaw SM, Bennett M, Devarajan P, Bellomo R. Urine biochemistry in septic and non-septic acute kidney injury: a prospective observational study. J Crit Care. 2013;28:371–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Lima C, Macedo E. Urinary biochemistry in the diagnosis of acute kidney injury. Dis Markers. 2018;2018:4907024.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Sumida M, Doi K, Kinoshita O, Kimura M, Ono M, Hamasaki Y, et al. Perioperative plasma neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin measurement in patients who undergo left ventricular assist device implantation surgery. Circ J. 2014;78:1891–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Doi K, Urata M, Katagiri D, Inamori M, Murata S, Hisagi M, et al. Plasma neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin in acute kidney injury superimposed on chronic kidney disease after cardiac surgery: a multicenter prospective study. Crit Care. 2013;17:R270.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Parikh CR, Devarajan P, Zappitelli M, Sint K, Thiessen-Philbrook H, Li S, et al. Postoperative biomarkers predict acute kidney injury and poor outcomes after pediatric cardiac surgery. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;22:1737–47.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Parikh CR, Coca SG, Thiessen-Philbrook H, Shlipak MG, Koyner JL, Wang Z, et al. Postoperative biomarkers predict acute kidney injury and poor outcomes after adult cardiac surgery. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;22:1748–57.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Mishra J, Dent C, Tarabishi R, Mitsnefes MM, Ma Q, Kelly C, et al. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) as a biomarker for acute renal injury after cardiac surgery. Lancet. 2005;365:1231–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Portilla D, Dent C, Sugaya T, Nagothu KK, Kundi I, Moore P, et al. Liver fatty acid-binding protein as a biomarker of acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery. Kidney Int. 2008;73:465–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Matsui K, Kamijo-Ikemori A, Sugaya T, Yasuda T, Kimura K. Usefulness of urinary biomarkers in early detection of acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery in adults. Circ J. 2012;76:213–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Katagiri D, Doi K, Honda K, Negishi K, Fujita T, Hisagi M, et al. Combination of two urinary biomarkers predicts acute kidney injury after adult cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93:577–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Doi K, Katagiri D, Negishi K, Hasegawa S, Hamasaki Y, Fujita T, et al. Mild elevation of urinary biomarkers in prerenal acute kidney injury. Kidney Int. 2012;82:1114–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Paragas N, Qiu A, Zhang Q, Samstein B, Deng SX, Schmidt-Ott KM, et al. The Ngal reporter mouse detects the response of the kidney to injury in real time. Nat Med. 2011;17:216–22.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Nickolas TL, O'Rourke MJ, Yang J, Sise ME, Canetta PA, Barasch N, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of a single emergency department measurement of urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin for diagnosing acute kidney injury. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148:810–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Singer E, Elger A, Elitok S, Kettritz R, Nickolas TL, Barasch J, et al. Urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin distinguishes pre-renal from intrinsic renal failure and predicts outcomes. Kidney Int. 2011;80:405–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Nejat M, Pickering JW, Devarajan P, Bonventre JV, Edelstein CL, Walker RJ, et al. Some biomarkers of acute kidney injury are increased in pre-renal acute injury. Kidney Int. 2012;81:1254–62.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Nisula S, Yang R, Kaukonen KM, Vaara ST, Kuitunen A, Tenhunen J, et al. The urine protein NGAL predicts renal replacement therapy, but not acute kidney injury or 90-day mortality in critically ill adult patients. Anesth Analg. 2014;119:95–102.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Doi K, Negishi K, Ishizu T, Katagiri D, Fujita T, Matsubara T, et al. Evaluation of new acute kidney injury biomarkers in a mixed intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2011;39:2464–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    de Geus HR, Bakker J, Lesaffre EM, le Noble JL. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin at ICU admission predicts for acute kidney injury in adult patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;183:907–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Pepe MS, Etzioni R, Feng Z, Potter JD, Thompson ML, Thornquist M, et al. Phases of biomarker development for early detection of cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93:1054–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Zarbock A, Kellum JA, Schmidt C, Van Aken H, Wempe C, Pavenstadt H, et al. Effect of early vs delayed initiation of renal replacement therapy on mortality in critically Ill patients with acute kidney injury: the ELAIN randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;315:2190–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Meersch M, Schmidt C, Hoffmeier A, Van Aken H, Wempe C, Gerss J, et al. Prevention of cardiac surgery-associated AKI by implementing the KDIGO guidelines in high risk patients identified by biomarkers: the PrevAKI randomized controlled trial. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43:1551–61.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Palevsky PM, Molitoris BA, Okusa MD, Levin A, Waikar SS, Wald R, et al. Design of clinical trials in acute kidney injury: report from an NIDDK workshop on trial methodology. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;7:844–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    de Caestecker M, Humphreys BD, Liu KD, Fissell WH, Cerda J, Nolin TD, et al. Bridging translation by improving preclinical study design in AKI. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;26:2905–16.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Doi K, Leelahavanichkul A, Yuen PS, Star RA. Animal models of sepsis and sepsis-induced kidney injury. J Clin Invest. 2009;119:2868–78.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Fisher CJ Jr, Agosti JM, Opal SM, Lowry SF, Balk RA, Sadoff JC, et al. Treatment of septic shock with the tumor necrosis factor receptor: Fc fusion protein. The Soluble TNF receptor sepsis study group. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:1697–702.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Fisher CJ Jr, Dhainaut JF, Opal SM, Pribble JP, Balk RA, Slotman GJ, et al. Recombinant human interleukin 1 receptor antagonist in the treatment of patients with sepsis syndrome. Results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Phase III rhIL-1ra Sepsis Syndrome Study Group. JAMA. 1994;271:1836–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Rittirsch D, Huber-Lang MS, Flierl MA, Ward PA. Immunodesign of experimental sepsis by cecal ligation and puncture. Nat Protoc. 2009;4:31–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Remick DG, Newcomb DE, Bolgos GL, Call DR. Comparison of the mortality and inflammatory response of two models of sepsis: lipopolysaccharide vs. cecal ligation and puncture. Shock. 2000;13:110–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Eskandari MK, Bolgos G, Miller C, Nguyen DT, DeForge LE, Remick DG. Anti-tumor necrosis factor antibody therapy fails to prevent lethality after cecal ligation and puncture or endotoxemia. J Immunol. 1992;148:2724–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Echtenacher B, Falk W, Mannel DN, Krammer PH. Requirement of endogenous tumor necrosis factor/cachectin for recovery from experimental peritonitis. J Immunol. 1990;145:3762–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Doi K, Hu X, Yuen PS, Leelahavanichkul A, Yasuda H, Kim SM, et al. AP214, an analogue of alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone, ameliorates sepsis-induced acute kidney injury and mortality. Kidney Int. 2008;73:1266–74.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Miyaji T, Hu X, Yuen PS, Muramatsu Y, Iyer S, Hewitt SM, et al. Ethyl pyruvate decreases sepsis-induced acute renal failure and multiple organ damage in aged mice. Kidney Int. 2003;64:1620–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Heung M, Koyner JL. Entanglement of sepsis, chronic kidney disease, and other comorbidities in patients who develop acute kidney injury. Semin Nephrol. 2015;35:23–37.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    James MT, Grams ME, Woodward M, Elley CR, Green JA, Wheeler DC, et al. A meta-analysis of the association of estimated GFR, albuminuria, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension with acute kidney injury. Am J Kidney Dis. 2015;66:602–12.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Doi K, Leelahavanichkul A, Hu X, Sidransky KL, Zhou H, Qin Y, et al. Pre-existing renal disease promotes sepsis-induced acute kidney injury and worsens outcome. Kidney Int. 2008;74:1017–25.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Leelahavanichkul A, Huang Y, Hu X, Zhou H, Tsuji T, Chen R, et al. Chronic kidney disease worsens sepsis and sepsis-induced acute kidney injury by releasing High Mobility Group Box Protein-1. Kidney Int. 2011;80:1198–211.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Zuk A, Palevsky PM, Fried L, Harrell FE Jr, Khan S, McKay DB, et al. Overcoming translational barriers in acute kidney injury: a report from an NIDDK workshop. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018;13:1113–23.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Fliser D, Kielstein JT. Technology Insight: treatment of renal failure in the intensive care unit with extended dialysis. Nat Clin Pract Nephrol. 2006;2:32–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Prowle JR, Bellomo R. Continuous renal replacement therapy: recent advances and future research. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2010;6:521–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Iwagami M, Yasunaga H, Noiri E, Horiguchi H, Fushimi K, Matsubara T, et al. Choice of renal replacement therapy modality in intensive care units: data from a Japanese Nationwide Administrative Claim Database. J Crit Care. 2015;30:381–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Wald R, McArthur E, Adhikari NK, Bagshaw SM, Burns KE, Garg AX, et al. Changing incidence and outcomes following dialysis-requiring acute kidney injury among critically ill adults: a population-based cohort study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2015;65:870–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Miyamoto Y, Iwagami M, Aso S, Yasunaga H, Matsui H, Fushimi K, et al. Temporal change in characteristics and outcomes of acute kidney injury on renal replacement therapy in intensive care units: analysis of a nationwide administrative database in Japan, 2007–2016. Crit Care. 2019;23:172.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Komaru Y, Inokuchi R, Iwagami M, Matsuura R, Hamasaki Y, Nangaku M et al. Correlation between the Incidence and Attributable Mortality Fraction of Acute Kidney Injury: A Systematic Review. Blood Purif. 2017;1–8. https://doi.org/10.1159/000505568.

  69. 69.

    Iwagami M, Yasunaga H, Noiri E, Horiguchi H, Fushimi K, Matsubara T, et al. Potential survival benefit of polymyxin B hemoperfusion in septic shock patients on continuous renal replacement therapy: a propensity-matched analysis. Blood Purif. 2016;42:9–17.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Iwagami M, Yasunaga H, Doi K, Horiguchi H, Fushimi K, Matsubara T, et al. Postoperative polymyxin B hemoperfusion and mortality in patients with abdominal septic shock: a propensity-matched analysis. Crit Care Med. 2014;42:1187–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Fujii T, Ganeko R, Kataoka Y, Furukawa TA, Featherstone R, Doi K, et al. Polymyxin B-immobilized hemoperfusion and mortality in critically ill adult patients with sepsis/septic shock: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44:167–78.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Brouwer WP, Duran S, Kuijper M, Ince C. Hemoadsorption with CytoSorb shows a decreased observed versus expected 28-day all-cause mortality in ICU patients with septic shock: a propensity-score-weighted retrospective study. Crit Care. 2019;23:317.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Doi K, Iwagami M, Yoshida E, Marshall MR. Associations of polyethylenimine-coated an69st membrane in continuous renal replacement therapy with the intensive care outcomes: observations from a claims database from Japan. Blood Purif. 2017;44:184–92.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Shiga H, Hirasawa H, Nishida O, Oda S, Nakamura M, Mashiko K, et al. Continuous hemodiafiltration with a cytokine-adsorbing hemofilter in patients with septic shock: a preliminary report. Blood Purif. 2014;38:211–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Ronco C, Bellomo R. Critical care nephrology: the time has come. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1998;13:264–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Bagshaw SM, Gibney RT. The Evolution of critical care nephrology in edmonton. Blood Purif. 2016;41:I–.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Askenazi DJ, Heung M, Connor MJ Jr, Basu RK, Cerda J, Doi K, et al. Optimal role of the nephrologist in the intensive care unit. Blood Purif. 2017;43:68–77.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Hirasawa H, Sugai T, Ohtake Y, Oda S, Shiga H, Matsuda K, et al. Continuous hemofiltration and hemodiafiltration in the management of multiple organ failure. Contrib Nephrol. 1991;93:42–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Clermont G, Acker CG, Angus DC, Sirio CA, Pinsky MR, Johnson JP. Renal failure in the ICU: comparison of the impact of acute renal failure and end-stage renal disease on ICU outcomes. Kidney Int. 2002;62:986–96.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Carlson N, Hommel K, Olesen JB, Soja AM, Vilsboll T, Kamper AL, et al. Dialysis-requiring acute kidney injury in denmark 2000–2012: time trends of incidence and prevalence of risk factors-A nationwide study. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0148809.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Hsu RK, McCulloch CE, Ku E, Dudley RA, Hsu CY. Regional variation in the incidence of dialysis-requiring AKI in the United States. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;8:1476–81.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Ronco C. Cardiorenal and renocardiac syndromes: clinical disorders in search of a systematic definition. Int J Artif Organs. 2008;31:1–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Doi K, Rabb H. Impact of acute kidney injury on distant organ function: recent findings and potential therapeutic targets. Kidney Int. 2016;89:555–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Klein CL, Hoke TS, Fang WF, Altmann CJ, Douglas IS, Faubel S. Interleukin-6 mediates lung injury following ischemic acute kidney injury or bilateral nephrectomy. Kidney Int. 2008;74:901–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Ishii T, Doi K, Okamoto K, Imamura M, Dohi M, Yamamoto K, et al. Neutrophil elastase contributes to acute lung injury induced by bilateral nephrectomy. Am J Pathol. 2010;177:1665–733.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Hassoun HT, Lie ML, Grigoryev DN, Liu M, Tuder RM, Rabb H. Kidney ischemia-reperfusion injury induces caspase-dependent pulmonary apoptosis. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2009;297:F125–F137137.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Doi K, Ishizu T, Tsukamoto-Sumida M, Hiruma T, Yamashita T, Ogasawara E, et al. The high-mobility group protein B1-Toll-like receptor 4 pathway contributes to the acute lung injury induced by bilateral nephrectomy. Kidney Int. 2014;86:316–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Sumida M, Doi K, Ogasawara E, Yamashita T, Hamasaki Y, Kariya T, et al. Regulation of mitochondrial dynamics by dynamin-related protein-1 in acute cardiorenal syndrome. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;26:2378–87.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Fox BM, Gil HW, Kirkbride-Romeo L, Bagchi RA, Wennersten SA, Haefner KR, et al. Metabolomics assessment reveals oxidative stress and altered energy production in the heart after ischemic acute kidney injury in mice. Kidney Int. 2019;95:590–610.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Bower JL, Christensen CM. (1995) Disruptive Technologies: Catching the Wave. Harvard Business Review. 1995;43–53.

  91. 91.

    Hayase N, Doi K, Hiruma T, Matsuura R, Hamasaki Y, Noiri E, et al. Recombinant thrombomodulin on neutrophil extracellular traps in murine intestinal ischemia-reperfusion. Anesthesiology. 2019;131:866–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Nakazawa D, Kumar SV, Marschner J, Desai J, Holderied A, Rath L, et al. Histones and neutrophil extracellular traps enhance tubular necrosis and remote organ injury in ischemic AKI. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;28:1753–68.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Hayase N, Doi K, Hiruma T, Matsuura R, Hamasaki Y, Noiri E, et al. Recombinant thrombomodulin prevents acute lung injury induced by renal ischemia-reperfusion injury. Sci Rep. 2020;10:289.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author thank all the colleagues and collaborators.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kent Doi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author has declared no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Doi, K. The need for disruptive innovation in acute kidney injury. Clin Exp Nephrol (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-020-01920-w

Download citation

Keywords

  • Biomarker
  • Animal model
  • Critical care nephrology
  • Organ crosstalk