Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The relationship between etiology, symptom severity and indications of surgery in cases of anal incontinence: a 25-year analysis of 1,046 patients at a tertiary coloproctology practice

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The etiology of anal incontinence (AI) is often multifactorial. There is little data on the relationship between the etiology of AI, symptom severity, and the need for surgery. The aim of our study was to investigate this association in a large number of unselected patients with AI referred to a tertiary specialist coloproctological practice.

Methods

Patients with AI seen at our unit between 1983 and 2008 were analyzed. The main etiologies were categorized as congenital, traumatic, neurologic, idiopathic, post-operative, post-obstetric, secondary to rectal prolapse, or inflammatory bowel disease. The severity of AI was graded using the validated Pescatori incontinence scale.

Results

Overall, 1,046 patients were studied. The AI score was higher in patients with congenital (4.7 ± 1.1), traumatic (4.6 ± 1.4), and neurological (4.4 ± 1.2) incontinence. Surgical treatment was indicated in 214 cases (20.5%). Patients with AI related to trauma and congenital anomalies required surgery in 43.5 and 31.4% of cases, respectively, a percentage significantly higher than that for patients with other etiologies (P = 0.002). Prolapse-related AI usually responded to correction of the prolapse.

Conclusions

Patients with congenital, traumatic, and neurological AI tend to have greater symptom severity. Traumatic, rectal prolapse-related, and congenital AI cases more often require surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Soffer EE, Hull T (2000) Fecal incontinence: a practical approach to evaluation and treatment. Am J Gastroenterol 95:1873–1880

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Perry S, Shaw C, McGrother C et al (2002) Prevalence of faecal incontinence in adults aged 40 years or more living in the community. Gut 50:480–484

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nelson RL (2004) Epidemiology of fecal incontinence. Gastroenterology 126:S3–S7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Akpan A, Gosney MA, Barret J (2007) Factors contributing to fecal incontinence in older people and outcome of routine management in home, hospital and nursing home settings. Clin Interv Aging 2:139–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rothbarth J, Bemelman WA, Meijerink WJ et al (2001) What is the impact of fecal incontinence on quality of life? Dis Colon Rectum 44:67–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Farage MA, Miller KW, Berardesca E, Maibach HI (2008) Psychosocial and societal burden of incontinence in the aged population: a review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 277:285–290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Williams A, Lavender T, Richmond DH, Tincello DG (2005) Women’s experiences after a third-degree obstetric anal sphincter tear: a qualitative study. Birth 32:129–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pescatori M, Anastasio G, Bottini C, Mentasti A (1992) New grading and scoring for anal incontinence. Evaluation of 335 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 35:482–487

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Boffi F, Ayabaca S, Corradi A, Renzi C, Pescatori M (2002) Etiology and severity of symptoms of fecal incontinence: is there a correlation? Int J Colorectal Dis 17:59–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nichols CM, Ramakrishnan V, Gill EJ, Hurt WG (2005) Anal incontinence in women with and those without pelvic floor disorders. Obstet Gynecol 106:1266–1271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Engel AF, Kamm MA, Bartram CI, Nicholls RJ (1995) Relationship of symptoms in faecal incontinence to specific sphincter abnormalities. Int J Colorect Dis 10:152–155

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fisher K, Bliss DZ, Savik K (2008) Comparison of recall and daily self-report of fecal incontinence severity. J Wound Ostomy Cont Nurs 35:515–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Terra MP, Deutekom M, Dobben AC et al (2008) Can the outcome of pelvic-floor rehabilitation in patients with fecal incontinence be predicted? Int J Colorectal Dis 23:503–511

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bordeianou L, Lee KY, Rockwood T et al (2008) Anal resting pressures at manometry correlate with the fecal incontinence severity index and with the presence of sphincter defects on ultrasound. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1010–1014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Deutekom M, Dobben AC, Terra MP (2007) Clinical presentation of fecal incontinence and anorectal function: what is the relationship? Am J Gastroenterol 102:351–361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sun WM, Donnelly TC, Read NW (1992) Utility of a combined test of anorectal manometry, electromyography and sensation in determining the mechanism of ‘idiopathic’ faecal incontinence. Gut 33:807–813

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fox JC, Fletcher JG, Zinsmeister AR, Seide B, Riederer SJ, Bharucha AE (2006) Effect of aging on anorectal and pelvic floor functions in females. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1726–1735

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Titi M, Jenkins JT, Urie A, Molloy RG (2007) Prospective study of the diagnostic evaluation of faecal incontinence and leakage in male patients. Colorect Dis 9:647–652

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rao SS, Ozturk R, Stessman M (2004) Investigation of the pathophysiology of fecal seepage. Am J Gastroenterol 99:2204–2209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bharucha AE, Seide BM, Zinsmeister AR, Melton LJ 3rd (2008) Relation of bowel habits to fecal incontinence in women. Am J Gastroenterol 103:1470–1475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Thekkinkattil DK, Lim M, Stojkovic SG, Finan PJ, Sagar PM, Burke D (2008) A classification system for faecal incontinence based on anorectal investigations. Br J Surg 95:222–228

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bharucha AE, Fletcher JG, Harper CM et al (2005) Relationship between symptoms and disordered continence mechanisms in women with idiopathic faecal incontinence. Gut 54:546–555

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mimura T, Kaminishi M, Kamm MA (2004) Diagnostic evaluation of patients with faecal incontinence at a specialist institution. Dig Surg 21:235–241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Vaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JA, Kamm MA (1999) Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut 44:77–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Jorge JM, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36:77–97

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rockwood TH, Church J, Fleshman JW et al (2000) Fecal Incontinence quality of life scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 43:9–16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Pescatori M, Zbar AP (2009) Tailored surgery for internal and external rectal prolapse: functional results of 268 patients operated upon by a single surgeon over a 21-year period. Colorectal Dis Jul 15 [Epub ahead of print]

  28. Rintala R, Mildh L, Lindahl H (1994) Fecal continence and quality of life for adult patients with an operated high or intermediate anorectal malformation. J Pediatr Surg 29:777–780

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Iwai N, Deguchi E, Kimura O, Kubota Y, Ono S, Shimadera S (2007) Social quality of life for adult patients with anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg 42:313–317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zbar AP, Beer-Gabel M, Chiappa AC, Aslam M (2001) Fecal incontinence after minor anorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 44:1610–1623

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Abbasakoor F, Nelson M, Beynon J, Patel B, Carr ND (1998) Anal endosonography in patients with anorectal symptoms after haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 85:1522–1524

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Casillas S, Hull TL, Zutshi M, Trzcinski R, Bast JF, Xu M (2005) Incontinence after a lateral internal sphincterotomy: are we underestimating it? Dis Colon Rectum 48:1193–1199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ, Bartram CI (1994) Prospective study of the extent of lateral anal sphincterotomy division during lateral sphincterotomy. Dis Colon Rectum 37:1031–1033

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Zbar AP, Kmiot WA, Aslam M et al (1999) Use of vector volume manometry and endoanal magnetic resonance imaging in the adult female for assessment of anal sphincter dysfunction. Dis Colon Rectum 42:1411–1418

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Cotterill N, Norton C, Avery KN, Abrams P, Donovan JL (2008) A patient-centered approach to developing a comprehensive symptom and quality of life assessment of anal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 51:82–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. L. Sacco Hospital, Polo Universitario, Milan, Italy

    A. Bondurri

  2. Chaim Sheba Medical Center Surgery, Tel-Aviv, Israel

    A. P. Zbar

  3. Coloproctology Unit, Ars Medica Hospital, Rome, Italy

    H. Tapia, F. Boffi & M. Pescatori

  4. Via Courmayeur 24, 00135, Rome, Italy

    M. Pescatori

Authors
  1. A. Bondurri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. P. Zbar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. H. Tapia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. F. Boffi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. M. Pescatori
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Pescatori.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bondurri, A., Zbar, A.P., Tapia, H. et al. The relationship between etiology, symptom severity and indications of surgery in cases of anal incontinence: a 25-year analysis of 1,046 patients at a tertiary coloproctology practice. Tech Coloproctol 15, 159–164 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-011-0682-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-011-0682-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation