Secondary imaging for suspected appendicitis after equivocal ultrasound: time to disposition of MRI compared to CT
The purpose of this study was to compare MRI to CT as a secondary imaging modality for children age 5 years and older with suspected appendicitis after an equivocal abdominal ultrasound in terms of (1) the time to ED disposition decision, (2) surgery consultation rate, and (3) imaging test accuracy.
We retrospectively studied children with suspected appendicitis and equivocal ultrasound results who underwent MR or CT as secondary imaging in a pediatric emergency department over two-consecutive 9-month periods. No oral or intravenous contrast was utilized for MRI. No sedation was utilized for any modality. Time of disposition is the time to admission or discharge order.
Twenty-five patients underwent CT and 30 underwent MRI, with no significant difference in the median time from ultrasound to disposition between the CT (5.9 h, IQR 4.5, 8.4) and the MRI (5.9 h, IQR 4.6, 6.9) groups (p = 0.65). Fifteen patients had appendicitis. Of the 40 negative or equivocal studies, surgery was consulted for 79% in the CT and 48% in the MRI group (odds ratio 4.12, 95% CI 1.02–16.67). Diagnostic accuracy was as follows: MRI: sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 97.1%, positive predictive value of 90%, and negative predictive value of 97.1%. Abdominal CT: sensitivity of 88%, specificity of 98.6%, positive predictive value of 95.7%, and negative predictive value of 95.8%.
MRI is a feasible alternative to CT for secondary imaging in acute appendicitis for showing comparable ED throughput metrics and diagnostic accuracy, with added benefits of reduced radiation and avoidance of intravenous contrast.
KeywordsAppendicitis MRI CT Ultrasound Children
We would like to thank Dr. James Chamberlain and Dr. Kristen Breslin for their support and guidance during this project.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 2.Smith MP, Katz DS, Lalani T, Carucci LR, Cash BD, Kim DH, Piorkowski RJ, Small WC, Spottswood SE, Tulchinsky M, Yaghmai V, Yee J, Rosen MP (2015) ACR Appropriateness Criteria® right lower quadrant pain—suspected appendicitis. Ultrasound 31(2):85–91. https://doi.org/10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000118 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Poortman P, Oostvogel HJ, Bosma E, Lohle PN, Cuesta MA, de Lange-de Klerk ES et al (2009) Improving diagnosis of acute appendicitis: results of a diagnostic pathway with standard use of ultrasonography followed by selective use of CT. J Am Coll Surg 208(3):434–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.12.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Krishnamoorthi R, Ramarajan N, Wang NE, Newman B, Rubesova E, Mueller CM, Barth RA (2011) Effectiveness of a staged US and CT protocol for the diagnosis of pediatric appendicitis: reducing radiation exposure in the age of ALARA. Radiology 259(1):231–239. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10100984 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Dillman JR, Gadepalli S, Sroufe NS, Davenport MS, Smith EA, Chong ST, Mazza MB, Strouse PJ (2015) Equivocal pediatric appendicitis: unenhanced MR imaging protocol for nonsedated children—a clinical effectiveness study. Radiology 279(1):216–225. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2015150941 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Moore MM, Brian JM, Methratta ST, Hulse MA, Choudhary AK, Eggli KD et al (2014) MRI for clinically suspected pediatric appendicitis: case interpretation. Ped. Radiology 44(5):605–612Google Scholar
- 14.Kulaylat AN, Moore MM, Engbrecht BW, Brian JM, Khaku A, Hollenbeak CS, Rocourt DV, Hulse MA, Olympia RP, Santos MC, Methratta ST, Dillon PW, Cilley RE (2015) An implemented MRI program to eliminate radiation from the evaluation of pediatric appendicitis. J Ped Surg 50(8):1359–1363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.12.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Moore MM, Gustas CN, Choudhary AK, Methratta ST, Hulse MA, Geeting G, et al. MRI for clinically suspected pediatric appendicitis: an implemented program. Ped Radiology 2012;42(9):1056–1063Google Scholar
- 17.Johnson AK, Filippi CG, Andrews T, Higgins T, Tam J, Keating D, Ashikaga T, Braff SP, Gallant J (2012) Ultrafast 3-T MRI in the evaluation of children with acute lower abdominal pain for the detection of appendicitis. Am J Roent 198(6):1424–1430. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.11.7436 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Petkovska I, Martin DR, Covington MF, Urbina S, Duke E, Daye ZJ, Stolz l, Keim SM, Costello JR, Chundru S, Arif-Tiwari H, Gilbertson-Dahdal D, Gries L, Kalb B (2016) Accuracy of unenhanced MR imaging in the detection of acute appendicitis: single-institution clinical performance review. Radiology 279(2):451–460. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2015150468 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Moore MM, Kulaylat AN, Hollenbeak CS, Engbrecht BW, Dillman JR, Methratta ST. Magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric appendicitis: a systematic review. Ped Radiology 2016;46(6):928–939Google Scholar
- 23.Wiersma F, Toorenvliet BR, Bloem JL, Allema JH, Holscher HC. US examination of the appendix in children with suspected appendicitis: the additional value of secondary signs. Eur Radiol 2009; 19(2):455–456, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-1176-6
- 28.Sodhi K, Krishna S, Saxena AK, Sinha A, Khandelwal N, Lee EY (2015) Clinical application of ‘Justification’ and ‘Optimization’ principle of ALARA in pediatric CT imaging: how many children can be protected from unnecessary radiation? Eur J Radiol 84(9):1752–1757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.05.030 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 30.Trout A, Sanchez R, Ladino-Torres M, Pai D, Strouse PA (2012) Critical evaluation of US for the diagnosis of pediatric acute appendicitis in a real-life setting: how can we improve the diagnostic value of sonography? Pediatr Radiol 42(7):813–823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-012-2358-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 32.Leeuwenburgh M, Wiarda B, Jensch S, Van EH, Stockmann H, Gratama J et al (2014) Accuracy and interobserver agreement between MR-non-expert radiologists and MR-experts in reading MRI for suspected appendicitis. Eur J Radiol 83(1):103–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.09.022 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar