Population Ecology

, Volume 58, Issue 4, pp 493–505 | Cite as

Density-dependent population regulation detected in short time series of saproxylic beetles

Original article


Understanding the regulation of natural populations has been a long-standing problem in ecology. Here we analyze the population dynamics of 17 species of saproxylic beetles in Shizuoka Prefecture, Japan collected over 11–12 years using autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models. We first examined the dynamics for indications of the order of the ARIMA models and evaluated the time series to determine that it was not simply a random, white noise sequence. All species dynamics were not mere random noise, and ARIMA models up to lag 3 were considered. The best model was selected from the possible ones using several criteria: model convergence, weak residual autocorrelation, the small sample AIC must be among the smallest that were not significantly different, and the lag indicated by the cutoff values in the detrended partial autocorrelation function. We found significant and nearly significant direct density-dependence for 14 of the 17 species, varying from −0.709 and stronger. The characteristic return rates were strong and only one species had a weak return rate (>0.9), implying that these species were strongly regulated by density-dependent factors. We found that populations with higher order ARIMA models (lag 2 and 3) had weaker return rates than populations with ARIMA models with only one lag, suggesting that species with more complex dynamics were more weakly regulated. These results contrast with previous suggestions that 20+ years are needed to detect density dependence from population time series and that most populations are weakly regulated.


ARIMA model Autoregressive model Equilibrium density Moving average model Stability Time lag 



We acknowledge the assistance of Mrs. N. Kiritani for collecting beetles every early morning during the study. Appreciation also goes to Drs. H. Amano, K. Fujii, Y. Higashiura, O. Imura, S. Masaki, T. Namba, M. Takada, S. Tanaka, K. Togashi, T. Royama, K. Yamamura and J. Yukawa for helpful comments made on an earlier draft of the manuscript. We also appreciate Dr. H. Makihara for identification of longicorn species and useful comments on biology.

Supplementary material

10144_2016_558_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (919 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 918 kb)


  1. Andrewartha HG, Birch LC (1954) The distribution and abundance of animals. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  2. Bellows TS Jr (1981) The descriptive properties of some models for density dependence. J Anim Ecol 50:139–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berryman AA (2003) On principles, laws and theory in population ecology. Oikos 103:695–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brook BW, Bradshaw CJA (2006) Strength of evidence for density dependence in abundance time series of 1198 species. Ecology 87:1445–1451CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Clark JS, Bjørnstad ON (2004) Population time series: process variability observation errors, missing values, lags, and hidden states. Ecology 85:3140–3150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Den Boer PJ, Reddingius J (1996) Regulation and stabilization paradigms in population ecology. Chapman, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Hamilton JD (1994) Time series analysis. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  8. Hanski I (1990) Density dependence, regulation and variability in animal populations. Philos T Roy Soc Lon B 330:141–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hassell MP (1975) Density-dependence in single-species populations. J Anim Ecol 44:283–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ito K (1996) Relationship between larval density and survivorship of Cryptomeria bark borer, Semanotus japonicus Lacordaire (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) inoculated on trees of Japanese cedar, Cryptomeria japonica D. Don. Jpn J Appl Entomol Zool 40:1–7 (in Japanese with English abstract) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Itō Y (1972) On the method for determining density-dependence by means of regression. Oecologia 10:347–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Japan Meteorological Agency (2014) Various types of data and information. http://www.data.jma.go.jp/gmd/risk/obsdl/index.php. Accessed 18 Jul 2016
  13. Kiritani K (2012) Studies of the population dynamics of Trypoxylus dichotomus (Coleoptera; Scarabaeidae), a bioindicator species of the Satoyama landscape, to determine its baseline reference density. Jpn J Entomol (NS) 15:232–242 (in Japanese with English abstract) Google Scholar
  14. Knape J, de Valpine P (2012) Are patterns of density dependence in the global population dynamics database driven by uncertainty about population abundance? Ecol Lett 15:17–23CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kuno E (1971) Sampling error as a misleading artifact in ‘‘key factor analysis’’. Res Popul Ecol 13:28–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kuno E (1973) Statistical characteristics of the density-independent population fluctuation and the evaluation of density-dependence and regulation in animal populations. Res Popul Ecol 15:99–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lassau SA, Hochuli DF, Cassis G, Reid CAM (2005) Effects of habitat complexity on forest beetle diversity: do functional groups responds consistently? Divers Distrib 11:73–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. May RM, Oster GF (1976) Bifurcations and dynamic complexity in simply ecological models. Am Nat 110:573–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Murdoch WW (1994) Population regulation in theory and practice. Ecology 75:271–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nicholson AJ (1933) The balance of animal populations. J Anim Ecol 2:132–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nicholson AJ (1957) The self-adjustment of populations to change. Cold Spring Harb Symp 22:153–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nishimura M (1995) Studies on a solution to the mechanism of infestation by sugi bark borer Semanotus japonicus Lacordaire occurring in Japanese cedar, Cryptomeria japonica, plantations. J Toyama For For Prod Res Center 9:1–77 (in Japanese with English summary) Google Scholar
  23. Rotella JJ, Link WA, Nichols JD, Hadley GL, Garrott RA, Proffitt KM (2009) An evaluation of density-dependent and density-independent influences on population growth rates in Weddell seals. Ecology 90:975–984CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Royama T (1977) Population persistence and density dependence. Ecol Monogr 47:1–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Saitoh T, Stenseth NC, Bjørnstad ON (1998) The population dynamics of the vole Clethrionomys rufocanus in Hokkaido, Japan. Res Popul Ecol 40:61–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. St-Amant JLS (1970) The detection of regulation in animal populations. Ecology 51:823–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Strong DR (1986) Density-vague population change. Trends Ecol Evol 1:39–42CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Togashi K, Nakamura K, Jikumaru S (2012) Effects of spring-killed pine trees on the epidemics of pine wilt disease. Appl Entomol Zool 47:311–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Turchin P, Taylor AD (1992) Complex dynamics in ecological time series. Ecology 73:289–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yamamura K (2001) Theoretical studies on the relationship between the spatial distribution of insects and population dynamics. Bull Natl Inst Agro Environ Sci 19:1–60 (in Japanese with English summary) Google Scholar
  31. Yamamura K, Yokozawa M, Nishimori M, Ueda Y, Yokosuka T (2006) How to analyze long-term insect population dynamics under climate change: 50-year data of three insect pests in paddy fields. Popul Ecol 48:31–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yamamura K, Matsuda H, Yokomizo H, Kaji K, Uno H, Tamada K, Kurumada T, Saitoh T, Harukawa H (2008) Harvest-based Bayesian estimation of sika deer populations using state-space models. Popul Ecol 50:131–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ziebarth NL, Abbott KC, Ives AR (2010) Weak population regulation in ecological time series. Ecol Lett 13:21–31CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Population Ecology and Springer Japan 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EntomologyUniversity of MinnesotaSt. PaulUSA
  2. 2.ItoJapan

Personalised recommendations