Abstract
This paper analyses prospects for ecosystem-based adaptation, through examining diverse forest-people interactions in Nepal’s community forestry as a social-ecological system (SES). We examine the linkage between social-ecological resilience and societal adaptation in the Middle Hills of Nepal and, based on this, discuss the prospects of this system for climate adaptation. In doing so, we also discuss the prospects of community forestry for ecosystem-based adaptation in the rural agrarian context, focussing on a few attributes of resilience: diversity, modularity, and flexibility. We find that community forestry provides multiple pathways for both reactive and anticipatory adaptation, often reinforcing community resilience. Our finding also shows that, while ecological processes in community forestry (CF) are being managed by local institutions with an explicit goal to enhance the overall resilience of the SES, the underlying social and political dynamics of CF tend to be neglected in adaptation policy and planning. This prevents local organizations from harnessing the benefits of ecological resilience to enhance their adaptive capacity. The contribution of ecological resilience to societal adaptation has been constrained by large scale social and political drivers, especially bureaucratic structures underpinning the governance of forest in Nepal. Based on these findings, we recommend that ecosystem-based adaptation is fully informed by, and takes account of, local power dynamics. For instance, aligning governance and decision-making with the needs of marginalized groups can increase the resilience and adaptive capacity of social-ecological systems.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The Federation of Community Forestry Users Nepal (FECOFUN) is a national level formal network of Forest User Groups.
References
Adger WN (1999) Social vulnerability to climate change and extremes in coastal Vietnam. World Dev 27(2):249–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00136-3
Adhikari B, Di Falco S (2009) Social inequality, Local leadership and collective action: an empirical study of forest commons. Eur J Dev Res 21:179–194. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2008.16
Agarwal B (2001) Participatory exclusions, community forestry, and gender: an analysis for South Asia and a conceptual framework. World Dev 29(10):1623–1648. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00066-3
Agrawal A, Ostrom E (2001) Collective action, property rights, and decentralization in resource use in India and Nepal. Polit Soc 29(4):485–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329201029004002
Agrawal A, Gupta K (2005) Decentralization and participation: the governance of common pool resources in Nepal's Terai. World Dev 33(7):1101–1114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.04.009
Bennett L(2005) Gender, caste and ethnic exclusion in Nepal: following the policy process from analysis to action. In New Frontiers of Social Policy: Development in a Globalizing World. Arusha, Tanzania. ISBN 10: 9994689002
Berkes F (2007) Understanding uncertainty and reducing vulnerability: lessons from resilience thinking. Nat Hazards 41(2):283–295 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-006-9036-7
Bodin Ö, Tengö M (2012) Disentangling intangible social–ecological systems. Glob Environ Chang 22:430–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.01.005
Bryant RL (1992) Political ecology an emerging research agenda in third-world studies. Polit Geogr 11:12–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/0962-6298(92)90017-N
CBD (2009) Connecting biodiversity and climate change mitigation and adaptation: report of the Second Ad Hoc Technical Expert Group on Biodiversity and Climate Change, CBD Technical Montreal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. ISBN: 92-9225-134-1
Chakraborty A, Saha S, Sachdeva K, Joshi PK (2018) Vulnerability of forests in the Himalayan region to climate change impacts and anthropogenic disturbances: a systematic review. Reg Environ Chang:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s1011
Chapin FS, Walker BH, Hobbs RJ, Hooper DU, Lawton JH, Sala OE, Tilman D (1997) Biotic control over the functioning of ecosystems. Science 277(5325):500–504. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5325.500
Charmez K (2011) Grounded theory methods in social justice research. In: Denzin N, Lincoln Y (eds) The SAGE handbook of qualitative research, vol 03, 4th edn. SAGE, UK, pp 359–380. https://doi.org/10.4236/ib.2011.33031
Cote M, Nightingale AJ (2012) Resilience thinking meets social theory: situating social change in socio-ecological systems (SES) research. Prog Hum Geogr 36(4):475–489. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132511425708
Davidson DJ (2010) The applicability of the concept of resilience to social systems: some sources of optimism and nagging doubts. Soc Nat Resour 23(12):1135–1149. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941921003652940
Few R, Martin A, Gross-Camp N (2017) Trade-offs in linking adaptation and mitigation in the forests of the Congo Basin. Reg Environ Chang 17(3):851–863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-016-1080-6
Folke C, Carpenter S, Walker B, Scheffer M, Elmqvist T, Gunderson L, Holling CS (2004) Regime shifts, resilience, and biodiversity in ecosystem management. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:557–581. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.021103.105711
Gaire NP, Koirala M, Bhuju DR, Borgaonkar HP (2014) Treeline dynamics with climate change at the central Nepal Himalaya. Clim Past 10:1277–1290. https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-10-1277-2014
Gaire K, Beilin R, Miller F (2015) Withdrawing, resisting, maintaining and adapting: food security and vulnerability in Jumla, Nepal. Reg Environ Chang 15(8):1667–1678. https://doi.org/10.1007/s1011
Gilmour DA, Fisher RJ (1992) Villagers, forests, and foresters: the philosophy, process, and practice of community forestry in Nepal, 2nd edn. Sahayogi Press, Kathmandu
Haig BD (2008) Précis of ‘an abductive theory of scientific method’. J Clin Psychol 64(9):1019–1022. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20506
Harvey CA, Martínez-Rodríguez MR, Cárdenas JM, Avelino J, Rapidel B, Vignola R, Donatti CI, Vilchez-Mendoza S (2017) The use of ecosystem-based adaptation practices by smallholder farmers in Central America. Agric Ecosyst Environ 246:279–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.04.018
Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
Jones L, Boyd E (2011) Exploring social barriers to adaptation: insights from Western Nepal. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions 21:1262–1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.06.002
Leach M, Mearns R, Scoones I (1999) Environmental entitlements: dynamics and institutions in community-based natural resource management. World Dev 27:225–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00141-7
Lukasiewicz A, Pittock J, Finlayson M (2016) Institutional challenges of adopting ecosystem-based adaptation to climate change. Reg Environ Chang 16(2):487–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0765-6
Luthar SS, Cicchetti D (2000) The construct of resilience: implications for interventions and social policies. Dev Psychopathol 12:28–885. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579400004156
Mainali J, All J, Jha PK, Bhuju DR (2015) Responses of montane forest to climate variability in the central Himalayas of Nepal. Mt Res Dev 35:66–77. https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-13-00101.1
Malla YB (2001) Changing policies and the persistence of patron-client relations in Nepal: stakeholders' responses to changes in forest policies. Environ Hist 6:287–307. https://doi.org/10.2307/3985088
Morin MB, Kneeshaw D, Doyon F, Le Goff H, Bernier P, Yelle V, Blondlot A, Houle D (2015) Climate change and the forest sector: perception of principal impacts and of potential options for adaptation. For Chron 91:395–406. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc2015-069
Munang R, Thiaw I, Alverson K, Mumba M, Liu J, Rivington M (2012) Climate change and ecosystem-based adaptation: a new pragmatic approach to buffering climate change impacts. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 5(1):67–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2012.12.001
Naeem S, Thompson LJ, Lawler SP, Lawton JH, Woodfin RM (1994) Declining biodiversity can alter the performance of ecosystems. Nature 368(6473):734–737. https://doi.org/10.1038/368734a0
Nightingale AJ (2011) Bounding difference: intersectionality and the material production of gender, caste, class and environment in Nepal. Geoforum 42:153–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.03.004
Ojha HR (2014) Beyond the ‘local community’: the evolution of multi-scale politics in Nepal's community forestry regimes. Int For Rev 16:14–353. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554814812572520
Ojha H, Persha L, Chhatre A (2009) Community forestry in Nepal: a policy innovation for local livelihoods. Intl Food Policy Res Inst 913
Pandit R, Bevilacqua E (2011) Social heterogeneity and community forestry processes: reflections from forest users of Dhading District, Nepal. Small-Scale Forestry 10(1):97–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-010-9136-9
Peterson G, Allen CR, Holling CS (1998) Ecological resilience, biodiversity, and scale. Ecosystems 1:6–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100219900002
Pillar VD, Blanco CC, Müller SC, Sosinski EE, Joner F, Duarte LDS, Bello F (2013) Functional redundancy and stability in plant communities. J Veg Sci 24(5):963–974. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12047
Pimm SL (1984) The complexity and stability of ecosystems. Nature 307(5949):321–326. https://doi.org/10.1038/307321a0
Pramova E, Locatelli B, Djoudi H, Somorin OA (2012) Forests and trees for social adaptation to climate variability and change. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 3:581–596. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.195
