Population Ecology

, Volume 59, Issue 1, pp 65–70 | Cite as

Seasonal habitat-dependent change in nest box occupation by Tengmalm’s owl associated with a corresponding change in nest predation

  • Markéta Zárybnická
  • Jan Riegert
  • Karel Šťastný
Original article
  • 127 Downloads

Abstract

We investigated the nest-site settlement of the forest-dwelling Tengmalm’s owl (Aegolius funereus) in the temperate zone of Central Europe (Czech Republic) over a 14-year period. We analysed the effect of changes in nest-site suitability (expressed as the proportion of deciduous forest) within the immediate surroundings of the nest boxes (a buffer radius of 25 m) in relation to nest box occupancy, the mean standardized laying date (further the laying date), occurrence of nest predation, and breeding density. In line with the predictions of the site dependence model, we found a positive relationship between the laying date and the proportion of deciduous trees in the nest box surrounding. Further, we found the interactive effect of the laying date and the proportion of deciduous forest surrounding a nest box on the occurrence of breeding attempts predated by pine martens. A higher proportion of deciduous forest was found in the surroundings of predated than non-predated breeding attempts, and a steeper positive relationship between the laying date and the proportion of deciduous forest was found in the surroundings of non-predated than predated breeding attempts. The change in the owls’ habitat utilization can be explained by the process of tree leafing which makes the deciduous forest a less suitable habitat with high risk of nest predation before tree foliage and a more suitable habitat with low risk of nest predation after tree foliage. We conclude that our results are in agreement with the site dependence model, and that the degree of foliage of deciduous forest in the nest surrounding of Tengmalm’s owl is a key factor determining site suitability due to predation risk from pine martens in Central Europe.

Keywords

Aegolius funereus Anti-predation strategy Habitat selection Laying date Temperate area Tree foliage 

References

  1. Both C, Visser M (2003) Density dependence, territoriality, and divisibility of resources: from optimality models to population processes. Am Nat 161:326–336CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Brambilla M, Pedrini P (2011) Intra-seasonal changes in local pattern of Corncrake Crex crex occurrence require adaptive conservation strategies in Alpine meadows. Bird Conservation International 21:388–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bye FN, Jacobsen BV, Sonerud GA (1992) Auditory prey location in a pause-travel predator: search height, search time, and attack range of Tengmalm’s owl (Aegolius funereus). Behav Ecol 3:266–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Donald PF, Evans AD, Muirhead LB, Buckingham DL, Kirby WB, Schmitt SIA (2002) Survival rates, causes of failure and productivity of Skylark Alauda arvensis nests on lowland farmland. Ibis 144:652–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eldegard K, Sonerud GA (2012) Sex roles during post-fledging care in birds: female Tengmalm’s Owls contribute little to food provisioning. J Ornithol 153:385–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Franklin A, Anderson D, Gutierrez R, Burnham K (2000) Climate, habitat quality, and fitness in Northern Spotted Owl populations in northwestern California. Ecol Monogr 70:539–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fretwell S (1972) Populations in seasonal environments. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  8. Fretwell S, Lucas H (1970) On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. Acta Biotheor 19:16–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hakkarainen H, Korpimäki E (1996) Competitive and predatory interactions among raptors: an observational and experimental study. Ecology 77:1134–1142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hakkarainen H, Korpimäki E, Laaksonen T, Nikula A, Suorsa P (2008) Survival of male Tengmalm’s owls increases with cover of old forest in their territory. Oecologia 155:479–486CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Halama KJ, Dueser RD (1994) Of mice and habitats—tests for density-dependent habitat selection. Oikos 69:107–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hayward GD, Hayward PH, Garton EO (1993) Ecology of boreal owl in the Northern Rocky-Mountains, USA. Wildlife Monogr 124:1–57Google Scholar
  13. Kaufman DW, Peterson SK, Fristik R, Kaufman GA (1983) Effect of microhabitat features on habitat use by Peromyscus leucopus. Am Midl Nat 110:177–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Korpimäki E (1988a) Diet of breeding Tengmalm’s owls Aegolius funereus: long-term changes and year-to-year variation under cyclic food conditions. Ornis Fennica 65:21–30Google Scholar
  15. Korpimäki E (1988b) Effects of territory quality on occupancy, breeding performance and breeding dispersal in Tengmalm’s owl. J Anim Ecol 57:97–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Korpimäki E, Hakkarainen H (2012) The Boreal Owl: ecology, behaviour and conservation of a forest-dwelling predator. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kostrzewa A (1996) A comparative study of nest-site occupancy and breeding performance as indicators for nesting-habitat quality in three European raptor species. Ethol Ecol Evol 8:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Loman J (1975) Nest distribution in a population of hodded crow. Ornis Scand 6:169–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Martínez JE, Pagán I, Calvo JF (2006) Factors influencing territorial occupancy and reproductive output in the Booted Eagle Hieraaetus pennatus. Ibis 148:807–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Martínez JE, Pagán I, Palazón JA, Calvo JF (2007) Habitat use of booted eagles (Hieraaetus pennatus) in a special protection area: Implications for conservation. Biodivers Conserv 16:3481–3488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H (2013) A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods Ecol Evol 4:133–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Newton I (1998) Population limitation in birds. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Overskaug K, Bolstad JP, Sunde P, Oien IJ (1999) Fledgling behavior and survival in northern Tawny Owls. Condor 101:169–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Penteriani V, Delgado M, Gallardo M, Ferrer M (2004) Spatial heterogeneity and structure of bird populations: a case example with the eagle owl. Popul Ecol 46:185–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rodenhouse NL, Sherry TW, Holmes RT (1997) Site-dependent regulation of population size: a new synthesis. Ecology 78:2025–2042Google Scholar
  26. Rodenhouse NL, Sherry TW, Holmes RT (2000) Site-dependent regulation of population size: reply. Ecology 81:1168–1171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sergio F, Blas J, Forero MG, Donazar JA, Hiraldo F (2007) Sequential settlement and site dependence in a migratory raptor. Behav Ecol 18:811–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sonerud GA (1985) Risk of nest predation in three species of hole nesting owls: influence on choice of nesting habitat and incubation behaviour. Ornis Scand 16:261–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Šťastný K, Bejček V, Hudec K (2006) The atlas of breeding birds in the Czech Republic 2001–2003. Aventinum, PragueGoogle Scholar
  30. StatSoft, Inc. (2013) STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 12, USA. http://www.statsoft.com
  31. Suárez S, Balbontin J, Ferrer M (2000) Nesting habitat selection by booted eagles Hieraaetus pennatus and implications for management. J Appl Ecol 37:215–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sunde P (2005) Predators control post-fledging mortality in tawny owls, Strix aluco. Oikos 110:461–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tome D (2003) Nest site selection and predation driven despotic distribution of breeding long-eared owls Asio otus. J Avian Biol 34:150–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Úřadníček L, Maděra P, Kolibáčová S, Koblížek J, Šefl J (2001) Trees of the Czech Republic. Matice lesnická, Písek, pp 1–333Google Scholar
  35. Wilson JD, Evans J, Browne SJ, King JR (1997) Territory distribution and breeding success of skylarks Alauda arvensis on organic and intensive farmland in southern England. J Appl Ecol 34:1462–1478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zárybnická M, Korpimäki E, Griesser M (2012) Dark or short nights: differential latitudinal constraints in nestling provisioning patterns of a nocturnally hunting bird species. PLoS One 7:e36932CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Zárybnická M, Vojar J (2013) Effect of male provisioning on the parental behavior of female Boreal Owls Aegolius funereus. Zool Stud 52:36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zárybnická M, Riegert J, Šťastný K (2013) The role of Apodemus mice and Microtus voles in the diet of the Tengmalm’s owl in Central Europe. Popul Ecol 55:353–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zárybnická M, Sedláček O, Salo P, Šťastný K, Korpimäki E (2015a) Reproductive responses of temperate and boreal Tengmalm’s Owl Aegolius funereus populations to spatial and temporal variation in prey availability. Ibis 157:369–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zárybnická M, Riegert J, Kouba M (2015b) Indirect food web interactions affect predation of Tengmalm’s Owls Aegolius funereus nests by Pine Martens Martes martes according to the alternative prey hypothesis. Ibis 157:459–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zárybnická M, Riegert J, Šťastný K (2015c) Non-native spruce plantations represent a suitable habitat for Tengmalm’s Owl (Aegolius funereus) in the Czech Republic, Central Europe. J Ornithol 156:457–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zárybnická M, Riegert J, Brejšková L, Šindelář J, Kouba M, Hanel J, Popelková A, Menclová P, Tomášek V, Šťastný K (2015d) Factors affecting growth of Tengmalm’s Owl (Aegolius funereus) nestlings: prey abundance, sex and hatching order. PLoS One 10:e0138177CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Population Ecology and Springer Japan 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Markéta Zárybnická
    • 1
  • Jan Riegert
    • 2
  • Karel Šťastný
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Environmental SciencesCzech University of Life Sciences PraguePragueCzech Republic
  2. 2.Department of Zoology, Faculty of ScienceUniversity of South BohemiaČeské BudějoviceCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations