Safe and bloodless exposure of the third segment of the vertebral artery: a step-by-step overview based on over 50 personal cases

Abstract

Craniovertebral junction surgery usually requires the exposure of the third segment of the vertebral artery (V3). However, the complexity of musculature, a relatively high incidence of anomalies in the course of the vertebral artery (VA), and the presence of a rich venous plexus in this region make the V3 exposure challenging with a high risk of serious complications while taking down the suboccipital muscles in a single layer. A muscle dissection in interfascial layers, however, overcomes the drawbacks inherent in a blind dissection of the V3 as each of the muscles represents substantial landmark aiding subsequent step of the procedure and thus helping identify underlying anatomical structure early and safely. Moreover, along with a bloodless VA dissection off its surrounding venous plexus, it permits a safe and comfortable V3 exposure during the surgically demanding procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. 1.

    Abumi K, Shono Y, Ito M, Taneichi H, Kotani Y, Kaneda K (2000) Complications of pedicle screw fixation in reconstructive surgery of the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:962–969

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Aota Y, Honda A, Uesugi M, Yamashita T, Baba N, Niwa T, Saito T (2006) Vertebral artery injury in C-1 lateral mass screw fixation. Case illustration J Neurosurg Spine 5:554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Arnautović KI, al-Mefty O, Pait TG, Krisht AF, Husain MM (1997) The suboccipital cavernous sinus. J Neurosurg 86:252–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Bertalanffy H, Seeger W (1991) The dorsolateral, suboccipital, transcondylar approach to the lower clivus and anterior portion of the craniocervical junction. Neurosurgery 29:815–821

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Bithal P, Dash HH, Vishnoi N, Chaturvedi A (2003) Venous air embolism: does the site of embolism influence the hemodynamic changes? Neurol India 51:370–372

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Burke JP, Gerszten PC, Welch WC (2005) Iatrogenic vertebral artery injury during anterior cervical spine surgery. Spine J 5:508–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Cengiz SL, Cicekcibasi A, Kiresi D, Kocaogullar Y, Cicek O, Baysefer A, Buyukmumcu M (2009) Anatomic and radiologic analysis of the atlantal part of the vertebral artery. J Clin Neurosci 16:675–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Crowley RW, Dumont AS, McKisic MS, Jane JA Sr (2011) Positioning for cranial surgery. In: Winn HR (ed) Youmans neurological surgery. Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 442–446

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Daentzer D (2009) Operative management for atlantoaxial instability in case of bilateral high-riding vertebral artery. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129:177–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    D’Antoni AV, Battaglia F, Dilandro AC, Moore GD (2010) Anatomic study of the suboccipital artery of Salmon with surgical significance. Clin Anat 23:798–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Ebraheim NA, Xu R, Ahmad M, Heck B (1998) The quantitative anatomy of the vertebral artery groove of the atlas and its relation to the posterior atlantoaxial approach. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23:320–323

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Elhammady MS, Morcos JJ (2011) OA-PICA bypass. In: Abdulrauf AI (ed) Cerebral revascularization. Techniques in extracranial-to-intracranial bypass surgery. Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 99–111

  13. 13.

    Fisahn C, Burgess B, Iwanaga J et al (2017) A previously unreported arterial variant of the suboccipital region based on cadaveric dissection. J Neurol Surg Rep 78:e40–e42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Grob D, Jeanneret B, Aebi M, Markwalder TM (1991) Atlanto-axial fusion with transarticular screw fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:972–976

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Gupta T (2008) Quantitative anatomy of vertebral artery groove on the posterior arch of atlas in relation to spinal surgical procedures. Surg Radiol Anat 30:239–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Hatzitheofilou C, Demetriades D, Melissas J, Stewart M, Franklin J (1988) Surgical approaches to vertebral artery injuries. Br J Surg 75:234–237

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Heros RC (1986) Lateral suboccipital approach for vertebral and vertebrobasilar artery lesions. J Neurosurg 64:559–562

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Karam YR, Menezes AH, Traynelis VC (2010) Posterolateral approaches to the craniovertebral junction. Neurosurgery 66:A135–A140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Lanzino G, Paolini S, Spetzler RF (2005) Far-lateral approach to the craniocervical junction. Neurosurgery 57(ONS Suppl 3):367–371

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Madawi AA, Casey AT, Solanki GA, Tuite G, Veres R, Crockard HA (1997) Radiological and anatomical evaluation of the atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation technique. J Neurosurg 86:961–968

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Matsushima T (2015) Microsurgical anatomy and surgery of the posterior cranial fossa. Surgical approaches and procedures based on anatomical study. Springer, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Maughan PH, Ducruet AF, Elhadi AM et al (2013) Multimodality management of vertebral artery injury sustained during cervical or craniocervical surgery. Neurosurgery 73(2 Suppl Operative):271–282

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Méndez JC, González-Llanos F (2005) Endovascular treatment of a vertebral artery pseudoaneurysm following posterior C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 28:107–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Meybodi AT, Rincon-Torroella J, El-Sayed IH, Lawton MT, Benet A (2016) Early localization of the third segment of the vertebral artery: the Atlanto-mastoid line. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 12:350359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Meybodi AT, Zhao X, Borba Moreira L, Lawton MT, Lang MJ, Labib M, Preul MC (2019) The inferior nuchal line as a simple landmark for identifying the vertebral artery during the Retrosigmoid approach. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 19. Pii: opz152. https://doi.org/10.1093/ons/opz152. Epub ahead of print

  26. 26.

    Neo M, Fujibayashi S, Miyata M, Takemoto M, Nakamura T (2008) Vertebral artery injury during cervical spine surgery: a survey of more than 5600 operations. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:779–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Osorio JA, Benet A, Hess CP, McDermott MW, Abla AA (2014) Primary vertebral artery reanastomosis during retrosigmoid skull base approach following iatrogenic near-transection with monopolar electrocautery. Neurosurgery Suppl 4:631639

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Park HK, Jho HD (2012) The management of vertebral artery injury in anterior cervical spine operation: a systematic review of published cases. Eur Spine J 21:2475–2485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Prabhu VC, France JC, Voelker JL, Zoarski GH (2001) Vertebral artery pseudoaneurysm complicating posterior C1-2 transarticular screw fixation: case report. Surg Neurol 55:29–33

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Reis CV, Deshmukh V, Zabramski JM et al (2007) Anatomy of the mastoid emissary vein and venous system of the posterior neck region: neurosurgical implications. Neurosurgery 61(5 Suppl 2):193–201

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Rhoton AL (2000) The far-lateral approach and its transcondylar, supracondylar, and paracondylar extensions. Neurosurgery 47:S195–S209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Smith MD, Emery SE, Dudley A, Murray KJ, Leventhal M (1993) Vertebral artery injury during anterior decompression of the cervical spine. A retrospective review of ten patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75:410–415

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Tubbs RS, Shah NA, Sullivan BP, Marchase ND, Cohen-Gadol AA (2009) Surgical anatomy and quantitation of the branches of the V2 and V3 segments of the vertebral artery. Laboratory investigation. J Neurosurg Spine 11:84–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Ulm AJ, Quiroga M, Russo A, Russo VM, Graziano F, Velasquez A, Albanese E (2010) Normal anatomical variations of the V3 segment of the vertebral artery: surgical implications. J Neurosurg Spine 13:451–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Wanibuchi M, Fukushima T, Zenga F, Friedman AH (2009) Simple identification of the third segment of the extracranial vertebral artery by extreme lateral inferior transcondylar-transtubercular exposure (ELITE). Acta Neurochir 151:1499–1503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Wen HT, Rhoton AL Jr, Katsuta T, de Oliveira E (1997) Microsurgical anatomy of the transcondylar, supracondylar, and paracondylar extensions of the far-lateral approach. J Neurosurg 87:555–585

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Wilson DA, Fusco DJ, Theodore N (2011) Delayed subarachnoid hemorrhage following failed odontoid screw fixation. J Neurosurg Spine 14:715–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Wong CW, Poon WS (1999) Far lateral approach with intraoperative ultrasound Doppler identification of the vertebral artery. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 101:264–267

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Youssef AS, Uribe JS, Ramos E, Janjua R, Thomas LB, van Loveren H (2010) Interfascial technique for vertebral artery exposure in the suboccipital triangle: the road map. Neurosurgery 67(2 Suppl Operative):355–361

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky (15-29021A) Dr. Vladimir Balik Palacky University Olomouc (LF 2019_003) Dr. Vladimir Balik Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy (LO1304, LM2015091) Dr. Vladimir Balik European Regional Development Fund (ENOCH CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000868) Dr. Vladimir Balik.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vladimir Balik.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approved

The study was performed according to the ethical standards of the Institutional Review Board of the Asahikawa Red Cross Hospital.

Informed consent

Patients’ consents were obtained from all participants, even though their identity was concealed and anonymity guaranteed in the publication.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Balik, V., Takizawa, K. Safe and bloodless exposure of the third segment of the vertebral artery: a step-by-step overview based on over 50 personal cases. Neurosurg Rev 42, 991–997 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-019-01158-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Suboccipital interfascial muscular dissection
  • Suboccipital triangle
  • Venous plexus
  • Vertebral artery