Abstract
This paper uses panel data to analyze whether a forest transition has occurred in China and to identify the driving forces behind forest growth in China. We used generalized method of moments (GMM) model to identify forest transition. Analyzing forest transition only at the national level neglects regional differences. The results show that there exists an environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) relationship between forest cover and per capita GDP at the provincial level in China. Considering the processes of urbanization, economic development, the abandonment of arable land, and changes in forested area as a whole, it is concluded that a forest transition has already occurred in China and that the turning point took place in the 1990s. Forest restoration in China is affected by both the economic development path and the forest scarcity path. Economic development and strict policies have played important roles in forest recovery in China. In the early period of the forest transition, the forest scarcity path dominated; however, in the long run, the marginalization of agricultural land is the key driver of the forest transition.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agras J, Chapman D (1999) A dynamic approach to the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis. Ecol Econ 28:267–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00040-8
Aide TM, Clark ML, Grau HR, López-Carr D, Levy MA, Redo D, Bonilla-Moheno M, Riner G, Andrade-Núñez MJ, Muñiz M (2013) Deforestation and reforestation of Latin America and the Caribbean (2001–2010). Biotropica 45:262–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2012.00908.x
Aisyah A, Shahrul AB, Zulfahmie MZM, Sharifah Mastura SA, Mokhtar J (2015) Deforestation analysis in Selangor, Malaysia between 1989 and 2011 J Trop For Sci 27: 3–12. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84920736223&partnerID=8YFLogxK; http://www.jstor.org/stable/43150969. Accessed 9 Dec 2018
Barbier EB (2004) Explaining agricultural land expansion and deforestation in developing countries. Am J Agric Econ 86:1347–1353. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0002-9092.2004.00688.x
Barbier EB, Burgess JC (2001) The economics of tropical deforestation. J Econ Surv 15:413–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6419.00144
Barbier EB, Burgess JC, Grainger A (2010) The forest transition: towards a more comprehensive theoretical framework. Land Use Policy 27:98–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.02.001
Bhattarai M, Hammig M (2001) Institutions and the environmental Kuznets curve for deforestation: a cross-country analysis for Latin America, Africa and Asia. World Dev 29:995–1010. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00019-5
Chapman CA, Chapman LJ, Wrangham RW, Isabirye-Basuta G, Ben-David K (1997) Spatial and temporal variability in the structure of a tropical forest. Afr J Ecol 35:287–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2028.1997.083-89083.x
Cheng SK, Xu ZR, Su Y, Zhen L (2010) Spatial and temporal flows of China’s forest resources: development of a framework for evaluating resource efficiency. Ecol Econ 69:1405–1415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.04.006
Choi SYP, Peng Y (2015) Humanized management? Capital and migrant labour in a time of labour shortage in South China. Hum Relat 68:287–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726714541162
Cropper ML, Griffiths C (1994) The interaction of population growth and environmental quality. Am Econ Rev 84:250–254 https://www.jstor.org/stable/2117838. Accessed 9 Dec 2018
Cropper M, Griffiths C, Mani M (1999) Roads, population pressures, and deforestation in Thailand, 1976-1989. Land Econ 75:58–73. https://doi.org/10.2307/3146993
Culas RJ (2012) REDD and forest transition: tunneling through the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecol Econ 79:44–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.015
DeFries R, Pandey D (2010) Urbanization, the energy ladder and forest transitions in India’s emerging economy. Land Use Policy 27:130–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.07.003
Ehrhardt-Martinez K, Crenshaw EM, Jenkins JC (2002) Deforestation and the environmental Kuznets curve: a cross-national investigation of intervening mechanisms. Soc Sci Quart 83:226–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6237.00080
Ekins P (1997) The Kuznets curve for the environment and economic growth: examining the evidence. Environ Plann A 29:805–830. https://doi.org/10.1068/a290805
Esmaeili A, Nasrnia F (2014) Deforestation and the environmental Kuznets curve in Iran. Small-scale For 13:397–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-014-9261-y
Ewers RM (2006) Interaction effects between economic development and forest cover determine deforestation rates. Glob Environ Chang 16:161–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.12.001
Fang JY, Guo ZD, Piao SL, Chen AP (2007) Terrestrial vegetation carbon sinks in China, 1981-2000. Sci China 50:1341–1350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-007-0049-1
Gan L (2013) Guaranteeing China’s arable land will never fall below 1.8 billion mu (120 million hectares) by reusing idle land. China Household Finance Survey. https://chfs.swufe.edu.cn/wap/xiangqing.aspx?id=979. Accessed 17 April 2013
Giriraj A, Irfan-Ullah M, Murthy M, Beierkuhnlein C (2008) Modelling spatial and temporal Forest cover change patterns (1973-2020): a case study from South Western Ghats (India). Sensors 8:6132–6153. https://doi.org/10.3390/s8106132
Grainger A (1995) The forest transition: an alternative approach. Area 27:242–251 https://www.jstor.org/stable/20003580. Accessed 9 Dec 2018
Hu AG, Shen RM, Lang XJ (2013) Verification of the environmental Kuznets curve relationship between changes in China’s forest resources and economic development: based on provincial panel data from the second to the seventh national forest statistics. China Public Admin Rev 15:61–75 http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CCJD&dbname=CCJDLAST2&filename=GOGL201302004. Accessed 9 Dec 2018
Huang H, Wang Z (2000) Woodland, forest and forestry in China. Kaiming Press, Beijing
Kauppi P, Ausubel J, Fang JY, Mather AS, Sedjo R, Waggoner PE (2006) Returning forests analyzed with the forest identity. P Natl Acad Sci USA 103:17574–17579. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0608343103
Koop G, Tole L (1999) Is there an environmental Kuznets curve for deforestation? J Dev Econ 58:231–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3878(98)00110-2
Lambin EF, Meyfroidt P (2010) Land use transitions: socio-ecological feedback versus socio-economic change. Land Use Policy 27:108–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.09.003
Lambin EF, Meyfroidt P (2011) Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. P Natl Acad Sci USA 108:3465–3472. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1100480108
Li XB, Zhao YL (2011) Forest transition, agricultural land marginalization and ecological restoration. Chinese J Popul Resour Environ 21:91–95. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2011.10.014
Li LC, Liu JL, Long HX, Jong WD, Youn YC (2015) Economic globalization, trade and forest transition-the case of nine Asian countries. Forest Policy Econ 76:7–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2015.12.006
Liu C, Lv JZ (2010) Study on China’s forest resource environmental Kuznets curve. Res Inst Econ 28:138–161 http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CCJD&dbname=CCJDLAST1&filename=ZDJJ201002010. Accessed 9 Dec 2018
Liu JL, Liang M, Li LC, Long HX, Jong WD (2017) Comparative study of the forest transition pathways of nine Asia-Pacific countries. Forest Policy Econ 76:25–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.03.007
López R (1994) The environment as a factor of production: the effects of economic growth and trade liberalization. J Environ Econ Manag 27:163–184. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1994.1032
Mather AS (1992) The forest transition. Area 24:367–379 https://www.jstor.org/stable/20003181. Accessed 9 Dec 2018
Mather AS (2007) Recent Asian Forest transitions in relation to forest transition theory. Int Forest Rev 9:491–502. https://doi.org/10.1505/ifor.9.1.491
Meyfroidt P, Rudel TK, Lambin EF (2010) Forest transitions, trade, and the global displacement of land use. P Natl Acad Sci USA 107:20917–20922. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1014773107
Munasinghe M (1999) Is environmental degradation an inevitable consequence of economic growth: tunneling through the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecol Econ 29:89–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00062-7
Panayotou T, Sungsuwan S (1994) An econometric study of the causes of tropical deforestation: the case of northeast Thailand. UBC Press, Vancouver
Robinson BE, Holland MB, Naughton-Treves L (2014) Does secure land tenure save forests? A meta-analysis of the relationship between land tenure and tropical deforestation. Glob Environ Chang 29:281–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.012
Roodman D (2007) How to do xtabond2: an introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. Center for Global Development Working Paper No103: 1–48. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.982943
Royston P (2004) Multiple imputation of missing values. Stata J 4:227–241 http://www.stata-journal.com/article.html?article=st0067. Accessed 9 Dec 2018
Rubin DB (1976) Inference and missing data (with discussion). Biometrika 63:581–592. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/63.3.581
Rubin DB (1996) Multiple imputation after 18+ years. J Am Stat Assoc 91:473–489. https://doi.org/10.2307/2291635
Rudel TK, Coomes OT, Moran E, Achard F, Angelsen A, Xu JC, Lambin E (2005) Forest transitions: towards a global understanding of land use change. Glob Environ Change 15:23–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.11.001
Sanchez-Cuervo AM, Aide TM (2013) Identifying hotspots of deforestation and reforestation in Colombia (2001-2010): implications for protected areas. Ecosphere 4:452–453. https://doi.org/10.1890/ES13-00207.1
Santos JE, Fushita AT, Souza IMM, Amorim LM, Andrade VAD (2015) Agriculture and forest transition: understanding of land use change in a cultural landscape. Open J Appl Sci 5:797–807. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojapps.2015.512076
Selden TM, Song DQ (1994) Environmental qualityand development: is there a Kuznets curve for air pollution? J Environ Econ Manag 27:147–162. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1994.1031
Selden TM, Song DQ (1995) Neoclassical growth, the J curve for abatement and the inverted U curve for pollution. J Environ Econ Manag 29:162–168. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1995.1038
Shi MY, Yin RS, Lv HD (2017) An empirical analysis of the driving forces of forest cover change in northeast China. Forest Policy Econ 78:200–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.12.008
Singh MP, Bhojvaid PP, Jong WD, Ashraf J, Reddy SR (2017) Forest transition and socio-economic development in India and their implications for forest transition theory. Forest Policy Econ 76:65–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2015.10.013
Sunderlin W, Resosudarmo IAP (1999) The effect of population and migration on forest cover in Indonesia. J Environ Dev 8:152–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/107049659900800204
Toledo M, Poorter L, Peña-Claros M, Alarcón A, Balcázar J, Leaño C, Licona JC, Llanque O, Vroomans V, Zuidema P, Bongers F (2010) Climate is a stronger driver of tree and forest growth rates than soil and disturbance. J Ecol 99:254–264. https://doi.org/10.2307/41058855
Wang ZK (2014) China’s “labour shortage” and migrant workers’ lack of social security. Int Labour Rev 153:649–658. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2014.00219.x
Wang S, Liu C, Wilson B (2007) Is China in a later stage of a U-shaped forest resource curve? - A re-examination of empirical evidence. Forest Policy Econ 10:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2006.12.003
Wang JY, Xin LJ, Tan MH, Wang YH (2016) Spatial heterogeneity in Chinese forest area change in the early 21st century. Forests 7:1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/f7100232
Xu JC, Yang YP, Fox J, Yang XF (2007) Forest transition, its causes and environmental consequences: empirical evidence from Yunnan of Southwest China. Trop Ecol 48(2):137–150 http://www.tropecol.com/volumes/toc/en/toc48_2_e.htm. Accessed 9 Dec 2018
Zhang YQ (2000) Deforestation and forest transition: theory and evidence in China. In: Palo M, Vanhanen H (eds) World forests from deforestation to transition? Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 41–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0942-3_3
Zhang M, Guo FY (2013) Analysis of rural residential commercial energy consumption in China. Energy 52:222–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.01.039
Zhang Y, Tachibana S, Nagata S (2006) Impact of socio-economic factors on the changes in forest areas in China. Forest Policy Econ 9:63–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2005.02.005
Zhang HP, Mou JL, Yin H (2010) Empirical analysis of rural household energy consumption and demand in forest zones: based on the double extended linear expenditure system model. Chinese Rural Economy 7:64–74 http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFQ&dbname=CJFD2010&filename=ZNJJ201007011. Accessed 9 Dec 2018
Zhang Y, Li XB, Song W (2014) Determinants of cropland abandonment at the parcel, household and village levels in mountain areas of China: a multi-level analysis. Land Use Policy 41:186–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.05.011
Zhang ZM, Zinda JA, Li WQ (2017) Forest transitions in Chinese villages: explaining community-level variation under the returning forest to farmland program. Land Use Policy 64:245–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.02.016
Zhao YL, Ge YJ, Kuang CH, Zhang Y (2018) The path of forest transformation in mountainous areas in Guizhou province under the strategy of rural revitalization. J Guizhou Norm Univ (Nat Sci) 36:1–7 http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFQ&dbname=CJFDLAST2018&filename=NATR201801002. Accessed 9 Dec 2018
Funding
This study was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (41571095) and National Key Basic Research Program of China (2015CB452702).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Editor: Helmut Haberl
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 1095 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, J., Xin, L. & Wang, Y. Economic growth, government policies, and forest transition in China. Reg Environ Change 19, 1023–1033 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-1450-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-1450-3