Abstract
Agroecosystems are facing a global challenge amidst a socioecological transition that places them in a dilemma between increasing land-use intensity to meet the growing demand of food, feed, fibres and fuels, while avoiding the loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services. We applied an intermediate disturbance-complexity approach to the land-use changes of a Latin American biocultural landscape (Cauca river valley, Colombia, 1943–2010), which accounts for the joint behaviour of human appropriation of photosynthetic capacity used as a measure of disturbance, and a selection of land metrics that account for landscape ecological functionality. We also delved deeper into local land-use changes in order to identify the main socioeconomic drivers and ruling agencies at stake. The results show that traditional organic mixed-farming tended to disappear as a result of sugarcane intensification. The analysis confirms the intermediate disturbance-complexity hypothesis by showing a nonlinear relationship, where the highest level of landscape complexity (heterogeneity–connectivity) is attained when disturbance peaks at 50–60%. The study proves the usefulness of transferring the concept of intermediate disturbance to biocultural landscapes and suggests that conservation of heterogeneous and well-connected mixed-farming, with a positive interplay between intermediate level of disturbances and land-use complexity endowed with a rich intercultural heritage, will preserve a wildlife-friendly agro-ecological matrix likely to house high biodiversity and ecosystem services.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agnoletti M, Emanueli F (2016) Biocultural diversity in Europe. Springer International Publishing, Cham. ISBN 978-3-319-26315-1
Alam M, Olivier A, Paquette A, Dupras J, Revéret JP, Messier C (2014) A general framework for the quantification and valuation of ecosystem services of treebased intercropping systems. Agrofor Syst 88:679–691. doi:10.1007/s10457-014-9681-x
Barnes B, Sidhu HS, Roxburgh SH (2006) A model integrating patch dynamics, competing species and the intermediate disturbance hypothesis. Ecol Model 194:414–420. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.10.040
Bendeck J (2013) Biocombustibles hoy. Boletín 101. http://www.fedebiocombustibles.com/v3/nota-web-id-1639.htm#editorial
Bengtsson J, Angelstam P, Elmqvist T, Emanuelsson U, Folke C, Ihse M, Moberg F, Nyström M (2003) Reserves, resilience and dynamic landscapes. Ambio 32(6):389–396. doi:10.1579/0044-7447-32.6.389
Benton TG, Vickery JA, Wilson JD (2003) Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trends Ecol Evol 18:182–188. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00011-9
Berrío JC, Hooghiemstra H, Marchant R, Rangel O (2002) Late-glacial and Holocene history of the dry forest area in the south Colombian Cauca Valley. Quat Sci 17(7, 2):667–682. doi:10.1002/jqs.701
Calow P (1987) Evolutionary physiological ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. ISBN 978-0521101653
Cárdenas Carmona G (2013) Comparación de la composición y estructura de la avifauna en diferentes sistemas de producción Universidad del Valle. Cali, Colombia. [electronic resource] (doctoral dissertation)
Cardinale BJ, Duffy JE, Gonzalez A, Hooper DU, Perrings Ch, Venail P, Narwani A, Mace G, Tilman D, Wardle DA, Kinzig AP, Daily GC, Loreau M, Grace JB, Larigauderie A, Srivastava DS, Naeem S (2012) Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486:59–67. doi:10.1038/nature11148
Cassman KG (1999) Ecological intensification of cereal production systems: yield potential, soil quality, and precision agriculture. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:5952–5959. doi:10.1073/pnas.96.11.5952
Chase TN, Pielke RA Sr, Kittel TGF, Nemani RR, Running SW (2000) Simulated impacts of historical land cover changes on global climate in northern winter. Clim Dyn 16(2–3):93–105. doi:10.1007/s003820050007
Chazdon RL, Harvey CA, Komar O, Griffith DM, Ferguson BG, Martínez-Ramos M, Philpott SM (2009) Beyond reserves: a research agenda for conserving biodiversity in human-modified tropical landscapes. Biotropica 41(2):142–153. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7429.2008.00471.x
Chesson P, Huntly N (1997) The roles of disturbance, mortality, and stress in the dynamics of ecological communities. Am Nat 150:519–553. doi:10.1086/286080
CVC—Corporación Autónoma Regional del Valle del Cauca, Universidad del Valle (2000) Caracterización del río Cauca. Tramo Salvajina. La Virginia, Cali
Delgadillo-Vargas O, García-Ruiz R, Forero-Álvarez J (2016) Fertilising techniques and nutrient balances in the agriculture industrialization transition: the case of sugarcane in the Cauca river valley (Colombia), 1943–2010. Agric Ecosyst Environ 218:150–162. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2015.11.003
Dupras J, Marull J, Ll Parcerisas, Coll F, Gonzalez A, Girard M, Tello E (2016) The impacts of urban sprawl on ecological connectivity in the Montreal Metropolitan Region. Environ Sci Policy 58:61–73. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2016.01.005
Escobar A (1996) La invención del Tercer Mundo. Construcción y deconstrucción del desarrollo. Editorial Norma S.A., Bogotá. ISBN 978-980-396-776-5
FAO—Food And Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2015). FAOSTAT. Retrieved September 10, 2015, from http://faostat.fao.org/
Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB (2006) Beyond fragmentation: the continuum model for fauna research and conservation in human-modified landscapes. Oikos 112(2):473–480. doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2006.14148.x
Fischer J, Brosi B, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR, Goldman R, Goldstein J, Lindenmayer DB, Manning AD, Mooney HA, Pejchar L, Ranganathan J, Tallis H (2008) Should agricultural policies encourage land sparing or wildlife-friendly farming? Front Ecol Environ 6:380–385. doi:10.1890/070019
Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter SR, Chapin FS, Coe MT, Daily GC, Gibbs HK, Helkowski JH (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science 309(5734):570–574. doi:10.1126/science.1111772
Fox WF (2013) The intermediate disturbance hypothesis should be abandoned. Trends Ecol Evol 28(2):86–92. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2012.08.014
Franklin JF, Lindenmayer DB (2009) Importance of matrix habitats in maintaining biological diversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106(2):349–350. doi:10.1073/pnas.0812016105
Godfray HCJ, Beddington JR, Crute IR, Haddad L, Lawrence D, Muir JF, Pretty J, Robinson S, Thomas SM, Toulmin C (2010) Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327(5967):812–818. doi:10.1126/science.1185383
González de Molina M, Toledo VM (2014) The social metabolism: a socio-ecological theory of historical change. Springer, New York. ISBN 978-3-319-06358-4
Grau HR, Kuemmerle T, Macchi L (2013) Beyond land sparing vs. land sharing: environmental heterogeneity, globalization and the balance between agriculture and nature conservation. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 5:477–483. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2013.06.001
Green RE, Cornell SJ, Scharlemann JPW, Balmford A (2005) Farming and the fate of wild nature. Science 307:550–551. doi:10.1126/science.1106049
Guardiola J (1995) Avances tecnológicos entre 1950 y 1980. In: Cassalett C, Torres J, Isaacs C (eds) El cultivo de la caña en la zona azucarera de Colombia. Cenicaña, Cali, pp 9–21
Guzmán G, Aguilera E, Soto D, Cid A, Infante J, García-Ruiz R, Herrera A, Villa I, González de Molina M (2014) Methodology and conversion factors to estimate the net primary productivity of historical and contemporary agroecosystems. Working Paper of the Sociedad Española de Historia Agraria, DT-SEHA n. 1407. http://repositori.uji.es/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10234/91670/DT-SEHA%201407.pdf?sequence=3
Haberl H, Erb KH, Krausmann F, Gaibe V, Bondeau A, Plutzar C, Gingrich S, Lucht W, Fischer-Kowalski M (2007a) Quantifying and mapping the human appropriation of net primary production in earth’s terrestrial ecosystems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(34):12942–12947. doi:10.1073/pnas.0704243104
Haberl H, Erb KH, Plutzar C, Fischer-Kowalski M, Krausmann F (2007b) Human appropriation of net primary production (HANPP) as indicator for pressures on biodiversity. In: Hak T, Moldan B, Dahl AL (eds) Sustainability indicators. A scientific assessment. SCOPE, Island Press, Washington, London, pp 271–288
Haberl H, Erb KH, Krausmann F (2014) Human appropriation of net primary production: patterns, trends, and planetary boundaries. Annu Rev Environ Resour 39:363–391. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-121912-094620
Harper KA, MacDonald SE, Burton PhJ, Chen J, Brosofsfe KD, Saunders SC, Euskirchen ES, Robert D, Jaiteh MS, Esseen PA (2005) Edge influence on forest structure and composition in fragmented landscapes. Conserv Biol 19:768–782. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00045.x
Hulme MF, Vickery JA, Green RE, Phalan B, Chamberlain DE, Pomeroy DE, Nalwanga D, Mushabe D, Katebaka R, Bolwig S, Atkinson PW (2013) Conserving the birds of Uganda’s banana-coffee arc: land sparing and land sharing compared. PLoS ONE. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0054597
Huston MA (2014) Disturbance, productivity, and species diversity: empiricism vs. logic in ecological theory. Ecology 95(9):2382–2396. doi:10.1890/13-1397.1
IAvH—Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander Von Humboldt (1998) Informe Nacional sobre el estado de la biodiversidad 1997-Colombia. Bosque seco tropical, In: Chávez ME, Arango N (eds) Tomo I: Diversidad, pp 56–71
IGAC—Instituto Geografico Agustin Codeazzi (2012) Atlas de la Distribución de la Propiedad Rural en Colombia Imprenta Nacional de Colombia, pp 406–417
ISO-International Sugar Organization (2012) Outlook of sugar and ethanol production in Brazil. MECAS 12:05
Jaeger J (2000) Landscape division, splitting index, and effective mesh size: new measures of landscape fragmentation. Landsc Ecol 15(2):115–130. doi:10.1023/A:1008129329289
Krausmann F, Haberl H, Erb KH, Wiesinger M, Gaube V, Gingrich S (2009) What determines geographical patterns of the global human appropriation of net primary production? J Land Use Sci 4:15–34. doi:10.1080/17474230802645568
Krausmann F, Erb KH, Gingrich S, Haberl H, Bondeau A, Gaube V, Lauk C, Plutzar C, Searchinger T (2013) Global human appropriation of net primary production doubled in the 20th century. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:10324–10329. doi:10.1073/pnas.1211349110
Lambin EF, Geist HJ, Lepers E (2003) Dynamics of land-use and land-cover change in tropical regions. Annu Rev Environ Resour 28(1):205–241. doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.28.050302.105459
Lindenmayer DB, Fischer J (2007) Tackling the habitat fragmentation panchreston. TREE 22:127–132. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.11.006
Loreau M, Mouquet N, Gonzalez A (2010) Biodiversity as spatial insurance in heterogeneous landscapes. P Natl Acad Sci 100(22):12765–12770. doi:10.1073/pnas.2235465100
Lorek T (2013) Imagining the Midwest in Latin America: US Advisors and the Envisioning of an Agricultural Middle Class in Colombia’s Cauca Valley, 1943–1946. Historian 75(2):283–305. doi:10.1111/hisn.12008
Marull J, Font C (2017) The energy-landscape integrated analysis (ELIA) of agroecosystems. In: Fraňková E, Haas W, Singh SJ (eds) Sociometabolic perspectives on sustainability of local food systems. New insights for science, policy and practice. Springer, Dordrecht
Marull J, Mallarach JM (2005) A GIS methodology for assessing ecological connectivity: application to the Barcelona Metropolitan Area. Landsc Urban Plan 71:243–262. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.03.007
Marull J, Tello E, Fullana N, Murray I, Jover G, Font C, Coll F, Domene E, Leoni V, Decolli T (2015) Long-term bio-cultural heritage: exploring the intermediate disturbance hypothesis in agro-ecological landscapes (Mallorca, c. 1850–2012). Biodivers Conserv 24(13):3217–3251. doi:10.1007/s10531-015-0955-z
Marull J, Font C, Tello E, Fullana N, Domene E (2016a) Towards an energy-landscape integrated analysis? Exploring the links between socio-metabolic disturbance and landscape ecology performance (Mallorca, Spain, 1956–2011). Landsc Ecol 31:317–336. doi:10.1007/s10980-015-0245-x
Marull J, Font C, Padró R, Tello E, Panazzolo A (2016b) Energy-landscape integrated analysis of agro-ecosystems: how the complexity of energy flows shapes landscape patterns (Barcelona province, 1860–2000). Ecol Ind 66:30–46. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.01.015
Matson PA, Vitousek PM (2006) Agricultural intensification: will land spared from farming be land spared for nature? Conserv Biol 20(3):709–710. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00442.x
Matthews R, Selman P (2006) Landscape as a focus for integrating human and environmental processes. J Agr Econ 57:199–212. doi:10.1111/j.1477-9552.2006.00047.x
Mayer A, Schaffartzik A, Haas W, Sepulveda AR (2015) Patterns of global biomass trade: the implications for food sovereignty and socio-environmental conflict. EJOLT Report No. 20, http://www.ejolt.org/2015/03/patterns-global-biomass-trade/
Parrotta JA, Trosper RL (2012) Traditional forest-related knowledge: sustaining communities, ecosystems and biocultural diversity. World For; 12:1–621. ISBN 978-94-007-2144-9
Patiño VM (1977) Aspectos históricos sobre los recursos naturales y las plantas útiles en Colombia. Instituto Colombiano de Cultura, Bogotá
Perfecto I, Vandermeer J (2010) The agroecological matrix as alternative to the land-sparing/agriculture intensification model. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(13):5786–5791. doi:10.1073/pnas.0905455107
Phalan B, Onial M, Balmford A, Green RE (2011) Reconciling food production and biodiversity conservation: land sharing and land sparing compared. Science 333:1289–1291. doi:10.1126/science.1208742
Piñeiro M, Fiorentino R, Trigo E, Balcázar A, Martínez A (1982) Articulación social y cambio técnico. La producción de azúcar en Colombia. Serie Investigación y Desarrollo (Instituto Interamericano de Cooperación para la Agricultura.). Centro Interamericano de Información y documentación Agrícola, CIDIA. San José, Costa Rica
Pino J, Marull J (2012) Ecological networks: are they enough for connectivity conservation? A case study in the Barcelona Metropolitan Region (NE Spain). Land Use Policy 29:684–690. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.11.004
Pungetti G (2013) Biocultural diversity for sustainable ecological, cultural and sacred landscapes: the biocultural landscape approach. In: Fu B, Jones B (eds) Landscape ecology for sustainable environment and culture. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 55–76. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6530-6_4
Ramírez M, Armbrecht I, Enríquez L, Lucía ML (2004) Importancia del manejo agrícola para la biodiversidad: caso de las hormigas en caña de azúcar. Rev Colomb Entomol; 30(1):115–123. ISSN: 0120-0488
Rivera C, Naranjo L, Duque A (2007) De María a un Mar de Caña. Imaginarios de naturaleza en la transformación del paisaje vallecaucano entre, 1950 y 1970. Universidad Autónoma de Occidente, Cali. ISBN 978-958-8122-53-3
Sala OE, Chapin FS 3rd, Armesto JJ, Berlow E, Bloomfield J, Dirzo R, Huber-Sanwald E, Huenneke LF, Jackson RB, Kinzig A, Leemans R, Lodge DM, Mooney HA, Oesterheld M, Poff NL, Sykes MT, Walker BH, Walker M, Wall DH (2000) Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287(5459):1770–1774. doi:10.1126/science.287.5459.1770
Shreeve TG, Dennis RLH, Van Dick H (2004) Resources, habitats and metapopulations—whither reality? Oikos 106:404–408. doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.13516.x
Swift MJ, Izac AMN, van Noordwijk M (2004) Biodiversity and ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes—are we asking the right questions? Agr Ecosyst Environ 104(1):113–134. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2004.01.013
Thomson AM, Calvin KV, Chini LP, Hurtt G, Edmonds JA, Bond-Lamberty B, Frolking S, Wise MA, Janetos AC (2010) Climate mitigation and the future of tropical landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(46):19633–19638. doi:10.1073/pnas.0910467107
Tilman D, Cassman KG, Matson PA, Naylor R, Polasky S (2002) Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418(6898):671–677. doi:10.1038/nature01014
Tscharntke T, Klein AM, Kruess A, Steffan-Dewenter I, Carsten Thies C (2005) Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity-ecosystem service management. Ecol Lett 8:857–874. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00782.x
Tscharntke T, Clough Y, Wanger TC, Jackson L, Motzke I, Perfecto I, Vandermeer J, Whitbread A (2012) Global food security, biodiversity conservation and the future of agricultural intensification. Biol Conserv 151:53–59. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2012.01.068
Van der Maarel E (1993) Some remarks on disturbance and its relations to diversity and stability. J Veg Sci 4:733–736. doi:10.2307/3235608
Vandermeer J, Perfecto I (2007) The agricultural matrix and a future paradigm for conservation. Conserv Biol 21(1):274–277. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00582.x
Vranken I, Baudry J, Aubinet M, Visser M, Bogaert J (2015) A review on the use of entropy in landscape ecology: heterogeneity, unpredictability, scale dependence and their links with thermodynamics. Landsc Ecol 30:51–65. doi:10.1007/s10980-014-0105-0
Wilson JB (1990) Mechanisms of species coexistence: twelve explanations for Hutchinson’s ‘paradox of the plankton’: evidence from New Zealand plant communities. New Zeal J Ecol 13:17–42
Wilson JB (1994) The ‘intermediate disturbance hypothesis’ of species coexistence is based in on patch dynamics. New Zeal J Ecol 18:176–181
Zuluaga F (1992) El valle: Historia y paisaje. In: Historia regional del Valle del Cauca. Universidad del Valle, Facultad de Humanidades, Cali, pp 11–25
Acknowledgements
This work has been supported by the international Partnership Grant SSHRC-895-2011-1020 on ‘Sustainable farm systems: long-term socio-ecological metabolism in western agriculture’ funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada and by the Doctoral Scholarship Grant 12010XU0401200 funded by the Pontifical Javeriana University in Colombia.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marull, J., Delgadillo, O., Cattaneo, C. et al. Socioecological transition in the Cauca river valley, Colombia (1943–2010): towards an energy–landscape integrated analysis. Reg Environ Change 18, 1073–1087 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1128-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1128-2