CT angiograms of the neck in strangulation victims: incidence of positive findings at a level one trauma center over a 7-year period



To determine the incidence of acute findings diagnosed with computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the neck among emergency department patients presenting with strangulation injury.

Method and materials

This institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant retrospective review was performed at our academic urban level 1 trauma center. The PACS database was queried for all consecutive patients who had CTAs of the neck performed for the exam indication of strangulation between January 1, 2009, and April 30, 2016, resulting in 142 included patients. Analysis of the individual cases was then performed, recording any positive results, with clinical findings classified using, when possible, standardized terminology found in the literature. Frequency of acute injury in the CTA neck examinations was determined with the calculation of 95% confidence interval (CI) and positive clinical findings were evaluated by calculation of prevalence. Additionally, two board certified radiologists with training in neuroradiology assessed the cases for vascular injury.


There were 142 patients who met inclusion criteria (average age, 32.6 years) and 116 (81.7%) patients were female. CTA of the neck revealed 21 patients to have acute injuries (15.5%, 95% CI 9.5, 21.4) including 6 initially reported vascular injuries (4.2%, 95% CI 0.9, 7.5). Although neck pain (73, 51.4%), loss of consciousness (67, 47.2%), and headache (31, 21.8%) were frequently reported in the ROS, their predictive value of vascular injury was weak (4.1%, 4.5%, and 3.2%, respectively). On physical exam, redness/bruising of the neck (73, 51.4%) and neck tenderness (47, 33.1%) were both the most common and had the highest prevalence (19.2% and 12.8%, respectively), however, when selecting for vascular injuries alone were found to have low predictive yield (vascular injury 4.1% and 2.1%, respectively). The above statistics were based on the initial radiologist report and Emergency Department findings. After retrospective review, 3 Grade 1 BIFFL vascular injuries were identified (2.1%), with one false negative case (0.7%).


Performing CTA of the neck after acute strangulation injury rarely identifies clinically significant findings, with vascular injuries proving exceedingly rare. As positive vascular injury could not be clinically predicted by history and physical examination, prospective validation of a clinical prediction rule in this population is warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Change history

  • 24 June 2020

    The original source of the flowchart in Fig. 3 has not been referenced and acknowledged correctly in the original article. This is now corrected.


  1. 1.

    Liang T, Tso DK, Chiu RYW, Nicolaou S (2013) Imaging of blunt vascular neck injuries: a clinical perspective. Am J Roentgenol 201(4):893–901. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.12.9663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Funk M, Schuppel J (2003) Strangulation injuries. Wisc Med J 102:41–45

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Stapczynski JS (2010) Strangulation injuries. Emerg Med Rep 31(17):193–203

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Armstrong M, Strack GB (2016) Recognition and Documentation of Strangulation Crimes. JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery 142(9):891. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2016.0293

  5. 5.

    Harle L, PathologyOutlines.com, Inc. Forensics. Asphyxia. 2012. Available at: http://www.pathologyoutlines.com/ topic/forensicsasphyxia.html. Accessed 08/03/2018

  6. 6.

    Liang T, Tso DK, Chiu RYW, Nicolaou S (2013) Imaging of blunt vascular neck injuries: a review of screening and imaging modalities. Am J Roentgenol 201(4):884–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Strack GB, McClane GE, Hawley D (2001) A review of 300 attempted strangulation cases, part I: criminal legal issues. J Emerg Med 21(3):303–309

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    McClane GE, Strack GB, Hawley D (2001) A review of 300 attempted strangulation cases, part II: clinical evaluation of the surviving victim. J Emerg Med. 21(3):311–315

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Strack GB, Mcclane GE, Hawley D (2001) A review of 300 attempted strangulation cases part i: criminal legal issues.The Journal of Emergency Medicine 21(3):303–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0736-4679(01)00399-7

  10. 10.

    Linden JA, Rivello RJ (2018) Sexual Assault . In:Rosen's Emergency Medicine - Concepts and Clinical Practice. 9th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier, p 737–752

  11. 11.

    Mokri B, Piepgras DG, Houser OW (1988) Traumatic dissections of the extracranial internal carotid artery. J Neurosurg 68:189–197

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Malek AM, Higashida RT, Halbach VV, Dowd CF, Phatouros CC, Lempert TE, Meyers PM, Smith WS, Stoney R (2000) Patient presentation, angiographic features, and treatment of strangulation-induced dissection of the internal carotid artery. J Neurosurg 92(3):481–487. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2000.92.3.0481

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Carrillo EH, Osborne DL, Spaine DA et al (1999) Blunt carotid artery injuries. J Trauma 46:1120–1125

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Molacek J, Baxa J, Houdek K, Ferda J, Treska V (2010) Bilateral post-traumatic carotid dissection as a result of a strangulation injury. Ann Vasc Surg 24(8):1133.e9–1133.e11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2010.02.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Nunnink L (2003) Accidental carotid artery injury caused by a horse rope. Br J Sports Med 37(5):460–461. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.37.5.460

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Cheddie S, Pillay B, Goga R (2013) Bilateral blunt carotid artery injury: a case report and review of the literature. S Afr J Surg 51(2):77. https://doi.org/10.7196/sajs.1381

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Kiani SH, Simes DC (2000) Delayed bilateral internal carotid artery thrombosis following accidental strangulation. Br J Anaesth 84(4):521–524. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013484

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Wilbur L, Higley M, Hatfield J, Surprenant Z, Taliaferro E, Smith DJ Jr, Paolo A (2001) Survey results of women who have been strangled while in an abusive relationship. J Emerg Med 21:297–302

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Biffl WL, Moore EE, Offner PJ et al (1999) Blunt carotid arterial injuries: implications of a new grading scale. J Trauma 47(5):845–853

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Omar Safi Zuberi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zuberi, O.S., Dixon, T., Richardson, A. et al. CT angiograms of the neck in strangulation victims: incidence of positive findings at a level one trauma center over a 7-year period. Emerg Radiol 26, 485–492 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-019-01690-3

Download citation


  • CTA
  • Angiogram
  • Strangulation
  • Strangled
  • Vascular injury
  • Trauma