Marine Biotechnology

, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 363–374 | Cite as

Cuttlebone as a Marine-Derived Material for Preparing Bone Grafts

  • Alisa Palaveniene
  • Volodymyr Harkavenko
  • Vitalina Kharchenko
  • Povilas Daugela
  • Mindaugas Pranskunas
  • Gintaras Juodzbalys
  • Nataliya Babenko
  • Jolanta Liesiene
Original Article


The use of synthetic materials for biomedical applications still presents issues owing to the potential for unfavourable safety characteristics. Currently, there is increasing interest in using natural, marine-derived raw materials for bone tissue engineering. In our study, the endoskeleton of the mollusc Sepia, i.e. cuttlebone (CB), was used with regenerated cellulose (RC) to prepare three-dimensional composite bone grafts. CB microparticles were mechanically immobilised within a cellulose gel, resulting in a macroporous structure upon lyophilisation. The interconnected porous structure of the regenerated cellulose/cuttlebone (RC/CB) composite was evaluated by micro-computed tomography. The porosity of the composite was 80%, and the pore size predominantly ranged from 200 to 500 μm. The addition of CB microparticles increased the specific scaffold surface by almost threefold and was found to be approximately 40 mm−1. The modulus of elasticity and compressive strength of the RC/CB composite were 4.0 ± 0.6 and 22.0 ± 0.9 MPa, respectively. The biocompatibility of the prepared RC/CB composite with rat hepatocytes and extensor digitorum longus muscle tissue was evaluated. The obtained data demonstrated that both the composite and cellulose matrix samples were non-cytotoxic and had no damaging effects. These results indicate that this RC/CB composite is a novel material suitable for bone tissue-engineering applications.


Cuttlebone Regenerated cellulose Bone tissue engineering Cytotoxicity 



The authors want to thank Springer Nature Author Services for English grammar proof on the paper.

Funding Information

The study was financially supported by the Lithuanian Research Council in the form of grant MIP019/2014.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical Approval

All animal procedures were performed in accordance with approved animal handling guidelines (Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.


  1. Achalandabaso A, Plaza-Manzano G, Lomas-Vega R, Martínez-Amat A, Camacho MV, Gassó M, Hita-Contreras F, Molina F (2014) Tissue damage markers after a spinal manipulation in healthy subjects: a preliminary report of a randomized controlled trial. Dis Markers 2014:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amini AR, Laurencin CT, Nukavarapu SP (2012) Bone tissue engineering: recent advances and challenges. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 40:363–408CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson JM, Rodriguez A, Chang DT (2008) Foreign body reaction to biomaterials. Semin Immunol 20:86–100CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Aranaz I, Mengíbar M, Harris R, Paños I, Miralles B, Acosta N, Galed G, Heras Á (2009) Functional characterization of chitin and chitosan. Curr Chem Biol 3:203–230Google Scholar
  5. Baptista A, Ferreira I, Borges JP (2013) In: Thakur VK, Singha AS (eds) Biomass-based biocomposites. Smithers Rapra Technology, ShrewsburyGoogle Scholar
  6. Birchall J, Thomas N (1983) On the architecture and function of cuttlefish bone. J Mater Sci 18:2081–2086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brennan O, Stenson B, Widaa A (2015) Incorporation of the natural marine multi-mineral dietary supplement Aquamin enhances osteogenesis and improves the mechanical properties of a collagen-based bone graft substitute. J Mech Behav Biomed 47:114–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brutman-Barazani T, Horovitz-Fried M, Aga-Mizrachi S, Brand C, Brodie C, Rosa J, Sampson SR (2012) Protein kinase Cδ but not PKCα is involved in insulin-induced glucose metabolism in hepatocytes. J Cell Biochem 113:2064–2076CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cadman J, Zhou S, Chen Y, Li Q (2012) Cuttlebone: characterisation, application and development of biomimetic materials. J Bionic Eng 9:367–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Checa AG, Cartwright JH, Sánchez-Almazo I, Andrade JP, Ruiz-Raya F (2015) The cuttlefish Sepia officinalis (Sepiidae, Cephalopoda) constructs cuttlebone from a liquid-crystal precursor. Sci Rep 5:11513CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen YM, Xi T, Zheng Y, Guo T, Hou J, Wan Y, Gao C (2009) In vitro cytotoxicity of bacterial cellulose scaffolds used for tissue-engineered bone. J Bioact Compat Polym 24:137–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clarke S, Walsh P, Maggs C, Buchanan F (2011) Designs from the deep: marine organisms for bone tissue engineering. Biotechnol Adv 29:610–617CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Colombo P, Vakifahmetoglu C, Costacurta S (2010) Fabrication of ceramic components with hierarchical porosity. J Mater Sci 45:5425–5455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Culverwell E, Wimbush SC, Hall SR (2008) Biotemplated synthesis of an ordered macroporous superconductor with high critical current density using a cuttlebone template. Chem Commun 0:1055–1057Google Scholar
  15. Cunningham E, Dunne N, Walker G, Maggs C, Wilcox R, Buchanan F (2010) Hydroxyapatite bone substitutes developed via replication of natural marine sponges. J Mater Sci Mater Med 21:2255–2261CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Denton E, Gilpin-Brown J, Howarth J (1961) The osmotic mechanism of the cuttlebone. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 41:351–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dermience M, Lognay G, Mathieu F, Goyens P (2015) Effects of thirty elements on bone metabolism. J Trace Elem Med Biol 32:86–106CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Dogan E, Okumus Z (2014) Cuttlebone used as a bone xenograft in bone healing. Vet Med Czech 59:254–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Doguzhaeva LA, Weaver PG, Ciampaglio CN (2012) A unique late Eocene coleoid cephalopod Mississaepia from Mississippi, USA: new data on cuttlebone structure, and their phylogenetic implications. Acta Palaeontol Pol 59:147–162Google Scholar
  20. Dorey N, Melzner F, Martin S, Oberhänsli F, Teyssié J, Bustamante P, Gattuso J, Lacoue-Labarthe T (2013) Ocean acidification and temperature rise: effects on calcification during early development of the cuttlefish Sepia officinalis. Mar Biol 160:2007–2022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Falini G, Fermani S (2004) Chitin mineralization. Tissue Eng 10:1–6CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Florek M, Fornal E, Gómez-Romero P, Zieba E, Paszkowicz W, Lekki J, Nowak J, Kuczumow A (2009) Complementary microstructural and chemical analyses of Sepia officinalis endoskeleton. Mater Sci Eng C 29:1220–1226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Florencio-Silva R, Sasso G, Sasso-Cerri E, Simões MJ, Cerri PS (2015) Biology of bone tissue: structure, function, and factors that influence bone cells. Biomed Res Int 2015:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Franz S, Rammelt S, Scharnweber D, Simon JC (2011) Immune responses to implants—a review of the implications for the design of immunomodulatory biomaterials. Biomaterials 32:6692–6709CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. García-Enriquez S, Guadarrama H, Reyes-González I, Mendizábal E, Jasso-Gastinel C, García-Enriquez B, Rembao-Bojórquez D, Pane-Pianese C (2010) Mechanical performance and in vivo tests of an acrylic bone cement filled with bioactive sepia officinalis cuttlebone. J Biomat Sci Polym Ed 21:113–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gauvrit E, Du Sel GP, Daguzan J (1998) Age group determination by analysis of the cuttlebone of the cuttlefish Sepia officinalis L. in reproduction in the Bay of Biscay. J Molluscan Stud 64:183–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Givissis PK, Stavridis SI, Papagelopoulos PJ, Antonarakos PD, Christodoulou AG (2010) Delayed foreign-body reaction to absorbable implants in metacarpal fracture treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:3377–3383CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Gutowska MA, Melzner F, Pörtner HO, Meier S (2010) Cuttlebone calcification increases during exposure to elevated seawater pCO2 in the cephalopod Sepia officinalis. Mar Biol 157:1653–1663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Han X, Li X, Lin H, Ma J, Chen X, Bian C, Wu X, Qu F (2014) Hierarchical meso–macroporous bioglass for bone tissue engineering. J Sol Gel Sci Technol 70:33–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hildebrand T, Rüegsegger P (1997) Quantification of bone microarchitecture with the structure model index. Comput Methods Biomech 1:15–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hildebrand T, Laib A, Müller R, Dequeker J, Rüegsegger P (1999) Direct three-dimensional morphometric analysis of human cancellous bone: microstructural data from spine, femur, iliac crest, and calcaneus. J Bone Miner Res 14:1167–1174CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Jayakumar R, Chennazhi KP, Srinivasan S, Nair SV, Furuike T, Tamura H (2011) Chitin scaffolds in tissue engineering. Int J Mol Sci 12:1876–1887CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Jia X, Qian W, Wu D, Wei D, Xu G, Liu X (2009) Cuttlebone-derived organic matrix as a scaffold for assembly of silver nanoparticles and application of the composite films in surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Colloid Surface B 68:231–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Johnson AJW, Herschler BA (2011) A review of the mechanical behavior of CaP and CaP/polymer composites for applications in bone replacement and repair. Acta Biomater 7:16–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kannan S, Rocha J, Agathopoulos S, Ferreira J (2007) Fluorine-substituted hydroxyapatite scaffolds hydrothermally grown from aragonitic cuttlefish bones. Acta Biomater 3:243–249CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Karageorgiou V, Kaplan D (2005) Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials 26:5474–5491CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Kasaai MR (2008) A review of several reported procedures to determine the degree of N-acetylation for chitin and chitosan using infrared spectroscopy. Carbohydr Polym 71:497–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kassahn K, Donnellan S, Fowler A, Hall K, Adams M, Shaw P (2003) Molecular and morphological analyses of the cuttlefish Sepia apama indicate a complex population structure. Mar Biol 143:947–962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kayano K, Saruwatari K, Kogure T, Shiraiwa Y (2011) Effect of coccolith polysaccharides isolated from the coccolithophorid, Emiliania huxleyi, on calcite crystal formation in in vitro CaCO3 crystallization. Mar Biotechnol 13:83–92CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Kim B, Kang HJ, Lee J (2013a) Improvement of the compressive strength of a cuttlefish bone-derived porous hydroxyapatite scaffold via polycaprolactone coating. J Biomed Mater Res B 101:1302–1309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kim J, Shin J, Oh S, Yi W, Heo M, Lee S, Choi S, Huh KH (2013b) The three-dimensional microstructure of trabecular bone: analysis of site-specific variation in the human jaw bone. Imaging Sci Dent 43:227–233CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Kurita K (2006) Chitin and chitosan: functional biopolymers from marine crustaceans. Mar Biotechnol 8:203–226CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Lee SJ, Lim GJ, Lee J, Atala A, Yoo JJ (2006) In vitro evaluation of a poly(lactide-co-glycolide)–collagen composite scaffold for bone regeneration. Biomaterials 27:3466–3472CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Lin Z, Solomon KL, Zhang X, Pavlos NJ, Abel T, Willers C, Dai K, Xu J, Zheng Q, Zheng M (2011) In vitro evaluation of natural marine sponge collagen as a scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Int J Biol Sci 7:968–977CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Liu Y, Lim J, Teoh S (2013) Review: development of clinically relevant scaffolds for vascularised bone tissue engineering. Biotechnol Adv 31:688–705CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Marsano E, Conio G, Martino R, Turturro A, Bianchi E (2002) Fibers based on cellulose-chitin blends. J Appl Polym Sci 83:1825–1831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mastrogiacomo M, Scaglione S, Martinetti R, Dolcini L, Beltrame F, Cancedda R, Quarto R (2006) Role of scaffold internal structure on in vivo bone formation in macroporous calcium phosphate bioceramics. Biomaterials 27:3230–3237CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Mayer A, Rodríguez AD, Taglialatela-Scafati O, Fusetani N (2013) Marine pharmacology in 2009–2011: marine compounds with antibacterial, antidiabetic, antifungal, anti-inflammatory, antiprotozoal, antituberculosis, and antiviral activities; affecting the immune and nervous systems, and other miscellaneous mechanisms of action. Mar Drugs 11:2510–2573CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Meyers MA, Chen P, Lin AY, Seki Y (2008) Biological materials: structure and mechanical properties. Prog Mater Sci 53:1–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Morganti P, Morganti G (2008) Chitin nanofibrils for advanced cosmeceuticals. Clin Dermatol 26:334–340CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Murphy CM, Haugh MG, O'Brien FJ (2010) The effect of mean pore size on cell attachment, proliferation and migration in collagen–glycosaminoglycan scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 31:461–466CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Muzzarelli RA (2009) Chitins and chitosans for the repair of wounded skin, nerve, cartilage and bone. Carbohydr Polym 76:167–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nagahama H, Nwe N, Jayakumar R, Koiwa S, Furuike T, Tamura H (2008) Novel biodegradable chitin membranes for tissue engineering applications. Carbohydr Polym 73:295–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nge TT, Sugiyama J (2007) Surface functional group dependent apatite formation on bacterial cellulose microfibrils network in a simulated body fluid. J Biomed Mater Res A 81:124–134CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Ogasawara W, Shenton W, Davis SA, Mann S (2000) Template mineralization of ordered macroporous chitin-silica composites using a cuttlebone-derived organic matrix. Chem Mater 12:2835–2837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Oh SY, Yoo DI, Shin Y, Kim HC, Kim HY, Chung YS, Park WH, Youk JH (2005) Crystalline structure analysis of cellulose treated with sodium hydroxide and carbon dioxide by means of X-ray diffraction and FTIR spectroscopy. Carbohydr Res 340:2376–2391CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Olszta MJ, Cheng X, Jee SS, Kumar R, Kim Y, Kaufman MJ, Douglas EP, Gower LB (2007) Bone structure and formation: a new perspective. Mater Sci Eng R 58:77–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Özyurt G, Duysak Ö, Akamca E, Tureli C (2006) Seasonal changes of fatty acids of cuttlefish Sepia officinalis L. (Mollusca: Cephalopoda) in the north eastern Mediterranean Sea. Food Chem 95:382–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Park J, Lim Y, Youn M, Gwon H, Nho Y (2012) Biodegradable polycaprolactone/cuttlebone scaffold composite using salt leaching process. Korean J Chem Eng 29:931–934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Petrauskaite O, Gomes PS, Fernandes MH, Juodzbalys G, Stumbras A, Maminskas J, Liesiene J, Cicciù M (2013) Biomimetic mineralization on a macroporous cellulose-based matrix for bone regeneration. Biomed Res Int 2013:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Petrauskaite O, Juodzbalys G, Viskelis P, Liesiene J (2016) Control of the porous structure of cellulose-based tissue engineering scaffolds by means of lyophilization. Cellul Chem Technol 50:23–30Google Scholar
  62. Petrenko AY, Sukach A (1991) Isolation of intact mitochondria and hepatocytes using vibration. Anal Biochem 194:326–329CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Pillai C, Paul W, Sharma CP (2009) Chitin and chitosan polymers: chemistry, solubility and fiber formation. Prog Polym Sci 34:641–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pina S, Oliveira JM, Reis RL (2015) Natural-based nanocomposites for bone tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: a review. Adv Mater 27:1143–1169CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Razak SIA, Sharif N, Rahman W (2012) Biodegradable polymers and their bone applications: a review. J Basic Appl Sci 12:31–49Google Scholar
  66. Rocha J, Lemos A, Agathopoulos S, Valério P, Kannan S, Oktar F, Ferreira J (2005) Scaffolds for bone restoration from cuttlefish. Bone 37:850–857CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Shankar S, Reddy JP, Rhim J, Kim H (2015) Preparation, characterization, and antimicrobial activity of chitin nanofibrils reinforced carrageenan nanocomposite films. Carbohydr Polym 117:468–475CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Sherrard KM (2000) Cuttlebone morphology limits habitat depth in eleven species of Sepia (Cephalopoda: Sepiidae). Biol Bull 198:404–414CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Sibley JA, Lehninger AL (1949) Determination of aldolase in animal tissues. J Biol Chem 177:859–872PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Siddiquee MRA, Sultana A, Siddiquee A (2013) Scientific review of Os Sepia (Jhaag-e-Darya/Samudra Phena) with respect to Indian medicine and its characterization on physicochemical parameters. Int J Pharm India 2:669–678Google Scholar
  71. Silva TH, Alves A, Ferreira B, Oliveira JM, Reys L, Ferreira R, Sousa R, Silva SS, Mano JF, Reis RL (2012) Materials of marine origin: a review on polymers and ceramics of biomedical interest. Int Mater Rev 57:276–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Smith SM, Wunder MB, Norris DA, Shellman YG (2011) A simple protocol for using a LDH-based cytotoxicity assay to assess the effects of death and growth inhibition at the same time. PLoS One 6:1–6Google Scholar
  73. Stevens MM (2008) Biomaterials for bone tissue engineering. Mater Today 11:18–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Subia B, Kundu J, Kundu S (2010) In: Eberli D (ed) Tissue engineering. InTech, RijekaGoogle Scholar
  75. Turan C, Yaglioglu D (2010) Population identification of common cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis) inferred from genetic, morphometric and cuttlebone chemistry data in the NE Mediterranean Sea. Sci Mar 74:77–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Vázquez B, Ginebra MP, Gil X, Planell JA, San Román J (2005) Acrylic bone cements modified with β-TCP particles encapsulated with poly (ethylene glycol). Biomaterials 26:4309–4316CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Wang C, Wang X, Xu X, Yuan X, Gou W, Wang A, Guo Q, Peng J, Lu S (2014) Bone microstructure and regional distribution of osteoblast and osteoclast activity in the osteonecrotic femoral head. PLoS One 9:1–10Google Scholar
  78. Whang K, Healy KE, Elenz DR, Nam EK, Tsai DC, Thomas CH, Nuber GW, Glorieux FH, Travers R, Sprague SM (1999) Engineering bone regeneration with bioabsorbable scaffolds with novel microarchitecture. Tissue Eng 5:35–51CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Won S, Lee JM, Cheong J, Park H, Seo J (2015) Evaluation of the biocompatibility of cuttlebone in mouse. J Vet Clin 32:417–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Xiao S, Zheng X, Wang Z, Wang R (2005) A study of the organic matrix of cuttlebone: molecular weights, characterized infrared spectrum and amino acid composition. Res Bull Phuket Mar Biol Cent 66:235–241Google Scholar
  81. Xu J, McCarthy SP, Gross RA, Kaplan DL (1996) Chitosan film acylation and effects on biodegradability. Macromolecules 29:3436–3440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Xu G, Li H, Ma X, Jia X, Dong J, Qian W (2009) A cuttlebone-derived matrix substrate for hydrogen peroxide/glucose detection. Biosens Bioelectron 25:362–367CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Yang S, Leong K, Du Z, Chua C (2001) The design of scaffolds for use in tissue engineering. Part I. Traditional factors. Tissue Eng 7:679–689CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Zaborowska M, Bodin A, Bäckdahl H, Popp J, Goldstein A, Gatenholm P (2010) Microporous bacterial cellulose as a potential scaffold for bone regeneration. Acta Biomater 6:2540–2547CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Zhang X, Vecchio KS (2013) Conversion of natural marine skeletons as scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Front Mater Sci 7:103–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Zhang S, Li F, Yu J (2009) Preparation of cellulose/chitin blend bio-fibers via direct dissolution. Cellul Chem Technol 43:393–398Google Scholar
  87. Zhang Y, Cheng Q, Yao Y, Guo X, Wang R, Peng Z (2014) A preliminary study: saltiness and sodium content of aqueous extracts from plants and marine animal shells. Eur Food Res Technol 238:565–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Zhao Z, Liang Z, Ping G (2011) Macroscopic identification of Chinese medicinal materials: traditional experiences and modern understanding. J Ethnopharmacol 134:556–564CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Zheng H, Zhou J, Du Y, Zhang L (2002) Cellulose/chitin films blended in NaOH/urea aqueous solution. J Appl Polym Sci 86:1679–1683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Zumholz K, Hansteen TH, Piatkowski U, Croot PL (2007) Influence of temperature and salinity on the trace element incorporation into statoliths of the common cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis). Mar Biol 151:1321–1330CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alisa Palaveniene
    • 1
  • Volodymyr Harkavenko
    • 2
  • Vitalina Kharchenko
    • 2
  • Povilas Daugela
    • 3
  • Mindaugas Pranskunas
    • 3
  • Gintaras Juodzbalys
    • 3
  • Nataliya Babenko
    • 2
  • Jolanta Liesiene
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Polymer Chemistry and TechnologyKaunas University of TechnologyKaunasLithuania
  2. 2.Department of Ontogenetic PhysiologyV. N. Karazin Kharkiv National UniversityKharkivUkraine
  3. 3.Department of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryLithuanian University of Health SciencesKaunasLithuania

Personalised recommendations