Regmi, M.C. (1999) A study in Nepali economic history, 1768–1846. Delhi: Adroit. ISBN: 8187392010
Ribot, J. (2010) Vulnerability does not fall from the sky: toward multiscale, pro-poor climate policy. In: Mearns, Norton A (eds) Social dimensions of climate change: equity and vulnerability in a warming world. New frontiers of social policy. Washington, D.C.: World Bank. pp 47–74. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857939111
Ribot J (2014) Cause and response: vulnerability and climate in the Anthropocene. J Peasant Stud 41(5):667–705. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2014.894911
Robledo C, Clot N, Hammill A, Riche B (2012) The role of forest ecosystems in community-based coping strategies to climate hazards: three examples from rural areas in Africa. Forest Policy Econ 24:20–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2011.04.006
Sapkota P, Keenan RJ, Paschen JA, Ojha HR (2016) Social production of vulnerability to climate change in the rural middle hills of Nepal. J Rural Stud 48:53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.09.007
Sapkota P, Keenan RJ, Ojha HR (2018) Community institutions, social marginalization and the adaptive capacity: a case study of a community forestry user group in the Nepal Himalayas. Forest Policy Econ 92:55–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.04.001
Scarano FR (2017) Ecosystem-based adaptation to climate change: concept, scalability and a role for conservation science. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation 15:65–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2017.05.003
Sen A (1981) Poverty and famines: an essay on entitlement and deprivation. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198284632.001.0001
Shrestha AB, Aryal R (2011) Climate change in Nepal and its impact on Himalayan glaciers. Reg Environ Chang 11(1):65–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-010-0174-9
Shrestha KK, McManus P (2008) The politics of community participation in natural resource management: lessons from community forestry in Nepal. Aust For 71(2):135–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049158.2008.10676280
Strauss A, Corbin J (1990) Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications, Newbury Park. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153
Sunderlin WD, Angelsen A, Belcher B, Burgers P, Nasi R, Santoso L, Wunder S (2005) Livelihoods, forests, and conservation in developing countries: an overview. World Dev 33:1383–1402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.10.004
Thoms CA (2008) Community control of resources and the challenge of improving local livelihoods: a critical examination of community forestry in Nepal. Geoforum 39:1452–1465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.01.006
Tompkins EL, Adger WN (2004) Does adaptive management of natural resources enhance resilience to climate change? Ecol Soc 9(2). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-00667-090210
Vignola R, Locatelli B, Martinez C, Imbach P (2009) Ecosystem-based adaptation to climate change: what role for policy-makers, society and scientists?(Report). Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Chang 691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-009-9193-6
Vignola R, McDaniels TL, Scholz RW (2013) Governance structures for ecosystem-based adaptation: using policy-network analysis to identify key organizations for bridging information across scales and policy areas. Environ Sci Pol 71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.03.004
Vignola R, Harvey CA, Bautista-Solis P, Avelino J, Rapidel B, Donatti C, Martinez R (2015) Ecosystem-based adaptation for smallholder farmers: definitions, opportunities and constraints. Agric Ecosyst Environ 211:126–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.05.013
Vogt DJ, Vogt KA, Gmur SJ, Scullion JJ, Suntana AS, Daryanto S, Sigurðardóttir R (2016) Vulnerability of tropical forest ecosystems and forest dependent communities to droughts. Environ Res 144:27–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2015.10.022
Walker BH, Salt D (2006) Resilience thinking: sustaining ecosystems and people in a changing world. Island Press. ISBN: 9781597260930
Xu J, Grumbine RE, Shrestha A, Eriksson M, Yang X, Wang Y, Wilkes A (2009) The melting himalayas: cascading effects of climate change on water, biodiversity, and livelihoods. Conserv Biol 23(3):520–530. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01237.x
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the University of Melbourne and Australia Awards.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Editor:Chinwe Ifejika Speranza.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sapkota, P., Keenan, R.J. & Ojha, H.R. Co-evolving dynamics in the social-ecological system of community forestry—prospects for ecosystem-based adaptation in the Middle Hills of Nepal. Reg Environ Change 19, 179–192 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-1392-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-1392-9