Abstract
There is a need to increase regional and community level action towards adaptation to climate change. Natural resource managers and planners have to make challenging decisions within the complex and uncertain arena of climate change. Environmental decision support systems (EDSS) have been developed to assist stakeholders in effective decision making for the management of complex natural resource problems. EDSS which combine community engagement in developing future scenarios with computer-based land use planning and modeling tools are used internationally and reported to be effective. Yet, they are often not used after the research and development phase. To gain an understanding of the effectiveness of these tools, we interviewed the end users of an EDSS used in a climate change adaptation project in Canada and another in Australia. The end users of the tool are key informants, yet their perspective is lacking in the sustainability science literature. The findings show that neither EDSS was used after the projects ended. However, the majority of the end users in both projects valued the EDSS, confirming that the tools resulted in direct adaptation activities and influenced the thinking and work habits of the end users of the EDSS. We report on lessons learned from the two case studies and make recommendations regarding the processes and structures required to increase the effectiveness of the EDSS, its long-term use, and the legacy of learning that is embodied within it.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beach DM, Clark DA (2015) Scenario planning during rapid ecological change: lessons and perspectives from workshops with southwest Yukon wildlife managers. Ecol Soc 20(1):61. https://doi.org/10.5751/es-07379-200161
Betsill M, Bulkeley H (2007) Looking back and thinking ahead: a decade of cities and climate change research. Local Environ 12(5):447–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549830701659683
Bizikova L (2009) Challenges and lessons learned from integrated landscape management (ILM) projects: International Institute for Sustainable Development
Bizikova L, Hatcher BG (2010) Scenario-based planning for a changing climate in the Bras d’Or ecosystem January 28 & 29, 2010 Cape Breton University. International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD)
Bohnet IC, Roebeling PC, Williams KJ, Holzworth D, van Grieken ME, Pert PL, …, Brodie J (2011) Landscapes toolkit: an integrated modelling framework to assist stakeholders in exploring options for sustainable landscape development. Landsc Ecol 26(8):1179–1198. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-011-9640-0
Bowron B, Davidson G (2012) Climate change planning: case studies from Canadian communities. The Davidson Group, Vancouver
Burck J, Marten F, Bals C (2015) The climate change performance index: results 2015: Germanwatch
Burck J, Marten F, Bals C (2016) The Climate Change Performance Index: results 2016. Retrieved from https://germanwatch.org/en/download/10407.pdf
Cairns G, Ahmed I, Mullett J, Wright G (2013) Scenario method and stakeholder engagement: critical reflections on a climate change scenarios case study. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 80(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.08.005
Campbell CA, Lefroy EC, Caddy-Retalic, S, Bax, N., Doherty PJ, Douglas MM, …, West J (2015) Designing environmental research for impact. Sci Total Environ 534:1–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.11.089,
Cohen S, Neilsen D, Smith S, Neale T, Taylor B, Barton M, …, Langsdale S (2006) Learning with local help: expanding the dialogue on climate change and water management in the Okanagan Region, British Columbia, Canada. Clim Chang, 75(3):331–358. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-6336-6
Dahl AL (2012) Achievements and gaps in indicators for sustainability. Ecol Indic 17:14–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.032
Dilling L, Lemos MC (2011) Creating usable science: opportunities and constraints for climate knowledge use and their implications for science policy. Glob Environ Chang 21(2):680–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.11.006
Ernst KM, van Riemsdijk M (2013) Climate change scenario planning in Alaska’s national parks: stakeholder involvement in the decision-making process. Appl Geogr 45:22–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.08.004
Koontz TM (2005) We finished the plan, so now what? Impacts of collaborative stakeholder participation on land use policy. Policy Stud J 33(3):459–481. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2005.00125.x
Lemos MC, Kirchhoff CJ, Ramprasad V (2012) Narrowing the climate information usability gap. Nat Clim Chang 2(11):789–794. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1614
Levin K, Cashore B, Bernstein S, Auld G (2012) Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. Policy Sci 45(2):123–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-012-9151-0
Liepa I (2009) Adapting to climate change in Kimberley, BC: report and recommendations, June 2009. Columbia Basin Trust. Retrieved from https://kimberley.civicweb.net/document/1770
Matthies M, Giupponi C, Ostendorf B (2007) Environmental decision support systems: current issues, methods and tools. Environ Model Softw 22(2):123–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.09.005
McIntosh BS, Ascough JC, Twery M, Chew J, Elmahdi A, Haase D, …, Voinov A (2011) Environmental decision support systems (EDSS) development—challenges and best practices. Environ Model Softw, 26(12):1389–1402. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.09.009
Measham TG, Preston BL, Smith TF, Brooke C, Gorddard R, Withycombe G, Morrison C (2011) Adapting to climate change through local municipal planning: barriers and challenges. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 16(8):889–909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-011-9301-2
Meinke H, Howden SM, Struik PC, Nelson R, Rodriguez D, Chapman SC (2009) Adaptation science for agriculture and natural resource management—urgency and theoretical basis. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 1(1):69–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2009.07.007
Meyer W, Bryan B, Lyle G, McLean J, Moon T, Siebentritt M, …, Wells S (2013) Adapted future landscapes—from aspiration to implementation. National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility, Gold Coast
Meyer WS, Bryan BA, Summers DM, Lyle G, Wells S, McLean J, Siebentritt M (2015) Regional engagement and spatial modelling for natural resource management planning. Sustain Sci 11(5):733–747. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0341-5
Miller TR (2012) Constructing sustainability science: emerging perspectives and research trajectories. Sustain Sci 8(2):279–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-012-0180-6
Miller TR, Wiek A, Sarewitz D, Robinson J, Olsson L, Kriebel D, Loorbach D (2014) The future of sustainability science: a solutions-oriented research agenda. Sustain Sci 9(2):239–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-013-0224-6
Moretti C, Siebentritt M, Spoehr J (2009) Learning from the implementation of South Australia’s climate change adaptation planning framework: Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources
Mukheibir P, Kuruppu N, Gero A, Herriman J (2013) Overcoming cross-scale challenges to climate change adaptation for local government: a focus on Australia. Clim Chang 121(2):271–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0880-7
Palacios-Agundez I, Casado-Arzuaga I, Madariaga I, Onaindia M (2013) The relevance of local participatory scenario planning for ecosystem management policies in the Basque Country, Northern Spain. Ecol Soc 18(3):7. https://doi.org/10.5751/es-05619-180307
Pert PL, Hill R, Williams KJ, Harding K, O'Malley T, Grace RA, …, Butler JRLA (2010) Scenarios for community-based approaches to biodiversity conservation: a case study from the Wet Tropics, Queensland, Australia. Aust Geogr 41(3):285–306. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00049182.2010.498037
Pettit CJ, Raymond CM, Bryan BA, Lewis H (2011) Identifying strengths and weaknesses of landscape visualisation for effective communication of future alternatives. Landsc Urban Plan 100(3):231–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.01.001
Pond E, Schroth O, Sheppard SRJ (2009) CALP visioning and visualizations: Kimberley climate adaptation project. Collaborative for Advanced Landscape Planning, University of British Columbia, Vancouver
Reed MS (2008) Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biol Conserv 141(10):2417–2431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014
Reed MS, Kenter J, Bonn A, Broad K, Burt TP, Fazey IR, …, Ravera F (2013) Participatory scenario development for environmental management: a methodological framework illustrated with experience from the UK uplands. J Environ Manag 128:345–362. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.05.016
Rizzoli AE, Young WJ (1997) Delivering environmental decision support systems: software tools and techniques. Environ Model Softw 12(2–3):237–249. Retrieved from. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-8152(97)00016-9
Robinson J, Burch S, Talwar S, O’Shea M, Walsh M (2011) Envisioning sustainability: recent progress in the use of participatory backcasting approaches for sustainability research. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 78(5):756–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2010.12.006
Roux DJ, Stirzaker RJ, Breen CM, Lefroy EC, Cresswell HP (2010) Framework for participative reflection on the accomplishment of transdisciplinary research programs. Environ Sci Pol 13(8):733–741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2010.08.002
Salter JD, Campbell C, Journeay M, Sheppard SR (2009) The digital workshop: exploring the use of interactive and immersive visualisation tools in participatory planning. J Environ Manag 90(6):2090–2101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.08.023
Schroth O, Pond E, Muir-Owen S, Campbell C, Sheppard SRJ (2009) Tools for the understanding of spatio-temporal climate scenarios in local planning: Kimberley (BC) case study. Swiss National Sciences Foundation, Zurich
Schroth O, Pond E, Sheppard SRJ (2015) Evaluating presentation formats of local climate change in community planning with regard to process and outcomes. Landsc Urban Plan 142:147–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.03.011
Sheppard SRJ, Shaw A, Flanders D, Burch S, Wiek A, Carmichael J, …, Cohen S (2011) Future visioning of local climate change: a framework for community engagement and planning with scenarios and visualisation. Futures 43(4):400–412. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2011.01.009
Talwar S, Wiek A, Robinson J (2011) User engagement in sustainability research. Sci Public Policy 38(5):379–390. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234211x12960315267615
Tompkins EL, Few R, Brown K (2008) Scenario-based stakeholder engagement: incorporating stakeholders preferences into coastal planning for climate change. J Environ Manag 88(4):1580–1592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.07.025
Voinov A, Bousquet F (2010) Modelling with stakeholders. Environ Model Softw 25(11):1268–1281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.03.007
Voinov A, Gaddis EJB (2008) Lessons for successful participatory watershed modeling: a perspective from modeling practitioners. Ecol Model 216(2):197–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.03.010
Wells S, McLean J (2013) One way forward to beat the Newtonian habit with a complexity perspective on organisational change. Systems 1(4):66–84. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems1040066
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank all those who participated in the interviews for sharing their experiences with us so generously.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Human Research Ethics approval was granted prior to the interview process by the Queensland University of Technology University Human Research Ethics Committee (approval number 1500001155).
Additional information
Editor: Erica Smithwick
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reiter, D., Meyer, W., Parrott, L. et al. Increasing the effectiveness of environmental decision support systems: lessons from climate change adaptation projects in Canada and Australia. Reg Environ Change 18, 1173–1184 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1255-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1255-9