Clinical impact of computed tomography in the emergency department in nontraumatic chest and abdominal conditions
To evaluate the clinical impact of CT scan in modifying the clinical management in patients referred to the emergency department.
We prospectively evaluated 300 patients (177 males, 63 ± 18 years old) admitted in the emergency department (ED) of a single institution, who underwent a CT examination for thoracic and/or abdominal complains. Demographic and clinical data were collected. Hypothesized outcome prior to CT scan and final management (i.e., discharge, short observation in the ED, hospitalization, and department of admission) were compared.
After CT examination, a major variation in diagnosis occurred in 37% of cases and clinical management changed in 43%, occurring in 51% of patients who underwent abdominal CT, in 40% of chest CT, and in 29% of chest/abdominal CT (P = 0.015). Department of hospitalization changed in 26% of cases (P < 0.001). Clinical impact of CT scan was significantly associated (P = 0.001) with the color code at admission. In particular, the more severe was the clinical condition, the lower was the variation of management after CT examination.
This work confirms the crucial role of CT examination in the management of nontraumatic patients admitted to the ED, both in terms of better clarifying the diagnosis and in influencing the clinical management.
KeywordsComputed tomography Emergency department Clinical impact Outcome
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was waived by the relevant Ethics Committee.
- 6.Pandharipande PV, Reisner AT, Binder WD, Zaheer A, Gunn ML, Linnau KF, Miller CM, Avery LL, Herring MS, Tramontano AC, Dowling EC, Abujudeh HH, Eisenberg JD, Halpern EF, Donelan K, Gazelle GS (2016) CT in the emergency department: a real-time study of changes in physician decision making. Radiology 278:812–821. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2015150473 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Eisenberg JD, Reisner AT, Binder WD, Zaheer A, Gunn ML, Linnau KF, Miller CM, Tramontano AC, Herring MS, Dowling EC, Halpern EF, Donelan K, Gazelle GS, Pandharipande PV (2017) Role of CT in the diagnosis of nonspecific abdominal pain: a multicenter analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 208:570–576. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.16.16669 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Millet I, Sebbane M, Molinari N, Pages-Bouic E, Curros-Doyon F, Riou B, Taourel P (2017) Systematic unenhanced CT for acute abdominal symptoms in the elderly patients improves both emergency department diagnosis and prompt clinical management. Eur Radiol 27:868–877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4425-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Broder JS, Hamedani AG, Liu SW, Emerman CL (2013) Emergency department contrast practices for abdominal/pelvic computed tomography-a national survey and comparison with the american college of radiology appropriateness criteria(®). J Emerg Med 44:423–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.08.027 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Hasani SA, Fathi M, Daadpey M, Zare MA, Tavakoli N, Abbasi S (2015) Accuracy of bedside emergency physician performed ultrasound in diagnosing different causes of acute abdominal pain: a prospective study. Clin Imaging 39:476–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2015.01.011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Sconfienza LM, Mauri G, Muzzupappa C, Poloni A, Bandirali M, Esseridou A, Tritella S, Secchi F, di Leo G, Sardanelli F (2015) Relevant incidental findings at abdominal multi-detector contrast-enhanced computed tomography: a collateral screening? World J Radiol 7:350–356. https://doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v7.i10.350 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 18.Dugas A, Therasse E, Kauffmann C, Tang A, Elkouri S, Nozza A, Giroux MF, Oliva VL, Soulez G (2012) Reproducibility of abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter measurement and growth evaluation on axial and multiplanar computed tomography reformations. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 35:779–787. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-011-0259-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Memon W, Khattak YJ, Alam T, Sconfienza LM, Awais M, Anwar SSM (2014) MDCT of small bowel obstruction: how reliable are oblique reformatted images in localizing point of transition? Gastroenterol Res Pract 2014:815802–815807. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/815802 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar