Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Outcomes after biological mesh reconstruction of the pelvic floor following extra-levator abdominoperineal excision of rectum (APER)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Extra-levator abdominoperineal excision of the rectum (ELAPER) for low rectal cancer is used to avoid the adverse oncological outcomes of inadvertent perforation and a positive circumferential resection margin associated with the conventional APER technique. This wider excision creates a large defect requiring pelvic floor reconstruction, and there is still controversy regarding the best method of closure. The aim of this study is to present outcomes of biological mesh pelvic floor reconstruction following ELAPER.

Methods

Prospective data on consecutive patients having ELAPER for low rectal cancer at a single UK institution between October 2008 and March 2013 were collected. The perineum was reconstructed using a biological mesh and the short-term outcomes were evaluated, focusing particularly on perineal wound complications and perineal hernias.

Results

Thirty-four patients were included [median age 62 years, range 40–72 years, 27 males (79 %)]. The median operative time was 248 min (range 120–340 min). The median length of hospital stay was 9 days (range 4–20 days). There were three perineal complications (9 %) requiring surgical intervention, but no meshes were removed. There were no perineal hernias. The median length of follow-up was 21 months (range 1–54 months). The overall mortality was 9 % from distant metastases.

Conclusions

Our series adds to the increasing evidence that good outcomes can be achieved for pelvic floor reconstruction with biological mesh following ELAPER without the additional use of myocutaneous flaps. The low serious complication rate, good outcomes in perineal wound healing and the absence of perineal hernias demonstrates that this is a safe and feasible procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wibe A, Syse A, Andersen E, Tretli S, Myrvold HE, Soreide O (2004) Oncological outcomes after total mesorectal excision for cure for cancer of the lower rectum: anterior vs. abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 47:48–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJ, Marijnen CA, van Krieken JH, Quirke P (2005) Low rectal cancer: a call for a change of approach in abdominoperineal resection. J Clin Oncol 23:9257–9264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Eriksen MT, Wibe A, Syse A, Haffner J, Wiig JN (2004) Inadvertent perforation during rectal cancer resection in Norway. Br J Surg 91:210–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Marr R, Birbeck K, Garvican J et al (2005) The modern abdominoperineal excision: the next challenge after total mesorectal excision. Ann Surg 242:74–82

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Anderin C, Martling A, Hellborg H, Holm T (2010) A population-based study on outcome in relation to the type of resection in low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 53:753–760

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Miles WE (1908) A method of performing abdomino-perineal excision for carcinoma of the rectum and of the terminal portion of the pelvic colon. Lancet 2:1812–1813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Holm T, Ljung A, Haggmark T, Jurell G, Lagergren J (2007) Extended abdominoperineal resection with gluteus maximus flap reconstruction of the pelvic floor for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 94:232–238

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. West NP, Finan PJ, Anderin C, Lindholm J, Holm T, Quirke P (2008) Evidence of the oncologic superiority of cylindrical abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:3517–3522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. West NP, Anderin C, Smith KJ, Holm T, Quirke P (2010) Multicentre experience with extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 97:588–599

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nisar PJ, Scott HJ (2009) Myocutaneous flap reconstruction of the pelvis after abdominoperineal excision. Colorectal Dis 11:806–816

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bullard KM, Trudel JL, Baxter NN, Rothenberger DA (2005) Primary perineal wound closure after preoperative radiotherapy and abdominoperineal resection has a high incidence of wound failure. Dis Colon Rectum 48:438–443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Artioukh DY, Smith RA, Gokul K (2007) Risk factors for impaired healing of the perineal wound after abdominoperineal resection of rectum for carcinoma. Colorectal Dis 9:362–367

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Barker JA, Blackmore AE, Owen RP, Rate A (2013) Prone cylindrical abdominoperineal resection with subsequent rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap reconstruction performed by a colorectal surgeon. Int J Colorectal Dis 28:801–806

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hainsworth A, Al Akash M, Roblin P, Mohanna P, Ross D, George ML (2012) Perineal reconstruction after abdominoperineal excision using inferior gluteal artery perforator flaps. Br J Surg 99:584–588

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Anderin C, Martling A, Lagergren J, Ljung A, Holm T (2012) Short-term outcome after gluteus maximus myocutaneous flap reconstruction of the pelvic floor following extra-levator abdominoperineal excision of the rectum. Colorectal Dis 14:1060–1064

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wille-Jorgensen P, Pilsgaard B, Moller P (2009) Reconstruction of the pelvic floor with a biological mesh after abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:323–325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Christensen HK, Nerstrom P, Tei T, Laurberg S (2011) Perineal repair after extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 54:711–717

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dalton RS, Smart NJ, Edwards TJ, Chandler I, Daniels IR (2012) Short-term outcomes of the prone perineal approach for extra-levator abdomino-perineal excision (elAPE). Surgeon 10:342–346

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Boereboom CL, Watson NF, Sivakumar R, Hurst NG, Speake WJ (2009) Biological tissue graft for pelvic floor reconstruction after cylindrical abdominoperineal excision of the rectum and anal canal. Tech Coloproctol 13:257–258

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Peacock O, Pandya H, Sharp T et al (2012) Biological mesh reconstruction of perineal wounds following enhanced abdominoperineal excision of rectum (APER). Int J Colorectal Dis 27:475–482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Colon and Rectum Cancer Staging (2012) American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC). http://www.cancerstaging.org/staging/posters/colon8.5x11.pdf. Accessed 21 Dec 2012

  22. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Marshall MJ, Smart NJ, Daniels IR (2012) Biologic meshes in perineal reconstruction following extra-levator abdominoperineal excision (elAPE). Colorectal Dis 14(Suppl 3):12–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Dabbas N, Adams K, Chave H, Branagan G (2012) Current practice in abdominoperineal resection: an email survey of the membership of the Association of Coloproctology. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 94:173–176

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rothenberger DA, Wong WD (1992) Abdominoperineal resection for adenocarcinoma of the low rectum. World J Surg 16:478–485

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. van der Wal BC, Cleffken BI, Gulec B, Kaufman HS, Choti MA (2001) Results of salvage abdominoperineal resection for recurrent anal carcinoma following combined chemoradiation therapy. J Gastrointest Surg 5:383–387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Khoo AK, Skibber JM, Nabawi AS et al (2001) Indications for immediate tissue transfer for soft tissue reconstruction in visceral pelvic surgery. Surgery 130:463–469

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kapoor V, Cole J, Isik FF, Sinanan M, Flum D (2005) Does the use of a flap during abdominoperineal resection decrease pelvic wound morbidity? Am Surg 71:117–122

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hendren SK, Swallow CJ, Smith A et al (2007) Complications and sexual function after vaginectomy for anorectal tumors. Dis Colon Rectum 50:810–816

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Foster JD, Pathak S, Smart NJ et al (2012) Reconstruction of the perineum following extralevator abdominoperineal excision for carcinoma of the lower rectum: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 14:1052–1059

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Konstantinovic ML, Lagae P, Zheng F, Verbeken EK, De Ridder D, Deprest JA (2005) Comparison of host response to polypropylene and non-cross-linked porcine small intestine serosal-derived collagen implants in a rat model. BJOG 112:1554–1560

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ayubi FS, Armstrong PJ, Mattia MS, Parker DM (2008) Abdominal wall hernia repair: a comparison of Permacol and Surgisis grafts in a rat hernia model. Hernia 12:373–378

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Vaughan-Shaw PG, Cheung T, Knight JS, Nichols PH, Pilkington SA, Mirnezami AH (2012) A prospective case-control study of extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) of the rectum versus conventional laparoscopic and open abdominoperineal excision: comparative analysis of short-term outcomes and quality of life. Tech Coloproctol 16:355–362

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Han JG, Wang ZJ, Gao ZG, Xu HM, Yang ZH, Jin ML (2010) Pelvic floor reconstruction using human acellular dermal matrix after cylindrical abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 53:219–223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Han JG, Wang ZJ, Wei GH, Gao ZG, Yang Y, Zhao BC (2012) Randomized clinical trial of conventional versus cylindrical abdominoperineal resection for locally advanced lower rectal cancer. Am J Surg 204:274–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Jin J, Rosen MJ, Blatnik J et al (2007) Use of acellular dermal matrix for complicated ventral hernia repair: does technique affect outcomes? J Am Coll Surg 205:654–660

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Rice RD, Ayubi FS, Shaub ZJ, Parker DM, Armstrong PJ, Tsai JW (2010) Comparison of Surgisis, AlloDerm, and Vicryl Woven Mesh grafts for abdominal wall defect repair in an animal model. Aesthet Plast Surg 34:290–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Chan S, Miller M, Ng R et al (2010) Use of myocutaneous flaps for perineal closure following abdominoperineal excision of the rectum for adenocarcinoma. Colorectal Dis 12:555–560

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Surgery, School of Graduate Entry Medicine and Health, University of Nottingham, Royal Derby Hospital, Uttoxeter Road, Derby, DE22 3DT, UK

    O. Peacock & J. N. Lund

  2. Division of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Derby Hospital, Uttoxeter Road, Derby, DE22 3NE, UK

    J. A. Simpson, S. I. Tou, N. G. Hurst, W. J. Speake & G. M. Tierney

Authors
  1. O. Peacock
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. A. Simpson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. I. Tou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. N. G. Hurst
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. W. J. Speake
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. G. M. Tierney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. J. N. Lund
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. Peacock.

Additional information

An abstract of 29 patients has been submitted to the European Society of Coloproctology Conference 2013 in Belgrade and was accepted for a poster presentation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peacock, O., Simpson, J.A., Tou, S.I. et al. Outcomes after biological mesh reconstruction of the pelvic floor following extra-levator abdominoperineal excision of rectum (APER). Tech Coloproctol 18, 571–577 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-013-1107-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-013-1107-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation