Advertisement

Regional Environmental Change

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 311–323 | Cite as

Environmental injustice and flood risk: a conceptual model and case comparison of metropolitan Miami and Houston, USA

  • Timothy W. Collins
  • Sara E. Grineski
  • Jayajit Chakraborty
Original Article

Abstract

This article outlines a conceptual model and comparatively applies it to results from environmental justice (EJ) studies of flood risk in the Miami, Florida, and Houston, Texas, metropolitan areas. In contrast to most EJ studies of air pollution, which have found that socially vulnerable groups experience disproportionate risk, distributive EJ studies of flooding reveal inconsistent findings regarding the relationship between social vulnerability and flood exposure. Counterintuitively (from a conventional EJ perspective), some pre-flood EJ studies have found that socially advantaged people experience the highest residential exposure to flood risks. To integrate those anomalous findings within an EJ perspective, our conceptual model focuses on (1) the differential capacities of social groups to deploy/access protective resources for reducing the threat of loss, even while they reside amid flood-prone environments, and (2) both flood hazards and water-based benefits. Application of this model in Miami reveals that environmental injustices materialize as socially privileged groups expose themselves to residential flood risks by seeking coastal amenities, as the costs of mitigating risks are conveyed to the broader public; in the process, socially vulnerable residents are relegated to areas with air pollution and/or inland flood risks, where they experience constrained access to protective resources and coastal amenities. Findings from Houston better align with conventional EJ expectations—with flood zones disproportionately inhabited by socially vulnerable people—because many coastal lands there are used by petrochemical industries, which produce major residential-environmental disamenities. Results underscore the need to consider protective resources and locational benefits in future empirical research on the EJ implications of flood hazards.

Keywords

Flood hazard Flood risk Floodplain Environmental justice Social vulnerability Miami 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors recognize Marilyn Montgomery, Alejandra Maldonado, Maricarmen Hernandez, Jose Castañeda, Sofia De Anda, and Dorian Payan for their work on various facets of the project from which this article extends. The authors acknowledge US National Science Foundation (NSF) Grants CMMI-1129984 and CMMI-1536113 for funding this work. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.

Supplementary material

10113_2017_1121_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (297 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 296 kb)

References

  1. Alhakami A, Slovic P (1994) A psychological study of the inverse relationship between perceived risk and perceived benefit. Risk Anal 14:1085–1096. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00080.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. BBC (British Broadcasting Corporation) (2015) Toll from floods in Texas and Oklahoma rises. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-32888733. Accessed 14 Nov 2016
  3. Been V (1994) Locally undesirable land uses in minority neighborhoods: disproportionate siting or market dynamics? Yale Law J 103:1383–1406. doi: 10.2307/797089 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bin O, Kruse JB (2006) Real estate market response to coastal flood hazards. Nat Hazards Rev 7:137–144. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2006)7:4(137) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bin O, Crawford TW, Kruse JB, Landry CE (2008) Viewscapes and flood hazard: coastal housing market response to amenities and risk. Land Econ 84:434–448. doi: 10.3368/le.84.3.434 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bolin B, Grineski S, Collins T (2005) The geography of despair: environmental racism and the making of South Phoenix, Arizona, USA. Hum Ecol Rev 12:155–167Google Scholar
  7. Boone CG (2002) An assessment and explanation of environmental inequity in Baltimore. Urban Geogr 23:581–595. doi: 10.2747/0272-3638.23.6.581 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brody S, Zahran S, Maghelal P, Grover H, Highfield W (2007) The rising costs of floods: examining the impact of planning and development decisions on property damage in Florida. J Am Plann Assoc 73:330–345. doi: 10.1080/01944360708977981 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bullard R, Wright B (2009) Race, place, and environmental justice after Hurricane Katrina: struggles to reclaim, rebuild, and revitalize New Orleans and the Gulf Coast. Westview, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  10. Burton C, Cutter SL (2008) Levee failures and social vulnerability in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta area, California. Nat Hazards Rev 9:136–149. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2008)9:3(136) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chakraborty J, Maantay J, Brender J (2011) Disproportionate proximity to environmental health hazards: methods, models, and measurement. Am J Public Health 101:S27–S36. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.300109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chakraborty J, Collins T, Montgomery M, Grineski S (2014a) Social and spatial inequities in exposure to flood risk in Miami, Florida. Nat Hazards Rev 15:04014006. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000140 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chakraborty J, Collins T, Grineski S, Montgomery Hernandez M (2014b) Comparing disproportionate exposure to acute and chronic pollution risks: a case study in Houston, Texas. Risk Anal 34:2005–2020. doi: 10.1111/risa.12224 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chakraborty J, Collins T, Grineski S (2016) Cancer risks from exposure to vehicular air pollution: a household level analysis of intra-ethnic heterogeneity in Miami, Florida. Urban Geogr. doi: 10.1080/02723638.2016.1150112 Google Scholar
  15. Cole L, Foster SR (2001) From the ground up: environmental racism and the rise of the environmental justice movement. New York University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Collins T (2008) The political ecology of hazard vulnerability: marginalization, facilitation and the production of differential risk to urban wildfires in Arizona’s White Mountains. J Polit Ecol 15:21–43Google Scholar
  17. Collins T (2009) The production of unequal risk in hazardscapes: an explanatory frame applied to disaster at the U.S.-Mexico border. Geoforum 40:589–601. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.04.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Collins T (2010) Marginalization, facilitation, and the production of unequal risk: the 2006 Paso del Norte floods. Antipode 42:258–288. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2009.00755.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Collins T, Jimenez A, Grineski S (2013) Hispanic health disparities after a flood disaster: results of a population-based survey of individuals experiencing home site damage in El Paso (Texas, USA). J Immigr Minor Health 15:415–426. doi: 10.1007/s10903-012-9626-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Collins T, Grineski S, Chakraborty J (2015a) Household-level disparities in cancer risks from vehicular air pollution in Miami. Environ Res Lett 10:095008. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/10/9/095008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Collins T, Grineski S, Chakraborty J, Montgomery M, Hernandez M (2015b) Downscaling environmental justice analysis: determinants of household-level hazardous air pollutant exposure in Greater Houston. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 105:685–703. doi: 10.1080/00045608.2015.1050754 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Colten C (2007) Environmental justice in a landscape of tragedy. Technol Soc 29:173–179. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2007.01.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cutter SL (1996) Vulnerability to environmental hazards. Prog Hum Geogr 20:529–539. doi: 10.1177/030913259602000407 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cutter SL, Boruff BJ, Shirley WL (2003) Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc Sci Q 84:242–261. doi: 10.1111/1540-6237.8402002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Davis M (1998) The ecology of fear: Los Angeles and the imagination of disaster. Metropolitan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Earnhart D (2001) Combining revealed and stated preference methods to value environmental wetland permit decisions. Land Econ 55:213–222. doi: 10.2307/3146977 Google Scholar
  27. Elliott JR, Pais J (2006) Race, class, and Hurricane Katrina: social differences in human responses to disaster. Soc Sci Res 35:295–321. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.02.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fielding J (2007) Environmental injustice or just the lie of the land: an investigation of the socio-economic class of those at risk from flooding in England and Wales. Sociol Res Online 12(4):4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fielding J, Burningham K (2005) Environmental inequality and flood hazard. Local Environ 10:379–395. doi: 10.1080/13549830500160875 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Grineski S, Collins T, Chakraborty J (2013) Hispanic heterogeneity and environmental injustice: intra-ethnic patterns of exposure to cancer risks from vehicular air pollution in Miami. Popul Environ 35:26–44. doi: 10.1007/s11111-012-0184-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Grineski S, Collins T, Chakraborty J, Montgomery M (2015) Hazardous air pollutants & flooding: a comparative interurban study of environmental injustice. GeoJournal 80:145–158. doi: 10.1007/s10708-014-9542-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Grineski S, Collins T, Chakraborty J, Montgomery M (2016) Hazard characteristics and patterns of environmental injustice: household-level determinants of environmental risk in Miami, Florida. Risk Anal. doi: 10.1111/risa.12706 Google Scholar
  33. Hernandez M, Collins T, Grineski S (2015) Immigration, mobility, and environmental injustice: a comparative study of Hispanic people’s residential decision-making and exposure to hazardous air pollutants in Greater Houston, Texas. Geoforum 60:83–94. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.01.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jimenez A, Collins T, Grineski S (2013) Intra-ethnic disparities in respiratory health outcomes among Hispanic residents impacted by a flood. J Asthma 50:463–471. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2013.786087 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Johnson C, Penning-Roswell E, Parker D (2007) Natural and imposed injustices: the challenges in implementing ‘fair’ flood risk management policy in England. Geogr J 173:374–390. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4959.2007.00256.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kates RW (1971) Natural hazard in human ecological perspective: hypotheses and models. Econ Geogr 47:438–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kates RW, Haarmann V (1992) Where the poor live: are the assumptions correct? Environment 34:4–28. doi: 10.1080/00139157.1992.9932557 Google Scholar
  38. Landry SM, Chakraborty J (2009) Street trees and equity: evaluating the spatial distribution of an urban amenity. Environ Plann A 41:2651–2670. doi: 10.1068/a41236 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Maantay J, Maaroko A (2009) Mapping urban risk: flood hazards, race, and environmental justice in New York. Appl Geogr 29:111–124. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2008.08.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Maldonado A, Collins T, Grineski S (2016a) Hispanic immigrants’ vulnerabilities to flood and hurricane hazards in two US metro areas. Geogr Rev 106:109–135. doi: 10.1111/j.1931-0846.2015.12103.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Maldonado A, Collins T, Grineski S, Chakraborty J (2016b) Exposure to flood hazards in Miami and Houston: are Hispanic immigrants at greater risk than other social groups? Int J Environ Res Public Health. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13080775 Google Scholar
  42. Masozera M, Bailey M, Kerchner C (2007) Distribution of impacts of natural disasters across income groups: a case study of New Orleans. Ecol Econ 63:299–306. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.06.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Montgomery M, Chakraborty J (2013) Social vulnerability to coastal and inland flood hazards: a comparison of GIS-based spatial interpolation methods. Int J Appl Geospatial Res 4:58–79. doi: 10.4018/jagr.2013070104 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Montgomery M, Chakraborty J (2015) Assessing the environmental justice consequences of flood risk: a case study in Miami, Florida. Environ Res Lett 10:095010. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/10/9/095010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Montgomery M, Chakraborty J, Grineski S, Collins T (2015) An environmental justice assessment of public beach access in Miami, Florida. Appl Geogr 62:147–156. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.04.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mustafa D (2005) The production of an urban hazardscape in Pakistan: modernity, vulnerability, and the range of choice. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 95:566–586. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00475.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nicholls R, Hanson S, Herweijer C, Patmore N, Hallegatte S, Corfee-Morlot J, Chateau J, Muir Wood R (2008) Ranking port cities with high exposure and vulnerability to climate extremes: exposure estimates. OECD environment working papers 1, OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/011766488208
  48. Oakes JM, Anderton DL, Anderson AB (1996) A longitudinal analysis of environmental equity in communities with hazardous waste facilities. Soc Sci Res 25:125–148. doi: 10.1006/ssre.1996.0006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pelling M (1999) The political ecology of flood hazard in urban Guyana. Geoforum 30:249–261. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7185(99)00015-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pulido L (2000) Rethinking environmental racism: white privilege and urban development in Southern California. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 90:12–40. doi: 10.1111/0004-5608.00182 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rufat S, Tate E, Burton C, Maroof A (2015) Social vulnerability to floods: review of case studies and implications for measurement. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 14:470–486. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.09.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Siegrist M, Cvetkovich G (2000) Perception of hazards: the role of social trust and knowledge. Risk Anal 20:713–719. doi: 10.1111/0272-4332.205064 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Slovic P (1987) Perception of risk. Science 236:280–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Slovic P (2000) The perception of risk. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  55. Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S (1980) Facts and fears: understanding perceived risk. In: Schwing R, Albers W Jr (eds) Societal risk assessment: how safe is safe enough?. Plenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  56. Ueland J, Warf B (2006) Racialized topographies: altitude and race in southern cities. Geogr Rev 96:50–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1931-0846.2006.tb00387.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. U.S. Congressional Budget Office (2007) Value of properties in the national flood insurance program. https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/110th-congress-2007-2008/reports/06-25-floodinsurance.pdf. Accessed 27 Jan 2016
  58. Walker G (2012) Environmental justice: concepts, evidence, and politics. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  59. Walker G, Burningham K (2011) Flood risk, vulnerability and environmental justice: evidence and evaluation of inequality in a UK context. Crit Soc Policy 31:216–240. doi: 10.1177/0261018310396149 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wisner B, Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I (2004) At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters, 2nd edn. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  61. Wolch JR, Byrne J, Newell JP (2014) Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: the challenge of making cities ‘just green enough’. Landsc Urban Plan 31:234–244. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Yan H, Lavandera E (2016) Houston flooding: 7 dead, 1200 rescued—and more rain to come. http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/19/us/houston-texas-flooding/. Accessed 14 Nov 2016
  63. Zahran S, Brody SD, Peacock WG, Vedlitz A, Grover H (2008) Social vulnerability and the natural and built environment: a model of flood casualties in Texas. Disasters 32:537–560. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2008.01054.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Timothy W. Collins
    • 1
  • Sara E. Grineski
    • 1
  • Jayajit Chakraborty
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Sociology and AnthropologyUniversity of Texas at El Paso (UTEP)El PasoUSA

Personalised recommendations