Regional Environmental Change

, Volume 18, Issue 5, pp 1495–1507 | Cite as

Investigating environmental migration and other rural drought adaptation strategies in Baja California Sur, Mexico

  • Melissa Haeffner
  • Jacopo A. Baggio
  • Kathleen Galvin
Original Article


This paper explores the relationship between specific household traits (region of residence, head of household occupation, financial diversity, female level of education, land and animal ownership, social capital, and climate perception) and choice of specific adaptation strategies used by households in two sites in Baja California Sur, Mexico, during a severe drought from 2006 to 2012 using survey data and key informant interviews. We analyzed the co-occurrence of household traits adopting different drought adaptation strategies, then applied Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) to examine the relationship between traits and strategies and integrated interview data to understand how rancheros perceive associations. We found evidence of diversity among households within the larger cultural group, both in the types of resources they have available and in the adaptation strategies they select. However, the most robust finding across the analyses appeared to be urban access; that is, the more a household was able to access urban services including piped water, the less likely they were to have used one of the drought adaptation strategies under study. These findings suggest that social structure and public investments are stronger predictors of smallholder adaptation rather than individual household traits. We also found that rancheros seem to rely less on traditional environmental migration to adapt to drought and rather settle in key watershed zones. We call for targeted policies to address inequities to access fresh water, including urban water, during drought times for the benefit of overall watershed health and the sustainability of rural ranchero livelihoods as they evolve to respond to climatological and economic change.


Drought Adaptation Environmental migration Livelihoods Climate change QCA Multiple methods 



The authors would like to thank the respondents for giving their time to this study. We would like to acknowledge the following for their assistance in translation and transcription: Vinnie Enrique Caicero, Yuridia Davis, Chris Estrada, Joel Coronado Gaxiola, Mariana Ledesma, Irene López, Carlos Mancilla, Luz Fabiola Armenta Martínez, Laura Morales, Carlos Nava, Arry Gonzalez Peralta, Nancy Rubio, Cenia Alemán Sarabia, Jesenia Torres, Mabilia Urquidi, and Paola Bonilla Yee. Thank you to the following guides in the field: Aníbal López, Profesora Rosario Almeida Cruz, Ezequiel, Jesús “Chuy,” and the non-profit organizations Niparajá A.C. ( and Raíces Vivas (, without whom this project would not have been possible. Thank you to Mabilia Urquidi who produced the map.

Compliance with ethical standards

This research was approved by the Colorado State University Institutional Review Board Protocol 12-3573H.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10113_2018_1281_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1.2 mb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 1273 kb)


  1. Afifi T, Liwenga E, Kwezi L (2013) Rainfall-induced crop failure, food insecurity and out-migration in Same-Kilimanjaro, Tanzania. Climate and Dev 6(1):1–8. Google Scholar
  2. Alscher S (2010) Environmental factors in Mexican migration: the cases of Chiapas and Tlaxcala. In: Afifi T and Jager J (eds) Environment, forced migration and social vulnerability. Springer, 171–185.
  3. Baggio JA, BurnSilver SB, Arenas A, Magdanz JS, Kofinas GP, De Domenico M (2016a) Multiplex social- ecological network analysis reveals how social changes affect community robustness more than resource depletion. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113(48):13708–13713. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baggio J, Barnett A, Perez-Ibarra I, Brady U, Ratajczyk E, Rollins N, Rubiños C, Shin H, Yu D, Aggarwal R, Anderies J (2016b) Explaining success and failure in the commons: the configural nature of Ostrom’s institutional design principles. Int J Commons 10(2):417–439. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barnett A, Baggio J, Perez-Ibarra I, Brady U, Ratajczyk E, Rollins N, Rubiños C, Shin H, Yu D, Aggarwal R, Anderies J, Janssen M (2016) An iterative approach to Large-N case studies: insights from qualitative analysis of quantitative inconsistencies. Int J Commons 10(2):467–494. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blankespoor B, Dasgupta S, Laplante B, Wheeler D (2010) The economics of adaptation to extreme weather events in developing countries. Center for Global Development Working Paper (199).
  7. Cavazos T, Arriaga-Ramírez S (2012) Downscaled climate change scenarios for Baja California and the North American monsoon during the twenty-first century. J Clim 25(17):5904–5915. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. CONAGUA, Comisión Nacional del Agua (2013) Diaro Oficial de la Federacion. DECLARATORIA de Desastre Natural por la ocurrencia de sequía severa del 1 de mayo al 30 de noviembre de 2011 en los municipios de La Paz, Los Cabos y Loreto del Estado de Baja California SurGoogle Scholar
  9. Cook ER, Seager R, Heim RR, Vose RS, Herweijer C, Woodhouse C (2010) Megadroughts in North America: placing IPCC projections of hydroclimatic change in a long-term palaeoclimate context. J Quat Sci 25(1):48–61. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. de Janvry A, Sadoulet E (2001) Income strategies among rural households in Mexico: the role of off-farm activities. World Dev 29(3):467–480. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eakin H (2005) Institutional change, climate risk, and rural vulnerability: cases from Central Mexico. World Dev 33(11):1923–1938. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ellis F (2000) Rural livelihoods and diversity in developing countries. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  13. Gray C (2009) Environment, land, and rural out-migration in the Southern Ecuadorian Andes. World Dev 37(2):457–468. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gray C, Mueller V (2012) Drought and population mobility in rural Ethiopia. World Dev 40(1):134–145. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haeffner M, Galvin K, Vázquez AEG (2016) Urban water development in La Paz, Mexico 1960-present: a hydrosocial perspective. Water History 9(2):1–19. Google Scholar
  16. INEGI, Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (2010) Principales resultados del Censo de Población y Vivienda. Retrieved January 29, 2014Google Scholar
  17. IOM, International Organization on Migration (2007) Ninety-Fourth Session Discussion Note: Migration and the Environment (MC/INF/288) Accessed December 26, 2017
  18. Kok M, Lüdeke M, Lucas P, Sterzel T, Walther C, Janssen P, Sietz D, de Soysa I (2016) A new method for analysing socio-ecological patterns of vulnerability. Reg Environ Chang 16(1):229–243. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Laczko F, Aghazarm C (2009) Migration, environment and climate change: assessing the evidence. International Organization for Migration Geneva.
  20. Laube W, Schraven B, Awo M (2012) Smallholder adaptation to climate change: dynamics and limits in Northern Ghana. Clim Chang 111(3–4):753–774. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Leighton M (2011) Drought, desertification and migration: past experiences, predicted impacts and human rights issues. Migr Clim Chang 331-358Google Scholar
  22. Liverman DM (1999) Vulnerability and adaptation to drought in Mexico. Nat Resour J 39:99Google Scholar
  23. Mardero S, Schmook B, Radel C, Christman Z, Lawrence D, Millones M, Nickl E, Rogan J, Schneider L (2015) Smallholders’ adaptations to droughts and climatic variability in southeastern Mexico. Environ Hazards 14(4):271–288. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Massey DS, Axinn WG, Ghimire DJ (2010) Environmental change and out-migration: evidence from Nepal. Popul Environ 32(2–3):109–136. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McLeman RA, Ploeger SK (2012) Soil and its influence on rural drought migration: insights from Depression-era Southwestern Saskatchewan, Canada. Popul Environ 33(4):304–332. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Narayan D, Pritchett L (1999) Cents and sociability: household income and social capital in rural Tanzania. Econ Dev Cult Chang 47(4):871–897. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Navarro-Navarro LP, Moreno-Vazquez JL, Scott CA (2017) Social networks for management of water scarcity: evidence from the San Miguel Watershed, Sonora, Mexico. Water Altern 10(1):41–64Google Scholar
  28. Nelson R, Kokic P, Elliston L, King JA (2005) Structural adjustment: a vulnerability index for Australian broadacre agriculture. Agric Commod 12(1):171 Google Scholar
  29. Nelson DR, Adger WN, Brown K (2007) Adaptation to environmental change: contributions of a resilience framework. Annu Rev Environ Resour 32(1):395–419. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Niparajá, Sociedad de Historia Natura (2014) Retrieved January 28, 2014, from
  31. Okpara UT, Stringer LC, Dougill AJ (2016) Using a novel climate–water conflict vulnerability index to capture double exposures in Lake Chad. Reg Environ Chang 17:1–16. Google Scholar
  32. Ragin C (1987) The comparative method: moving beyond qualitative and quantitative methods. University of California, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  33. Ragin C (2014) The comparative method: moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. University of California PressGoogle Scholar
  34. Rocha J, Yletyinen J, Biggs R, Blenckner T, Peterson G (2015) Marine regime shifts: drivers and impacts on ecosystems services. Philos Trans R Soc B 370(1659):20130273. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Saldaña-Zorrilla SO (2008) Stakeholders’ views in reducing rural vulnerability to natural disasters in Southern Mexico: hazard exposure and coping and adaptive capacity. Glob Environ Chang 18(4):583–597. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vadjunec J, Radel C, Turner IIBL (2016) Introduction: the continued importance of smallholders today. Land 5(4):34. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vilei S, Dabbert S (2007) Locally derived indicators for evaluating sustainability of farming systems. Paper presented at the Proceedings Deutscher Tropentag.
  38. Vincent K, Cull T (2010) A Household Social Vulnerability Index (HSVI) for evaluating adaptation projects in developing countries. In: PEGNet conference : 2–3Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Environmental Science & ManagementPortland State UniversityPortlandUSA
  2. 2.Department of Environment and SocietyUtah State UniversityLoganUSA
  3. 3.Department of AnthropologyColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA

Personalised recommendations