Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Outcomes in 74 patients with an appendicolith who did not undergo surgery: is follow-up imaging necessary?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Emergency Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study was to report the clinical outcome of patients with an appendicolith on computed tomography (CT) who did not undergo appendectomy on initial presentation. Reports from 45,901 abdominal CT examinations performed between March 2000–March 2004 containing the words “appendicolith” or “fecalith” were identified. Patients with appendicoliths not initially undergoing appendectomy were followed to assess re-presentation with abdominal pain ultimately requiring appendectomy. Seventy-four patients had an appendicolith on CT report, were discharged without surgery, and had clinical follow-up. Fifty-two of 74 (70%) patients had no appendiceal symptoms, were given an alternate diagnosis, and did not return with appendicitis. Twenty-two of 74 (30%) patients were discharged without acute appendicitis but with possible appendiceal symptoms. Five of these 22 (23%) patients returned with pathologically proven acute appendicitis, and all had possible appendiceal symptoms at initial presentation. An appendicolith may be a marker of increased risk for appendicitis but is not an indication for appendectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shaw RE (1965) Appendix calculi and acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 52:451–459

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Daly CP, Cohan RH, Francis IR, Caoili EM, Ellis JH, Nan B (2005) Incidence of acute appendicitis in patients with equivocal CT findings. Am J Roentgenol 184:1813–1820

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cakirer S, Basak M, Colakoglu B, Bankaoglu M (2002) Diagnosis of acute appendicitis with unenhanced helical CT: a study of 130 patients. Emerg Radiol 9(3):155–161

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA (1997) Helical CT incidence and characterization of appendicoliths in 100 patients with appendicitis. Emerg Radiol 4:55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Benjaminov O, Atri M, Hamilton P, Rappaport D (2002) Frequency of visualization and thickness of normal appendix at nonenhanced helical CT. Radiology 225:400–406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Maitino AJ, Levin DC, Parker L, Rao VM, Sunshine JH (2003) Nationwide trends in rates of utilization of noninvasive diagnostic imaging among the Medicare population between 1993 and 1999. Radiology 227:113–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Birnbaum BA, Wilson SR (2000) Appendicitis at the millennium. Radiology 215:337–348

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Peck J, Peck A, Peck C, Peck J (2000) The clinical role of noncontrast helical computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Am J Surg 180(2):133–136

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lowe LH, Penney MW, Scheker LE et al (2000) Appendicolith revealed on CT in children with suspected appendicitis: how specific is it in the diagnosis of appendicitis? Am J Roentgenol 175:981–984

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Huwart L, El Khoury M, Lesavre A et al (2006) Is appendicolith a reliable sign for acute appendicitis at MDCT? J Radiol 87(4 Pt 1):383–387

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Giuliano V, Giuliano C, Pinto F, Scaglione M (2006) Chronic appendicitis “syndrome” manifested by an appendicolith and thickened appendix presenting as chronic right lower abdominal pain in adults. Emerg Radiol 12(3):96–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Alobaidi M, Shirkhoda A (2003) Value of bone window settings on CT for revealing appendicoliths in patients with appendicitis. Am J Roentgenol 180(1):201–205

    Google Scholar 

  13. Weltman DI, Yu J, Krumenacker J Jr, Huang S, Moh P (2000) Diagnosis of acute appendicitis: comparison of 5- and 10-mm CT sections in the same patient. Radiology 216(1):172–177

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jones BA, Demetriades D, Segal I, Burkitt DP (1985) The prevalence of appendiceal fecaliths in patients with and without appendicitis. A comparative study from Canada and South Africa. Ann Surg 202:80–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Teicher I, Landa B, Cohen M, Kabnick LS, Wise L (1983) Scoring system to aid in diagnoses of appendicitis. Ann Surg 198:753–759

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Balthazar EJ, Megibow AJ, Hulnick D, Gordon RB, Naidich DP, Beranbaum ER (1986) CT of appendicitis. Am J Roentgenol 147:705–710

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Malone AJ Jr, Wolf CR, Malmed AS, Melliere BF (1993) Diagnosis of acute appendicitis: value of unenhanced CT. Am J Roentgenol 160:763–766

    Google Scholar 

  18. Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV (1990) The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 132:910–925

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Brown Medical School, Rhode Island Hospital, 593 Eddy Street, Providence, RI, 02903, USA

    Chad B. Rabinowitz, Thomas K. Egglin, Michael D. Beland & William W. Mayo-Smith

Authors
  1. Chad B. Rabinowitz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas K. Egglin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michael D. Beland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. William W. Mayo-Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chad B. Rabinowitz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rabinowitz, C.B., Egglin, T.K., Beland, M.D. et al. Outcomes in 74 patients with an appendicolith who did not undergo surgery: is follow-up imaging necessary?. Emerg Radiol 14, 161–165 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-007-0613-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-007-0613-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation