Advertisement

Emergency Radiology

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 387–391 | Cite as

To reduce routine computed tomographic angiography for thoracic aortic injury assessment in level II blunt trauma patients using three mediastinal signs on the initial chest radiograph: a preliminary report

  • John H. HarrisJr
  • William H. Harris
  • Sanjay Jain
  • A. Y. Ferguson
  • David A. Hill
  • Amy M. Trahan
Original Article
  • 77 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

CTA is routinely ordered on level II blunt thoraco-abdominally injured patients for assessment of injury to the thoracic aorta. The vast majority of such assessments are negative. The question being asked is, Does the accurate interpretation of the three mediastinal signs permit reliable determination of which patients need CTA for aortic assessment? The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the role of three specifically selected mediastinal anatomic signs on the initial supine chest radiograph (CXR) of adult level II blunt thoraco-abdominally injured patients for the presence or absence of a mediastinal hematoma. The presence of a mediastinal hematoma is typically used as an indicator for computed tomographic angiography (CTA). The three mediastinal signs are the right para-tracheal stripe (RPTS), left para-spinal line (LPSL), and the left apical extra-pleural area (LAPA).

Materials and methods

The patient triage designation (level II trauma) was made by the attending physician at the time of admission. The initial CXR image and the CTA report of the 197 adult blunt level II thoraco-abdominally injured patients obtained on the day of admission were compared. The CXR of each of the 197 patients was independently assessed by each of four observers specifically for the status of the three mediastinal signs. Each observer was blinded to the CTA report until after the status of the three mediastinal sign evaluation had been determined. Two or three of the mediastinal signs being positive were required to determine that the CXR was positive for a mediastinal hematoma.

Results

Two or three of the selected mediastinal signs were normal in 192 (97.5%) patients. None of these patients had either a mediastinal hematoma or a major aortic injury on CTA. In each of the remaining five (2.5%) patients, two or three of the mediastinal signs were abnormal. Each of these patients had a mediastinal hematoma and a major thoracic aortic injury on CTA.

Conclusions

This preliminary study suggests that the accurate interpretation of the three specifically selected mediastinal signs on the initial supine CXR of adult level II blunt thoraco-abdominally injured patients could reduce the need for routine CTA for thoracic aortic injury assessment, and requires verification by an additional study.

Keywords

Blunt thoraco-abdominal trauma Mediastinal hematoma Thoracic aortic injury Right para-tracheal stripe (RPTS) Left para-spinal line (LPSL) Left apical extra-pleural area (LAPA) 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Savoca CJ, Austin JH, Goldberg HI (1977) The right paratracheal stripe. Radiology 122:295–301CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Woodring JH, Daniel TI (1986) Mediastinal analysis emphasizing plain radiographs and computed tomograms. Med Radiog Photogr 62(1):1–48Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Woodring JH, Loh FK, Kryscio RJ (1984) Mediastinal hemorrhage: an evaluation of radiographic manifestations. Radiology 151:212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gibbs JM, Chitra A, Chandrasekhar MBBS, Ferguson EC, Oldham SAA (2007) Lines and Stripes: Where did they go?—from conventional radiology to CT. Radiographics 27:33–485 4CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Heitzman ER (1977) The mediastinum: radiologic correlation with anatomy and pathology, 2nd edn. Springer- Verlag, Berlin, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Simeoni JF, Minagi H, Putman CE et al (1957) Traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta: significance of the left apical extra-pleural cap. Radiology 117Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Simeoni JF, Deren MM, Cagle E (1981) The value of the apical pleural cap in the diagnosis of aortic rupture. Radiology 139:37–39Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kirwadi A, Pakala VB, Suresh D et al (2008) Left apical pleural cap: an early and important sign on chest radiographs. Emerg Med J 25:819CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Trauma Alert and Response Guidelines.Traumaburn.com/Protocols/Trauma.alert.pdf
  10. 10.
    Rabin J, DuBose J, Sliker CW et al (2014) Parameters for successful non-operative management of traumatic aortic injury. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 147:143–150CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hsiang YN, Fragoso M, Lundkist A, Weis M (1992) The natural history of intimal flaps caused by angioscopy. Ann Vasc Surg 6:38–44CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Creasy JD, Chiles C, Routh WD, Dyer RB (1997) Overview of traumatic injury of the thoracic aorta. Radiographics 17:27–45CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brink M, Deunk J, Dekker HM et al (2010) Criteria for the selective use of chest computed tomography in blunt trauma patients. Eur Radiol 4:818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hendee WR, Becker GJ et al (2010) Addressing overutilization in medical imaging. Radiology 257:2403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Plurad D, Green D et al (2007) The increasing use of chest computed tomography for trauma: is it being over-utilized? J Trauma 63:631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Geusens E, Pans S, Prinsloo J, Fourneau I (2005) The widened mediastinum in trauma patients. Eur J Emerg Med 12:179–184CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Woodring JH (1990) The normal mediastinum in blunt traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta and brachio-cephalic arteries. J Emerg Med 8:467–476CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cleverly JR, Barrie JR, Raymond GS, Primack SL, Mayo JR. Direct findings of aortic injury on contrast-enhanced CT in surgically proven dramatic aortic injury: a multi-centre reviewGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rojas CA, Restrepro CS (2009) Mediastinal Hematomas: Aortic injury and beyond. J Comput Assist Tomogr 33:218–224CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mirvis SE, Shanmuganathan K Diagnosis of blunt traumatic aortic injury 2007: still a nemesis. Eur J Rad 2007(64):27–40Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gutierrez A, Inaba K, Siboni S, Effron Z, Haltmeier T, Jaffray P, Reddy S, Lofthus A, Benjamin E, Dubose J, Demetriades D (2016) The utility of chest X-ray as a screening tool for thoracic aortic injury. Injury 47:32–36CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ungar TC, Wolf SJ, Haukoos JS, Dyer DD, Moore EE (2006) Derivation of a clinical decision rule to exclude thoracic theory imaging iin patients with blunt chest trauma after after motor vehicle collisions. J Trauma 61:1150–1155CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Steenburg SD, Ravenel JG, Ikonomidis JS et al (2008) Acute Traumatic aortic injury: imaging evaluation and management. Radiology.  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2483071416
  24. 24.
    Kuhlman JE, Pozniak MA, Collins J, Kinsley BL (1998) Radiographic and CT findings of blunt chest trauma: aortic injuries and looking beyond them. Radiogr 18:1085CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Society of Emergency Radiology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • John H. HarrisJr
    • 1
    • 2
  • William H. Harris
    • 3
  • Sanjay Jain
    • 1
  • A. Y. Ferguson
    • 4
  • David A. Hill
    • 5
  • Amy M. Trahan
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyUniversity of Texas McGovern School of MedicineHoustonUSA
  2. 2.SeminoleUSA
  3. 3.Harris Orthopaedic LaboratoryMassachusetts General HospitalBostonUSA
  4. 4.Department of RadiologySt. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical CenterPhoenixUSA
  5. 5.Division of Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeryRush University Medical CenterChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations