Abstract
Andean forests decreased in area over the past decade, and communities throughout the Andes are experiencing environmental degradation and soil fertility loss. But amid deforestation, forests returned to some Andean regions, producing local ‘forest transitions’, or net increases in forest cover. The mechanisms that drive these local transitions – often in part the actions of residents – are still little studied, but hold key information for creating successful forest and landscape restoration interventions. This paper investigates cloud forest cover dynamics in Intag, a region in northwest Andean Ecuador where people were actively reforesting by planting trees. We used remote sensing analysis of LANDSAT imagery (from 1991, 2001, and 2010) and household surveys and oral histories with residents of four communities. Results from remote sensing show that prior to reforestation projects (before 2001), deforestation rates were high (> 3%/year). But from 2001 to 2010 forest recovery surpassed deforestation – a local forest transition (net 3% forest cover). But although deforestation rates slowed precipitously (< 2%) people continued to clear forests in the highlands even as forests regrew around communities. This change in clearing rates and spatial redistribution of forest cover reflects people’s reasons for planting trees – to restore water and other key ecosystem services perceive to be ‘scarce’. The results point to a new ‘path’ by which forest transitions occur – the ecosystem service scarcity path – in which local demand for forest ecosystem services drive forest recovery.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The Intag region has been of interest to international mining companies for decades (Bebbington et al. 2008; Kocian et al. 2011; Buchanan 2013). In the early 2000s, communities protested, dismantled a mining exploration camp, and ultimately prevented illegal mining exploration. Community-owned reserves create small areas of land that cannot be sold for development without communal consent, providing a safeguard against mining.
Approximately 2.5% per year in Intag compared to the average for Ecuador of 1.2% per year from 1990 to 2000 (FAO 2005).
References
Abram NK, Meijaard E, Ancrenaz M, Runting RK, Wells JA, Gaveau D, Pellier AS, Mengersen K (2014) Spatially explicit perceptions of ecosystem services and land cover change in forested regions of Borneo. Ecosyst Serv 7:116–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.11.004
Aide TM, Ruiz-Jaen M, Grau H (2010) What is the state of tropical montane cloud forest restoration. In: Bruijnzeel LA, Scatena FN, Hamilton LS (eds) Tropical montane cloud forests: science for conservation and management. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511778384.010
Aide TM, Clark ML, Grau HR, Lopez-Carr D, Levy MA, Redo D, Bonilla-Moheno M, Riner G, Andrade-Núñez MJ, Muniz M (2013) Deforestation and reforestation of Latin America and the Caribbean (2001–2010). Biotropica 45:262-271. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2012.00908.x
Angelsen A, Rudel TK (2013) Designing and implementing effective REDD+ policies: a forest transition approach. Rev Environ Econ Policy 7:91–113. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/res022
Aubad J, Aragón P, Olalla-Tárraga MÁ, Rodríguez MÁ (2008) Illegal logging, landscape structure and the variation of tree species richness across north Andean forest remnants. For Ecol Manag 255:1892–1899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.12.011
Balthazar V, Vanacker V, Molina A, Lambin EF (2015) Impacts of forest cover change on ecosystem services in high Andean mountains. Ecol Indic 48:63–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.07.043
Barlow J, Gardner TA, Araujo IS, Ávila-Pires TC, Bonaldo AB, Costa JE, Esposito MC, Ferreira LV, Hawes J, Hernandez MI (2007) Quantifying the biodiversity value of tropical primary, secondary, and plantation forests. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:18555–18560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0703333104
Bebbington A, Humphreys Bebbington D, Bury J, Lingan J, Muñoz JP, Scurrah M (2008) Mining and social movements: struggles over livelihood and rural territorial development in the Andes. World Dev 36:2888–2905. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1265582
Beck E, Bendix J, Kottke I, Makeschin F, Mosandl R (2008) (eds) (n.d.) Gradients in a Tropical Mountain Ecosystem of Ecuador. Ecological Studies: Springer. 198: 15-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73526-7
Bhagwat SA, Willis KJ, Birks HJB, Whittaker RJ (2008) Agroforestry: a refuge for tropical biodiversity? Trends Ecol Evol 23:261–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.01.005
Bonner MT, Schmidt S, Shoo LP (2013) A meta-analytical global comparison of aboveground biomass accumulation between tropical secondary forests and monoculture plantations. For Ecol Manag 291:73–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.11.024
Bremer LL, Farley KA (2010) Does plantation forestry restore biodiversity or create green deserts? A synthesis of the effects of land-use transitions on plant species richness. Biodivers Conserv 19:3893–3915. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-010-9936-4
Brooks TM, Mittermeier RA, da Fonseca GA, Gerlach J, Hoffmann M, Lamoreux JF, Mittermeier CG, Pilgrim JD, Rodrigues AS (2006) Global biodiversity conservation priorities. Science 313:58–61. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1127609
Buchanan KS (2013) Contested discourses, knowledge, and socio-environmental conflict in Ecuador. Environ Sci Pol 30:19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.12.012
Chander G, Markham BL, Helder DL (2009) Summary of current radiometric calibration coefficients for Landsat MSS, TM, ETM+, and EO-1 ALI sensors. Remote Sens Environ 113:893–903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2009.01.007
Chazdon RL (2008) Beyond deforestation: restoring forests and ecosystem services on degraded lands. Science 320:1458–1460. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1155365
Chazdon RL, Harvey CA, Komar O, Griffith DM, Ferguson BG, Martınez-Ramos M, Morales H, Nigh R, Soto-Pinto L, van Breugel M (2008) Beyond reserves: a research agenda for conserving biodiversity in human-modified tropical landscapes. Biotropica 41:142–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2008.00471.x
Coomes OT, Grimard F, Potvin C, Sima P (2008) The fate of the tropical forest: carbon or cattle? Ecol Econ 65:207–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.12.028
de Jong W (2010) Forest rehabilitation and its implication for forest transition theory. Biotropica 42:3–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2009.00568.x
DECOIN (2010) Defensa y Conservation Ecologica de Intag Retrieved 20/12, 2013, from http://www.decoin.org
Dent DH, Wright SJ (2009) The future of tropical species in secondary forests: a quantitative review. Biol Conserv 142:2833–2843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.05.035
Duchelle AE (2009) Conservation and livelihood development in Brazil-nut producing communities in a tri-national Amazonian frontier. (dissertation), University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
ENVI (2009) Atmospheric correction module: QUAC and FLAASH User’s guide. ITT Visual Information Solutions, Boulder, CO.
FAO (2005) Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
FAO (2011) State of The World's Forests 2011. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
FAO (2015) State of The World's Forests 2011. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Farley KA (2007) Grasslands to tree plantations: forest transition in the Andes of Ecuador. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 97:755–771. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2007.00581.x
Farley KA (2010) Pathways to forest transition: local case studies from the Ecuadorian Andes. J Lat Am Geogr 9:7–26. https://doi.org/10.1353/lag.2010.0011
Fitzherbert EB, Struebig MJ, Morel A, Danielsen F, Brühl CA, Donald PF, Phalan B (2008) How will oil palm expansion affect biodiversity? Trends Ecol Evol 23:538–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.06.012
Foster AD, Rosenzweig MR (2003) Economic growth and the rise of forests. Q J Econ 118:601–637. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355303321675464
Freiberg M, Freiberg E (2000) Epiphyte diversity and biomass in the canopy of lowland and montane forests in Ecuador. J Trop Ecol 16:673–688. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467400001644
Gaglio M, Aschonitis VG, Mancuso MM, Puig JPR, Moscoso F, Castaldelli G, Fano EA (2017) Changes in land use and ecosystem services in tropical forest areas: a case study in Andes mountains of Ecuador. IJBESM 13(1):264–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2017.1345980
Garen EJ, Saltonstall K, Slusser JL, Mathias S, Ashton MS, Hall JS (2009) An evaluation of farmers' experiences planting native trees in rural Panama: implications for reforestation with native species in agricultural landscapes. Agrofor Syst 76:219–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-009-9203-4
Geist HJ, Lambin EF (2002) Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation. BioScience 52:143–150. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0143:PCAUDF]2.0.CO;2
Gibson L, Lee TM, Koh LP, Brook BW, Gardner TA, Barlow J, Peres CA, Bradshaw CJ, Laurance WF, Lovejoy TE (2011) Primary forests are irreplaceable for sustaining tropical biodiversity. Nature 478:378–381. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10425
Grainger A (1995) The forest transition: an alternative approach. Area 27:242–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.1998.tb00055.x
Grêt-Regamey A, Brunner SH, Kienast F (2012) Mountain ecosystem services: who cares? Mt Res Dev 32(S1):S23–S34. https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-10-00115.S1
Groom B, Palmer C (2012) REDD+ and rural livelihoods. Biol Conserv 154:42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.03.002
Harvey CA, Komar O, Chazdon R, Ferguson BG, Finegan B, Griffith DM, Martinez-Ramos M, Morales H, Nigh R, Soto-Pinto L (2008) Integrating agricultural landscapes with biodiversity conservation in the Mesoamerican hotspot. Conserv Biol 22:8–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00863.x
Headley, R. (2010). Landsat—A global land-imaging project: U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2010–3026 Retrieved 08/22, 2014, from http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2010/3026/
Hoch L, Pokorny B, De Jong W (2012) Financial attractiveness of smallholder tree plantations in the Amazon: bridging external expectations and local realities. Agrofor Syst 84:361–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-012-9480-1
Holl KD (2002) Long-term vegetation recovery on reclaimed coal surface mines in the eastern USA. J Appl Ecol 39:960–970. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2002.00767.x
Jokisch BD, Lair BM (2002) One last stand? Forests and change on Ecuador’s eastern cordillera. Geogr Rev 92:135–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1931-0846.2002.tb00006.x
Kanowski J, Catterall CP, Wardell-Johnson GW (2005) Consequences of broadscale timber plantations for biodiversity in cleared rainforest landscapes of tropical and subtropical Australia. For Ecol Manag 208:359–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.01.018
Kappelle M, Avertin G, Juárez ME, Zamora N (2000) Useful plants within a campesino community in a Costa Rican montane cloud forest. Mt Res Dev 20:162–171. https://doi.org/10.1659/0276-4741(2000)020[0162:UPWACC]2.0.CO;2
Keating PL (1997) Mapping vegetation and anthropogenic disturbances in southern Ecuador with remote sensing techniques: implications for park management. Paper presented at the Yearbook. Conference of Latin Americanist Geographers
Kintz DB, Young KR, Crews-Meyer KA (2006) Implications of land use/land cover change in the buffer zone of a national park in the tropical Andes. Environ Manag 38:238–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-005-0147-9
Kocian M, Batker D, Harrison-Cox J (2011) An ecological study of Ecuador’s Intag region: the environmental impacts and potential rewards of mining. Earth Economics, Tacoma
Koh LPD, Wilcove S (2008) Is oil palm agriculture really destroying tropical biodiversity? Conserv Lett 1:60–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2008.00011.x
Lamb D, Erskine PD, Parrotta JA (2005) Restoration of degraded tropical forest landscapes. Science 310:1628–1632. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1111773
Laurance WF, Albernaz AKM, Schroth G, Fearnside PM, Bergen S, Venticinque EM, Da Costa C (2002) Predictors of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. J Biogeogr 29:737–748. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2002.00721.x
Lehner B, Verdin K, Jarvis A (2008) New global hydrograhy derived from spaceborne elevation data. Eos, trans. Am Geophys Union 89:93–94. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008EO100001
Liebsch D, Marques M, Goldenberg R (2008) How long does the Atlantic rain Forest take to recover after a disturbance? Changes in species composition and ecological features during secondary succession. Biol Conserv 141:1717–1725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.04.013
Lillesand TM, Kiefer RW, Chipman JW (2004) Remote sensing and image interpretation. John Wiley Sons Ltd., Hoboken
Locatelli B, Lavorel S, Sloan S, Tappeiner U, Geneletti D (2017) Characteristic trajectories of ecosystem services in mountains in a nutshell. Front Ecol Environ 15:150–159. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1470
Lugo AE, Helmer E (2004) Emerging forests on abandoned land: Puerto Rico’s new forests. For Ecol Manag 190:145–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2003.09.012
Mather AS (1992) The Forest Transition. Area 24:367–379
Mather AS, Needle C (1998) The forest transition: a theoretical basis. Area 30:117–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.1998.tb00055.x
McKinney ML, Lockwood JL (1999) Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. Trends Ecol Evol 14:450–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01679-1
Meyfroidt P, Lambin EF, Erb K-H, Hertel TW (2013) Globalization of land use: distant drivers of land change and geographic displacement of land use. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 5:438–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.04.003
Mitchell MG, Bennett EM, Gonzalez A (2013) Linking landscape connectivity and ecosystem service provision: current knowledge and research gaps. Ecosystems 16:894–908. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-013-9647-2
Munroe DK, Southworth J, Tucker CM (2002) The dynamics of land-cover change in western Honduras: exploring spatial and temporal complexity. Agric Econ 27:355–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2002.tb00125.x
Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, Da Fonseca GA, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858. https://doi.org/10.1038/35002501
Nagendra H (2009) Drivers of regrowth in South Asia’s human impacted forests. Curr Sci 97:1586–1592
Nanni AS, Grau HR (2014) Agricultural adjustment, population dynamics and forests redistribution in a subtropical watershed of NW Argentina. Reg Environ Chang 14:1641–1649
Nelson A, Chomitz K (2007) The Forest–hydrology–poverty Nexus in Central America: an heuristic analysis. Environ Dev Sustain 9:369–385. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-3430
Paudyal K, Baral H, Putzel L, Bhandari S, Keenan RJ (2017) Change in land use and ecosystem services delivery from community-based forest landscape restoration in the Phewa Lake watershed, Nepal. Int For Rev 4:88–101
Pellissier L, Anzini M, Maiorano L, Dubuis A, Pottier J, Vittoz P, Guisan A (2013) Spatial predictions of land-use transitions and associated threats to biodiversity: the case of forest regrowth in mountain grasslands. Appl Veg Sci 16:227–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-109X.2012.01215.x
Perz SG (2007) Grand theory and context-specificity in the study of forest dynamics: forest transition theory and other directions. Prof Geogr 59:105–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9272.2007.00594.x
Perz SG, Skole DL (2003) Secondary forest expansion in the Brazilian Amazon and the refinement of forest transition theory. Soc Nat Resour 16:277–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920309153
Peters, T., T. Drobnik, H. Meyer, M. Rankl, M. Richter, R. Rollenbeck, B. Thies, and J. Bendix. (2013). Environmental changes affecting the Andes of Ecuador. In J. Bendix, E. Beck, A. Bräuning, F. Makeschin, R. Mosandl, S. Scheu W. Wilcke (eds). Ecosystem services, biodiversity and environmental change in a Tropical Mountain ecosystem of South Ecuador. Springer, 19-29. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38137-9_2
Phalan B, Onial M, Balmford A, Green RE (2011) Reconciling food production and biodiversity conservation: land sharing and land sparing compared. Science 333:1289–1291. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1208742
Portillo-Quintero CA, Sanchez AM, Valbuena CA, Gonzalez YY, Larreal JT (2012) Forest cover and deforestation patterns in the northern Andes (Lake Maracaibo Basin): a synoptic assessment using MODIS and Landsat imagery. Appl Geogr 35:152–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.06.015
Reardon T, Vosti SA (1995) Links between rural poverty and the environment in developing countries: asset categories and investment poverty. World Dev 23:1495–1506. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(95)00061-G
Redo DJ, Grau HR, Aide TM, Clark ML (2012) Asymmetric forest transition driven by the interaction of socioeconomic development and environmental heterogeneity in Central America. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109:8839–8844. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1201664109
Rhemtulla JM, Mladenoff DJ, Clayton MK (2007) Regional land-cover conversion in the US upper Midwest: magnitude of change and limited recovery (1850–1935–1993). Landsc Ecol 22:57–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-007-9117-3
Rudel TK (2009) Three paths to Forest expansion: a comparative historical analysis. In: Nagendra JSH (ed) Reforesting Landscapes Linking Pattern and Process. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9656-3_3
Rudel TK, Bates D, Machinguiashi R (2002) A tropical forest transition? Agricultural change, out-migration, and secondary forests in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 92:87–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8306.00281
Rudel TK, Coomes OT, Moran E, Achard F, Angelsen A, Xu J, Lambin E (2005) Forest transitions: towards a global understanding of land use change. Glob Environ Chang 15:23–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.11.001
Sánchez-Cuervo AM, Aide TM, Clark ML, Etter A (2012) Land cover change in Colombia: surprising forest recovery trends between 2001 and 2010. PloS One 7:e43943. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043943
Sarmiento FO, Frolich LM (2002) Andean cloud forest tree lines: naturalness, agriculture and the human dimension. Mt Res Dev 22:278–287. https://doi.org/10.1659/0276-4741(2002)022[0278:ACFTL]2.0.CO;2
Schelhas J, Sánchez-Azofeifa GA (2006) Post-frontier forest change adjacent to Braulio Carrillo National Park, Costa Rica. Hum Ecol 34:407–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/~10745-006-9024-2
Schmook B, Palmer Dickson R, Sangermano F, Vadjunec JM, Eastman JR, Rogan J (2011) A step-wise land-cover classification of the tropical forests of the southern Yucatán, Mexico. Int J Remote Sens 32:1139–1164. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160903527413
Shvidenko A, Barber C, Persson R (2005) Forest and woodland systems
Silver WL, Kueppers LM, Lugo AE, Ostertag R, Matzek V (2004) Carbon sequestration and plant community dynamics following reforestation of tropical pasture. Ecol Appl 14:1115–1127. https://doi.org/10.1890/03-5123
Sloan S (2008) Reforestation amidst deforestation: simultaneity and succession. Glob Environ Chang 18:425–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.04.009
Vallet A, Locatelli B, Levrel H, Pérez CB, Imbach P, Carmona NE, Manlay R, Oszwald J (2016) Dynamics of ecosystem services during forest transitions in Reventazón, Costa Rica. PloS One 11(7):e0158615. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158615
Wilson, S (2015) Replanting a Future: Restoring cloud forest, biodiversity and rural livelihoods in Andean Ecuador. PhD Thesis, McGill University
Wilson SJ, Coomes OT (2019) ‘Crisis restoration’ in post-frontier tropical environments: replanting cloud forests in the Ecuadorian Andes. J Rural Stud 67:152–165
Wilson SJ, Rhemtulla J (2016) Community-based tree planting accelerates forest recovery but creates novel forests in Andean Ecuador. Ecol Appl 26:203–218. https://doi.org/10.1890/14-2129
Wilson SJ, Rhemtulla J (2018) Small montane cloud forest fragments are important for conserving tree diversity in the Ecuadorian Andes. Biotropica 50:586–597
Wilson SJ, Schelhas J, Grau R, Sofia Nanni A, Sloan S (2017) Forest ecosystem-servicetransitions: the ecological dimensions of the forest transition. Ecol Soc 22:38. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09615-220438
Wunder S (1996) Deforestation and the uses of wood in the Ecuadorian Andes. Mt Res Dev 16:367–381. https://doi.org/10.2307/3673987 ctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research, 33: 165–172
Zhai D-L, Xu J-C, Dai Z-C, Cannon CH, Grumbine R (2014) Increasing tree cover while losing diverse natural forests in tropical Hainan, China. Reg Environ Chang 14:611–621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-013-0512-9
Acknowledgments
We wish to thank McGill University’s Geographic Information Centre (GIC) for assistance with remote sensing analysis; Miriam Harder, Silvana Bolanos, Alonzo Andrengo, and Carmen Navarette for field assistance; Jake Brennan for his assistance with interviews and constructive comments; Carlos Zorilla of DECOIN, Joseph de Coux of the Los Cedros Reserve, and Ana Mariscal of Fundacion Cambugan for their help with fieldwork logistics and information; botanists Miguel Angel Chinchero, Jenny Elizabeth Correa, Gabriela Cruz, and Carlos Morales for their help in the field and lab; and Jeanine Rhemtulla, Brian Robinson, Sylvia Wood, Ignacia Holmes, and Aerin Jacob for their insightful comments on results and earlier versions of this article. This study was funded by the International Development and Research Centre (IDRC), the National Science and Engineering Council of Canada (NSERC), the Fonds de Recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies (FQRNT), and the Theo Hills Family.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Editor: Nicolas Dendoncker.
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 99 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wilson, S.J., Coomes, O.T. & Dallaire, C.O. The ‘ecosystem service scarcity path’ to forest recovery: a local forest transition in the Ecuadorian Andes. Reg Environ Change 19, 2437–2451 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-019-01544-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-019-01544-1