Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Computed tomography for suspected pulmonary embolism results in a large number of non-significant incidental findings and follow-up investigations

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Emergency Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Computed tomographic pulmonary angiograms (CTPAs) are often ordered to evaluate pulmonary embolism (PE) in the emergency department (ED). The increase use of CTPA has led to an increase in incidental findings, often of low clinical significance. Our objectives were to (1) assess the prevalence and clinical significance of incidental findings identified in patients evaluated with CTPAs for PE in the ED, (2) evaluate follow-up investigations for these incidental findings, and (3) assess the utility of routine chest X-rays done prior to CTPA.

Methods

This is a historical cohort study of adult patients, presenting to two tertiary care EDs from January–December 2015, evaluated with CTPA for possible PE. Two reviewers’ extracted data from electronic CT records in a standardized fashion with inter-rater reliability reported using the kappa statistic. We measured the prevalence of PE and stratified non-PE findings according to alternative diagnoses and incidental findings. Data were reported as mean and standard deviation (SD). Univariate analyses were performed with t test for continuous variables.

Results

A total of 1708 studies were included (mean 62 years (SD 16.7), 56.9% female). PE was found in 233 (13.6%) patients. A total of 223 (13.1%) patients had an incidental finding, the majority of which included pulmonary nodules (n = 83, 37.2%) and adenopathy (n = 26, 11.6%). Of the incidental findings, 197 (88.3%) were non-significant and led to no definitive diagnosis of cancer. In patients who underwent both CTPA and chest X-ray, X-ray reports revealed the same diagnosis in 77% of PE-negative patients without missing a clinically significant incidental finding.

Conclusions

Incidental findings are as common as a diagnosis of PE in patients undergoing CTPA. They are rarely clinically significant. Chest radiograph remains a reasonable initial investigation as it can aid in identifying alternative diagnoses especially in the setting of a low pre-test probability for PE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brown M, Vance S, Kline J (2005) An emegency department guideline for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: an outcome study. Acad Emerg Med 12(1):20–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Caroline C (2014) Lung cancer screening with low dose CT. Radiol Clin N Am 52(1):27–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chandra S, Sarkar P, Chandra D, Ginsberg N, Cohen R (2013) Finding an alternative diagnosis does not justify increased use of CT-pulmonary angiography. BMC Pulm Medicine 13:9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen Y, Gray B, Bandiera G (2014) Variation in the utilization and positivity rates of CT pulmonary angiography among emergency physicians at a tertiary academic emergency department. Emerg Radiol 22(3):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen Y, Gray B, Bandiera G, MacKinnon D, Deva D (2015) Variation in the utilization and positivity rates of CT pulmonary angiography among emergency physicians at a tertiary academic emergency department. Emerg Radiol 22(3):221–229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cochon L, McIntyre K, Nicolas J, Baez A (2017) Incremental diagnostic quality gain of CTA over V/Q scan in the assessment of pulmonary embolism by means of a Wells score Bayesian model: results from the ACDC collaboration. Emerg Radiol 24(4):355–359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Costa A, Basseri H, Sheikh A, Stiell I, Dennie C (2014) The yield of CT pulmonary angiograms to exclude acute pulmonary embolism. Emerg Radiol 21(2):133–141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Courtney D, Miller C, Smithline H, Klekowski N, Hogg M, Kline J (2010) Prospective multicenter assessment of interobserver agreement for radiologist interpretation of multidetector computerized tomographic angiography for pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost 8:533–539

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Foley P, Hamaad A, El-Gendi H, Leyva F (2010) Incidental cardiac findings on computed tomography imaging of the thorax. BMC Res Notes 3:326

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Hall W, Truitt S, Scheunemann L (2009) The prevalence of clinically relevant incidental findings on chest computed tomographic angiograms ordered to diagnose pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med 169(21):1961–1965

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jansen A, van Aalst-Cohen E, Hutten B, Buller H, Kastelein J, Prins M (2005) Guidelines were developed for data collection from medical records for use in retrospective analyses. J Clin Epidemiol 58(3):269–274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kline J, Mitchell A, Kabrhel C, Richman P, Courtney D (2004) Clinical criteria to prevent unnecessary diagnostic testing in emergency department patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost 2(8):1247–1255

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. MacMahon H, Naidich D, Goo J, Lee K, Leung A, Mayo J, … Bankier A (2017) Guidelines for management of incidental pulmonary nodules detected on CT images: from the Fleischner Society 2017. Radiology 284(1):228–243

  14. Perelas A, Dimou A, Saenz A, Rhee J, Teerapuncharoen K, Rowden A, Elger G (2015) Incidental findings on computed tomography angiography in patients evaluated for pulmonary embolism. Ann Stat 12(5):689–695

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schattner A (2009) Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography to diagnose acute pulmonary embolism: the good, the bad, and the ugly: comment on “The prevalence of clinically relevant incidental findings on chest computed tomographic angiograms ordered to diagnose pulmonary embolism”. Arch Intern Med 169(21):1966–1968

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shah U, Freya S, Nandakumar K (2012) Evaluation of incidental findings other than PE on CT pulmonary angiogram. Eur Respir J 40:648

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tsai K, Gupta E, Haramati L (2004) Pulmonary atelectasis: a frequent alternative diagnosis in patients undergoing CT-PA for suspected pulmonary embolism. Emerg Radiol 10(5):282–286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. van Strijen M, Bloem J, de Monye W, Kieft G, Pattynama P, van den Berg-Huijsmans A, Huisman M (2005) Helical computed tomography and alternative diagnosis in patients with excluded pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost 3(11):2449–2456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. van Es J, Douma R, Schreuder S, Middledorp S, Kamphuisen P, Gerdes V, Beenen L (2013) Clinical impact of findings supporting an alternative diagnosis on CT pulmonary angiography in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Chest 144(6):1893–1899

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Weir I, Drescher F, Cousin D, Fraser E, Lee R, Berman L, … Fine J (2010) Trends in use and yield of chest computed tomography with angiography for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in a Connecticut hospital emergency department. Conn Med 74:5-9

  21. Wells P, Anderson D, Rodger M, Stiell I, Dreyer J, Barnes D, … Kovacs M (2001) Excluding pulmonary embolism at the bedside without diagnostic imaging: management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism presenting to the emergency department by using a simple clinical model and d-dimer. Ann Intern Med 135(2):98–107

  22. Zhonghua S, Jing L (2017) Diagnostic yield of CT pulmonary angiography in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a single centre experience. Interv Cardiol 9(5):191–198

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Undergraduate Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada

    Omar Anjum & Helena Bleeker

  2. The Department of Emergency Medicine, Health Science North Research Institute, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada

    Robert Ohle

  3. The Ottawa Hospital, 1053 Carling Avenue, Room F662, Ottawa, ON, K1Y 4E9, Canada

    Robert Ohle

Authors
  1. Omar Anjum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Helena Bleeker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Robert Ohle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Ohle.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anjum, O., Bleeker, H. & Ohle, R. Computed tomography for suspected pulmonary embolism results in a large number of non-significant incidental findings and follow-up investigations. Emerg Radiol 26, 29–35 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-018-1641-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-018-1641-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation